The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About800, 808 & 814 W. PROSPECT RD. MIXED-USE (OBSERVATORY PARK) - PDP - 41-02A - CORRESPONDENCE - (19)--Mmber: 83 Created: 2/20/2003 Water meter snitI may not be locatedinthe Prospect R.O.W. or within the detention pond. W G h4V4 Tki M e4er p;* In pv,4 DN 4 Ao"--1 f/1.4 ii 44i,e +44 M•p/•L. Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Overall Utility Plan —Number: 77 Created: 2/19/2003 Show location of the gas main(s) and electric line(s) running east/west in Prospect R.O.W. IUG titvt iotIt 4Q1 M<i^ QwA 1Xc Gjeo4,0 �/n, l+ e x is f14761r:411.4/,f. Project Comments Sheet �s Selected Departments City of Fort Collin Department: Water Wastewater Date: February 20, 2003 Project: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 19, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 38 Created: 10/23/2002 As previously indicate, provide separate water/sewer services for each type of use in the proposed building (I.e. residential/commercial). Number: 39 Created: 10/23/2002 As previously indicated provide flow rate calculations for fire system The existing water mains and sanitary sewers in Prospect may not have adequate capacity. Developer may be required to make offsite improvements to these systems. Number: 40 Created: 10/23/2002 As previously indicated, include a note that the fire line and water services must be extended into a mechanical room with a back flow preventor and a floor drain sized to accept the discharge from the back flow preventor. Include a note to maintain the required depth of bury over the water lines as they cross the detention pond. Will a lowering of the fire line be required at the detention pond? ,-Number: 75 Created: 2/14/2003 As previously indicated, show and label all existing water/sewer services. If water/sewer services are not being used they must be abandoned at the main. Include a note to coordinate all water/sewer abandonment's with the city.utilities at 221-6700 Lve. sAOw Z w-1—s'erulGes 4-A 4we Se we JG rV it aJ Se/nI dire+%eh f.w' 44 m4i- OA0Vb/:l t*,Y iy PA4 member: 76 Created: 2/14/2003 Flow calculations for the domestic service indicate a 3-inch water service iS required. Show and label all items associated with this size of service. We r.A&^1 i� 4 re F eYviio fo 3- a. Jrbo+•a See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. +44 2-it-02 Dare CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS X Plat Site Drainage Report Other_ X Utility lC Redline Utility _A' Landscape Page 1 446mber: 87 Created: 2/20/2003 Temporary cunstruction easements are needed for the suuroundin`g properties before a hearing can be set. Soon, ieala/�.I -t•LG Gajopme-i,r poep-t•e 1 A)f Y Number: 88 Created: 2/20/2003 Off -site drainage esements are needed if the 100-year developed flow in any swales are not fully contained with the property boundaries. Please provide documentation that these flows are maintained on -site. opfc: Erosion/Sediment Control Number: 89 Created: 2/20/2003 Please indicate on the plan that the ponds along the south portion of the property will be constructed'J as the first phase of grading, and utilize them as sediment traps. Z Lit �C pt 4 Ilo+e- a' -tAG P/fn- Page 2 M City of Fort Collins Project Comments Sheet Selected Departments Department: Stormwater Utility Date: February 20, 2003 Project: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 19, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: drainage I.NtT fiber: 43 Created: 10/23/2002 Please add water quality outlet structure detail. The detail should be similar to UDSCM, Vol III detail with the trash rack at a 3 or 4 to 1 slope. Repeat Comment 2119/03. There also needs to be calculations in the report documenting amount of water quality volume required and sizing of the orifices. FYI - The water quaIurrgqq require�J needs to be in addition to the water quantity detention. We. c allied e.X%o n.t eat Tia[c•Fo`..Y'e p• rc r !c fb•� Number: 47 Created: 10/25/2002 Please investigate if off -site flows from the west will enter the site. Also, the grading does not match existing contours on the west property boundary and some proposed contours are missing. Repeat Comment 2/19/03. The eastern property boundary still needs to show existing contours 50 feet into the eastern property. Areas along the east and north property boundary still do not show all grading (contours) requireq to verify flgw path. WG %.vt exti.i.ol+.( t4L C'-+V.rt 0. tAc Werf. A/,rr< r, Et if rider 4r fc.a,r i♦A-e4ov/ev. LNdmber: 84 Created: 2/20/2003 Detention pond 2 is not large enough as graded to hold the volume required. Making detention pond 1 larger does not compensate for the volume if the release rates are not changed. Each pond needs to have its required volume per release rate speed with the total site releasing at the allowable 2-year historic release rate. Please revise. Wt k•vt lflevue.( t4c r@,1e•re- r.tc fe- l.oi`!. pe.dr Number: 85 Created: 2/20/2003 There is currently no freeboard for the detention ponds. There needs to be 1 foot of freeboard with a designated spillway for each pond. Currently, water could spill onto the adjacent properties. There also needs to be at least 1 foot of freeboard to any finished floor elevation of the structure. The mechanical and equipment room are currently inundated by th@@ HWEL of pond 2. Please revise and provide spil way calculations in the report. fyc h4rL ik e, Jpi!/G+cy {'fir Ye.[ .S in+:t Yi✓dwAy, Number: 86 Created: 2/20/2003 The grading at the eastern parking garge entrance seems to show that water will flow underneath the building before the 100-year WSEL is achieved. This seems to be a possible flooding and structural hazard that should be avoided. The crest elevation of this entrance should be higher than the spillway elevation to ensure that detention pond water will not inundate the parking underneath the building. Please revise. -1 vo3 Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RF,CEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat Site ,/ Drainage Report Other_ Utility = Redline Utility J/ Landscape Page t GC- TC1 J G IhJ' W1tcAue �w✓�-`llisr7 Topic: Overall Utility Plan viQumber: 62 Created: 2/7/2003 The existing buildings/driveways adjacent to the site (within the distance contained on the plan sheet is ok) need to be shown In a grey/ghosted weight line. Lm a 74 rr e.f +4 e. 6 u0 d.,.f/ 6. +4e. Orep e.A7 .ye +4 a cued --Wumber: 63 Created: 2/7/2003 Please label the radii of the curb returns. It appears that they are 20', but it should be labeled. W a la L le .1. 41 e. 12ad; i �u�aeei Number: 64 Created: 2/7/2003 Regarding the sidewalk, In order to add width to an existing sidewalk, a minimum of 4' should be added. Any width to be added under that amount will need to be done by demolishing the existing sidewalk and installing a new one. It looks like a good portion of the sidewalk will be taken out anyway due to the installation of utilities, so it might be better to replace the whole sidewalk. w+- Otte vI.elve.L+,Le. walk, 10 if W''il! a111c'1"0. L-Number: 65 Created: 2/7/2003 The new meter pit and stop box should be placed outside of the ROW. T 4 G rn e. f a,. y it 4 r fo i 6 .x w e r e w e+e A A) e.-fl, 6 v f of 4-4c R, 6.W tNamber: 66 Created: 2/7/2003 The pedestrian ramp on the west side of the driveway should be designed to the detail shown on the driveway detail. (N e- Gor•e4}e.l r "p. L-kumber: 67 Where are the existing curb cuts to be filled in? Topic: Grading Plan Created: 2/7/2003 We- -Showe.l lAfsfhI Cwi cuts. Number: 32 Created: 10/10/2002 It appears that temporary construction easements will be needed on the north, east and west edges of the site for the placement of the silt fence and the construction of the pan along the edge of the property. Please provide letters of intent for these easements prior to hearing, and provide copies of the completed easements prior to signing of mylars. u21 .03 - it isn't necessary to show these easements on the plans/plat. The separate document(s) will be sufficient. W t I e 4 f -t4e e.auemeA4r o- f4e P 1 4 f Jo +4, Cc^X4Vwka.W to14.6 Noy ese Number: 68 Created: 2/7/2003 There are a few minor locations where it appears that this project will be re -grading on neighboring lots. Any re -grading on adjacent property will require.a permanent offske easement for grading. The construction easement does not cover this. rAr ra.1•ad 1,7 .f ra A M;Aor . tve. w311 to �f e44.4...? ws we. p..+-rieG,,L ,i. ow pw.�OPe LDtifter: 70 Created: 2/7/2003 The high ridge shown on the driveway needs to be located at the ROW line, not further south. An expansion joint also needs to be provided at the ROW line. w e. ►t o• e.4 +Le r � -17 a .V o .+k a.. A s 44 4d +Aa a u,oa+ale— a o;- f Topic: Detail Sheet Number: 33 Created: 10/10/2002 Please use detail 7-29B for the drive approach and use detail D-10 for the sidewalk culvert. L2r7:b3 - Detail D-10 was not used; the old detail is still on the plans. Lu e- C k 4w4+.4 foe DefAi I + 0 D -10 . LNUmber: 71 Created: 2/7/2003 Please include Drawing 16-4a. t0 t, a Ad e A +k e- r 6,.., p A G f a i l. Page 2 IAMM Project Comments Sheet City of Fort Collins Selected Departments Department: Engineering Date: February 19, 2003 Project: 808 WEST PROSPECT MIXED USE PDP All comments must be received by Ted Shepard in Current Planning, no later than the staff review meeting: February 19, 2003 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General -Number: 30 Created: 10/1012002 Where is the proposed ped/bare connection to the North? 1_2 ..03 -This connection is still not being shown offslte. 7k a P14 w +etr S4, A i e .-r,la v -44 cua /!c e, • w v ✓ i i,, Number: 72 Created: 2/7/2003 TheexIstingg ROW width should be shown on all plans. S-F lSth am.. 0, +4c .rAee i-J. Tl.c e7 Real it GO'. 4pp,4.,o-al 9,V.aJ- o,u Avo.f4 i-fZi' --ITumber: 73 Created: 2/7/2003 It appears that some sort of patterned/colored concrete is proposed across the driveway between the pedestrian ramps. Decorative concrete will not be maintained by the City. w e el e. I c +e A a 4 e pa H e r a.( cow c v .{e. &1a iber: 74 Created: 2/7/2003 The soils report is being returned so chat it can be signed and stamped and returned with the next submittal. 7 t4;1( 7&4 a Jiyn1-t copy &8a l ev" Fie/2/'c� `..4c ke_ ,,Number: 78 Created: 2/19/2003 Please have the soils reD�ott �p�ed and stamped and returned with the next submittal. Nn F-estoo..ee. L-1111-mber: 81 Created: 2/19/2003 The retaining wall needs to be moved a minimum of 2' behind the ROW due to sidewalk separation requirements (for the future sidewalk placement). tJ et .., . , . ,( 4 ti e r c {4;„�;1 w , i/ Z' .V o r44. ddomber: 82 Created: 2/19/2003 There is a possibility that the building might need to get smaller In order to address the various departments' concerns. Me 4°expohce. Topic: Utility Plan cover sheet c-Number: 61 Created: 2/7/2003 Please note the two approved variances under number 48. Lu (! no+e rt {plc +wo J ari44cY) ati i'J.c Govcr.rjr r� Z. Signature Date CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _ Plat X Site Drainage Report _� Otherf 1 L s r O-f-F X Utility X Redline Utility 'C Landscape Page I