The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRIDGEWOOD HILLS 4TH FILING, TRACTS N & T - PDP - 55-84N - CORRESPONDENCE - (11)iaPROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning REt.p DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 41h Filing, Tracts N and T, PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 Note - PLEASE identifv your redlines for future reference 1. �Jo2lND�1E5 CLOSE. 2, /hl55iNG B�A�iNG1 /S?, 90AI SN66"7_2� �R✓E5 CZ,G3/C4 AeENaT Si/or✓^� O N SNEET ¢, /✓---�s 5T.1.v >jtL>D `f Per e_- ;>12 ,,,,� -4r q 11re scA� a,Y� r.�� u.�.a�c 0F�- s s17'� 57'4' 4Z 5� 6�er cASa,r� 1 s i i ro g !/.� c,� �zsD 3 Y T� /S �G�•r� — `7/�Yr3� Ti`/ R f' Cam � D /3� /rilApc sue•-z�Y�b Gc.sC12.. CHERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS L- lat _Site _Drainage Report _Other #Mah— _Redline Utility _Landscape City of Fort Collins 0 FORT COLLINS•LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT \ SOUTH FORT COLLINS SANITATION DISTRICT November 17, 2004 RECEIVED Mr. Steve Olt No V n ) 2004 City of Fort Collins CNRRE P.O. Box 580 NT pfANN1NG Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 4° Filing, Tracts N and T, PDP Dear Mr. Olt, The Fort -Collins ---Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District have reviewed the above mentioned project and submit the following comments. The District signature block is to be replaced with the District's standard signature block. General notes #5 and # 13 need to be corrected to reflect District specifications and requirements. The proposed sanitary sewer profiles were not included for review. The proposed landscape plan was not included for review. The review was not completed due to the lack of adequate information. The District will require another review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 14, if you have any questions or require additional information. Respectfully, ZX-, , ZF W. Farrill, P.E. District Engineer xc: Mr. Michael D. DiTullio, District Manager Loonan & Associates, Inc. 5150 Snead Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone (970) 226-3104 Fax (970) 226-0186 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins RECEIVED Current Plannint! DEC 03 2004 DATE: November I0, 2004 TO: Xcel Energy PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 4t" Filing, Tracts N and T. PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference • ONS MPr1NSt SERVICES' /IAlQ METER LOCATIONS MUST BE C6DRD1A1#TE13 CLDSLEY W I TH PUBLIC IERVICL" CO r0 ML ET CLEARt�NCE QEAIJI REMEAITI o GA5 MRIAI EXTENA16N WILL BE AcCOR111AL6 TV T/fE EKTEA1J10a/ POLICY ON F&F La/ /TH TitE COLD P_U.G. L-N /�F/LAERBRAN/J /?�O��of Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS mat "Ii�e _Drainage Report _Other �— tility _Redline Utility AE'rndscape City of of Fort Collins PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins E I V E D Current Planning DEC 02 2004 - G DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Comcast PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 41h Filing, Tracts N and T, PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 Note - PLEAsE identify your redlines for future reference Comcast Cable will require 6-foot rear lot utility easements on lots 14, 13, 12, 11. Also we will need a side lot easement on lot 10. Comcast would also like 6-foot utility easements out side of the Tracts that look like they will be used as private drives or access easements. Comcast Cable would also like to request that the owner of the project provide us with an electronic copy of the final plat map. ��e� n � s �►r��rltva 1 � Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat >Ote _Drainage Report _Other �— _XUtility _Redline Utility Vandscape City ofCity of Fort Collins DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Forestry PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 4th Filing, Tracts N and T, PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 Note - PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference 4-- J 4, F qn— o� rl.e Nees aNcl � e. P' Cl .^ Gl o�e 5 In o I G 2 ti % I i-- y y9 .t, i" O p c. S+V' will 5lnrvbs c�S-N� + KQ7 (::A LA pt�A +-ti"f has c. i PiQN G1i'VIC 4(� I�,lo�Is o,.i-lneSln✓�lOs. Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _ Utility _Redline Utility Other #MM&%.M City of Fort Collins PROJECT 6 i••r COMMENT SHEET E I V E D City of Fart Collins Current Plannino NOY 1 R 2004 ^NNING DATE: November 10, 2004 TO: Streets PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills, 4th Filing, Tracts N and T, PDP - Type I (LUC) All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: December 1, 2004 Note --PLEASE identify your redlines for future reference �t � 4P-e -5 A'vl� loin back 4 -Fo Ao6naoJe �A. U +here CA_ +r-acA be+wv-n 4+1& 4+v ro J +f1a't ,iiU be MCLAVZ 1 L- rU4 b j avj 064 — o&I ucl t S At u 6 n o bj ce ma t� ? �trs��S Zei, , 5ow er Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS (Plat ) .Site _Utility _Redline Utility Drainage Report _Other _Landscape • Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Transportation Number: 46 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04]Sheet 7: Preliminary Utility Plans. Please provide crosswalk ramps on the south side of Avondale at the intersection of Woodrow to facilitate an accessible crossing of the Avondale. Also, the crosswalk ramps at all corners need to be directional. Number: 48 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04]Sheet 7: Preliminary Utility Plans. Is the walkway connection from this project to Payton Drive at -grade as it crosses the drive aisle near lot 10? Ramps need to be added here if not. Number: 52 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04]The TIS states that there are bike lanes on Avondale and portions of Triangle Dr but these do not show up anywhere in the plan set. Please show and call out existing bike lanes as well as any new bike lanes that will be constructed with this project either on the utility plans OR provide a signing and striping plan. I am particularly interested in understanding how the bike lane design is handled at the roundabout intersection of these two roads. Thank you. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckolls Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 11 / 18/ 2004 [11/18/041 Remove topography lines form final site plan. Number: 2 Created: 11 / 19 / 2004 [11/ 19/04] Please note the building height and proposed materials on the elevation sheet. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at this time. Red -lined plan from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round of staff review may be necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being December 8, 2004) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all of vour red -lined plans when you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yo rs Truly, Steve Olt City Planner Page 9 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Drainage Basin Design Number: 45 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 It is unclear how the site is being graded as the proposed grading was not shown on the grading plan. Please explain where is basin J going as this part of the site appears to be draining with no control to the east. City regulations do not allow flows to be draining onto neighboring properties that are in excess of historic rates. Please make sure that not only the rates are not exceeded, but also that these flows are not concentrated in a manner that is different than historical. Since Basin I is being directed towards Triangle Drive, it is not clear that the downstream conveyance capacities were sized to accommodate these flows, please provide supporting documentation from the Shenandoah development showing what was assumed to be coming from this site and make sure that the actual flows from this site do not exceed the assumed rates. Topic: Grading Number: 47 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Please show how the grading will tie to adjacent property to the east and to the south. Make sure no adverse impact will happen to existing lots, and no flows are drained onto the property to the east. Topic: Overflow Number: 49 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Provide an overflow location and analyze that condition for the inlets on Avondale Road and for the proposed detention pond. Topic: Plat Number: 50 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/04] Will the exiting drainage easement on Tract T be vacated by this plat, if it is need to show how the flows that were routed through that easement are now being handled. The existing easement covering part of Lots 29, 37 and 38 will need to be vacated to allow development to take place in this area. Topic: Retaining wall Number: 51 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/04] At final, please provide retaining wall detail as well as top and bottom of wall elevations Topic: Water Quality Number: 60 Created: 12 / 3 / 2004 [12/3/04] At final please make sure that a water quality outlet structure and the appropriate water quality capture volume is designed into the pond in order to meet updated City requirements. Page 8 • Buildings three stories or more in height must have access to a 30 foot unobstructed access roadway on at least (1) one side for aerial operations. PFA Policy 85-5 (B) Number: 55 Created: 12 / 2 / 2004 [12/2/04] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 A. In Multi -story buildings the following requirements shall pertain. 1. The first floor units shall be designated with 100's. 2. The second floor units with 200's 3. The third floor units with 300's, and so forth. B. All brass letters and numerals shall be posted on a black background. C. Some multi -family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front of the buildings. D. A clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained. Number: 56 Created: 12 /2 / 2004 [12/2/04] A man door shall be provided which allows access into the living quarters without having to go through the garage. Number: 57 Created: 12 / 2 / 2004 [12/2/04]WATER SUPPLY: Commercial No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 Number: 58 Created: 12 / 2 / 2004 [12/2/04] WATER SUPPLY: Residential (Within GMA) No Residential building can be greater then 400 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 800 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1000 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 Number: 59 Created: 12 / 2 / 2004 [12/2/04] STREET NAMES: Street names shall be verified and reviewed by County / City Planning Dept. prior to being put in service. 1997 UFC 901.4.5 Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General Number: 61 Created: 12 / 7/ 2004 [12/7/04] No comment Page 7 Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Rob Irish Topic: General Number: 39 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Electric facilities are existing along Triangle Dr. adjacent to the site. Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the developer's expense. Number: 40 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Power for single-family lots on Tract N will be provided from the front of the lots. Power will not be provided in the alley. Number: 41 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Will need to coordinate transformer locations with Light & Power for single-family attached on Tract T. Transformers need to be within 10' of a paved surface and cannot be placed in the parkway. Number: 42 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Will need to coordinate meter locations with Light & Power for single- family attached. Meters need to be ganged on one end of the units. Number: 43 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Recommend utility coordination meeting for single-family attached on Tract T due to limited space for all utilities. Number: 44 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Electric Capacity fees and Building Site charges will apply for this development. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 53 Created: 12 / 1 / 2004 [ 12/ 1 /04] No issues at this time. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 54 Created: 12 / 2 / 2004 [12/2/04] REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1; FCLUC The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be met. 1. The minimum width shall be 20 feet. 2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be 50 feet. 3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only. The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be required to support 40 tons 4. The fire lane shall be platted as an "Emergency Access Easement" on the final plat. Page 6 Number: 20 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/04] Please use the current standard directional ramps at street corners, and include the current ADA details as well. Topic: Woodrow Drive plan and profile Number: 28 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Lots of information is missing, even for preliminary. Please see the utility plan checklist and redlines for any additional comments not provided below. Number: 29 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Please label curb return radii and ROW radii at corners as well. Additional ROW at street corners is required to accommodate the current ramp detail (attached). Number: 30 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Where drive -over curb and gutter is proposed, an additional foot of ROW is required for that side of the street. On the plan and profile sheet, please label the types of curb and gutter used on the plan view. For an example, please see the Lind plans (C-3 1989) Also, please dimension the centerline of the road to the edge of the ROW, since it will be uneven due to the different curb and gutter types on each side of the street. Please provide details for the atypical transition/cross-pans needed at the intersections. Number: 31 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Label the horizontal curve(S?) and provide radii and lengths. Number: 32 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 The maximum grade approaching an intersection is 4% (LCUASS 8.2.4B) Number: 33 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Please remove note 2. Pavement designs shall be approved separately by the City Engineer. Number: 34 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Street details - add drawing 708, remove 1603, add the new ramp details, and add typical cross -sections for Avondale and Triangle. Number: 36 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Using the centerline curve values from the plat: The ratio between the two curves on Woodrow needs to be 1.5 or less (currently 1.7). The tangent between the two curves needs to be twice the minimum (100'), or 200' (currently 93'). Please review LCUASS Chapter 7. Number: 37 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Please provide centerline profiles through intersections. Page 5 0 Number: 7 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Show/label how ROW was dedicated for Triangle and Avondale. Are the existing ROW widths adequate to meet the current Master Street Plan? Both Avondale and Triangle are collectors (with parking) on the Master street plan, with 76' of ROW standard. Number: 8 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/041 Please label the Sight Distance Easements as such (not site distance triangles). Number: 9 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/041 Emergency access easements require 25' interior radii and 50' exterior radii (same center point) around curves unless otherwise approved by PFA. Revise as needed. Also, Emergency Access Easements should be located in the drive aisle only, and should not overlap parking, curbing, landscaping, or any other impediments. Number: 10 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/04] Please call out emergency access easements as such. Access easement only means that any member of the public can use that area, but doesn't cover PFA's concerns. Number: 11 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/041 Who will own and maintain Tracts A, B, and C? Number: 12 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Several lots are shown to overlap a drainage easement, and while it would be possible to still build structures on Lots 37 and 29, Lot 38 would be unbuildable. Can the easement be vacated within these lots? Please work with the Stormwater Department. Number: 13 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Please correct plat language as redlined. Topic: Site plan Number: 16 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 The site plan labels the utility easement as 9' along Avondale, but it scales out at 15'. Please revise. Number: 17 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Please show all easements on the site plan. Number: 18 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Please label all sidewalk, parkway, and driveway widths (to standard). Number: 19 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Label ROW width on Triangle, which is a collector, not a connector. Page 4 E [11/30/041 Please provide details of all retaining walls, and label top and bottom of wall elevations along the walls. Please use a distinct line weight for retaining walls. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 14 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Please show utility locations on the landscape plan, including services, and add the utility separation note calling out required distances between utilities and trees/shrubs. Number: 15 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/041 Show all sight distance easements. on the landscape plan. Topic: Overall Utility plan Number: 24 Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 [11/30/04]Please label/dimension ROW and easements, all sidewalk, parkway, and driveway widths. Number: 25 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Driveways should be a minimum of 28' for the ones shown. Driveways not yet shown for single-family lots can be min. 12' wide. Number: 26 [11/30/04] Label retaining walls. Created: 11 / 30/ 2004 Number: 27 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Since the single-family lots are so narrow along the east side of Woodrow and the south side of Triangle east of Woodrow, please show service locations and driveway locations now. It needs to be seen whether everything can fit, along with the street trees. Topic: Plat Number: 3 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Regarding the vacation statement: The parties to which the easements are dedicated are the ones that must sign this plat in order to vacate those easements. To whom were the easements dedicated? Number: 4 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 Add the sight distance easement restrictions to the plat. Number: 5 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/04] Show match lines on sheets 3-6 and/or reduce the scale of the drawings - the large scale makes the plat confusing. This plat could probably fit on 1-2 sheets and would be much clearer to see what's going on that way. Number: 6 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/04] Sheet 2: What exactly is this sheet supposed to be? Is it really necessary? Page 3 • Number: 69 Created: 12 / 13 / 2004 [12/ 13/04] The Preferred Option C Plan with the request for a modification of a y� standard (approved July 8, 2004) showed "major walkway spines" between 'QlN/buildings that were no more than 30' from any front door entry into a dwelling unit. This PDP Plan (sheet 3 Of 6) has the "major walkway spines" located such that they are a little more off -center and a distance of 32' to 37' to several front doors. Could the spines be realigned some to be more centered, with equitable distances from front doors on both sides of the walks? Topic: Transportation Number: 68 Created: 12/ 13/2004 [ 12 / 13 / 04] Triangle Drive between South College Avenue and Avondale Road is .Q— classified as a "collector" street on the City's Master Street Plan, not a connector as /shown on the PDP plans. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: General Number: 23 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/041 Please use directional ramps with ADA truncated domes at all street intersections. Please provide an additional ramp on the south side of Avondale to align with a ramp from Woodrow Drive. Number: 35 Created: 11 /30/2004 [11/30/04] Triangle Drive is designated as a collector (with parking) on the Master Street Plan. As such, it would have a standard ROW of 76'. This development is responsible for ensuring that its half (38' from the Centerline of Triangle) is dedicated with this project. This development is also responsible for ensuring that Triangle complies with the master street plan as it is constructed. Discussions within the Transportation Coordination group at the City resulted in the following: in order to comply with the requirement for Triangle to be a collector along this development's frontage, it should design and construct inset parallel parking areas along its Triangle Drive frontage. Prior to the next round of review, please call to arrange a meeting regarding this design. Number: 38 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 The utility plan checklist was reviewed for preliminary items only. Additional comments will appear with more detailed review. Topic: Grading Number: 21 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 [11/30/041 It appears as though the only place where proposed grading is shown is for the large pond at the southeast corner of the site. Please show proposed grading for the rest of the site as well. The proposed basin lines do not seem to work with the existing grading. Also, show existing grading for at least 50' offsite so that it can be seen whether the proposed grading will work with the offsite grading. Number: 22 Created: 11 / 30 / 2004 Page 2 • STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Cityaf Fort Collins Progressive Living Structures Date: 12/8/2004 c/o Vignette Studios/Terence Hoaglund 144 North Mason Street, Suite 2 Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for RIDGEWOOD HILLS, 4TH FILING, TRACTS N & T - PDP - #55-84N, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Building Elevations Number: 64 Created: 12 / 13 / 2004 [12/ 13/041 The height of the multi -family buildings should be shown on the V/ Architectural Elevations (sheet 6 Of 6), along with building materials and a general color palette. Topic: General Number: 63 Created: 12 / 13 / 2004 [ 12 / 13 / 04] General Note # 11 on the Cover Sheet (1 of 6) of the PDP documents vindicates that the project will be 'constructed as a single phase project". Does this /mean that both Tracts N & T will be constructed at the same time and the landscape covenants will apply to the whole PDP? If so, then all of the landscaping will have to be installed or secured with a letter of credit or other form of security before any certificate of occupancy can be issued. Topic: Lighting/Photometric Number: 62 Created: 12/ 13/2004 ,a/ [.12/ 13/04] A lighting photometric plan is needed for Tract T, the multi -family /�/portion of the PDP. Topic: Site pion Number: 65 Created: 12 / 13 / 2004 [12/ 13/041 Driveway locations for the two-family dwellings should be shown on the Site Plan for Tract N (sheet 2 Of 6). , Number: 66 Created: 12 / 13 / 2004 i_Rv1 [ 12 / 13 / 04] Are all 28 dwellings units on Tract N to be attached (duplex) units? If / so, they would be "two-family dwellings" according to the LUC. Number: 67 Created: 12/ 13/2004 [12/ 13/04] The proposed 2 parking spaces/dwelling unit on Tract N limits the nun ber of bedrooms per unit to no more than 3. 9 U f—e Page 1