The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUNRISE RIDGE, FIRST FILING - PDP - 13-05A - CORRESPONDENCE -Number: 5 Created: 1 /5/2006 [3/7/06] [1/5/06] Need a note on the landscape plan regarding installation of landscaping prior to issuance of CO's 3.2.1(1)(4) 3-7-06 - 1 still don't see a landscape assurance note on the landscape plan Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. SinTcerely- Ted Shepard Chief Planner Page 5 Number: 7 Created: 1/18/2006 [3/14/06] Your response indicates that "we'd like to install improvements on our clients property only." and I think that is possible. Build the walk to the property line, then "straddle" the walk with the barricade on your property. Place the barricade a foot inside of the property line so that it remains on your parcel. It needs to be shown on the utility and site plans. [1/18/06] Please show a Type III barricade at the northern terminus of the sidewalk on Zeigler Rd. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 22 Created: 1 /27/2006 [3/17/06] This is needed before a hearing. [1 /27/06] Please provide a letter from the owners of the detention pond stating the modification and expansion of the pond is acceptable and also a maintenance agreement will be agreed upon in the future. Number: 24 Created: 1 /27/2006 [3/17/06] The drainage easements for the storm sewers on the lots need to be 20 feet wide unless it can be shown the pipe can be replaced within a narrower distance under OSHA guidelines. [1/27/06] For this case, the storm sewers in the lots are Ok due to the large size of the lots. Some thought needs to take place into exactly where the pipes should br placed. If fencing is to be allowed by the HOA, placing them 10 feet offset of the property line may be a better location. The storm sewers also need to be included in a drainage easement. Number: 25 Created: 1 /27/2006 [3/17/06) Repeat Comment. [1/27/061 Off -site drainage easements on the lot to the south, as well as on the property to the west are required. Letters of intent are required before a public hearing. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 4 Created: 1 /5/2006 [3/7/06] [1/5/06] Regarding note #21 in Conceptual Review Staff Comments. Lot number 7, the house will have to be setback at least 70 feet from the front property line in order to meet lot width requirements. See article 5 for the definition of Lot Width. Page 4 [1/31/06] Letters of intent are required from the Fossil Creek Inlet Ditch Company, the property owner to the south, and the Observatory Village (Willow Brook) development. Number: 42 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] Carried over for reference. [1/31/06] Carrying over a comment from conceptual, we'll need to discuss in the future the providing of funds in lieu of construction for Strauss Cabin Road along the +/- 580 feet of frontage. Number: 43 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] Carried over for reference and future discussion. [1/31/06] The construction of the sidewalk along the south side of Rock Creek Drive may be better to defer until the second filing to prevent possible issues with the second filing utility connections requiring work along Rock Creek Drive that would cause the sidewalk to be damaged. I am following up with internal City utilities to discuss this further. Should it be deemed appropriate to delay the construction of the sidewalk, the developer will still be obligated for the sidewalk adjacent to Tract A as the tract of land is undergoing development under 24-95 of the City Code. We would need to look at providing for funds in lieu of constructing the sidewalk in this location. Topic: Plat Number: 46 Created: 3/21 /2006 [3/21/061 Technical Services provided the following comments:\ 1. Boundary and legal close. 2. Bearing/distance on Lot 12 appears to be in the the wrong place. 3. Plat needs a note vacating the eisting easements on Tract 7" of the previous plat. 4. Control corner and outer boundary monuments are not described. 5. A curve table was not provided. 6. How were existing roads dedicated? 7. How wide is the additional right-of-way for Strauss Cabin Road? Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number: 6 Created: 1 /18/2006 [3/14/06] Your showing directional ramps, but they still do not create a crossing that is 90 degrees to the roadway. Refer to redlined utility plans (Sheet S1) for clarification. Add ramp locations to site and utility plans as well. Thanks. [1/18/06] Directional ramps need to be shown on site/utility plans at the crossings of Daylight Ct. and of Rock Creek Dr. at Strauss Cabin Rd. Also, if your going to show the as yet un-named street to Sunrise Ridge 2nd, there should be directional ramps indicated on that crossing (Sheet U1 of utility plans shows a portion of this extension). Page 3 Number: 40 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] Please overlay existing striping on the interim design plans to show how the patching proposed matches the striping. [1/31/06] There needs to be an "interim" design for Strauss Cabin Road to specify how the Rock Creek Drive improvements will tie into the existing road, how are the grades and spot elevations shown in this condition, how do flows end up being conveyed to the ditch, etc. Number: 41 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] The striping plan should be revised to reflect a left turn lane being provided and parking eliminated along Rock Creek Drive approaching the Strauss Cabin Road intersection. [1/31/06] Provide a striping plan. Number: 44 Created: 3/21 /2006 [3/21/06] The plans don't appear to clearly show the intent of providing sidewalk along Strauss Cabin Road abutting Lot 12. In discussion with Transportation Planning, the sidewalk should be provided at this time. In looking at the grading plan it is apparent that the sidewalk cannot be provided with the grades proposed.. Please address in the design how the sidewalk can be provided meeting standards at this time. Please note that even if the sidewalk were to be deferred at a later date the grading shown on the plans needs to be able to accommodate the future sidewalk. Number: 45 Created: 3/21 /2006 [3/21/06] Provided truncated dome details for the access ramps in accordance with LCUASS standards (can be done at time of final submittal). Topic:, General Number: 20 Created: 1/24/2006 [3/21/06] The construction drawings don't really appear to be showing these correctly as they are at a slight angle. The site and landscape plans still show ramps that lead to the corner of the intersection. [1/24/06] Access ramps are required to be "directional" and not lead to the middle of the intersection. The two intersections with Rock Creek Drive being T-intersections should each provide for a third access ramp across the street. At the intersection of Strauss Cabin Road, one access ramp will be theoretically needed on the east side of the street which requires one access ramp on the west side to split in two directions. Number: 33 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] Letters of intent were received from all previously mentioned parties except the property owner to the south. As I believe the property owner to the south is the developer, please just provide a letter indicating this for the record prior to hearing. Page 2 N L.L�; 'Wn- STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Citvof Fort Collins o�® KELLY SMITH Date: 03/23/2006 7890 PHEASANT RUN LANE WELLINGTON, CO 80549 Staff has reviewed your submittal for SUNRISE RIDGE, FIRST FILING, PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: Construction Drawings Number: 26 Created: 1/31/2006 [3/21/06] This appears to still be the case with A, Al, and A1-1. Couldn't re -grading occur to provide more fall on this storm line? If there is no alternative in meeting the standards a variance request is needed and we would likely look to using a concrete section for Rock Creek Drive from the future street heading south to Strauss Cabin Road. [1/31/06] There appears to be several storm sewer lines that have inadequate cover requirements over the proposed street grade. Number: 30 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] The diagonal tie in to the sewer line is problematic from a street cut repair standpoint, can the sewer tie in be done perpendicular to the street further north to minimize the impact to existing roads? If not, the diagonal patching does not meet street repair criteria. The City's Pavement Management Engineer would require in this case that the entire intersection be mill and inlaid. In doing so, street cut penalty fees (and the tripling of the fee for the pavement being less than 5 years old) would not be assessed. Otherwise the patching limits will need to be expanded from its current configuration and penalty fees would be levied. [1/31/06] With the offsite utility easement shown connecting to the Northern Lights Drive and Big Dipper Drive intersection being apparently done with this project, please specify patching limits for this work. An excavation permit along with street cut penalty fees would be required for this work. Number: 38 Created: 1 /31 /2006 [3/21/06] The variance requests submitted were approved as of this date. [1/31/06] Items 35-37 indicating where design requirements are not being met was discussed internally and variance requests to these designs were viewed favorably upon should a redesign not be pursued. Any such variance requests should be thoroughly prepared in accordance with our variance request submittal process rather than operating under an assumption that the requests will be automatically granted. Page 1