Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7-ELEVEN @ COLLEGE & MAGNOLIA - PDP/APU - PDP120026 - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffinQton(rbfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 3 11/05/2012: Add traffic -rated clean -out detail. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Originated: 11/05/2012 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: If a transformer is to be located on site and landscaping plans will need to updated with the location and notes on how it will be screened. Also submitted proposal plans did not include mechanical/utility equipment locations and notes on how they are to be painted and screened. This will need to be included on the elevation drawings. Please call out painted to match. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: The tree mitigation plan states that 10 trees will be required but on the landscape plan there is only nine trees designated as mitigation trees. Also tree that are part of the mitigation are required to by up -sized then the standard plantings for Shade trees 3" caliper, ornamental is 2.5" caliper and evergreen trees 8' height. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: Bicycle parking spaces have recently changed and this application was submitted after the change therefore this project will need to be meet the new standards. There needs tc be a minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces and 20% of these spaces will need to be Enclosed/covered. So a total of 4 spaces with 1 of those enclosed/covered. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: Is the glazing on the building transparent? Land Use Code section 4.16(D)(5)(c)l. Window requirements see section for details. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: Reminder that signage and its location are not approved through the PDP/FD process. Signs and their locations are approved by a separate sign permit. Please include a note on the plans indicating this. Also the clock as currently shown is considered a sign. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: Need to provide elevations for trash enclosure and detail of back rack. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: To be considered a grocery store there needs to be at least 5000 sq ft of space since 7 Eleven is less than this it falls under the use catagory General Retail for the parking table in the Land Use Code. General Retail is limited to 4 spaces per 1000 sq ft which would allow this project only 16 vehicle parking spaces. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970.221.6820, wstanford@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/01/2012 11/0112012: In the Traffic Signing notes revise all instances of local entity engineer to state local entity Traffic engineer. Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/0112012 11/01/2012: TIS analyzes Mason and Magnolia with left turns. All left turns are restricted at the location now due to RR aspects. At the time of the scoping session the changes were not in place and the consultant would not have known this change unless informed by Clty staff. As such, Traffic will not require the consultant to revise their TIS to correct the ommission. Traffic has run its own evaluation of the intersection with the left turns removed and the left turn volumes reallocated. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/01/2012 11/01/2012: The TIS DOES need to be revised to complete a ped and bicycle LOS review per the Clty standards. If the consultant is unfamiliar with the required ped/bike review please find the City's Pedestrian Plan on the City website (http://www.fcgov.com/transportationplanning/pedplan.php) and the Multi -Modal LOS manual in Appendix H of the LCUASS (hftp://www.larimer.org/engineering/gmardstds/ApdxH_04_01_2007.pdf). If you have any questions please contact Transportation Planning at 970-416-2643. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/01/2012 11/01/2012: Per City policy traffic impacts are to be analyzed using the latest HCM methodologies. The traffic analysis in the TIS was performed with Synchro and appears to present Synchro's findings. Unfortunately the Synchro results are unacceptable. It is acceptable however to use Synchro's HCM function for the analysis, findings and appendix documentation. Please revise the TIS using HCM methods. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970.221.6704, eolson( fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/05/2012 11/05/2012: Irrigation plans are required at time of building permit. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(&fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/29/2012 10/29/2012: Label curb stop. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 1012912012 10/29/2012: Install water meter in a pit adjacent to the curb stop betweeen main and sidewalk. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221-6588, jcounty(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, C4.0, C5.0, C6.0 & C10.0. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please lighten the bold street name & alley text on sheet C4.0, C5.0, C7.0, C8.0 & C10.0. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please remove all reference to PDP or Project Development Plan from all sheets prior to filing the final plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: The elevation of benchmark 6-00 has changed to 4990.68. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please correct the sheet numbering & the sheet index. These do not match. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Sheets 1, 4, 5 & 6 are missing the scale bar. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Should the Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services or the Director of Planning be signing sheet 1? These are two different positions. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: There are line over text issues on sheets 2, Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please make all of the text in the titleblock consistent on all sheets. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please label the alley and complete street names on sheets 4, 5 & 6. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 11 11/07/2012: Please add a north arrow. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 7 11/07/2012: Please lighten the bold street name & alley text on sheet 3. Comment Number: 8 11/0712012: There are text over text issues on sheet 3. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221.6820, wstanfordofcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416.2418, wlamaroueOfcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/30/2012 10/30/2012: 1. Plat Map - IF (repeat IF) this is needed, it should show the 100-year City (Old Town) floodplain boundary, the Old Town floodway boundary, the benchmark number and elevation of the benchmark. 2. In the Drainage Report, Section III Part E - elaborate on comments by adding a note about the site being submitted for a CLOMR/LOMR (raised site/structure will not be subject to Chapter 10 of City Code) 3. Please correct the drainage report as redlined. 4. Please explain how proposed construction and site plans meet the standards of Chapter 10, and why you are choosing to prepare a City-CLOMR for this site. 5. Please commit in writing to preparation of the City-CLOMR. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/30/2012 10/30/2012: Quantity detention is required for this development due to the large increase in impervious area. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/30/2012 10/30/2012: Please see redlines on the utility plans and the drainage report for other comments. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, jcount@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please correct the sheet titles in the sheet index. These do not match the titles on each sheet. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: The elevation of benchmark 6-00 has changed to 4990.68. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please add a second benchmark. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/0712012: The scale bar is missing on sheets C1.0, C2.0, C6.0 & C9.0. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 11/07/2012 11/07/2012: Please remove all reference to Preliminary or Not For Construction from all sheets prior to filing the final plans. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartine(rDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2012 10/18/2012: There is an existing electric transformer approximately 45 feet to the north of this site at the rear of the Clock Tower Square building. The electric service to 7-Eleven could be from this transformer (by builder). The developer will need to obtain an off -site easement from the owner of Clock Tower Square. As an alternative, a new transformer could be installed on the 7-Eleven site at a location to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering (970-221-6700). An easement from the alley to the new transformer will be necessary. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2012 10/18/2012: Light & Power Engineering will need a Commercial Service Information (C-1) form completed. Normal electric development and system modification charges will apply. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Don Kapperman, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/01/2012 11/01/2012: Comcast would like to do a joint trench with Light and Power if owner would like Comcast service. Please contact Don Kapperman at Don_Kapperman@cable.comcast.com Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416.2869, jlynxwilerftoudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 01 Comment Originated: 10/30/2012 10/3012012: No additional comments as long as the building is to be one story and is less than 5,000 square feet. Comment Number: 02 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: The proposed building is adjacent to public roads and within access of fire apparatus. A dedicated Emergency Access Easement through the site is not required. It is however a recommendation that the drive isle through the property be constructed to support the weight of fire apparatus at 40 tons. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue(aRcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/31/2012: The three large spruces shown to be removed are prominent and very significant. They are in fair condition. Forestry staff has assigned tree mitigation numbers. Significant trees should be retained to the extent reasonable feasible. A significant amount of the root system would need to protected for the trees to be retained. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/31/2012: To help protect the ash shown to be retained on the west edge of the site can the curb location be moved further from the tree? It is currently shown at about 6 feet from the trunk. Minimizing the depth of excavation for the curb is also important. Forestry staff is available to meet on site to review. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/31/2012: Please add these landscape notes: - The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. -A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/31/2012: Please check the number of upsized trees shown on the plan. Ten are required but it appears that only nine are shown. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/3112012: Please move the two proposed honeylocust shown east of the curb cut along Magnolia Street to the east so as to provide more distance from the west tree and the curb cut. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/31/2012 10/31/2012: Please add a tree in the landscape area located off the NW corner of the building. Why does the stormsewer need to bisect that island? The utility should be relocated so that the tree would be 6 feet from that utility. Upsized chanticlear pear is recommended for that island. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11106/2012: It maybe worth considering utilizing texas red oak insead of honeylocust on West Magnolia Street for two reasons: it ties in with the texas red oak accross the street creating a desireable streetscape and the honeylocust downtown are prone to disease - esp. spider mites. Department: Light And Power Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221-6567, mvirata(cDfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Please specify the proposed driveway radius for the driveways out to College Avenue and Magnolia Street. They should be built to LCUASS detail 707 with this detail added to the detail sheets. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The driveways out to College Avenue and Magnolia Street sheetflow parking lot drainage over the sidewalk. In it's present design, the grading of the parking lot behind both driveways need to establish that no more than 750 square feet of area sheet flows over the sidewalks, and additionally sidewalk culverts should be utilized for the concentrated flows to be directed underneath the sidewalk. Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: There are portions of existing sidewalk that appear to be in substandard condition and as a heads -up would need to be replaced prior to C.O. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The creation of an angle point for where the angled parking edge meets the flowline along Magnolia Street needs to be changed to a radius (15' min.) to help allow for street cleaning operations to reach. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The landscape plan should be identifying existing condition of landscaping along College Avenue and Magnolia Street right-of-way, and whether or not any changes are proposed with the project. The rock mulch along Magnolia Street I suspect would be considered problematic by other departments in the City if allowed to remain. Topic: Variance Request Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The variance request for driveway spacing uses a justification that the granting will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. The request needs to provide a justification/methodology for the variance that can then conclude this justification/methodology is therefore not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. The justification/methodology on its own that it is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare isn't sufficient for a variance request. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchanan(a.fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevinpston(7a.fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10125/2012: The bike parking minimum requirement is 4 spaces. 3 should be enclosed and 1 should be a fixed rack. Please provide bike parking detail on elevations. You will need to update the table on sheet 1 to reflect the bike parking requirements in LUC Section 3.2.2(C)(4) Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: The sidewalk connection on Magnolia Street needs to be relocated to the west to line up with the entrance per LUC 3.2.2(C)(5) and 3.5.3(B). The second entrance on Magnolia Street should be functional. Additionally, all doors are required to have clear glass per 3.5.1(E) (3). Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: The handicapped signage needs to be relocated on the north elevation as to not block the window. Its current location (sheet 3) shows it on a window. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The use is classified as general retail in terms of the parking table in LUC Section 3.2.2(K)(2) which allows for 4 parking stalls per 1,000 square feet of GLA. 16 spaces are permitted maximum and the site plans shows 18 spaces. Fast food restaurants are parked at 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Please delinate the fast food restaurant if you intend on keeping the 18 spaces. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221.6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11106/2012: The access ramps out to the College Avenue and Magnolia Street need to add truncated dome panels in accordance with LCUASS criteria and reference LCUASS detail 1607 in the plan set. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: A signing/striping plan for the diagonal parking spaces along Magnolia Street is needed to understand how parking stall striping is to be adjusted with the removal of the eastern existing driveway and modification of the western existing driveway. This is also needed as information to justify the proposed modification of the flowline, reducing the amount of parkway in the project. Ensure that parking stall dimensions are illustrated. Additionally, the signing/striping plan should show College Avenue and potential impacts to the parallel parking north of the project with the widened driveway and larger radius. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Where the new widening occurs of the parking stall, please adjust that portion shown at .44% along the flowline for the driveway removal along Magnolia Street to .5%. Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston(cDfc4ov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Per LUC 3.2.2(M)(2), please add the following note to the landscape plan: "No certificate of occupancy for property with an off-street parking area required to provide landscaping in conformance with the Land Use Code shall be issued unless all landscaping on the property has been installed in accordance with an approved landscape plan for such property. In the event that such landscape installation has not been completed, an occupancy permit may be issued upon the receipt by the City of a cash deposit, bond, letter of credit or other satisfactory financial guarantee in the amount of one hundred twenty-five (125) percent of the estimated cost of the landscaping improvements determined by an executed contract to install such landscaping or by adequate appraisals of such cost. Such bond, cash deposit or equivalent shall further guarantee the continued maintenance and replacement of the landscaping for a period of two (2) years after installation, but the amount of the same shall be reduced after installation is completed to twenty-five (25) percent of the actual cost of such landscaping. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: It appears as though the cyclist will have to traverse a landscaped area to access the fixed bike rack. Is this the best location for the bike rack? It seems like there could be a space closer to the entrance. Please revise the location and show detail with dimensions on the elevations. The bike rack should allow the bicycle frame and both wheels to be securely locked to the parking structure. The structure shall be of permanent construction such as heavy gauge tubular steel with angle bars permanently attached to the pavement foundation. Fixed bicycle parking facilities shall be at least two (2) feet in width and five and one-half (51/2) feet in length, with additional back -out or maneuvering space of at least five (5) feet (LUC 5.1.2). Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: They parkway strip on West Magnolia is currently rock and it should be lawn. Please update the landscape plans. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The lighting plan does not show detail for the goosneck lights shown on the elevations and their location and quantity. Please revise and include per section 3.2.4 of the Land Use Code. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The wall mounted security light as well as the parking lot pole mounted lights not meet the standards for fully sheilded and down directional and the photometric plan is not clear as to its quanity and location. Please include in next submittal. Topic: Site Plan Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416.2283, clevingstonna fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2012 10/25/2012: 540 square feet of interior landscape area is required for the 9,009 square foot parking lot. As shown on sheet 1, the table does not delinate between interior landscaping and perimeter parking lot landscaping. Please modify the table on the first sheet accordingly. There may be only one area on the proposed site plan that qualifies for interior landscaping and additional landscaped island may need to be added if that area is not 540 square feet. Please follow up with Zoning to verify. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/05/2012 11/05/2012: Trees are required in all landscape islands per 3.2.1(E)(5)(c) A 10 foot separation distance between trees and water/sewer mains is required per Section 3.2.1(K). That being said, could the sewer main be relocated 10 feet north to accommodate a tree in the landscape island? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/05/2012 11/05/2012: On the landscape plan, please provide water budget and hydrozone chart per LUC 3.2.1(E)(3)(b) Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The LUC states that street trees should be at 30-40 foot spacings. While the honeylocust on West Magnolia Street are meeting the code at 40', there is an oppertunity to add another street tree by moving to a 30 - 35 foot spacing. Please add another tree. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The landscape plan should be modified to show the symbol for the 3" cal upsized species as well as the standard 2" and call out the number for each. Additionally please lable West Magnolia Street, College Avenue, the Alley and show the on -street parking spaces on West Magnolia. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: 1 only count 6 swedish columnar aspens (on the west side of the site) yet the plan says 7. 1 also counted 10 cologreen junipers and the quantity on the table says 3. 1 counted 11 skyrocket junipers and the quanity on the table says 20. 1 counted 17 of the alpine currant opposed to the 18 listed in the table. The table states that there are 46 count little bluestem and I counted 44 shown on the plan. The plan states there are 66 count of the switchgrass and I counted 64. The plan states 61 count for the feather reed grass and I counted 57. Please recount and update the quantities in the table accordingly. Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston(a)fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The proposed elevations do not meet Section 3.5.3(D)(6) in terms of a "base, middle, top" treatment. A wainscoting or kickplate treatment was suggested to assist in meeting this standard. As stated in 4.16(1))(4)(b), other detailing is required. Additionally, treatments such as thicker stone lentils and sills on the "second" story should be called out. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Please provide a cornice detail on elevations. Section 3.5.3 requires a substantial top/cornice treatment. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: LUC 4.16(D)(5)(e) requires material modules shall not exceed either five (5) feet horizontally or three (3) feet vertically without the clear expression of a joint. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: Please show a detail on the elevations for the upper story glass, ensuring that the glass is transparent and how it will be blacked out. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/05/2012 11/05/2012: Please provide a colored elevation al rendering for the P & Z Board of how the project will look including the ramps (north and east elevations). Will there be handrails on the ramps? If so that should be shown on elevations as well. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Is the trash enclosure area adequate to accomodate trash as well as recycling? What are the proposed sizes of the trash and recycling containers? (LUC 3.2.5) Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11106/2012: Please note that per LUC 3.5.1(J) regulates operational/physical Compatibility Standards. Conditions may be imposed upon the approval of development applications to ensure that new development will be compatible with existing neighborhoods and uses. Such conditions may include, but need not be limited to, restrictions on hours of operation and deliveries. It appears as the existing 7-Eleven at 430 Remington has 24 hour operations. At time of your resubmittal, please provide a management/operational plan that addresses this code section and affected property owner concerns. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: Please show the on street parking spaces on West Magnolia Street on the site and landscape plan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/08/2012 11/08/2012: The TIS is for a convenience store and fast food restaurant. Please delinate that on the plans. Fast Food restaurants are permitted in the Downtown Zone District, Topic: Landscape Plans Cityof Fort Collins November 08, 2012 Sara Streeter Verdad Real Estate 1121 Grant St, #2 Denver, CO 80203 RE: 7-Eleven at College and Magnolia PDP with Addition of Permitted Use, PDP120026, Round Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax rcgov. com/develo pmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416-2283, clevingston(rDfcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Per 3.5.1(E), please call out all building materials and colors. The awning should be a compatible material with the downtown context. What color is proposed for the goosneck lamp(s)? Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: The second entrance on Magnolia Street should be functional. Additionally, all doors are required to have clear glass per 3.5.1(E)(3). Please include a note on the plans and show on south elevation. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/06/2012: Please show location of utilities on elevations. Utilities must be fully screened and painted to match. Please call out painted to match on elevations (LUC 3.5.1(1) Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/06/2012 11/0612012: Please call out the height of the building to the top of the building as well as the top of the parapet. While the drop ceiling can be at 14 feet. The actual roof should be at around 33 feet. LUC Section 3.5.3(C) states that false fronts or parapets are prohibited.