HomeMy WebLinkAboutWILLOW BROOK, FILING THREE - FDP - 32-10/A - CORRESPONDENCE -This concludes the formal rounds of review. For resolution of remaining issues, please
contact the individual department and staff .
Sincere)
T
Ted Shepard
Chief Planner
Page 4
[3/7/11] On the utility sheets, please add a note or call out that the approximate limits of any
street cuts are shown on the demo sheet. There is no need to clutter up the utility sheet with
the street cuts but please call out that they are displayed on the demo sheets.
Department: Forestry Issue Contact: Tim Buchanan
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 91 Created: 3/9/2011
[3/9/11] Additional appropriate species or tree selections can be used to increase diversity
on this project with 15% maximum for the site or in the area for projects with 60 or more
trees.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carle Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 74 Created: 3/7/2011
PFA has no additional comments or concerns at this time. Thank you for all your work and
cooperation - we really appreciate it.
Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 54 Created: 1 /4/2011
[3/7/11] This Ordinance # will be required prior to filing.
[1/4/11] Please add the ROW Vacation Ordinance # to the Site Plan prior to filing.
Topic: Subdivision Plat
Number: 51 Created: 1 /4/2011
[3/7/11 ] This Ordinance # will be required prior to filing.
[1/4/11] Please add the ROW Vacation Ordinance # to the Subdivision Plat prior to filing.
Number: 75 Created: 3/7/2011
- ----[3/7/11]- The Subdivision -Plat legal-& boundary close. - - ---- - ---- --
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 76 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] Please add or correct the north arrows on sheets 14, 15 & 18 of the Utility Plans.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 87 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] Please provide an emergency spillway for the sump condition of sub -basin 3. This
can be near the inlet at design point 3. See redlines.
Number: 88 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11 ] Please provide a 2% longitudinal slope for the swale at the southwest corner of the
open space.
Number: 89 Created: 3/8/2011
(3/8/11] Please show the 100-year HGLs on the storm sewer profiles.
Number: 90 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] Please label cross-section A -A on the Drainage Plan.
Page 3
[3/7/11] The new ADA ramps at Galileo and Lady Moon need to be directional ADA ramps.
The existing ramps that are not to current standard are acceptable as long as they are in
acceptable condition; however any new ramps need to be built to current standards.
Number: 78 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] On the Phase 3 demo sheet, do not display the limits of development for phases 1
& 2. However, do show the limits for phase 3 (they are not currently displayed).
Number: 79 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] On any Phase 3 sheet or plan, show any phase 1/2 improvements or changes as
existing. Likewise, on any phase 1/2 sheets, do not display any phase 3 items.
Number: 80 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] The limits and dimensions of any phase lines need to be consistent for all sheets in
the utility plan set. Currently, the phase lines vary from the grading sheet to the utility sheet
to the demo sheet etc., please revise to that the limits for phase 1 encompass all of phase
one etc.
Number: 81 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] On the street profile sheets, please more clearly show where the point grade
changes are. It is difficult to tell in a few locations, see redlines.
Number: 82 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] There are several locations where the point grade brakes are too large. Any single
point brake must be less than 0.4%. See redlines.
Number: 83 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] The scale on sheet #13 is incorrect.
- - Number: 84 - - -- - - - -- — - — -- -- Created:-3/8/2011---- -- — -- - - - --
[3/8/11] On sheet #23, one spot elevation is missing, see redlines.
Number: 85 Created: 3/8/2011
[3/8/11] Please add details 707 and 1606.
Number: 86 Created: 3/8/2011
(3/8/11] With my redlines, I have supplied the applications for both the Development
Agreement as well as the Development Construction Permit. Once returned to me, I will be
able to begin work on both items.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 64 Created: 3/1 /2011
[3/1/11] Please label the existing and proposed ROW widths of all streets on the utility
sheets, Voyager Lane is not dimensioned.
Number: 65 Created: 3/1 /2011
[3/1/11] If the small existing utility easements along Rock Creek and Galileo are being
vacated by this projects plat, they are not needed on the utility sheets.
Number: 77
Created: 3/7/2011
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Citv of Fort Collins
Jen Torrey Date: 3/14/2011
TST Inc
748 Whalers Way
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for WILLOW BROOK, THIRD FILING PDP - TYPE I
(Ref.#8-99), and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Andrew Carney
Topic: General
Number: 61 Created: 1 /4/2011
[3/7/11] Carried forward as a reminder.
[1/4/111 Regarding the ROW vacation, I will route the provided legal and exhibit of the
proposed vacation area to all of the affected utility providers to get their final approval (2
week turnaround). Once that is done and the project has gone through hearing, I will
prepare a ordinance for city council. The vacation can be taken to first reading while the
project is still in final compliance; however it can not be taken to second reading until after
the mylars have been signed (however we can not release the mylars for copies until after
the second reading).
Number: 66 Created: 3/1/2011
[3/1/11] Comment from Engineering Inspection: All driveway entrances must be in Concrete
from the curbline to the ROW line.
Number: 67 Created: 3/1/2011
- — [3/1/1l]--On sheet-22; on -the -Right flowline of Exploration -Lane profile, -the -minimum length
for a sag vertical curve is 70', there are several shown that are only 50'.
Number: 68 Created: 3/1/2011
[3/1/11] On the flowline profiles please also label them as North/South or East/West not left
or right.
Number: 70 Created: 3/7/2011
(3/7/11] On sheet 6, is the shown easement for the FCLWD line existing or proposed?
Number: 71 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] It appears as if all of the lot corner spot elevations are provided except for one. See
sheet 9.
Number: 72 Created: 3/7/2011
[3/7/11] Why are the limits of construction for Phase 1 encroaching on the lots to the south
across Galileo Drive? If no impact is proposed to those lots, please revise the boundary
line.
Number: 73
Created: 3/7/2011
Page 1