HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUCKING HORSE FIRST FILING - PDP - PDP120010 - CORRESPONDENCE -utilities
C'}` ,
electric • stormwater . wastewater . water
Of
Fort
700 Wood St.
PO Box 580
Collins
Fort Collins, CO 80522
For
970.221.6700
970.221.6619 fax . 970.224.6003 Too
utilities@fcgov.com . fcgov.com/utilities
Water Conservation Standards for Landscapes
COMMENT SHEET
Project Name: ? 0Lrr� \'� � / P-sl
Date of Review: l 1,6 2
Reviewed By: Eric Olson, Water Conservation Coordinator, 221-6704
I have reviewed this landscape plan and it does not comply with the standards marked below.
Landscape Plan Requirements
O Accurate and clear identification of all applicable hydrozones using the following
categories:
High Hydrozone: 18 gallons/s.f./season
Moderate Hydrozone: 10 gallons/s.f./season
Low Hydrozone: 3 gallons/s.f./season
Very Low Hydrozone: 0 gallons/s.f./season
_ Plants have been selected from the City of Fort Collins Plant Lisp
F—t,9S�t� Ste - MPoL)sy o,
O A Water Budget Chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not exceed fifteen
(15) gallons per square foot over the site, including all hydrozones used on the landscape
plan.
O A General Note: An irrigation plan is required to be submitted to and approved by Fort
Collins Utilities prior to the issuance of the building permit, in accordance with the Land
Use Code Section 3.2.1.J requirements.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/26/2012
04/26/2012: LUC 4.28(E)(2)(a) Requires that Child Care Centers meet the standards of section
3.5.3
LUC 3.5.3(13)(2)(a) & (b) Build to lines: if a parcel, lot or tract has multiple streets, then the
building shall be built to at least two of them, the building shall be locted no more than fifteen
feet from the adjoining right-of-way. A modification will be necessary to setback the Child care
center from the Timberline Ave.
LUC 3.5.3(C) Requires Variation in Massing
LUC 3.5.3(D) Standards for Character and Image, the new building should include predominant
charctereristics shared by all buildings in the development.
LUC 3.5.3(D)(2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) Standards for Facades (base/tops), Entrances, and
Awnings.
LUC
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 04/26/2012
04/26/2012: Outlot B property line runs along two walls of a structure. It is not encouraged to
create a property line immediately along a wall of a building. It is recommended at least a five ft
setback along the building.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 04/27/2012
04127/2012: LUC 3.2.5 & 3.5.1(1) Trash/Recycling enclosures shall be on a cement concrete
pad, designed with a walk-in access without having to open the main service gate, and set
back twenty ft from a public sidewalk
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221-6854, rbuf5ngton(Mcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/30/2012: Bucking Horse Townhomes (BHTH): A meeting with PFA is needed to discuss fire
hydrant locations and the need for hydrants slong the interior drives.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHTH: Schedule meeting to review alignments of sanitary sewers in relationship
to landscaping and required separation distances
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHTH: Install water mains and sanitary sewers in steel casing at all locations
where these lines are crossing below a storm sewer 24" or larger.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHTH: Show water and sanitary sewer mains and services on the landscape
plans and adjust plantings to provide the required separation distances.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: JFAV: Show utility easements on the plat.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416.2313, nbeals(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/26/2012
04/26/2012: Need elevations for all buildings (3-plex, 5-plex, 6-plex, the other industrial
building, the other commercial building, the child care center, entrance to wine cave,
trash/recylcing enclosures)
Elevations of the industrial building include the loading dock area.
All elevations should include preliminary locations of mechanical/utility equipment with a note
on how such equipment should be screened/painted.
The names of the buildings on the site plan need to be consistent with the names of the
buildings on the elevations.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/26/2012
04/2612012: Please show on the plans in a table how parking/bicycling requirements are
being met.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 04/26/2012
04/26/2012: LUC 4.28(E)(2)(c) In the industrial zone district New building color shades shall be
neutral, with a medium or dark color range, and not white, bright or reflective.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970.221-6854, rbuffington(alfcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: Bucking
Horse Residences (BHR): The overall utility plans appear to show drive
locations; however, drives are not included on the plat for Sidehill 2nd Filing. In addition, the
drive locations for
some lots do not align with the building envelops. Please clarify.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
The heavy phasing lines are covering some notes and symbols on the
overall water plan.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
Maintain 10 foot separation between water mains and all sewers (sanitary
and storm). (Noticed on Cutting Horse Drive.)
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
Install water mains and sanitary sewers in steel casing at all locations where
these lines are crossing
below a storm sewer 24" or larger.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
Re -align storm sewers to cross water and sanitary at right angles (+/-).
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/3012012: BHR:
Lowering table on Sht 61 contains more lowering that labeled on water
plans. Schedule meeting to review and clarify.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
Underdrain detail shows 1 foot separation between bottom of sanitary and
top of underdrain.
Why are profiles generally showing in excess of 2 feet of separation?
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR:
Update Standard Details.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated:
04/30/2012
04/30/2012: BHR: See redlined utility plans for other comments.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/3012012: Jessup Farm Artisan Village (JFAV): Will Pads 2 and 3 in Lot 2 and Pad 4 in Lot 1
need water and sewer service?
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/30/2012: JFAV: Can the two fire hydrants in Lot 1 be switched to the other side of the drive
to avoid crossing the sewer?
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/30/2012: JFAV: What are the plans for water and sewer service to Pads 4 through 8 in Lot
2?
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/30/2012: JFAV: Are there any irrigation taps planned?
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, Icounty(a)fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 55 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please correct Sandbur Drive on sheet 2. Sandbur is one word.
Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please adjust curve labels to appropriate sides of curves.
Comment Number: 57 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please add graphical tie information to the Basis of Bearings.
Comment Number: 58
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please provide monument records for all public land corners per
Development Review Submittal requirement 3(v).
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 59 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHFF - The legal description on the cover sheet doesn't describe what is shown
on the plans.
Comment Number: 60 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHFF - There are line over text issues on sheets LS100, LS101 & LS102.
Comment Number: 61 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The legal descriptions on the cover sheet & sheet LS100 don't match the
subdivision plat.
Comment Number: 62 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The cover sheet index doesn't match sheet LS100.
Comment Number: 63 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are line over text issues on sheets LS101, LS102 & LS103.
Comment Number: 64 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT -There are text over text issues on sheet LS102.
Comment Number: 65 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - There are line over text issues on sheets LS401 & LS403.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970.221.6704, eolsonofcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/27/2012
04/27/2012: Per Eric Olson, Russian Sage is no longer on the City of Fort Collins allowed plant
list. Please revise landscape plan.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221.6854, rbuffington(&fcgov.com
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icountvCD.fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 39
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please correct the typos in the legal description.
Comment Number: 40
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
0510912012: BHT - Please state the scale that the scale bar is showing.
Comment Number: 41
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Where there any found pins?
Comment Number: 42
Comment Originated:
05/0912012
05109/2012: BHT - Please correct the sub -title. This is in the west half of Section 20.
Comment Number: 43
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please show the adjoining street right of way, and how it was dedicated.
Comment Number: 44
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please dimension all property lines.
Comment Number: 45
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please label all blocks.
Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please label all tracts, and show their use.
Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 05/0912012
05/09/2012: BHT - All existing & proposed easements must be locatable.
Comment Number: 48
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHT - Please reference the all adjoining subdivision plats.
Comment Number: 49
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are line over text issues on sheets 1 & 2.
Comment Number: 50
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are text over text issues on sheet 2.
Comment Number: 51
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please change the vicinity map to match the boundaries being replatted.
Comment Number: 52
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHT - All text should be oriented so that it is read from the bottom of the page.
Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05109/2012: BHT - Please add ownership & maintenance for all Tracts per Development
Review Submittal requirement 3(e).
Comment Number: 54 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - Please cite the development agreement and/or other documents affecting
use of the property.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, jcountvna fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please revise general note #5, providing use, ownership & maintainance
of Tracts per Development Review Submittal requirement 3(e).
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please correct the typo in general note #6.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHJF - Where there any found pins?
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please change the vicinity map on sheet 2 to match the boundary.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please show the adjoining street right of way, and how it was dedicated.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please reference the all adjoining subdivision plats.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please dimension all property lines.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please increase the text size of the right of way widths.
Comment Number: 31
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please dimension the waterline easement shown at the
north end of the
property. All easements existing & proposed must be locatable.
Comment Number: 32
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please show all building envelope dimensions.
Comment Number: 33
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please tie all building envelopes to the outer boundary.
Comment Number: 34
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - All text should be oriented so that it is read from the bottom of the page.
Comment Number: 35
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please make all size & thickness of text consistent.
Comment Number: 36
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please state the scale that the scale bar is showing.
Comment Number: 37
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please provide monument records for all public land corners per
Development Review Submittal requirement 3(v).
Comment Number: 38
Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The boundary & legal close.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, icounty(cbfcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 7
05/09/2012: BHR - Please add ownership & maintenance for all Tracts.
Comment Number: 8
05/09/2012: BHR - Where there any found pins?
Comment Number: 9
05/09/2012: BHR - Please add a definition of the 9' UE.
Comment Number: 10
05/09/2012: BHR - Please state the scale that the scale bar is showing.
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - We recommend that the lot lines be straight lines not curved. This is not
required.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - Please show how all right of ways were dedicated.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - Please reference the all adjoining subdivision plats.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - Please darken the linework for the Sidehill - Filing Two.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - Please provide monument records for all public land corners per
Development Review Submittal requirement 3(v).
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - The legal description does not match sheet 2.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05109/2012: BHJF - A closure was not done on the legal description or the boundary.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please correct the typos in the sub -title.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please correct the typos in the legal description.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHJF - The acrage in the legal description does not match the acreage shown on
sheet 2.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHJF - Please add "Basis of Bearings" to general note #3.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHJF - Please cite the development agreement and/or other documents affecting
use of the property.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, jcountyCcDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/08/2012
05/08/2012: For clarity each project will be referenced as the following. Bucking Horse
Residences will be BHR, Bucking Horse - Jessup Farm Artisan Village will be BHJF, Bucking
Horse - Townhomes will be BHT, and Bucking Hore First Filing will be BHFF.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 66 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHFF - The legal description on the cover sheet doesn't describe what is shown
on the plans.
Comment Number: 67 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHFF - There are line over text issues on sheets LP101 & LP102.
Comment Number: 68 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHT - The legal description on the cover sheet doesn't match the subdivision plat.
Comment Number: 69 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are line over text issues on sheets LP101, LP102, LP103 & LP104.
Comment Number: 70 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - There are line over text issues on sheets LP401 & LP402.
Comment Number: 71 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - There are text over text issues on sheets LP403, LP404 & LP405.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 77 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The details on sheets L101, L102 & L103 are hard to read. Please increase
the size.
Comment Number: 78 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05109/2012: BHJF -There are line over text issues on sheet L101.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/08/2012
05/08/2012: BHR - The boundary & legal close.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/08/2012
05/0812012: BHR - Please change all lot lines to solid linetype.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/08/2012
05/08/2012: BHR - Please add a curve table.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - Please correct the typo in the legal description.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05109/2012: BHR - Please cite the development agreement and/or other documents affecting
use of the property.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221-6588, icountvCD.fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 81
05/09/2012: BHR - There are line over text issues on many sheets.
Comment Number: 82
05/0912012: BHR - There are text over text issues on many sheets.
Comment Number: 83
05/09/2012: BHR - There is cut off text on sheets 18, 29 & 61.
Comment Number: 84
05/09/2012: BHR - Could sheet 28 be enlarged?
Comment Number: 85
05/0912012: BHR - There is an incorrect matchline number on sheet 50.
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Number: 86 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - There is a typo in the legal description on sheet CS1.
Comment Number: 87 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHJF - There is a typo in the contact information, under Surveyor on sheet CS1.
Comment Number: 88 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHJF - The benchmark descriptions are incomplete on sheet CS2.
Comment Number: 89 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHT - The legal description on sheet CS1 doesn't match the subdivision plat.
Comment Number: 90 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The sheet index on sheet CS1 doesn't match sheet DR1.
Comment Number: 91 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There is a typo in the legal description on sheet CS1.
Comment Number: 92 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The benchmark descriptions are incomplete on sheet CS2.
Comment Number: 93 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - The details on sheets EC2 is hard to read. Please increase the size.
Comment Number: 94 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are line over text issues on sheets HC1, HC2, HC3, G1, G2 & G3.
Comment Number: 95 Comment Originated:
05109/2012
05/09/2012: BHT - There are text over text issues on sheets HC2 & HC3.
Comment Number: 96 Comment Originated:
05/09/2012
05/0912012: BHT - There is an incorrect matchline number on sheet G3.
Topic: General
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: Please provide a drainage summary describing any changes to the original
design of Sidehill, Filing 2 and confirm that this PDP is in conformance with City criteria.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: Please document all flows from Jessup Farm (north and south) and confirm that
these flows are either less than historic or adequate conveyance is provided.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/04/2012
05/04/2012: Please provide 10 feet of separation between the storm sewer and the trash
enclosure located in the townhome area.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 05/0412012
05/04/2012: If grading is changed in the single family portion of this PDP, reanalysis of the
storm water infrastructure may be required. This could include street capacity, inlet sizing, etc.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/04/2012
05/04/2012: At final compliance stage, review of all hydraulics and detailed grading will take
place.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, jcountvOfcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 72
05/09/2012: BHT - No comments.
Comment Number: 73
05/09/2012: BHJF - There is a typo on sheet PDP 4.
Comment Number: 74
05/09/2012: BHJF - Please add "Elevation" to sheets PDP 5 -11.
Comment Number: 75
05/09/2012: BHJF - There are typos on sheet PDP 7.
Comment Number: 76
05/09/2012: BHJF - There are line over text issues on sheet PDP 9.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 79
05/09/2012: BHR - The legal description doesn't match the subdivision plat.
Comment Number: 80
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/0912012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: BHR - There are problems with the benchmarks on sheets 1 & 2. Please contact
Technical Services @ 221-6588 for a current copy of the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control
Network.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221-6361, tbuchanan(rDfcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: The landscape architect should schedule a meeting with the City Forester to
discuss species choices for street trees on these three projects.
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Josh Weinberg, 970.221-6206, iweinberg(rDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comments are pending
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartine(cDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Originated: 05/01/2012
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: The private drives - plus 8 ft. on each side - in the townhouse area need to be
utility easements. A utility coordination meeting is encouraged for this portion. Please contact
Doug Martine in Light & Power Engineering (224-6152) if any questions.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: The E-W storm drains shown on both sides of Sanbur Dr. at Timberline will need to
be placed elsewhere to make room for existing and planned electric utility facilities between
the sidewalk and curb.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: After the plans are final and approved, an AutoCad (v. 2008) of the site plans for
the townhouse and artisian village areas will need to be sent to Terry Cox at
TCOX@FCGOV.COM.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: The utility plans for the single family residences area does not show the locations
of the water stop boxes or water meter pits. The water stop boxes must be within 2 feet of the
back of the easement line, and the water meter pits just beyond the easement line.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: There is an existing electric vault and streetlight on the north side of Scarecrow
Rd., approximately 400 ft. south of Nancy Gray that appears to be in the driveway. Relocation
of these facilities will be necessary at the expense of the developer. The estimated cost of
relocation is about $6000.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 04/18/2012
04/18/2012: A copy of the landscape plans showing existing and planned streetlights has been
sent to Russell+Mills Studios. Street tree locations will need to be adjusted to provide 40 ft. of
clearance between the streetlight standards and shade type street trees (15 ft. to ornamental
type trees).
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tuchanan@fcaov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: Evergreen trees are not shown on the preliminary landscape plans. Explore
adding them in appropriate areas to add tree diversity and interest.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: Please add these notes to the landscape plans landscape.
• The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly
loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be thoroughly
incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling,
discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment
per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area.
• A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on
this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones
between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the
location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or
relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy.
• The developer shall contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the
completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as shown
on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final approval of
each phase. Failure to obtain approval by the City Forester for street trees in a phase shall
result in a hold on certificate of occupancy for future phases of the development.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: The number of mitigation trees required for each significant tree being remove
should be added to the labeled descriptions on Sheet LP401 and LP402.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012:: Add street trees between the sidewalk and curb along Timberline north of Nancy
Gray. As slope increases in the parkway to the north it may be difficult to include street trees.
Explore if this is possible or if back of walk street trees would be more suitable in this section.
City Forester is available to discuss best placement in this area.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: If there are any dead existing street trees in the parkway on Timberline by Bucking
Horse Town Homes they should be identified and noted form replacement.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: Ornamental trees are shown as symbols on the townhome site but are not identified
as to species on the Preliminary plan.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: Final landscape plans should incorporate the species diversity requirements in
3.2.1.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221-6603, agingerich(&fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - In some locations conflicting line bearings were found, line over text, text
cutoff by viewports and labels on top of each other.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Provide curve table on plat sheet and adjust north arrow.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - Per previous discussions regarding the Bucking Horse ODP amendment
the north access of the Jessup Farms Artisan Village should be removed. The current
proposed access road will need to be revised to provide adequate turn around. Provide a
revised Traffic Impact Study evaluating the proposed south accesses onto Timberline Road.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - The width of Scarecrow Road entrance north of Blackbird should be the
same width as the entrance to the south (30' FL -FL). Scarecrow does not need to continue as
30' but should be widened at the intersection of Blackbird to allow for less congestion,
improved intersection alignment, improved turning movements and more room for truck turning
radius.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224.6143, lexOfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/30/2012
04/30/2012: Based on the discussion during the ODP review last week, staff has reviewed the
ECS where numerous resources were originally documented (2001) on the site. Based on a
discussion with the appilcant and their site visit with their ecological consultant, these resources
no longer exist. Please provide a memo to me, from your ecological consultant, detailing the
site visit dates and what was/was not observed on the site. After I receive this memo, it would
be good to schedule a site visit to confirm these findings and to officially determine that Section
3.4.1 of the Land Use Code does not apply to this project.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchananna.fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/09/2012
05/09/2012: Mitigation trees need to be upsized and shown on final landscape plan.
Canopy Shade Trees 3.0 inch caliper
Ornamental Trees 2.5 inch caliper
Conifer trees 8 feet height
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerichCcDfcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Street and base linework appears to be missing from Storm Profile sheet
29.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05102/2012: BHR - Storm Plan and Profiles #2 and #3 are missing from sheet 31.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05102/2012: BHR - Utility easements are being called our on street plan and profile sheets but
the linework for the easements appears to be turned off.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/0212012: All projects - JFAV = JESSUP FARMS ARTISAN VILLAGE, BHTH = BUCKING
HORSE TOWNHOMES, BHR = BUCKING HORSE RESIDENCES. Its engineering
understanding that next submittal will have all three plans combined into one plan. For this
reason the cover sheets, notes and details were not fully reviewed as they will all most likely
be changing as the plans are combined.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: All projects - Sight distances shall comply with Figure 7-16 of LCUASS and if
easements are required than the site distance triangle easements need to be provided on the
plat
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: All projects - Replace "Local Entity" with "City of Fort Collins" in all notes.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - All sheets; most sheets contained double text, text and linework shaded
back too much, viewports cutting off text, and line over text conflicts.
Comment Number: 31
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Slope and grade break information needs to be provided in conjunction
with the vertical curve crest and sag information that was shown on the street plan and profile
sheets.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - Label tracts on the plat in accordance with note 5 of the cover sheet.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - Appears there is missing dimensions, curve and line text, tract labels, and
block labels.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - All sheets; label tracts, easements, and right of way.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221.6603, agingerich@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - On sheet U1 it appears that a storm sewer line exists beneath a trash
enclosure. If this is the intent then coordinate with Storm Water Department to ensure they are
comfortable with this layout.
Comment Number: 16
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - Per Fig. 7-17 of LCUASS the minimum vertical crest curve length for a
Local design speed of 30 mph is approximately 90 feet. The curve lengths shown on
Scarecrow are 75 feet.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - Sidewalk along Scarecrow Road should maintain a 2% cross slope at the
townhome driveway entrances. Since the private drives do not have curb and gutter it is
unlikely that directional ramps will be need at these crossings, however, is your intent to still
use truncated domes? A specific callout to the driveway detail intended at these crossings
should be included.
Comment Number: 16
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - Section 9.3.2.0 of LCUASS requires that driveway entrances be a
minimum of 28 feet wide when serving more than 12 multi -family dwelling units. The entrances
onto Scarecrow will need to meet this requirement and than can be tapered back down to the
20' width as proposed.
Comment Number: 19
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - Existing contours should be extended 50' past project limits to
demonstrate how proposed grading will tie onsite and any impacts to offsite or neighboring
parcels.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Revise the project site boundaries on the vicinity map.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Show linework for easements on overall utility plan.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - Show stationing for the Sanitary Plan and Profile sheets in the plan view.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - It appears that in numerous locations manholes exist near curb and gutter. It
should be noted that manhole covers are not permitted within curb and gutter.
Comment Number: 26
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05102/2012: BHR - Existing contours should be extended 50' past project limits to demonstrate
how proposed grading will tie onsite and any impacts to offsite or neighboring parcels
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHR - The scale on the overall erosion control plan appears to be too large which
results in the overall plan being very difficult to read and follow. Please revise.
City Of
Fort Collins
May 10, 2012
Craig Russell
Russell + Mills Studios
141 S. College Ave., Suite 104
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: Bucking Horse, First Filing, PDP120010, Round Number 1
Community Development and
Neighborhood services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins. CO 80522
970.221.6760
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/deve/opmentreview
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your
submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the
individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or
tshepard@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221.6603, agingerich(Dfcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - Provide concrete all the way back to right of way on driveway entrance at
the intersection of Scarecrow Road and Blackbird Drive.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: JFAV - No more than 750 square feet may drain from a private driveway into a
public street. It appears that a large volume of water is being directed down Scarecrow Road
and into Blackbird Drive. This will need to be addressed with inlets and/or sidewalk chases,
etc.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - Ensure that the entrance driveways into the Townhomes are at a minimum
+/-10 degrees from perpendicular for a minimum of 25 feet behind the flowline of Scarecrow
Road.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - On the Utility plan please show the size of proposed sanitary sewer lines.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/02/2012
05/02/2012: BHTH - It is assumed that the plat is dedicating a blanket utility and access
easement however it was unclear as the Tracts didn't appear to be labeled. If a blanket utility
easement is not intended then all proposed easements will need to be shown on the Utility
Plan.