HomeMy WebLinkAboutLANDMARK APARTMENTS EXPANSION - PDP - PDP120031 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION• Claustrophobic
• Open land — Sprawling design
• Big windows to nature
• Density is high
7. Jonathon Feihmon — Fought grove to last breath
• Admits Arch
• Feels condo something between duplex and 3 story
8. Bob Hosanna — Neenan
• Building cost — Karen — yes cost estimate for scale project
• Could flat roof be an alternative?
• Bud — Flat could be acceptable
• Bob Hosanna inquired with Bud if a garage is an expectation of project
9. 1804 Wallsenburg — Colleen
• Flat roof doesn't fit neighborhood
10. Flat or low pitch would be better
• Apartments example around town
11. Amy — Post war architecture modest
12. 1601 Sheely — Veta Hoogstaad
• Feels look like ex apartments
• Concerned with height from first floor
Per Letters sent in:
• Lack of sensitivity to neighborhood
• Land cost is not met
• Look at past study "workbook"
• 3.4.7 Land code for historic compatibility
Slezak Historic District
• 11 individual houses
• Feb 15, 2000 none of the houses were 50 years old
• Per's 1998
• City of Fort Collins District — ordinance in 2000
o Up to City Council
o Doesn't have to be 50 years old
• 1" District recognized as a mid century H. District
#2594 LPC Commission
Historical Review
March 14, 2012
Pat Tvede — LPC member — neighbor around the corner
LPC Comments:
Frick — Good Start: 2003 study has site plan with many buildings and only 2 stores
• PT out — bigger buildings scattered parking
• Worried it is too intense for historical
• Reflect on 2003 site plan
• More articulation
• Past study is more detailed
Pat — Looks 1990's doesn't fit
• Too high
• Size is biggest concern from Bud and Pat
• We need to show sections from Sheely Drive to Hobbitt
• Does MMN allow duplex and triplex
Research right to views of a neighbor view/corridors
Bud — More articulation of the roof
Get dimensions of Sheely Houses composed to these
LPC has a subcommittee for review
Come back to LPC —April 11'h, 2012
Material for package & date from LPC — April 1, 2012 to Karen
Public Comments:
Neighbors
1. 1609 Sheely — Ruth
• Worried with 3 stories (Basements)
• Height is a worry
2. 1612 Sheely Drive — Rule Ralston
Height is a worry
• Property is separate from Landmark
• Shouldn't be part of Landmark
• Feels has more restrictions
4. 1608 Sheely — Deb
• 3 story is too big for neighborhood
• Doesn't 4 have large overhangs
• Doesn't meet their agreement
Jack — Height — Profit shouldn't 4 be a part of it
6. 1604 Sheely Dr. — Amy