HomeMy WebLinkAbout516 DEINES COURT, EXTRA OCCUPANCY RENTAL HOUSE - PDP - PDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (38)1
Page 2 of 2
Good Afternoon -
Yesterday, I re -measured this front yard and have attached two versions of driveway expansions, with
the exact front yard measurements.
Could you please informally comment on which version zoning would prefer? I am fine with version
"A", as long as the city is ok with my new driveway being 39.3% of the front yard. Version "B" is one
less percent of the total area.
As soon as I hear from you, I will proceed with the Type 1 Hearing process.
Sincerely -
Deb Cook
2/16/2012
Page 1 of 2
w
Steve Olt
From: Steve Olt
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:50 PM
To: Gary Lopez; 'd.cook@q.com'
Cc: Sheri Langenberger; Marc Virata; Sandy Lindell
Subject: RE: 516 Deines Court
Based on this information the applicant is now able to submit a complete Project Development
Plan package for an extra occupancy rental house for 5 tenants. The request must go through the
Administrative (Type 1) review process, with a Hearing Officer being the ultimate decision
maker. A submittal appointment should be made with the Development Review Center (970-
416-2740) when ready.
The applicant must complete the Development Review Application and the Transportation
Development Review Application as part of the submittal package. Development review fees
must accompany the submittal.
stem dlt
Steve Olt
City Planner
From: Gary Lopez
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:16 PM
To: 'd.cook@q.com'
Cc: Steve Olt
Subject: RE: 516 Deines Court
Deb, I believe we prefer "B". However, due to possible neighborhood opposition we believe your site plan
needs to be professionally prepared which needs to show the front of the house, property lines, organic
and paved areas, sidewalk, etc. The engineer or surveyor should do all calculations to provide the ratio
so that if your challenged as to the numbers a licensed land engineer's testimony will hold up much better
than your calculations. In addition, this should be done because of the unusually dimensioned lot. You
do understand that the max. 40% vehicle driveways include not just the newly proposed but what's
already there?
From: d.cook@q.com [mailto:d.cook@q.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:56 PM
To: Gary Lopez
Subject: Re: 516 Deines Court
oops — sorry — attachments now
From: d.cook@a.com
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:05 PM
To: alooez@fcgov.com
Subject: 516 Deines Court
2/16/2012