HomeMy WebLinkAboutLARIMER COUNTY MIDPOINT CAMPUS EXPANSION - SPAR - SPA110002 - MINUTES/NOTES - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning & Zoning Board
July 21, 2011
Page 4
yes but not the trees at the end of the parking rows. Schmidt asked if this area was for impound vehicle
parking. Mills said no, the lot will more likely be used by employees. Mills said they were initially
planning 110 trees for the overall campus —there will be 7 less or 103 new trees planted.
Member Carpenter asked the City Forester speak to the health of the Crack Willow tree. Will it be there
for a while? Shepard said the Forester estimates this tree has at least 20 more years of very healthy life.
Member Lingle asked Shepard with regard to his memo, how should the Board handle it in the context of
a SPAR (Site Plan Advisory Review)? Lingle asked if the memo was to advise the Board of the
discussion versus making it a condition of approval. Shepard said this is an advisory review under state
statute —we technically don't have conditions of approval.
Member Schmidt asked if the triangle on the south was for detention. Shepard said that was storm water
detention.
Deputy City Attorney Daggett said her suggestion regarding the Crack Willow issue is if the County is
actually modifying its proposal, the Board could approve "as modified" by the County. Shepard said in
terms of it happening, we have a commitment from the team that it will happen. While the Board does
not have revised plans in front of them tonight; that's what staff would get with a subsequent submittal.
Schmidt said we could consider it modified.
Member Schmidt made a motion that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the
modified Larimer County Midpoint Campus Expansion — New Alternative Sentencing Department
Building, Sheriffs Office Addition, and Community Corrections Addition; Site Plan Advisory
Review, #SPA110002, as referenced in the July 21, 2011 Willow Tree Preservation agreement
memo and based on the Findings of Facts and Conclusions on page 7 of the staff report.
Member Lingle seconded the motion.
Member Lingle said he'd just like to thank the team for bringing forward a project that we can all support.
He also wanted to thank the County for their willingness to go back and address the problems that
predate everyone on this Board. He said he appreciates their efforts and looks forward to a continued
working relationship with the County.
The motion was passed 7:0.
Project: 2011 Annual Revisions, Clarifications and Additions to the Land Use Code
Project Description: This is a request for a Recommendation to City Council regarding the annual
update to the Land Use Code. There are proposed revisions, clarifications and
additions to the Code that address a variety of subject areas that have arisen since
the last update in 2010 and the revisions related to Plan Fort Collins in March of
2011.
Recommendation: Approval
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence
Chief Planner Ted Shepard said there are 25 proposed items that change, clarify or add to the Land Use
Code were brought to the Board at work sessions over the past several months. In the staff report, the
revisions, by Article, are summarized as follows:
Planning & Zoning Board
July 21, 2011
Page 3
Shepard said at the work session last Friday, staff talked about the concern of the City Forester with
regard to preserving the large Crack Willow Tree on the south end of the campus. He referred to a
memo dated July 21 that speaks to resolution of that issue. He said they've reviewed the proposal with
the consultants and the applicant and it seems to be moving forward very positively. He said they'll
probably address it in their presentation tonight and the information is offered for the Board's
consideration.
Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan Advisory Review for the Larimer County Midpoint Campus.
Expansion, New Alternative Sentencing Department Building, Sheriffs Office Addition and Community
Corrections Addition, #SPA110002.
Applicant's Presentation
Carr Bieker said he is an architect with the Architects' Studio. Joining him are also Michael Kirk, head of
Facilities for Larimer County; Paul Mills of Russell, Mills, landscape architecture; and Joe Delich, traffic
consultant.
Bieker described the master plan. He said the ASD (Alternative Sentencing Department) is the one new
50,000 plus square foot building. It's a non -secure facility that allows first time offenders (low security
risks) to maintain a job in the work release program. He said most participants spend an average of two
months there. Bieker said the program now operates Saturdays and Sundays and will also be moving to
a Wednesdays and Thursdays schedule with this expansion. He said the participants come in Saturday
to work, have dinner, and stay over one night. After their Sunday work day they go home. He said the
program currently operates out of ASU (Alternative Sentencing Unit) which is north of the main jail.
They're going to build the new ASD, move everyone from ASU to ASD and then renovate. Bieker said
the Sheriffs addition is simply expanding the facility for needed offices and training rooms. He said
Community Corrections is a small, 3,500 square foot addition to the office.
Bieker said the County has agreed to add sidewalks along Midpoint —making it continuous. They used
to be worried about security but the function makes more sense today. He said all has been carefully
orchestrated with the belief the plan will work for 15 years. By building the ASD facility as a separate,
self-contained facility; they can defer expansion of the main jail.
Bieker said the County's goal from a master plan perspective is to locate parking where it's not likely to
be built over. Bieker referred to the Crack Willow and the struggle they had with trying to work around it.
He said they are in agreement with what's being proposed.
Member Schmidt asked Bieker to speak to the County's need for parking and why they are unwilling at
first to give up 7 parking spaces. She asked how the parking would be used. Bieker said there's a net
gain of 75 cars. He said 40 of those parking spaces are for vehicles that have been impounded and
could be there for extended periods of time. The remainder is for the increase in alternative program
beds and for a number of Sheriffs Department cars, vans, and special vehicles that aren't used on a
daily basis. He said they don't expect this mix to significantly increase traffic on Midpoint Drive.
Public input
None
Member Schmidt asked Paul Mills to speak to the specifics of the compromise —where the Crack Willow
is located and where seven parking spaces will be created. Mills indicated it was half way along and
below the southern part of the new parking extension near the Sheriff's Building. He said the
compromise is they will remove a number of trees in the medians within that parking area to create
seven new parking spaces. Schmidt asked if the medians to the north would be going away. Mills said
Planning & Zoning Board
July 21, 2011
Page 2
sidewalks and enhancements to the water quality and stormwater system. The
site is -zoned E, Employment, I, Industrial and T, Transition and contains 35.8
acres.
There will be a total of 72,000 square feet of new building and additions and a total
Of 8,500 square feet of remodeled floor area.
.Recommendation: Approval
Hearing Testimony, Written Comments and Other Evidence
Chief Planner Ted Shepard, in his staff report, said since Larimer County is a political subdivision of the
State, the project is governed by the Site Plan Advisory Review process in accordance with the pertinent
State Statutes. The project's location, character and extent are found to be in compliance with the City's
comprehensive plan. Colorado Revised Statutes provide two specific references which allow the City to
review the planning and location of public facilities:
A. Section 22-32-124, C.R.S., as amended, addresses the right of the C.S.U. to construct
facilities within a municipality and the location or manner of construction of such schools.
The statutes specifically limit the municipalities' participation in the process to a limited
right of review and appeal to the C.S.U. Board of Governors.
Section 31-23-209, C.R.S. provides that no public building shall be constructed or
authorized in a city until the "location, character and extent thereof' has been submitted
for approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. In the case of disapproval, the Planning
and Zoning Board shall communicate its findings to the Board of County Commissioners.
The disapproval of the Planning and Zoning Board may be overruled by the Board of
County Commissioners by a vote of not less than two-thirds of its membership.
Under Section 31-23-209, C.R.S., the Planning and Zoning Board should make a finding as to the
location, character, and extent of the public building relative to the adopted Master Plan (City Plan) of the
City. Such findings help ensure that the proposed project conforms to the adopted plan of the City of
Fort Collins.
Also in the staff report, Shepard said a Transportation Impact Memorandum was provided. The primary
increases in traffic are related to an expanded video visitation system and an increase from 100 to 130
beds in the Alternative Sentencing Department. From a staffing perspective, the anticipated traffic
impact would be comparable to the existing condition as no new employees are expected as a result of
the campus expansion.
In reviewing the request for the Larimer County Midpoint Campus Expansion Site Plan Advisory Review,
Staff makes the following findings of fact:
A. The Site Plan Advisory Review complies with State Statute Section 31-23-209, C.R.S., in
that the location, character, and extent of the new public building, the two building
additions and associated site improvements conform to the adopted Master Plan (City
Plan) of the City of Fort Collins.
B. The Site Plan Advisory Review complies with the applicable General Development
Standards of Article Three and the zone district standards of Article Four.
Chair Stockover called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m.
Roll Call: Campana, Carpenter, Hatfield, Lingle, Schmidt, Smith, and Stockover
Staff Present: Dish, Daggett, Shepard, Virata, and Sanchez -Sprague
Agenda Review
Director Dish reviewed the agenda.
Citizen participation:
None
Chair Stockover asked if the Board was ready to act on the Consent Agenda as proposed.
Consent Agenda:
1. Minutes for the June 16, 2011 Planning & Zoning Board Hearings
Member Smith made a motion to approve the June 16, 2011 Hearing minutes. Member Schmidt
seconded the motion. The motion was approved 7:0.
Discussion Agenda:
2. Larimer County Midpoint Campus Expansion —New Alternative Sentencing Department Building,
Sheriffs Office Addition, and Community Corrections Addition; Site Plan Advisory Review,
#SPA110002
3. 2011 Annual Revisions, Clarifications and Additions to the Land Use Code
Project: Larimer County Midpoint Campus Expansion — New Alternative Sentencing
Department Building, Sheriff's Office Addition, and Community Corrections
Addition; Site Plan Advisory Review, #SPA110002
Project Description: This is a request to upgrade the existing Midpoint Campus by constructing a new,
53,500 square foot, and two-story building for the Alternative Sentencing
Department. Also, the existing Sheriffs Administration Building will be expanded
by 15,007 square feet, bringing the total up to 51,144 square feet. The existing
Community Corrections building will also be expanded by 3,500 square feet,
bringing the total up to 58,658 square feet. The existing Alternative Sentencing
Unit building will be remodeled for new functions. Finally, improvements to the
overall campus will include new parking spaces, new internal and external