The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About516 DEINES COURT, EXTRA OCCUPANCY RENTAL HOUSE - PDP - PDP120005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (35)reducing the visa,.. impact of the number of vehicles along the _ .Jetscape. It will also free up 8.5' of AM on street parking; not much but on a cul-de-sac on -street parking is premium. Had the width of the property as contoured with the street been less than 65 linear feet then the garage could be used as a parking space. However, the down side to this is the need for the garage to be used exclusively for parking. If it isn't utilized then another vehicle is on the street. A lease provision might be considered enforcing that the garage space be used for parking. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012 04/03/2012: 2nd round: I would agree with the applicant that even with a modification to add the garage space as one parking space would likely not appease those in opposition plus may be worse. If the garage space went unused pushing at least another car to the street the opposition might become even more dissatisfied. However, the garage space can still be used as a parking space and I would encourage that the tenants use it as it would provide a total of 5 off street parking spaces. So maybe make that the added benefit in that you'll ask the tenants to use the garage space as well. It is something simple enough to do though you're not required but doing as a goodwill gesture. Department: Engineering L . alopment Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: Previous comments have been addressed and no additional comments at this time. Engineering should be routed any future drawings/revisions pertaining to the project. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/06/2012 04/06/2012: The distance on the south property line is incorrect. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/21/2012 04/06/2012: The distance on the south property line is incorrect. 03/21/2012: There is an incorrect bearing & distance on the plan. These do not match the platted information. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/06/2012 04/06/2012: Please change the Subdivision name in the legal description to "Amended Plat of M. L. Deines Subdivision". Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/06/2012 04/06/2012: The green highlighting will not scan well. Maybe it could be changed to a hatching. Department: Zoning Contact: GaryLopez, 970.416.2338, glopezaa)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2012 3/15/2012 Based on the new site plan submitted my calculations of concrete area ratio full front yard are based on the front property line to building and side to side property lines show 722 s.f. concrete areas and 1375 s.f. organic totaling to total front yard area of 2097 s.f. thus concrete or hard surface area ratio is 34%/100% which is slightly less than calculation by Freeman Arch. which was 35%/100% again less than the 40%/100% required. I have no qualms with the numbers. Even if one doesn't take into account the arcs and made full rectangular spaces from the longest depth side I come up with 803 s.f./2097 s.f. representing 38%/100%. Adding the add'I amt. of full rectangle (without Arc) into the full front yard area brings the amount down to 37%/100%. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2012 3/15/2012 The two new right sides vehicle spaces will need concrete wheel stops to prevent vehicles forwarded on to the grass. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/15/2012 03/15/2012: In the event of neighborhood opposition a modification requesting that the garage be used as a vehicle space would reduce the outdoor off-street spaces from four to three thus 1 Contact: Steve Olt, 970.2k,-0341, solta()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/07/2012 04/11/2012: At the staff review meeting, I provided the applicant with the notification map and anticipate to schedule a neighborhood meeting for the first week of May (2 weeks notice period beyond next week). 04/09/2012: 1 received a confirmation for a neighborhood meeting from Debra Cook on 4/9/12 via voicemail. 03/07/2012: Is the applicant still intending to hold a neighborhood meeting as indicated in the response to Current Planning comments from conceptual review? Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012 04/09/2012: Please provide the front yard calculation with clearly hatched areas determining the percentage of parking sited there based on the definition in the municipal code: Sec. 20-104 defines 'yard' as: "Yard shall mean the open space between buildings and property lines at the front, rear and sides of a property. The front yard shall be considered to be the yard between the street abutting the lot and an imaginary line running along the front edge of the building closest to the street and extending to the side property lines. On a corner lot, the front yard shall be considered to be the yard abutting the shorter street right-of-way. The rear yard shall be considered to be the area located on the opposite side of the lot from the front yard. The side yard shall be considered to be that portion of the yard which is neither the front nor the rear yard." These calculations need to be based on a survey of the property. 03/19/2012: Based on the information on the Site Plan (dated February 28, 2012) it appears that the parking in the front yard will not exceed 40% in every case. This relates to the front yard within the property line, or including the parkway strip between back of sidewalk and the property line, or including the sidewalk. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/20/2012 04/11/2012: The Building Official accepted the architect's letter as adequate documentation that the post is decorative only. 04/09/2012: The building department has been out to inspect this situation. An engineer or the truss manufacturer needs to provide documentation that the support post is either load -bearing or decorative only. 03/20/2012: There is a support pole at the southwest corner of the house that supports the eave over the garage entry. Is it possible that this post could hinder the ability to park a car on the westernmost parking space as shown on the Site Plan? city O Fort Goilins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax tcgov. com/developmentreview April 11, 2012 Debra Cook n/a 5983 Star View Dr Broomfield, CO 80020 RE: 516 Deines Court Extra Occupancy Rental House, PDP120005, Round Number 2 Comments. Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Seth Lorson, 970.224-6189, slorson Mcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: We have received concerns about property upkeep and tenant behavior. Providing a list of other properties that you either own and/or manage to be used as comparison may help assuage neighborhood concerns. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/09/2012 04/09/2012: Are there field stakes confirming the ILC? This would be helpful for the neighbors and staff to get a good sense of the extent of impact proposed.