HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCINTYRE HOUSE (137 & 143 MATHEWS ST.) - PDP/APU - PDP120007 - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington(a)_fcgov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: Include the necessary easements on the plat to alllow the respective owners to
maintain their portions of the water and sewer service lines.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: Show the water and sewer servicesfor the two units.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(cDfcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012
03/19/2012: The site plan needs to match the Plat. Resubmit an updated site plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012
03/19/2012: On the site plan the names of the buildings on the south side and north side of the
subject property does not match up with the names provided in the narrative attached to the
application. Please verify the correct names and make sure the documents are consistent with
each other.
Comment. Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/19/2012
03/19/2012: With this application it is unclear if the request for modification is included. As
stated in the conceptual review comments a modification is needed for minimum lot width
requirement.
Department: Light And Por.,;r
Contact: Justin Fields, 970-224-6150, jfields(a�fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: The electric line will need to be located and shown in a utility easement on the
plat. The easement should be six feet wide, with three feet on each side of the electric line.
Department: PFA
Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970-221.6635, rgonzales(a)poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1. Comment Originated: 03/27/2012
03/27/2012: There shall be NO bar-b-q grilling on the wooden deck -gas or wood of any kind.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 10
03/29/2012: Please add a north arrow to the plan.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
03/29/2012: The Subdivision Plat boundary & legal close.
Comment Number: 2
03/29/2012: Please correct the square feet/acres for lot 1.
Comment Number: 3
03/29/2012: Please add a scale to the scale bar.
Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: Please show how the right of way of Mathews Street & the alley were dedicated.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: The Private Access Easements are not large enough to accommodate all of the
sidewalk shown on the Site Plan.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: Please correct the Subdivision name in the title commitment notes.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: - The Basis Of Bearings statement is not in accordance with State Board Rule 6.8.
Comment Number: 8 ' Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: There is a typo in the Basis Of Bearings statement.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012
03/29/2012: The proposed lot line shown is not consistent with the Subdivision Plat.
Department: Engineering Dt.elopment Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata(a)fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: Please coordinate the same title on all the documents. The plat uses "Seaser
Subdivision" while the site plan uses "137 Matthews Remodel" and internally the City is using
"McIntyre House"
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: Will this proposal require a building permit/certificate of occupancy? If so, I'll need
to inquire of Engineering Inspection on the condition of some of the sidewalk along Remington
Street for verification of the condition and whether this proposal would need to repair/replace
this infrastructure. The unusual sidewalk "dip" along the south boundary of the property which
appears to be mainly "needed" due to the property to the south is of particular question.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: Please clarify the existing and proposed improvements along the abutting alley.
I'm assuming that the existing garages are intended to remain with new carports added. Is the
concrete parking pad for each carport considered existing or proposed?
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated, 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: The plat language has been updated. Please provide the more updated certificate
of dedication, repair and maintenance language. The private access easement indication on
the plat would need to called out as an exception in the certificate of dedication to the
easements being dedicated to the City.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: The plat should be reflecting a 9' utility easement behind the right-of-way along
Mathews Street and 6' (8' is the typical but appears to be impacted by the garages) utility
easement along the alley. If the utility providers are not seeking these dedications in
conjunction with this review, then this comment wouldn't need to apply.
Department: Historical Preservation
Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416-2283, clevingston(&fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: Historic Preservation is in support of this request for an addition of premitted use,
as this with further the viability of this highly significant National Register and Local Landmark
eligible property. The applicant has worked very closely with the Landmark Preservation
Commission on his rehabilitation of the building. t Nbj\)1i& c,� �Z F, fiacF ps N,s TM
Topic: Landscape Plans "VVA6,PQ5 ae Tgeq-Ugneri"' t-A%
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 04/04/2012
04/04/2012: Landscape plans should reflect historic plantings, rather than non -historic species.
Please contact Karen McWilliams for more information.
(2) Such use comurms to the basic characteristics of the zone oistrict and the other permitted
uses in the zone district to which it is added;
(3) Such use does not create any more offensive noise, vibration, dust, heat, smoke, odor,
glare or other objectionable influences or any more traffic hazards, traffic generation or
attraction, adverse environmental impacts, adverse impacts on public or quasi -public facilities,
utilities or services, adverse effect on public health, safety, morals or aesthetics, or other
adverse impacts of development, than the amount normally resulting from the other permitted
uses listed in the zone district to which it is added;
(4) Such use is compatible with the other listed permitted uses in the zone district to which it is
added;
(5) Such use is not a medical marijuana dispensary or a medical marijuana cultivation facility;
And;
Comply with Section 3.5.1, Building and Project Compatibility.
And;
The Planning and Zoning Board finds that the proposal is not detrimental to the public good.
(Type II)
In order to process the request of a plat and an addition of a use a Project Development Plan
(PDP) is required.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: Please see the City's approved plant list for allowable varieties.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
V 04/03/2012: Please label applicable hydrozones (3.2(E)(3)(a).
Topic: Modification of Standard
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: A request for a Modification of Standards (2.8) is required due to a proposed lot
smaller than the zone district minimum:
N-C-B Land Use Standards (4.9(D))
(1) Density:
Proposed: lot 1: 6,991 SF; lot 2: 3,154 SF, required 5,000 SF min
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: A request for a Modification of Standards (4.9(D)(6)) Minimum lot width:
Proposed: lot 1: 31'6"; lot 2: 168"; required: 40'
Topic: Site Plan
voor Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012:' Please provide total floor area as calculated according to 4.9(D), for the entire lot
and the rear one-half.rV
'ice
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: The site plan shows a box with an ' X' in relation to the "1' trellis overhang" at the
rear outside parking spaces. The applicant has informed us that the "trellis overhang" is no
longer part of the plan. Please remove this from the revised submittal.
City of-
FortCollins a
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentreview
April 04, 2012
Rayno Seaser
719 BREAKWATER DR
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: McIntyre House - 137 Mathews St. PDP with Addition of a Permitted Use, PDP120007.
This is a request to replat the existing 10,145 sq. ft. lot containing a 3,485 sq. ft. residential duplex building,
create a new lot line that would run through the middle of the building, resulting in a separation of the duplex
into two, single family attached residences. The two proposed lot sizes are 6,997 square feet (lot 1), and
3,154 square feet (lot 2). A 2-hour firewall has been constructed between the two dwellings to meet building
code for single family attached residences. The lot line division will designate individual lots for each
dwelling. A request for an Addition of a Permitted use accompanies this replat. A duplex on one lot is
allowed in the NCB, Neighborhood Conservation Buffer zone district, single family attached dwellings with
their own lot lines, are currently not an allowed use. Please see the following summary of comments from
City staff and outside reviewing agencies for yoursubmittal of the above referenced project. If you have
questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Seth Lorson, at 970-224-6189 or slorson@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Seth Lorson, slorson fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/03/2012
04/03/2012: Dwelling, single-family attached is not permitted in the N-C-B (4.9) zone district.
fS Therefore an Addition of Permitted Use (1.3.4) is required.
In order to approve the addition of Dwelling, single-family attached to this site in the N C B Real, �E
zone district, the proposal must conform to the following conditions: tom"
(1) Such use is appropriate in the zone district to which it is added;