Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE DISTRICT @ CAMPUS WEST - PDP - PDP120003 - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/13/2012 03/13/2012: Replace the fire hydrant (to be relocated) at Blue Bell and Plum with a new hydrant. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 03/13/2012 03/13/2012: Connect the sewer service from Bldg 2 to the new manhole to be installed where the 8" service from Bldg 3 connects to the existing sewer. Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/14/2012 03/13/2012: (At final) 02/14/2012: Provide water service sizing calculations for the three buildings. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03113/2012 03/13/2012: It appears that an easement is needed for the fire hydrant at the northwest corner of the site. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416.2313, nbeals()fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/13/2012 2/13/2012 With 60 or more trees only 15% of total can be one specie. 3/12/2012 Tim Buchanan's (City Forester) has recommended to use the Swedish Columnar Aspen along the north side of the development being and ideal location for this speice. Therefore it is determined that though it exceeds the only 15% of one speice standard, it is deemed to be equally well to the standard. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/13/2012 Mechanical/utility equipment shall be screened/painted. Please indicated all such equipment on the plans, including in elevation drawings. 3/13/2012 The Final Development Plan's elevations and site plan shall include these items for review. Be sure to indicate heights of the parapet wall and the roof top equipment to be installed. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/13/2012 03/13/2012: Accessibility spaces are a requirement when development includes parking. At 495 vehicle spaces 9 are required to be Accessible. On sheet labeled Site Plan 2 Of 10 in the Project Parking table the Accessible requirement states zero when it should be nine. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford(a)fcgov.com Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/29/2012 02/29/2012: Existing ped and bike data used in the Existing AM and PM Shields and Plum intersection analysis does not correlate with the ped and bike count sheets. The east and west bound data is in error and the north and south bound ped and bike data is missing in the analysis sheets. Please revise the TIS. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/29/2012 03/01/2012: Please provide information on the number of bedrooms in the existing homes that are being replaced by this project. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle, 970.221.6197, emcardlet7a.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/0712012 03/12/2012: From the elevation you can't even see where this "Enhanced Transit Stop" is located, which makes me concerned about bus operators knowing that people are waiting. Please consider making this enhanced stop more prominant. The double entry way definitely doesn't indicate that this is a public use area. Is there a railing separating the steps next to the stop bench? 02107/2012: The bench is hidden from bus operators by the building. Please consider modifying the structure to allow for a line of site for bus operators and those waiting for the bus. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/12/2012 03/12/2012: Please designate the area used for this stop as a pedestrian access easement on the plat. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221.6854, rbuffington aRfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/14/2012 03/13/2012: 02/14/2012: Provide notes outlining how the water and sewer mains in Daisy and Columbine are to be abandoned. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/14/2012 03/13/2012: 02/14/2012: See redlines for other comments. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/13/2012 03/13/2012: Install manholes where 8" sewer services connect to existing sewer. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/13/2012 03/13/2012: Replace existing brick manhole where 8" sewer service from Bldg 1 connects to existing sewer at Daisy and Plum. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icounty(a)fcgov.com Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 27 03/14/2012: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/17/2012 03/14/2012: The subdivision plat boundaries & legals close. 02/17/2012: The subdivision plat boundaries & legals close. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/17/2012 02/17/2012: Are there any lienholders? If so, please add the signature block. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: All easements must be locatable. Sheet 3 is missing all dimensions for the private drainage easements. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: No comments. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970.221.6820, wstanfordnn fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/01/2012 02/29/2012: Please revise the following portion of note 11. , part C of the Construction Notes to read, " ...performed by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer or their designate." This will be a permanent change to that note for future reference. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/01/2012 02/29/2012: Please revise Note 6 and Note 14, Part C of the Construction Notes to state the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer where it currently states the City of Fort Collins Engineer. This will be a permanent change to those notes. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012 03/19/2012: Please remove the crosswalks crossing Plum and across Astor and Bluebell and the private driveway. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/01/2012 02129/2012: Please add the following language to the Landscape Notes: "Street landscaping, including street trees shall be selected and maintained in accordance with all City Codes and Policies." Topic: Traffic Impact Study Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416-2418, wlamarque(Mcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/14/2012 02114/2012: All of the drainage infrastructure, SOPs, etc. that is being designed by others will need to be reviewed and accepted during the final compliance stage and before signing of mylars. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/16/2012 02/16/2012: At final there will be many drainage design details that will need to be designed and reviewed including the outlet works for the detention planters, proportionate area to the detention planters, and the parking garage detention system. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/16/2012 02/16/2012: Drainage easements are required for the planter detention areas. The detention area in the parking garage will be discussed in the development agreement. The City is still deciding what the best options are for securing perpetual compliance for the garage detention. We welcome any suggestions from the applicant. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, jcounty&fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 02/17/2012 03/14/2012: There is still a line over text issue on sheet 10 of 10. 02/1712012: There is a line over text issue on sheet 10 of 10. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/1712012 03/14/2012: The E1/4 Corner description on sheet C000 still does not match the description on the Subdivision Plat. 02/17/2012: There is some confusion with the coordinate control on sheet C000. It doesn't match the information shown on the subdivision plat. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: The north arrow on sheet C502 is pointing the wrong direction. Topic: Easements Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: There is a typo in the legal and on the sketch for the Daisy Street ROW vacation. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: The exhibit legal for the boundaries close. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 29 03/14/2012: No comments. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 Department: PFA Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970.221.6635, rgonzalesopoudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: The building address for each one is required to be visible from the street fronting the property. Minimum 6-inch numerals are required to be posted on a contrasting background for visibility. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02110/2012: The water supply for this project will be 1500 gpm at 20 psi; with hydrant spacing of 300 feet to the building and on 600 foot centers thereafter. These distances are to be measured as the hose would lay, not as the crow Flies. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: Because calcium hypochlorite > 50% = a Class 3 oxidizer, the normal quantity limit is 10 Lbs. However, because this product is utilized for swimming pool maintenance quantity limit is increased to no more than 200 Ibs maximum when storage containers and the manner of storage is approved. Please provide a storage plan for approval if 11-200 Ibs is to be stored, or 10 Ibs will be the limit without an approved plan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: All fire appurtenances shown in the courtyards, including the bar-b-q area shall be at least 10 feet away from any combustible surfaces; and there shall not be any wood or charcoal allowed to be stored and/or burned. Wood is problematic for storage, embers, cooling, disposal of hot embers in ash, and the production of smoke. All fire appliances shall only be gas -fired, with natural gas preferred over propane. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/16/2012 02/16/2012: Because this project is a multi -story, multi -family comples it is imperative that the fire department standard width of 30-feet for a 3 or more story edifice be provided throughout. Please contact Ron Gonzales, Assistant Fire Marshal of the Poudre Fire Authority at 970-219-5316 if further details are needed. Comment Number: 9. Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: The testing of all buildings is required to determine whether a radio amplification system is necessary for enhanced fire department communications within and outside of the edifices. This will be a part of the development agreement. Comment Number: 10. Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: Because this is a multi -family, multi -story building, it is imperative that Comment #8 is followed through and shown to be available on the civil drawings. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargueng.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/14/2012 02/14/2012: The planters which have 2 feet of quantity detention depth are draining through the media which may burden the media and increase clogging. The extra detention depth should have its own outlet works to avoid draining through the media. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan(a)fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans 5. Please add the following landscape note: The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartine( fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02106/2012: The developer will need to coordinate power requirements and electric utility charges with Light & Power Engineering (970-221-6700). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: Light & Power Engineering will need a 1-line diagram of each electric service in order to design the electric utility system. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/06/2012 02/06/2012: The method of metering the electricity for the fire pump needs to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering early in the building design process. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 03/06/2012 03/06/2012: After the site plan is final, please send an AutoCad 2008 drawing to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: PFA Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970.221.6635, ronzales .poudre•fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02110/2012: This will be a fully fire sprinklered (NFPA 13) project due to reduced access. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: Buildings 4 or more stories in height require a standpipe system. This system shall provide a minimum of 100 psi at the heightest point of the system. Therefore, a properly sized UL listed fire pump will be required to augment the additional pressure required of the highest standpipe of each edifice. One master pump will suffice for the campus provided the volumes and pressures are available. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/10/2012 02/10/2012: The PFA anticipates conflict with other vehicles utilizing the Emergency Accessment Easement; i.e. trash and garage traffic. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan(ofcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 0211512012: The District at Campus West Forestry Comments 2-15-12 These Forestry comments are offered: 1. The applicant should contact the City Forester for a second walk through for a review of the existing trees now shown to be retained. This review could determine if there will be any construction impacts that would limit proposed tree retention or if any tree qualities need further review. 2. Tree condition information reviewed in the first walk through can be added to the inventory and mitigation table. 3. Tree Selection Choices: a. Tower Popular unfortunately is prone to many insect and diseases. This vulnerability has resulted in a rating of do not plant the Front Range Recommended Tree List. Swedish . Columnar Aspen could be a good substitution for the Tower Popular. b. Lanceleaf Cotton woods are used along the north perimeter in the 10 foot bed by rather high buildings. Lanceleaf cottonwood has a large mature size and broader mature canopy. In this smaller area near the buildings Crimson spire Oak could be a good choice. Its tight pyramidal form could function in this area. c. European Fastigiate Hornbeam has a good shape for the north perimeter bed. Some designers prefer to use smaller quantities in anticipation of the occasional freeze damage that may occur. Since conifer trees are not used in the north perimeter bed perhaps one of the upright cultivars of Rocky Mountain Juniper could be considered in this area area. d. In the narrow parkway along Bluebell the more upright growing Ivory Silk Tree Lilac would require less pruning than the broader Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn. This change is preferred by Forestry. c. If incorporating a red flowering crabapple with a narrower crown form is to be considered in certain areas, particularly close to buildings, to contrast with the Spring Snow Crabs than Red Barron or Thunderchild are cultivars to consider. 4. Placing trees along the north perimeter as far away from the buildings as possible will help reduce pruning and other conflicts. Explore planting tree close to the property line to help provide separation. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchananlafcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012 03/19/2012: Forestry Comments 3-19-12 The following comments are offered. 1. Swedish Columnar Aspen are used along the north wall. Forestry had discussed the use of this tree with the applicant. The Quantity proposed is 34, which is higher than the 15% species diversity for a project with this many trees. Forestry has reviewed other upright columnar trees that may work in this area. The following two could possibly be considered for this area, and could generally have better adaptability to growing in a shade location. Corinthian Linden Tilia cordata 'Corinthian' Compact pyramid formal shape created by uniform spacing of limbs around straight central leader, dense branching, lustrous dark green leaves, leaves smaller, thicker and more lustrous than species, Height 45' by width 15'. (Dirr, Manual of Woody Landscape Plants) Crimson Sentry Norway Maple Narrow upright habit. Red -purple summer foliage proceeded by greenish -yellow flowers in early spring. Prefers well -drained soils and regular moisture. Makes a colorful accent for small gardens. Height 30'-35' Width 12-15' (Descriptive Guide, Fort Collins Wholesale Nursery 5th edition) 2. Aerial evaluation by a qualified and certified arborist would determine if the trees to retain have any structural limitations at this stage of the project. 3. Will the street trees along City park Drive and Blue Bell street have tree grates? If so what is the size of the sidewalk cut out? Topic: Landscape Plans Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221.6567, mvirata(@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 03/14/2012: Carried over for reference. Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 02/15/2012: Encroachment permits for the private utility lines that cross right-of-way would ultimately need to be issued from Engineering Inspection. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 03/14/2012: Discussion on Thursday concluded that an access ramp across Plum Street at Aster Street is no longer needed. The access ramp crossing at Bluebell Street will suffice given the close proximity between the two streets and additionally, it appears constructing a required receiving ramp on the south side of Plum Street could potentially be difficult with existing constraints (trees and inlet). 02/15/2012: With the reconstruction of Aster Street, an access ramp should be provided facing south that allows for promoting the crossing of Plum Street. This appears to have been provided in the previous application submittal. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: In checking with Joe Olson, City Traffic Engineer, the striped crosswalk across Plum Street at Bluebell Street should not be installed with the project as proposed. This may be installed in the future by the City upon understanding of how pedestrian traffic functions in the area. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 03/15/2012 03/15/2012: A receiving access ramp on the south side of Plum Street at the Bluebell Street intersection needs to be provided and indicated on the drawings prior to a public hearing. This access ramp will need to meet City/ADA requirements. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03114/2012: The "private drainage easements" delineated throughout the plat will need to presumably be called out in the certificate of dedication as an exception to the "Easements" that the Owner is conveying to the City. Some description of the "private drainage easements" identifying the grantee of the easement and responsibilities pertaining to the easement should also be indicated. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: I've confirmed with the City Attorney's Office that a Transit Easement should be provided on the plat for the area identified as a transit stop as it provides needed specificity on the City's ability for placement of a transit stop which is less clear in a typical "access easement" designation. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224.6143, lex ,fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 02103/2012: No comments. Comment Originated: 02/03/2012 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970.221.6567, mvirata(a.fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 03/14/2012: This comment is considered unresolved with the understanding that detail review and comment is intended for after a hearing for the project. 02/15/2012: The variance requests regarding the street grade, cross slope, and pipe cover concerns are undergoing evaluation at this time and a response will be provided separately. Please note however that the last review for the previous iteration of the project had brought up the potential of using concrete streets as an option to help mitigate some of these concerns (including on Plum Street itself) and may need to be explored with this project. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 03/14/2012: As perhaps a comment for after a public hearing, the flowline information for Plum Street indicates that the flowline grade across Bluebell Street is not meeting the minimum .5% flowline grade. We'll want to look at options that lessen flowline grades on one or both sides of Bluebell Street in order to have the flowline grade on across Bluebell Street be at or above .5%. In our view the grade across Bluebell meeting standards is more critical than outside of the intersection where vehicular traffic does not cross the flowline. 02/15/2012: A profile of the north flowline of Plum Street should be provided to ascertain flowline grade and general drainage for the area along Plum Street. It was identified in the previous iteration that concerns regarding drainage exist, including the grade across Bluebell Street which appears to be at about .3% across the intersection. Intersection detail spot elevations should also be provided for this analysis on Plum with Aster and Bluebell. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/15/2012 03/14/2012: I'll defer to Transfort on the acceptability of the latest design. 02/15/2012: The bus bay design does not meet the standard prescribed in detail 711 of LCUASS. The width of the bus bay from the face of curb to the flowline of Plum Street is required per this standard to be 11 feet when 9 feet appears to be provided. Additionally, the transition lengths leading in and out from the through movement of Plum Street is required to be 60 feet but are in effect 24 feet here. This item should be documented in a variance request; if this design is agreed to by Transit, then I suspect the modified design would be viewed favorably. (I noticed Transfort's comments in the system, it appear they will require some changes to the transition lengths, I'm still pending a response from them on the bus bay width). Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: Please provide and define the western boundary of City Park Avenue on the construction plan sheets. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/14/2012 03/14/2012: With the apparent proposal to have the bus pull out in concrete and with a cross slope along Plum directed towards the centerline, please provide cross section information at time of final for its design, showing for instance whether a cross pan type cross section is maintained. In addition please provide a concrete jointing pattem. Topic: General Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970.221.6343, tshepard(a.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02119/2012: Current Planning supports the adjustments to the widths of parkways and sidewalks offered by Engineering. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: On the landscape plan, please label the "Enhanced Transit Stop Pull -in." Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02119/2012: On the architectural elevations, in order to match the project narrative with the character elevations, please provide a cornice detail, with dimensions. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/1912012: On the architectural elevations, it is unclear as to the exterior material for the ground floor elevation for Building Two. Is this material to be different from stone? Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: On the architectural elevations, please indicate the depth of the balconies. Staff would be concerned if these balconies were merely of the "Juliet' variety. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: Staff is concerned about the present depiction of the north character elevation of the parking structure. In the middle, there is a considerable gap in the deployment of masonry. The use of the masonry materials should be consistent across the entire north elevation. And, there appears to be no cornice treatment. Please note that Section 3.5.3(D)(6) requires the structure to have a recognizable top. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02119/2012: Based on the Lighting Plan, there appears to be no lighting on the top deck of the parking structure, unless the top deck is covered. If covered, then there are no lighting issues. If uncovered, however, the lighting details need to be provided. Such lighting must be strategically located to avoid light spillover to the north. House -side shields may be needed. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: On the Lighting Plan, on sheet 7 of 10, please provide a schedule for the specifications of the proposed fixtures. Also, please note that the photometric plan must be calibrated such that the light loss factor is 1.00. If not done so already, this may require re -submitting the photometric so that it is properly calibrated. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012:The request for four -bedroom units per Section 3.8.16 is acceptable. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02119/2012: Significant progress has been made since the early submittal from 2011. The submittal documents are very organized and complete. Please refer to the redlined plan set for other minor comments. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: MarcVirata, 970.221.6567, mviratacDfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Fort Collins c March 20, 2012 Linda Ripley Ripley Design, Inc. 401 W. Mountain Ave. #100 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: The District at Campus West, PDP120003, Round Number 2 Community Development and Neighborhood services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224,6134 - fax tcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Ted Shepard, 970.221.6343, tsheparcl(Mcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: Building Two contains two distinct uses, dwelling units and structured parking. Therefore, it is a mixed -use building and would be subject to the build -to line requirements per Section 3.5.3 rather than the residential setback requirements of Section 3.5.2. The same could be said for Building One as it contains the clubhouse and amenities in addition to dwelling units. Perhaps the leasing office could be added in order to strengthen the mix. Therefore, as with Building Two, Building One is subject to the build -to line and not the setback line. Building Three, however, appears to contain dwelling units only and, therefore, would be subject to the setback standards and the proposed Modification to Section 3.5.2. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/19/2012 02/19/2012: Regarding the Request for Modification for Building Three to Section 3.5.2, it appears that the most valid justification is the equal -to -or -better -than criterion of Section 2.8.2(H) (1). In your analysis, under justification number four, regarding the invisible right-of-way line, this justification should be moved under the aforementioned criterion. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/1912012 02/19/2012: On the site plan, a connection to the north is indicated at the north terminus of the access drive to the parking structure. This connnection is laudable. Could you please provide information as to what this connection ties into on the Sunstone side of the property line.