The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutELIZABETH & CITY PARK CORNER REDEVELOPMENT - PDP - PDP120008 - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle, 970.221.6197, emcardlefafcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012 03/29/2012: For your information this corridor was identified as an enhanced travel corridor in the City's Transportation Master Plan. It is anticipated that someday the Elizabeth corridor will provide a strong transit connection between the Mason Bus Rapid Transit Enhanced Travel Corridor, CSU, the Campus West area and the CSU Research Campus. Special transit routing could be offered to Hughes Stadium for special events. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/29/2012 03/29/2012: A bus stop is existing east of the intersection of West Elizabeth Street and City Park Avenue. No bus stop improvements are required of this site at this time. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221.6854, rbuffington(aUcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: Is the existing gas service being used as is? If yes, how much separation between this lilne and the propiosed water service? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/1012012: HDPE is allowed for 1.5" water services. If interested, material specs can be provided. In addition, PVC is allowed on fire lines. If used, tracer wire terminating in a locator station is required. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 05/15/2012: Add locator station detail. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970.416.2313, nbealsr?afcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 05115/2012: Reminder that all signs and their locations are not approved by the PDP or the FDP. A separate sign permit is required for approval. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, icounty(a.fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/09/2012 05/16/2012: No comments. 04/0912012: No comments. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/09/2012 05/16/2012: No comments. 04/09/2012: No comments. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/16/2012 05116/2012: No comments. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/09/2012 05/16/2012: No comments. 04109/2012: No comments. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/09/2012 05/16/2012: There are still line over text issues. 04/09/2012: There is a line over text issue. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221.6820, wstanford(afcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: The middle access scales about 30' wide. This is very wide for 1-way traffic. How are you going to control it to a 1-way in only access? This access should be redesigned to encourage desired traffic flow and safety at the access. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: The width of the middle access will allow motorists to enter into the diagonal parking area in front of the liqour store at higher speeds which can be problematic for peds and cyclists or other patrons in the parking lot. The access should be redesigned to promote movement control and safe movements in and around the access and parking lot. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: South access width is also very wide for a 1-way access. This access should be redesigned to encourage desired traffic flow and safety at the access. Department: Transportation Planning Contact: Emma McArdle, 970-221.6197, emcardlena fcgov.com Topic: General F. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wiamaroue@fcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/12/2012 04/12/2012: 1. Please note all red -lined comments on the drainage report, site plan and utility plans, and make corrections as indicated. 2. Please refer to the City's Floodplain Review Checklist 100% Development Review Submittals' in preparation of the plans. It can be found at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/what-we-do/stromwater/flood ing/forms-documents. 3. In the drainage report, please include wording describing the foundation type (e.g. slab -on -grade). 4. Also in the drainage report, include a table with the City BFE, RFPE, lowest floor elevation, and HVAC elevation. 5. Use NGVD29 datum when referring to elevation within the drainage report. 6. If the floodplain use permit and no -rise certification will be applied for at the time of the application for the building permit, as opposed to being completed as part development review process, please note that in the drainage report as well as on the grading and drainage plan. 7. Add a discussion of Chapter 10 compliance to the drainage report. 8. Include wording in the drainage report that a FEMA elevation certificate must be completed and approved prior to a C.O. being issued for the building. 9. In the drainage report, discuss the floodplain waiver, why it is needed, how it will be obtained, how it will be used, etc. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/11/2012 04/1112012: Please document how the roof drains for the minor and major storms. Can the roof piping handle the 100-year storm or will these flows be directed in a different direction. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/11/2012 04/11/2012: The rain garden should not be deeper than 1 foot per Urban Drainage. Is the wq volume calculated assuming deeper than 1 foot? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/12/2012 04/12/2012: Pleaes document the WQ volume required for the site and compare with what is proposed. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970.221.6588, Icountyna.fcgov.com i L Department: PFA Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970-221-6635, rgonzales(a)poudre-fire.ora Topic: General Comment Number: 1. Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 05/15/2012: address is required to be visible front street fronting the property Comment Number: 2. Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 05/15/2012: if 3 restaurants are built as shown, each is required to have a fire dept. issued occupant load sign. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 05/15/2012: a water supply of 1500 gpm @ 20 psi is required through one hydrant within 300 feet of the building, measured as the hose would lay. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05115/2012 05/15/2012: fire sprinklers will be required also. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970.416.2418, wlamarguena.fcgov.com Topic: Floodplain i Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lexna fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/05/2012 04/05/2012: No comments. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970.221.6361, tbuchanan(a)fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/10/2012: Please contact the City Forester to review at an onsite meeting the tree currently shown to be removed along Elizabeth. Existing trees need to be retained to the extent reasonably feasible or mitigated. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/11/2012: Incorporate street trees along City Park Drive and Elizabeth at 30- 40 feet spacing (3.2.1 D 2). If the sidewalk is wide enough along Elizabeth trees might be sited in cut outs with grates. Underground utility tree separation needs to be evaluated. Along City Park Drive explore placing trees in the planting bed behind the walk. Since this planting location is close to the building it may be more suitable to use ornamental trees at a closer spacing by the building. Canopy shade trees would be most suitable in areas not too close to the building, for example on either side of the entrance to the parking lot off City Park Drive. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970.224.6152, dmartineCD.fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/20/2012 03/20/2012: The builder will need to coordinate power requirements and electric development and system modification costs with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700). Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/21/2012 03/21/2012: After the site plan is final, an AutoCad drawing (version 2008) needs to be sent to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Department: Park Planning Contact: Craig Foreman, 970.221-6618, cforeman(&fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/16/2012 03/16/2012: No comment Department: PFA Contact: Ron Gonzales, 970.221.6635, rgonzales(a)poudre-fire.org Topic: General v Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingstonna fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/15/2012 4, 05/15/2012: It is understood street-ttee`s on Elizabeth are precluded by a storm drain line. Tim Buchanan, City Forester, has not confirmed that offsite tree mitigation is adequately addressed for the tree on Elizabeth (LUC 3.2.1(F)). Off site mitigation (LUC 3.2.1(F)) should be within 1,320 feet (114 mile) of the site. Off site replacement trees should be upsized as follows: Canopy Shade Trees 3.0" caliper balled and burlap or equivalent Ornamental Trees 2.5" caliper balled and burlap or equivalent Evergreen Trees 8' height balled and burlap or equivalent Please call out on plans upsized mitigation trees if onsite or note on landscape plans if off site and type, siie and location. Additionally please coordinate with Tim Buchanan in terms of meeting tree mitigation standard. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerich(&fcoov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/11/2012 05/07/2012: Per conversation with Mike Oberlander, letter will be submitted prior to or at staff review meeting on 05/24/2012. 04/11/2012: Sheet 2 6 If the limits of demolition will occur on or affect an adjacent property owner then a temporary construction easement or agreement will be required. Proof of this agreement or easement will be required prior to hearing. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/11/2012 05/07/2012: Variance for 16' was submitted and accepted, however revisions need to be made to first paragraph. 04111/2012: LS 1.0 - Per 19.6 LCUASS the parking setback based on traffic volumes requires a 50� setback from City Park flowline to the first parking stall. Engineering has a concern with traffic movement in and out of the parking lot relative to the proposed 206 setback proposed. Similar projects have requested less of a setback than the required 50� but a variance request with justification will need to be submitted and reviewed. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/11/2012 05/07/2012: Per conversation with Mike Oberlander, letter will be submitted prior to or at the staff review meeting on 05/24/2012. 04111/2012: LS 1.0 � The emergency access easement proposed exists on the property to the south. This portion of the easement will need to have a legal description that includes only the portion existing on the south property. A separate legal description will need to be prepared for the proposed lot. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970.224-6143, lex(alfcgov.com Community Development and City. Q' f Neighborhood Services FO Avenue r7t011Ins PO Box 80ollege - Fort Collins, CO 80522 -. 970.221.6750 R - fax a D A F 0 fcgov.com/deve/0pmentrLview ■ fcgov. com/developmentreview May 16, 2012 Cathy Mathis The Birdsall Group 444 Mountain Ave Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Elizabeth & City Park Corner Redevelopment, PDP120008, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Courtney Levingston, at 970-416-2283 or clevingston@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Advance Planning Contact: Clark Mapes, 970.221.6225, cmaaes@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/10/2012 04/1012012: Re the corner tower and projecting modules on the north elevation along Elizabeth Street: The effect of these projections, and the overall legibility of the building, are diminished by the division of those modules into horizontal strips, with masonry below and stucco system above. The effect would be much greater with full -height finishes on these massing modules. This includes the returns, to define those architectural modules. The sills could remain to add interest to the masonry walls. This is per LUC 3.5.1 Most of the windows lack any definition with lintels. Wherever windows occur in masonry or stucco walls, lintels should be added for this definition. This comment doesn't apply where windows occur in metal wall cladding. The metal joinery in those locations can be different to reflect the difference between the masonry and metal cladding. Can the steel kicker brackets on the tower feature be thicker, for a stronger effect more in proportion to the cornice and roof? LUC 3.5.1, LUC 3.5.3 Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970.416.2283, clevingstont7a.fcgov.com i