HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEW PROSPECT - PDP - 4-10 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)Number: 94 Created: 4/2/2010
[4/2/10] Provide individual water/sewer services to each duplex unit on Lots 26 & 27.
Comments from Current Planning:
Since the Sight Distant Easement note is placed on both the Site and Landscape
Plans, it would be helpful to indicate the location of this easement on each of these
sheets.
2. As discussed, the five foot wide walkway connection to the Spring Creek Trail is
located very close to the property line of Lot 23. At minimum, this walk should be
pulled away from the property line by two feet. If this walk were public, this
distance would be referred to as the "shy distance." The separation is intended to
allow some clearance between the fence and bicycle handlebars or two adults
walking side -by -side. A better solution would be shift the walk even further away
from the property line. Otherwise, the owner of Lot 23 will ultimately build privacy
features that will clash with the three -rail pole fence specified for the southern
property line for Lots 23 — 25.
3. Do you want to consider specifying a common rear yard fence style for Lots 18 —
22? Otherwise, the image of the entire project may be impacted by inconsistent
fence styles. Please consider a five foot high shadowbox, or a five foot high solid
picket as an acceptable fence. If a six foot height is needed, please consider
allowing five feet to be solid but the upper one foot must be of an open weave or
trellis design.
4. On the Site and Landscape Plans, for Prospect Commons, please note that the
correct spelling is "Ukiah" and that the zoning is L-M-N.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely:
Ted Shepard
Chief Planner
Page 4
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Plat
Number: 89 Created: 3/31/2010
[3/31/101 Make easement lines along the 24-inch and 30-inch trunk sewers more distinct so
that potential buyers understand the impacts on the property.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 52 Created: 2/10/2010
[3/31/10] At final.
[2/10/10] Are the pipes and storm sewers sized for the 100-year storm? If not, a
conveyance needs to be designed for these flows to the detention pond including safely
conveying these flows and erosion protection.
Number: 54 Created: 2/10/2010
[3/31110] At final.
[2/10/10] The swales may erode the landscaped surfaces. Some have supercritical flow.
Number: 91 Created: 3/31/2010
[3/31/10] Stormwater is ready for a hearing.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water -Wastewater
Number: 21 Created: 2/9/2010
[3/31 /101
[2/9/10] Label length's of pipe between valves, fittings, etc.
Number: 22 Created: 2/9/2010
[3/31/10] Label west FH. Swivel tee at north FH is an 8x6 with an 8-inch GV to the SE.
[2/9/10] Label swivel tees, TB's and valves at the hydrant locations.
Number: 26 Created: 2/9/2010
[3/31/10] For consistency, show all water meters in pits. Remove inside set detail.
[2/9/10] Will these houses have basements? If not, add the detail for the 3/4-inch meter pit.
Water meters are not allowed in crawl spaces.
Number: 28
[3/31/10]
[2/9/10] Label locations of water main lowerings.
main and storm sewer.
Created: 2/9/2010
Provide details with elevations of water
Number: 88 Created: 3/31/2010
[3/31/10] Provide a x-section at north end of detention pond showing pond grading and the
24-inch and 30-inch trunk sewers.
Number: 90 Created: 3/31/2010
[3/31/10] The narrow lots do not provide adequate space for utilities, driveway, tree, etc.
Schedule a meeting of all involved to see if a solution can be found.
Page 3
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 93 Created: 4/1 /2010
STREET NAME: The street that lines up across Prospect Road is Ellis Street, not Ellis
Drive. Please correct all sheets to reflect the correct name: Ellis Street. (There's an Ellis
Drive on CSU campus and I don't want to create more confusion.) Also, thanks for general
notes 6, 8, 9 and 10 and for addressing all my comments.
Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 84 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] The landscape plan has minor line over text issues.
Topic: Plat
Number: 42 Created: 2/10/2010
[3/25/10] The boundary & legal close.
[2/10/10] The boundary & legal close.
Number: 79 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] Please add "City of Fort Collins" to the plat subtitle.
Number: 80 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] Please darken the easement lines on the subdivision plat.
Number: 81 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] The point of commencement is missing some text. (See plat)
Number: 82 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] Please add a dividing line between Ellis Street & Sprocket Drive. (See plat)
Number: 83 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] Please change Ellis Drive to Ellis Street.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 85 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] Sheets 3, 4, 6, 9 & 11 of the utility plans have line over text issues.
Number: 86 Created: 3/25/2010
[3/25/10] The wattle installation detail on sheet 6 of the utility plans has very small text. This
may not copy or scan well.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: F/oodp/ain
Number: 95 Created: 4/2/2010
[4/2/10] Please see redlines and checklist for all floodplain comments. Please contact the
floodplain administrator regarding the foundations of the structures within the floodplain.
Page 2
J
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Terence Hoagland Date: 4/5/2010
Vignette Studios
P.O. Box 1889
Fort Collins, CO 80522-1889
Staff has reviewed your submittal for NEW PROSPECT PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the
following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Topic: General
Number: 96 Created: 4/5/2010
[4/5/10] Engineering is ready for hearing with the cautionary note that lot lines may have to
adjust in Final Compliance if the utilities can not serve the narrow lot(s) as currently shown.
Number: 97 Created: 4/5/2010
[4/5/10] Detailed review and comments to follow in Final Compliance.
Number: 98 Created: 4/5/2010
[4/5/10] Please label "Private Drive" after the private drive street names on all plan sets.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 46 Created: 2/10/2010
[3/30/10] [2/10/10] Lot 26 has a street tree placed right at the edge of the driveway and
may cause a problem for the future homeowner. Other trees along the west side of the
private drive need to be placed further west to allow people to open their car doors.
Topic: Plat
Number: 63 Created: 2/17/2010
[3/30/10] (FC) It looks like the SDE is all offsite now that I see it on paper and just as John
explained on the phone. Should we label the SDE as "offsite, by separate document" for
clarity? Also, I might be blind, but I could not find the tract table stating who owns and
maintains the tracts.
[2/17/10] Please provide a tract table and remove the sight distance language if no SDE is
proposed.
Topic: Utility Plans
Number: 66 Created: 2/17/2010
[3/30/10] (FC) Any details that pertains to private improvements on private property, need
to be labeled as "private" or "on -site". This is to ensure that they won't be accidentally used
in public row. City details are to be used only for public improvements in public row.
[2/17/10] Please label all onsite details as "on site".
Number: 92 Created: 3/30/2010
[3/30/10] (FC) Please provide signature blocks on sheets 7 and 9.
Page 1