The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About800, 808 & 814 W. PROSPECT RD. MIXED-USE (OBSERVATORY PARK) - PDP - 41-02A - CORRESPONDENCE - (28)PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: September 23, 2002 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #41-02 808 West Prospect Road Mixed -Use PDP — Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Ted Shepard no later than the staff review meeting: October 23, 2002 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference �� Uv,,,,e Sl�o4ld 5%Iou/d , tt5f' b� �YaZ�'ey � fuda�lvir/o.. 14CA)✓m&nV7-1 , Aiz,5 /Uc- L�d'Ta��c'l(�LS�IGr3..1C.iUJ'lS�P,OW"/�G /Ws`GoIlA��G t�f{r.yW[s%,G[O.oVCo OJ 1ciL 5c C_� Tf I Z)d �/�/j�C-p ^7DO/7IC/J//,D0%.�!A. w o/ Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECENE COPIES OF REVISIONS 1�'Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape 4012ftonaim"'i City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet ityaf Part Collins Selected Departments C Department: Water Wastewater Date: October 24, 2002 Prefect: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 23, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General 38 Provide separate water/sewer services for each type of use in the proposed building (I.e. residential/commercial). 14 (1 al1 ►- e-Jt+'A 1 39 Provide proposed demands for the domestic water and fire systems and the estimated flow rates for the sanitary sewer line for our review. The existing water mains and sanitary sewers in Prospect may not have adequate capacity. Developer m y be reqquired to Take offsite improv ments to these systems. W e- 44.9d fkc �tn,aft .1 ..,a ki1 &V0- lAe'l4ded. 40 Include a note that the fire line and water services must be extended into a mechanical room with a back flow preventor and a floor drain sized to accept the discharge from the back flow preventor. W e- haul ✓LowN -r" i.o, w &4,&- 1 relu 4101n-1 iefo +16f, 410Ak. 41 Meter pits may not be located in detention ponds. Retaining walls may not be located in utility easements. See, site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. IMt�Fe• fill «C. T,4j4 VtAt' &f I-L& JI.iGWLIk• Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ Utility ( Redline Utility �T Landscape —i T Page 1 2. Your EFF calculations don't contain all the BMP's you are using and as a result, the EFF doesn't exceed the PS for your plan, which it must. 3. Please add a note to the plan that states the information contained in your report relating to the fact that the detention areas need to be excavated first and will act as sediment traps, etc. Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Cihvuf Curt Collin - Department: Stormwater Utility Date: October 28, 2002 Project: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 23, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: drainage ,4`I— The detention ponds, or any drainage structures specific to this site, can not be in the future right-of-way for Prospect Road. cc) e do moo+ An+c -hA e^ i'� ,2. 0. w 43 Please add water quality outlet structure detail. The detail should be similar to UDSCM, Vol III detail with the trash rack at a 3 or 4 to 1 slope. 44 LP_4edse add basin summary, detention pond tables on the drainage plan. we e ddee( f!c two *-key 147 Please investigate if off -site flows from the west will enter the site. Also, the grading does not match existing contours on the west property boundary and some proposed contours are missing. We- ti tJt W �&.. /eo? �l, c.oti TA,.+ mw. o tl Please provide a drainage easement for detention ponds when Icoation is determined. We uddel o- ��df Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control 55 T� cl--Erosion control notes and schedule need to be on the plan. W c a.l nl eJ o � U -A,; .r a,1'hte)4 C oLer� Signature I D/a.8/01 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ✓ Plat Site ✓ Drainage Report Other_ ✓ Utility ✓ Redline Utility ✓ Landscape Page I C{- }�� Moote Sir .R. + I�tsac . ra-- The title shown Is incorrect, please rework dtle (for example: Frazier Subr being a / rl�lat of... 14 ) fv� �GCl�4a.�t{ -i o 1= I LP4 Vf Please label all adjoining properties. W e, )pw4- o 14.b• Pit t 44B�_ Are there any existing easements? ,V D Topic: Utility Plan cover sheet 1.9- Please include the legal description of the site below the title. We A 41 4A' J 26� The tide does not maatt�h the tides shown or; the site and Ian ape plans. WLcis.awted -fke- I-,{/e ' ;k{ ji e 4n4JCV0Ve GLatittW 4.Y The plat should not be Included in the numbering of the plan set sheets. 22--� Please provide a reference to the soils report on the cover sheet. W e 4ti / ` o'r Cd'e" Topic: Grading Plan 32 It appears that temporary construction easements will be needed on the north, east and west edges of the site for the placement of the silt fence and the construction of the pan along the edge of the property. Please provide letters of intent for these easements prior to hearing, and provide copies of the completed easements prior to signing of myiars. Topic: Overall Utility Plan 2.3' Please provide a standard 7' attached sidewalk along Prospect. 2* . k Prospect has been recently rehabilitated, and street cut fees will be accordingly high. BFi' Driveways onto arterials are required to use the radius -style drive approach. (,Je_ds.4&1e./ -iLe yiivh fod• s P•.�ii 26� Please submit a variance to not design the ultimate widening of Prospect. W C .41J 4 4JJ 4w-W rf / a Ind tJeA QY Please show the spacing of the next closest driveways on both sides of the street Most likely a variance will be required for this driveway location. Also, Is there an existing driveway cut to be closed? rtie •1,./ 4'Ait •+.( r, 'e 28-' A 30' wide fire lane is required adjacent to 3-scary or higher buildings. The lane shown is insufficient. (V e, C k a„Ied fo 30' E9-� Where will the fire trucks turn around? Any private drive greater than 150' in length is required to have a turnaround 100' in diameter at the end for emergency vehicles. 04 A a • e r )v ri- k ie,( +nG 16 Topic: Detail Sheet 333 Please use detail 7-29B for the drive approach and use detail D-10 for the sidewalk culvert CsJ C G1,4-qe-,14it 107i r'1 Page 2 Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments City of Fort Collins Department: Engineering Date: October 28, 2002 Project: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by TED SHEPARD in Current Planning no later than the staff review meeting: October 23, 2002 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General - L-&' Additional Right of Way must be dedicated along Prospect. In this location, Prospect Is considered a constrained arterial, with a corresponding total ROW of 102'. (The constrained arterial cross-section Is as follows: A 6' sidewalk, 8' parkway, 7' bike lane, five 12' vehicle lanes, another 7' bike lane, 8' parkway, and 6' sidewalk.) Accordingly, this project must dedicate an additional 21' of ROW for Prospect. Retaining walls and drainage facilities will not be allowed within the ROW, so the site must be reconfigured. We djW, ca �, / Zl act f o6 l2.OW 4a' olc The access point onto Prospect may become a right -In, right -out only access In the future. L{� The street trees need to be placed In the ultimate location. i-X c y o e •„ { ( t 1.+./lc.1'e r9pp. 112- The parkingsetback needs to be mea�ssured from the ultimate floEline of Prospect. wt K&v& if 34.17,,» Hew w0. r-? 14, 45� Is It possible to share access with adjacent properties? (highly recommended) .tJ o. 30-- Where Is the proposed ped/bike connection to the North? Z+ S0i/ 7', s f eoJ/acf %0 00rA F L 4H-� The driveway cut width shown Is too narrow; a minimum 28' width Is required for access to 12 or more multifamily units. LU CGA.t+fad if- -to 3a' 34 Please see the reclined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. (FYI - The checklist should have been submitted with this initial round of review and Is required of every project.) Topic: Plat Lk The standard 15' utility easement needs to be dedicated behind the Prospect ROW. Gd [ kovc +A' t-r I*— An emergency access easement needs to be dedicated on the plat. W t it,.• c p u f ; 4L a„ ,'• 04 4 Signature tD,z3,OZ_ Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Y_ Site Drainage Report Other NUC1e'd/ S+ _ Utility �x Redline Utility _ Landscape Page I with the south exposure. We suggest that softer, more conservative and traditional building materials be selected allowing the project to blend in as unobtrusively as possible. A second neighborhood meeting will be required. The mailing list provided by A.P.O. Colorado was in error as most addresses on the south side of Prospect were not included. We have received a corrected list. At strategic time to hold the meeting will be after the applicant and consulting team have had sufficient time to respond to these comments. Please provide two weeks advance notice of when you are prepared to hold this meeting so we can send out the letters with sufficient notification. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. As always, please call if you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues. related to this project at 221-6750. Sincerely: I6�+t Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 6 Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill L-fir�ovide separate water/sewer services for each type of use in the proposed building (Le. residential/commercial). r- f t"J a l I v e r- de »-Fi t/ L-115rovide proposed demands for the domestic water and fire systems and the estimated flow rates for the sanitary sewer line for our review. The existing water mains and sanitary sewers in Prospect may not have adequate capacity. Developer may be required to make.offsite improvements to these systems. W e, h- o `f l e •l a .n a N A a ti 1 w, it &Ac/„We t,Kclude a note that the fire line and water services must be extended into a mechanical room with a back flow prevention device and a floordrain sized to accept the discAarge from the back flow prevention device. Wa. k+.o. rit.ow� IFI;.&Li.p w• Je'°"e ^f• ♦tech++.c•/ )'00� • [,? Eer pits may not be located in detention pponds. Retai ing wall$ may�I,of be located in utility easements. M ll�t y p l +J 'i `� (n k.O. w. 17 -S M t r, ( e ww . See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols V. r. 2• Proposed site plan - very confusing at initial viewing. Would prefer to see building envelope only on site plan, possibly a second site plan sowing the underground portion layout - a 2- layer view. V IQ- Show the back-up distance for parking stalls both underground as well as outside. V F9- The number of parking stalls is misleading in the underground section - there are 15 standard stalls and 2 HC stalls, please revise. V Fx. Textured pedestrian crossing - will it be brick, stamped? Please clarify. V r r-- Show distance to property lines from building envelope. V F jr, Remove landscaping form the site plan - please show it on the landscape plan. Department: Current Planning v • F• Staff is concerned about the use of corrugated black metal siding on the south elevation. This is not a typical residential building material found in most neighborhoods and yet the south elevation will be the most visible. While we are keenly aware that the H-M-N zone encourages the proposed housing type, we cannot help but think that such a contemporary building material represents a radical departure from the existing character of the neighborhood. We are concerned that the generous use of metal may cause glare, especially Page 5 V. f:. Knox Box: Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97 UFC 902.4; PFA Policy 88-20 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: drainage the detention ponds, or any drainage structures specific to this site, cannot be in the future o k right-of-way for Prospect Road. We, O�o n of hw v-c Po-111f in X.0. w. Please add water quality outlet structure detail. The detail should be similar to UDSCM, Vol III detail with the trash rack at a 3 or 4 to 1 slope. Please add basin summary, detention pond tables on the drainage plan. Please investigate if off -site flows from the west will enter the site. Also, the grading does not match existing contours on the west property boundary and some proposed contours are missing. Please provide a drainage easement for detention ponds when lcoation is determined. Topic: Erosion/Sediment Control 1. Erosion control notes and schedule need to be on the plan. 2. Your EFF calculations don't contain all the BMP's you are using and as a result, the EFF doesn't exceed the PS for your plan, which it must. 3. Please add a note to the plan that states the information contained in your report relating to the fact that the detention areas need to be excavated first and will act as sediment traps, etc. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff v F It is recommended that a meeting be set up with Transportation Planning to discuss the future circulation pattern for this area as it redevelops for higher intensity according to the neighborhood plan. v• F Please be aware that this driveway may become a right-in/right-out access in the future as improvements to Prospect occur. The existing attached sidewalk will need to be widen to a minimum of 7 feet. It is recommended that the sidewalk be widened to an 8 foot minimum since the sidewalk in this location of town also srvep is the bi e way especially for CSU students. WG hyvL ^4 C e, r( ew^ k 71 V . F. Please explain further how this project ties into the surrounding transportation system, such as walkways, drive aisles, etc... Page 4 -Ttreplat should not be included in the numbering of the plan set sheets. Ole — Please provide a ref rence to the soils report on the cover sheet. hue, p.o,14ee 1,f io1li G.rovt oti 0f,1014n. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine Location of the electric transformer shown on the utility plan must be changed due to inadequate space (both horizontally & vertically). It appears an elevator is planned for the building. Most elevators require 3 phase power which is not available at this site. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore The applicant needs to contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester to see if the trees that are proposed to be removed may and if their loss will need to be mitigated. 3.2.1(F) REQUEST: Please consider designing your trash enclosure to accommodate recycling services. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Required Access: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 97 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC MOTE: With buildings three (3) stories in height a 30 foot fire lane is required on one side of the building to facilitate aerial operations. wL I"" /Q""" 'F': c 1 e"t f o 30' PFA Policy 85-5(B) Dead -End Access: Dead-end fire apparatus roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. 97 UFC 902.2.2.4 Address Numerals: Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6-inch numerals on a contrasting background. ( Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable) 97 UFC 901.4.4 Tbo hu•ur Uwwo r/f u:// EC {a tester Supply: No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual fpressure of 20 psi. 97 UFC 901.2.2.2 Theo ii t F. /I. S3'Eaif of tt& S•E to.,.- D I#eG0�_ L-,dpnnkler Requirement: This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. 97 UFC 1003.2.9 NOTE: The project has more then 16 units. The project is three(3) stories in height and a L P w:r/Ze , minimum 6-inch fire line is required. Page 3 Topic: Grading Plan It appears that temporary construction easements will be needed on the north, east and west edges of the site for the placement of the silt fence and the construction of the pan along the edge of the property. Please provide letters of intent for these easements prior to hearing, and provide copies of the completed easements prior to signing of mylars. Topic: Overall Utility Plan Please provide a standard T attached sidewalk along Prospect. We .19e + A 4 w 0 1 k +.71 prospect has been recently rehabilitated, and street cut fees will be accordingly high. ok- -Drivewgtonto arterials are required to�tse the radt is -style drive approach. We. aa1e/ to 7-Z9 8 Zo'B. 30' w� f4. Tease submit a variance to not design the ultimate widening of Prospect. We. PP0,04a A VAvianrt, a'" I f- Cr Incl..,/e./. --'tease show the spacings of the next closest driveways on both sides of the street. Most likely a variance will be required for this driveway location. Also, is there an existing driveway cut to be closed? Thera arz 4wo of eweu.yr Le,41 c/•ioat r.d ow a new 3o' W G inadc, a v Lbet 4wr.e re9.•d,.y let -f %o, d.,vrwayJ 0+ Lof'A jt;ies &6 Pkos,,,& L-A-30' wide fire lane is required adjacent to 3-story or higher buildings. The lane shown is insufficient. F i r es L4 me, Ls 30 Where will the fire trucks turn around? Any private drive greater than 150' in length is requt ed to have a tymaround 100' in diameter at the end for emergency ve icles. The b " � I a 1 % I will bB1Pr1-kl..4 in r+e✓ e4. rooeluawrc a - Topic: Plat Zte standard 15' utilit easement needs to be dedicated behind the Prospect ROW. W. rheve"( /°. X W. '(/orfh Zl' 'Zs -( & Aw+ a IT .Am -emergency access easement needs to be dedicated on the plat. w� a.Lla/ Fo f,L• Pit Zhe-title shown is incorrect, please rework title (for example: Frazier Sub, being a replat of...). W4 �MYa C.kalea I-Ac m—c 4o r-v4z-ier 1abo�i✓ rie. P/al• -Pi'ease label all adjoining properties. We t.bel.d o, S-,&. 'Plc f Are there any existing easements? Ad Topic: Utility Plan cover sheet Elease include the legal description of the sit below the title. we- 0.< "Leyal �u c. The -title does not match the titles shown on the site and landscape plan. We C ka' jew -kith -;`/ . HG D VI-10I P/,#-i t V.F/2 C�--I .( N.6 Jr,te � 1e-•/✓c+ivf�i� Page 2 0 City of Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW VF RIPLEY DON BROOKSHIRE 401 W. MOUNTAIN AVE., #201 FORT COLLINS, CO 80521 Date: 10/31/2002 Staff has reviewed your submittal for 808 & 814 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP, and we offer the following comments: Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Clark Mapes Please note that Section 4.24(E)(2)(b) requires that there be no vehicle use area in the front yard. The relationship of building to street must consist of doorway and front yard. The zone was specifically written to capture the positive urban relationship of a building face to a street and to place parking lots and drives to the side and rear. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: Detail Sheet Please use detail 7-29B for the drive approach and use detail D-10 for the sidewalk culvert. lve, chA�I#A fo -1-via , Zo',e.. po'!ui/;R we Liss,( D-10 r dew•1k Topic: General ,Additional Right of Way must be dedicated along Prospect. In this location, Prospect is considered a constrained arterial, with a corresponding total ROW of 102'. (The constrained arterial cross-section is as follows: A 6'sidewalk, 8' parkway, 7' bike lane, five 12'vehicle lanes, another T bike lane, 8' parkway, and 6'sidewalk.) Accordingly, this project must dedicate an additional 2l' of ROW for Prospect. Retaining walls and drainage facilities will not be allow5w�ithin the ROW, so the site must be reconfigured. IueGAave a sc l-ed 21, The access point onto Prospect may become a right -in, right -out only access in the future. V. F.Cp The street trees need to be placed in the ultimate location. V. C The parking setback needs to be measured from the ultimate flowline of Prospect. :4 su 36 a61t possible to share access with adjacent properties? (highly recommended) u•ti'osJIble. V4:• t-Wiibre is the proposed ped/bike connection to the North? lu&tk it com41 ao4f 4oM Frei, t fo N•Asp. t}4e driveway cut width shown is too narrow; a minimum 28' width is required for access to 12 or more multifamily units. We- Ckn.ye4 +o -1 -211 J zo' G.1. 30 w,d f[ Please see the redlined plans and utility plan checklist for any additional comments. (FYI - The checklist should have been submitted with this initial round of review and is required of every project.) Page 1