Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHICKORY COMMONS - PDP - PDP110005 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS (7)Department: Transportation Planning Contact: MattWempe, 970-416.2040, mwemae(a)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/05/2011 04/05/2011: Hickory Street is classified as a collector on the Master Street Plan. Right-of-way and design must follow the collector standards in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221.6854, rbuffington(a)fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 08/28/2012: 04/17/2012: 04/12/2011: At final, provide profile of sanitary sewer. Comment Number: 6 08/28/2012: 04/17/2012: 04/12/2011: Show all water valves. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/12/2011 Comment Originated: 04/12/2011 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012 08/28/2012: 04/18/2012: A utility coordination meeting is STRONGLY encouraged. There doesn't appear to be enough space for the dry utilities. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, *county@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 23 08/28/2012: There are line over text issues on sheet C3. Comment Number: 24 08/28/2012: Please mask all text in the profiles on sheets C6 & C9. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 19 08/28/2012: There are line over text issues on sheet 3. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 21 08/28/2012: No comments. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 16 08/28/2012: The boundary & legal description close. Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 08/28/2012: Please clarify the easements shown. There are multiple easements with the same use. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/17/2012 O8/28/2012: This has not been corrected. Please show the easements as they are on the subdivision plat. 04/17/2012: The easements on sheet 2 are incorrectly labelled. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 08/28/2012: Please remove "PDP" from the project title on sheet 1. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Matt Wempe, 970.416.2040, mwempe(a)fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/05/2011 04/05/2011: The individual unit sidewalk connections to the Hickory Trail spur will not be allowed. However, the two group connections (in between Buildings 3 and 4 and on the south side of Building 4) are ideal. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/05/2011 04/05/2011: Where will bicycle parking be located, and how much will be provided? The idea location is a hard surface, well -lit, near business entrances, secure, and protected from the elements. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamaroue(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/12/2011 04/20/2012: This can be finalized during the final compliance stage. 04112/2011: Please show drainage sub -basins on the drainage plan as well as a basin and pond summary table. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/13/2011 04/20/2012: Off -site water from the west needs to pass through the site. The sidewalk right on the property line does not allow for this. Conveyance needs to be provided along this property line directly these flows to the south. The off -site flows need to be quantified as well. 04/13/2011: Please include more detailed grading of the lots to the west of the site in order to make sure the fill for this site will not block existing off -site drainage and describe how these lots drain in the text of the drainage report. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/17/2012 04/17/2012: Detention in parking lots or driving lanes are allowed up to one foot of depth. This detention pond is proposing depths much greater. The detention area as proposed does not meet this important criteria Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/17/2012 04/17/2012: The detention pond does not meet our Detention Pond Landscape Standards with the large retaining wall surrounding 3 sides of the pond. This needs to be revised as well. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/20/2012 04/20/2012: The detention calculations show more detention than is required. I calculate .543 ac-ft of quantity detention plus the water quality volume for a total of .601 ac-ft of volume required. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/20/2012 04/20/2012: If a lower outfall was provided for this site, the detention and grading difficulties would be greatly improved. Coordinating an outfall with the Natural Resources department is suggested. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/20/2012 04/20/2012: Grading along the eastern side of the property shows that flows will be directed to the property to the east and not into the detention pond. These flows need to be directed to the detention pond. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221.6588, icountv(o.fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 08/28/2012: We were not routed these plans, and will need to see them next review. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 08/28/2012 08/28/2012: The sheet title "cover" is missing a "r" on sheet C1. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224-6152, dmartine(a)fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/29/2011 08/14/2012: Clarification --> Due to tight space availability, before it can be confirmed that installation of electric utility facilities is possible, Light & Power Engineering will need to know specifics of the power requirements. This includes if electric space heating (discouraged) is requested and how "live/work unit" impacts the electric service. A utility coordination meeting is encouraged. 03/29/2011: It is difficult to locate the electric (and gas) meters on the buildings, especially Bldg. #2. It is also unknown how "Live/Work Unit" impacts the electric service needs. In order to design the electric utility system, a utility coordination meeting is necessary. Depending on the power requirements to each building, other facilities such as water meter locations may need to be adjusted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 08/14/2012: Clarification --> Water meter pits need to be relocated to the property side of the easement, with the water stop boxes located in the easement, but within 2 ft. of the back of the easement. 04/10/2012: Water service stop boxes need to be 2' away from the back of the easement line. Also, the water meters need to be on the property side of the easement line in order to provide space for electric facilities Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/14/2012 08/14/2012: Specifics of methods to screen electric facilities and meters will need to be coordinated with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700). Department: Park Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingston(a.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/25/2012 04/25/2012: Please contact Helen Matson 221-6276, hmatson@fcgov.com, in Real Estate services regarding a construction and maintenance easement on City property. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamargue(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 04/17/2012: Need to see easement. Comment Originated: 04/12/2011 04112/2011: The off -site easement in the Natural Area was for just the property's drainage to the east. This development will need to obtain their own permission and easement. Please contact Daylan Figgs at 416-2814 for more information. Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218-2932, jschlam(a)fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 08/23/2012: e) The following standard erosion and sediment control notes: 1. The City Stormwater Department erosion control inspector must be notified at least 24 hours prior to any construction on this site. 2. All required BMPs shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activity (stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc). All of their required erosion control measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence as indicated in the approved project schedule, construction plans, and erosion control report., 3. Pre -disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible. Removal or disturbance of existing vegetation shall be limited to the area required for immediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical period of time. 4. All soils exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control is installed. No soils in areas outside project street rights of way shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) is installed, unless otherwise approved by the Stormwater Department. 5. The property must be watered and maintained at all times during construction activities so as to prevent wind -caused erosion. All land disturbing activities shall be immediately discontinued when fugitive dust impacts adjacent properties, as determined by the City Engineering Department. 6. All temporary (structural) erosion control measures must be inspected and repaired or reconstructed as necessary after each runoff event and every 14 days in order to assure continued performance of their intended function. All retained sediments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall be removed and disposed of in a manner and location so as not to cause their release into any drainageway. 7. No soil stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. All soil stockpiles shall be protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and perimeter silt fencing. Any soil stockpile remaining after 30 days shall be seeded and mulched. 8. City Ordinance prohibits the tracking, dropping, or depositing of soils or any other material onto city streets by or from any vehicle. Any inadvertent deposited material shall be cleaned immediately by the contractor. 9. Additional notes can (should) be added to reflect the erosion/sediment control plan of the individual development. "'There SHOULD be more than just these bare minimums. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224-6152, dmartineofcgov.com Topic: General Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, ischlam fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 08/23/2012: a) Standard and job -specific construction details of erosion and sediment control measures, and standard and job specific erosion and sediment control notes. These should not just be the standard notes block as added below, but should be intensified to describe the more important details from the Erosion Control Report. Remember, what is written here is what gets read by the contractor, and is easily referred back to when questions arise. b) List vegetative specifications from this Manual if standard vegetation is to be used. Include alternate specifications and justification if they are to be used. Please don't ask to reference Landscape plan, this should encompass a short but thorough description of any temporary or permanent seeding BMPs, it would also be great to show the location of these BMPs on the'fiatwork', or 'vertical construction' sections of the. sequence plans as these are the most ideal times to install these BMPs. c) List structural specifications from this Manual if standards are to be used. Include other specifications and justifications if they are to be used. 'This Manual' refers back to the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Vol. 3. d) A construction detail for all proposed construction BMPs. Emphasis on detail for ALL construction BMPs, both: structural and non-structural, temporary and permanent. These details should clearly explain installation requirements to guarantee correct application of the BMP and these should clearly explain the maintenance requirements of these BMP as to correctly take care of these BMPs (There should also be clear description of how to identify when a BMP needs to be replaced due to 'wear and tear' and 'weathering'.) Permanent BMPs like Detention Facilities, or Stormceptors, should include maintenance requirements for after construction, that can be used to help prevent future problems to the effectiveness of the BMP. 7 Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, jschlam(afcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 08/23/2012: The construction sequence must include at least the following: These are to help with the sequence charts and descriptions, not the sequence plans. 1. Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures 2. Sequence of all land disturbing activity . 3. Drainage facility construction 4. Sediment basins, temporary channel stabilization 5. Seeding 6. Mulching 7. Required maintenance activities (e.g. expected frequency of sediment pond cleaning, after -storm checks of all BMPs, etc.) e. Erosion control security calculations. The Erosion Control Drawing must contain or comply with the following: The Erosion Control Drawing should be the multiple page sequence plan. The Erosion Control Drawing must use same base used for drainage study. The erosion and sediment control plan may be combined with the grading plan, providing all the required information can be shown, and the combined plan is not so cluttered with information that all the elements cannot be readily seen and deciphered. All drawings must be twenty-two by thirty-four (2204) inches in size. A General Location Map shall be provided in sufficient detail to identify drainage flow entering and leaving the development and general drainage patterns. The map should be at a scale of 1" = 1000' to 1" = 8000' and show the path of all drainage from the upper end of any off -site basins to major drainage ways. The map must identify any major construction (i.e., development, irrigation ditches, existing detention facilities, culverts, storm sewers) along the entire path of drainage. Basins and divides are to be identified and topographic contours are to be included. The Erosion Control Plan drawings of the proposed development or redevelopment must have a scale of 1" = 20' to 1" = 200' on 22" x 34" drawings. These are clear enough but it says here that it may be combined with grading, it is a wise suggestion not to clutter the erosion control drawings with too much information. a Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218-2932, ischlam(a)fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control inlet structures or watercourses. 13. Other areas or procedures where potential spills can occur. This might be where groundwater and stormwater dewatering practices would be described. "*Note, there should be a detail sheet of all the employed BMPs included in this section"* Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: O8/23/2012 For the establishment of dryland vegetation, the discussion must include soil types, seed mix, soil amendments, and mulches. These are just one form of practices used to achieve final stabilization, please describe any other final stabilization practices used on the site in this section. d. Detailed sequence of construction activities must be submitted as part of the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan identifies the sequence for all the major construction and erosion and sediment control activities, including overlot grading, soil and aggregate stockpiling, construction of permanent drainage facilities, and maintenance activities. The construction sequence will be used as a basis for inspection of construction sites for compliance with the erosion and sediment control plan. This is a sequence of construction activities chart and or descriptions to be included in the report itself. The sequencing plan must clearly indicate the timing, extent and location where temporary BMP measures are installed and/or removed, depending on the type of construction activities undertaken, e.g. site grading, utilities installation, paving, flatwork, or vertical construction. This is actually multiple pages of drawings that show progressive stages of the construction site, as construction proceeds over time. The examples provided, are not necessarily the only way to divide the evolution of erosion control needs on site, but are a good starting point. The main focus here is to show the inspector and the site SWMP Administrator the exact placement of BMPs as the site is being built out overtime. This should help provide an idea to the contractors that these BMPs are not a simple setup at the beginning and take down at the end. Erosion Controls need to be dynamic as a site evolves. Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218.2932, ischlam(@.fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 ii.) Identification of Potential Pollutant Sources: Identify and describe sources that may contribute pollutants to runoff, and provide means of control through BMP selection and implementation. At a minimum, evaluate each of the following potential sources of pollution: (these are not the only sources, please add any that apply) 1. All disturbed and stored soils; Provide the area disturbed and location of the stockpile, along with the other structural and non structural practices to minimize erosion and sediment transportation. 2. Vehicle tracking of sediments; This is a major potential pollution source and should identify a very detailed management control, not just a tracking pad. Examples are sweeping and scraping activities, as well as identifying and protecting the closest inlet to the tracking location, other examples could be, minimizing site access, street sweeping, gravel parking, paved area restriction for vehicles, wash racks, education, etc... 3. Management of contaminated soils; Identify if there are any contaminated soils and where they are located, stored and disposed of. 4. Loading and unloading operations; Describe the site's traffic operations and any steps taken to minimize the movement of soil from the site. i.e. having contractors parking on sidewalks as opposed to on the lot itself. 5.Outdoor storage activities (building materials, fertilizers, chemicals, etc.); Describe cleanup procedures and possible secondary BMPs that could be applied to the storing of materials. 6. Vehicle and equipment maintenance and fueling; Describe procedures that deal with repairing equipment in the least detrimental way possible while on site. 7. Significant dust or particulate generating processes; Describe the processes that will be used to minimize the dust or other particulates from being released into the air. 8. Routine maintenance activities involving fertilizers, pesticides, detergents, fuels, solvents, oils, etc; Describe the maintenance procedures that deal with possible pollutants in the least detrimental way possible while on site. 9.On-site waste management practices (waste piles, liquid wastes, dumpsters, etc.); Provide the location of the waste material stockpile and possible BMPs to be used; these should be located a minimum of 50ft from any inlet structures or watercourses. 10. Concrete truck/equipment washing, including the concrete truck chute and associated fixtures and equipment; Provide the location of washouts and describe the BMPs to be used to eliminate possible pollutants from leaving the site, these too should be located at least 50ft from any inlet structures or watercourses. 11. Dedicated asphalt and concrete batch plants; If there is not to be one of these plants on site, clearly say there is no batch plant on site. 12. Non -industrial waste sources such as worker trash and portable toilets; and Provide the location of these sources; these too MUST be located a minimum of 50ft from any Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218.2932, ischlamna.fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 b. Stormwater Management Controls: Include a description of all stormwater management controls that will be implemented as part of the construction activity to control pollutants in stormwater discharges. The appropriateness and priorities of stormwater management controls should reflect the potential pollutant sources identified at the facility. The description of stormwater management controls should address the following components, at a minimum: i.) Identify SWMP Administrator: Identify a specific individual(s), position, or title that is responsible for developing, implementing, maintaining, and revising the SWMP. This designated individual(s) should address all aspects of the facility's SWMP. (This should include the responsible parties for all 4 of the SWMP needs, but the maintenance is a must for communicating immediate correction to the site, including phone, fax, address, and/or email.) Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970.218.2932, ischlam(a)fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 08/2312012: 1 read through your "erosion control report" and your "erosion control plan" neither one addresses the submittal needs for our requirements. Please read the attachment to meet the report and plan requirements. Let me know if you have any questions. The attached document should help you get through the requirements fairly simply. The black text is what is written in the code, and the blue are comments and suggestions to make clear what is asked in the code. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/23/2012 08/23/2012: Re: Erosion Control Report and Drawings Requirements Accompanying Document This document was created to help engineers and other design staff to better understand, meet and exceed the erosion control requirements listed in the "Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual". The following portion of the document has the exact code that was recently passed by Ordinance No. 174, 2011. The "black standard type", is the code word for word, and the accompanying comments, written in "blue and italicized type" is to explain a simplified version of what is expected from the code. Following these comments should facilitate the quicker process of the material and having the materials accepted by the city in order to start building soon. Volume 3, Chapter 7 1.3.3 PDP Erosion Control Report and Drawings Submittal Requirements with Comments Erosion Control Report and Plans are required at time of PDP Submittal. (Both documents MUST be submitted) The Erosion Control Report must contain or comply with the following: a. A written analysis of the area proposed for construction in reference to developed conditions, rainfall erodibility, and proposed rainfall erosion and sediment control methods. Control of rainfall erosion and sediment transport shall be analyzed in a manner that clearly demonstrates an understanding of how temporary and permanent mitigation methods will be used, including a discussion of the timing of construction phases and the sequential installation of all erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) proposed in the plan. (This section will focus on clearly defining the prior conditions of the site and to clearly define the nature and purpose of the construction activities that will be occurring on site: the description should be well detailed and very site specific; including such details as existing percent vegetation ground cover; estimates of total area of the site; estimates of expected disturbed area by clearing, excavating, grading; and outlining the closest receiving waters of the state and the path of travel to those waters. Also the phasing and sequential installation should encompass a detailed explanation of the phasing choices along with how these choices will minimize sediment transportation. This is also the section to disclose any anticipated allowable sources of non stormwater discharges, or any other existing relevant data (i.e. soil boringllab tests/groundwater levels) to the site.) IV Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221.6603, agingerich(ED ov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012 8/27/2012: What point of coordination are these discussions at? Will you be able to obtain a letter of understanding from the Parks Department at this point? 04/18/2012: The grading contours tie into existing on the adjacent trail parcel to the east. Please discuss with Parks department in regards to grading on their parcel and/or obtaining an easement or agreement and specific language may need to be added to the development agreement. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/2912012: Please reconsider the easements shown on the plat for drainage, utility and access. There appears to be redundancy overlapping of easements. Would it not still serve the same intent if the "utility easement" was removed from the center drive aisle and the Emergency access, access, utility and drainage easement was revised to be only "emergency access easement". Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221.6361, tbuchanan(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/15/2011 04/15/2011: Landscape note number 11 should clarify that the native seed would receive temporary irrigation but the trees and other plants that are in the native seed area will permanent automatic irrigation such as drip or bubler. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/18/2012 04/18/2012: Autumn Blaze maple is not adapted to Fort Collins Soils. The City Forester recommends that another more suited shade tree species be selected. Comment Number: 3 04/1812012: Please add these landscape notes. Comment Originated: 04/18/2012 A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy. Department: Internal Services Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218.2932, ischlam(fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221.6603, agingerich@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: What is the intent for emergency access? The easement appears to extend to Hemlock Right of Way but it is unclear how access would be taken in this location. C5 shows driveway approaches but site plan and landscape drawings show landscaping and no connection. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: Note 13 on sheet C5 declares that onsite contours are 2-foot contours, however the contours shown on the plan appear to be 1-foot contours. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08129/2012: Sheet C5, the storm drain pipe that extends to OS1 basin does not appear to show an inlet, FES, etc.? How is OS1 draining into this pipe? Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/12/2011 8/2712012; As discussed the sidewalks will be allowed as shown on site plan and utility plans. However, engineering requests that a variance request be prepared stating the reasons why the sidewalk will be attached on east side and detached on west side and it's location citing; landscaping, waterline, road taper, etc. 4/17/2012; Still Applicable; Sidewalks in this location should be detached, please reference "Type 1" in detail callout on Sheet C4 and show sidewalk detached along frontage. 4/12/2011: Where the sidewalk along Hickory crosses the proposed drive entrance, the ramps must be directional ADA ramps. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/17/2012 O8/27/2012: A 9' utility easement along Hemlock is shown on the plat but not shown on the utility plans. Please remove the note on sheet C3 directing dry utilities to be placed in the Right of Way. The applicant may coordinate with the dry utility companies to place them in this location but engineering can not support a note directing them to do such. 04/17/2012: Show utility easement along Hemlock right of way on utility sheet. The retaining wall appears to be located within proposed utility easement. Utility companies may need to be re-routed plans for any comments associated with retaining wall and fill within utility easement. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 04/17/2012 8/27/2012: This note needs to be revised to state "designed with consideration to 337 Hickory plans..." and remove the "based upon approved 337 plans". Also add something along the lines of the contractor should reference the 337 plans during construction and if 337 is under construction at the same time then the contractors shall coordinate. 04/17/2012: Note 1 of Sheet C7 may need to be revised to address the current state of 337 Hickory improvements. This note speaks to both projects being under construction at the same time. It may be better served to note that contractor shall review 337 plans to ensure improvements are constructed in conjunction with each other. f Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416-2283,--cleVingston(a).fcgov.com Topic: General V Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 O8/2912012: Staff has concerns about the adequacy of the parking of this development. While it meets the residential requirements, some of the uses proposed and their parking needs lack congruency. Could a situation arise that a resident lives in the unit but rents out the work space or vice versa? This scenario could cause parking deficiencies and staff is concerned about compatibility. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: How will truck and other vehicular noise be mitigated with the residential component. With the multitude of uses in the work section, and some of those uses lending to large loading trucks, this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: How is it insured that this development does not turn into all defacto multifamily units with no viable "work" component? Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: In terms of trash and recycling, staff views this project on par with multifamily, and a centralized trash and recycling area needs to be included per LUC 3.2.5. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: The loading dock should be screened and landscapped. Please see LUC 3.5.1(1) (2) Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 O8/29/2012: An irrigation plan is required prior to issuance of a building permit. Please coordinate with Eric Olson in Utilities. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: Provide a table detailing compliance with LUC 3.2.2. (M)(1) Parking lot interior landscaping . Provide total square footage of parking area and total square footage of interior landscape area. Please contact Noah Beals if there are questions as to which areas qualify for interior landscaping. Contact: Emma McArdle, 970.224.6197, emcardle0fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/13/2011 04/13/2011: In addition to the paper routings, please provide electronic versions of the resubmittal. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970.221.6603, agingerich fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings i City of 'Fibrt Collins August 29, 2012 Troy Jones MTA Planning & Architecture 608 S. Mason St. Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Hickory Commons, PDP110005, Round Number 3 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970,224,6134 - fax tcgov. com/deve/opmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingstonna.fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/27/2012 08/27/2012: When measuring the building height in feet on the elevations, the height must be measured from the average of the finished ground level at the center of all walls of a building or structure to the highest point of the roof surface or structure. (LUC 3.8.17). Please ensure for the next round that height is measured as such on the elevations. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/25/2012 08/29/2012: Staff is concerned regarding the overall compatibiltiy of the uses proposed. The use list needs to further be refined. 04/25/2012: On the 1 st page, the list of potential uses are listed. While these are all permitted uses in the Service Commercial Zone, they need to be re-examined due to incompatibility with site layout. LUC 3.2.2(F) talks about parking vis a vis user needs. With the proposed uses, this is not accommodated. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/27/2012 08/27/2012: Please show the residential density of the development on the site plan Please see 3.8.18 for details on specifics of calculating density. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/29/2012 08/29/2012: Is there adequate room for a loading truck to back out/tum around in the space identified?