HomeMy WebLinkAbout516 DEINES COURT, EXTRA OCCUPANCY RENTAL HOUSE - PDP - PDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (37)Pa.-e 2 of 2
before the required public hearing could be scheduled.
1. Conceptual Review Comments Conceptual review occurred on February 13, 2012.
Staff comments were provided to Ms. Cook immediately following the meeting.
2. Conceptual Review Doc Conceptual documents (site plan, floor plans) were provided
by Ms. Cook on about 2/3/2012, prior to the conceptual review meeting date.
3. Development Review Application Submitted February 23, 2012.
4. Response to Conceptual Review Comments Submitted with Development Review
Application.
5. revised 800 ft list Submitted with Development Review Application.
6. Site Plan A Site Plan was submitted with the development application.
7. Site Plan and Floor Plan A Site Plan and Floor Plans were submitted with the
development application.
8. subdivision plat A subdivision plat is not required with this development proposal
since the property is already platted (Lot 5, Deines Subdivision — April 14, 1960).
9. Transportation Development Review Application submitted February 23, 2012.
Thank you for your time,
Eric Pendergrass
(469)-767-6083
3/7/2012
Page 1 of
Steve Olt
From: Steve Olt
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 3:42 PM
To: 'Eric Pendergrass'
Cc: Peter Barnes; Gary Lopez; Laurie Kadrich
Subject: RE: Questions about PDP120005 516 Deines court extra occupancy rental house
Eric,
Questions 1— 5 below have been answered by Peter Barnes, Zoning Administrator, in his e-mail
to you dated 3/6/2012 and sent at 1:18 p.m. My answers and responses to Question 6 are below
(in red).
Stint Olt
Steve Olt
City's Project Planner
970-221-6341
solt fcgov.com
From: Eric Pendergrass [mailto:epende@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:54 AM
To: Steve Olt
Subject: Questions about PDP120005 516 Deines court extra occupancy rental house
Hi Steve, not sure if these questions should go to you or to Gary Lopez. If you have this
information, I'd greatly appreciate a reply.
1. What is the city -measured area of the front yard for 516 Deines Court (I could not find it in
the PDP documents)?
2. Does the city do an independent measurement of the front yard or rely on the developer's
measurement?
3. If the city measured, how was the area determined, specifically related to the curvature of
the lot where it meets the cul-de-sac circle? Was the cul-de-sac frontage measured as a
straight line or curvature? Could you give me the contact info of the staff member or
group who measured?
4. Where is the 19' depth for parking spaces measured from? Does the measurement start at
the sidewalk, the asphalt?
5. Must the entire width of the parking spot be 19' deep?
6. Has there been any correspondence with Debra Cook since these documents were
created? Not since she submitted her development application. The first round of
staff development review is 3 weeks in length. We will be meeting with Ms. Cook on
Wednesday, March 215t to discuss her submittal documentation. For instance, have
there been any further back and forth comments or document revisions? No, there has
not been back and forth comments. That is what will occur on March 215t during
staff's discussion with the applicant. At that time staff will determine if plans must
be revised. If so, the applicant will have to go through another round of review
3/7/2012