Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIDGEWOOD HILLS 4TH FILING, TRACTS N & T - PDP - 55-84N - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)6a REVISION City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Current Planning DATE: March 8, 2005 TO: Technical Services PROJECT: #55-84N Ridgewood Hills 4" Filing, Tracts N & T PDP All comments must be received by Steve Olt no later than the staff review meeting: March 23, 2005 Note -.Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems © Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) /, 66Mt1JD&2fe S Ct,056. Z. SHceT Z /5 5T/[L m/S5inI-e, iNFoAA7d4Tio.✓, 3, SSG-rronJ T16 on) SH&E-' Z /S rwlCaKteCC-_V ? Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape In City of Fort Collins revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being April 6, 2005) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all of your red -lined plans when you re-submit., e-submit The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner cc: Katie Moore Loonan & Associates Heyne-Schuster, Inc. Current Planning File #55-84N Page 9 Topic: Eroding Number: 47 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/24/05] [11/30/04] Please show how the grading will tie to adjacent property to the east and to the south. Make sure no adverse impact will happen to existing lots, and no flows are drained onto the property to the east. Topic: Plot Number: 50 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/24/05] Please vacate add note.4pecifying that existing drainage easement located on Tract T is being vacated by the replat of Tract T. [11/30/04] Will the exiting drainage easement on Tract T be vacated by this plat, if it is need to show how the flows that were routed through that easement are now being handled. The existing easement covering part of Lots 29, 37 and 38 will need to be vacated to allow development to take place in this area. Topic: Retaining wall Number: 51 [3/24/051 Created: 11/30/2004 [11/30/04] At final, please provide retaining wall detail.as well as top and bottom of wall elevations Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Site plan Number: 70 Created: 3/22/2005 [3/22/05] Please align the crosswalk ramps on the north side of Avondale at Woodrow so that the crossing is perpendicular to the roadway. The eastern ramp of this crossing is slightly askew to the south. Thanks. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 11/18/2004 [3/16/05] [11/18/04] Remove topography lines from Eingi site plan, when. submitted. This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies)•review and comments at this time. Red -lined plan from City departments are included with this comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming. Another round of staff review is determined to be necessary. This proposal is subject to the 90-day Page 8 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Detention Pond Spillway Number: 77 Created: 3/24/2005 [3/24/05] The detention pond spillway seems to be directed toward private property in Shenandoah, future development as currently designed. If the spillway crest elevation is designed at the 100-year water surface elevation, then a downstream drainage easement from the owner of the Shenandoah property would be required. If an additional 1 foot of freeboard between the 100 year pond water surface elevation and the spillway crest elevation is incorporated into the pond design, then no downstream easement would be required. Topic: Drainage Basin Design Number: 45 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/24/05] Please provide a detention summary table on the drainage plan. [11/30/04] It is unclear how the site is being graded as the proposed grading was not shown on the grading plan. Please explain where is basin J going as this part of the site appears to be draining with no control to the east. City regulations do not allow flows to be draining onto neighboring properties that are in excess of historic rates. Please make sure that not only the rates are not exceeded, but also that these flows are not concentrated in a manner that is different than historical. Since Basin I is being directed towards Triangle Drive, it is not clear that the downstream conveyance capacities were sized to accommodate these flows, please provide supporting documentation showing what was assumed to be coming from this site and make sure that the actual flows from this site do not exceed the assumed rates. Topic: Erosion and Sediment Control Number: 76 [3/24/05] March 23, 2005 Created:3/24/2005 1. In the report the table of contents and the actual page numbers of the sediment/erosion control portion do not match. 2. Sediment/Erosion control notes on the plan (Sheet 4) must be replaced with the new standard Fort Collins notes. Retain any notes that are specific to this project. 3. The plan is preliminary and incomplete. Review of stormwater management plan will be made when complete submittal is received. Page 7 Number: 85 1Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/06] Please provide intersection spot elevations per LCUASS. Topic: Woodrow DHve p/an and profile Number: 31 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] The southern curve does not meet the minimum arc length requirement (100'). Please revise. [11/30/04] Label the horizontal curve(S?) and provide radii and lengths. Number: 33 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Please remove pavement notes from cross -sections as well. [11/30/04] Please remove note 2. Pavement designs shall be approved separately by the City Engineer. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Rob Irish Topic: Light d Power Number: 71 Created: 3/22/2005 (3/22/05] Strongly recommend utility coordination meeting for Tract T. Due to limited space for utilities there doesn't seem to be any room for electric to install its facilities around water and sewer. Number: 72 Created: 3/22/2005 [3/22/05] Strongly recommend coordinating utilities on Tract N due to the 45' wide lots. Paired water services will pose a problem with electric facilities. Please separate these services. Will need to coordinate gas and electric service to the lots in order to meet required separation. Driveway placement, gas service and electric service will need to be shown on the plans to accomplish this. Again, a utility coordination meeting is recommended. Number: 73 [3/22/05]. Department: Natural Resources Topic: Light of Power Number: 74 [3/23/05] No Issues. Deportment: Police Topic: 6Wwrol Number: 75 [3/23/05] No comments Created: 3/22/2005 Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created:3/23/2005 Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created:3/23/2005 Page 6 w Number: 12 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] These easements are still not noted to be vacated. [11/30/04] Several lots are shown to overlap a drainage easement, and while it would be possible to still build structures on Lots 37 and 29, Lot 38 would be unbuildable. Can the easement be vacated within these lots? Please work with the Stormwater Department. Topic: 51te plan Number: 17 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/04] Please show all easements on the,site plan. Number: 18 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/04] Please label all sidewalk, parkway; and driveway widths (to standard). Topic: Street design Number:80 1 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Please provide 8' cross -pans where Woodrow meets Triangle and Avondale. Number: 81 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Please keep manholes out of wheel paths, especially bike lanes. Number: 82 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Avondale Rd - It is unclear whether you are proposing to completely revise the existing plans for Avondale. The proposed centerline profile has grades much lower than the flowline profiles already approved. Please clarify and provide station equations to tie this design to the existing approved design by Nolte. If a new design is proposed, please provide new 500' offsite design to the east. Number; 83 1 Created::3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Please show how the proposed striping on Triangle connects to existing striping northeast of the site. Number: 84 ' ' ' ' Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Triangle drive - why is a proposed centerline shown when Triangle is already built? Are you proposing rebuilding the entire street? _Please show the existing centerline of triangle, the existing flowline profile and'the proposed flowline profile and provide enough elevations to determine whether the proposed flowline and resultant cross -slopes will work. The proposed additional pavement slope should be greater than or equal to the slope of the existing roadway. The design speed for Triangle is 40 mph, not 25. Page 5 Number: 27 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Gas and electric need to be addressed. The Utilities have concerns about serving this project, especially the multifamily to the south. Please call to arrange a Utility coordination meeting prior to re -submittal. [11/30/04] Since the single-family lots are so narrow along the east side of Woodrow and the south side of Triangle east of Woodrow, please show service locations and driveway locations now. It needs to be seen whether everything can fit, along with the street trees. Topic: Plot Number: 3 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Since the easement to be vacated is a City easement, please remove this vacation statement and simply note on the plat the easements to be vacated by this plat. [11/30/04] Regarding the vacation statement: The parties to which the easements are dedicated are the ones that must sign this plat in order to vacate those easements. To whom were the easements dedicated? Number: 5 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/041 Show match lines on sheets 3-6 and/or reduce the scale of the drawings - the large scale makes the plat confusing. This plat could probably fit on 1-2 sheets and would be much clearer to see what's going on that way. Number: 6 Created. 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/04] Sheet 2: What exactly is this sheet supposed to be? Is it really necessary? Number: 9 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] The radii required by the Land Use Code are in place because the fire department needs wider areas around turns because of truck overhangs. Having 30' and 50' radii actually narrows the width of the easement they would be able to use. Please revise and/or obtain approval from PFA for alternate radii. [11/30/04] Emergency access easements require 25' interior radii and 50' exterior radii (same centerpoint) around curves unless otherwise approved by PFA. Revise as needed. Also, Emergency Access Easements should be located in the drive aisle only, and should not overlap parking, curbing, landscaping, or any other impediments. Page 4 Number: 79 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] Please revise all plans to meet scanability requirements in LCUASS Appendix E-6. Number: 86 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05]- please remove the landscape plans from the utility plan set. Number: 87 Created: 3/29/2005 [3/29/05] The City intends to grant the sight distance easement variance request, but first needs a simplified revised request. Please revise and resubmit. Number: 88 Created: 3/29/2005 [3/29/05] Please see redlines for any additional comments. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 14 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] What about gas/electric? [11/30/04] Please show utility locations on the landscape plan, including services, and add the utility separation note calling out required distances between utilities and trees/shrubs. Number: 15 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Please show the easements, not the sight lines. [11/30/04] Show all sight distance easements on the landscape plan. Topic: Ovrmll Utility plan Number: 24 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/04]Please label/dimension ROW and easements, all sidewalk, parkway, and driveway widths. Number: 25 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Driveways should be held at their minimum widths for at least a car length (20') [11/30/04] Driveways should be a minimum of 28' for the ones shown. Driveways not yet shown for single-family lots can be min.12' wide. Page 3 I , . Topic: Overa# Utility plan Number: 91 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Please add a line to the signature blocks on the utility plans for Light & Power. Number: 97 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Due to the tightness of the site it is imperative that a utility coordination meeting be held as soon as possible to discuss potential utility service conflicts. Katie Moore of the Engineering Department will assist the applicant with the scheduling of this meeting. Topic: Retaining wall Number: 93 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Retaining wall design is needed in 2 locations. Topic: Site plan Number: 67 Created: 12/13/2004 [4/6/05] This is a repeat comment just as a reminder. [12/13/04] The proposed 2 parking spaces/dwelling unit on Tract N limits the number of bedrooms per unit to no more than 3. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Katie Moore Topic: 6enerol Number: 23 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] Also, please provide spot elevations for ramps to ensure compliance with ADA grades. [11/30/04] Please use directional ramps with ADA truncated domes at all street intersections. Please provide an additional ramp on the south side of Avondale to align with a ramp from Woodrow Drive. Number: 38 Created: 11/30/2004 [3/27/05] [11/30/04] The utility plan checklist was reviewed for preliminary items only. Additional comments will appear with more detailed review. Number: 78 Created: 3/27/2005 [3/27/05] The drive aisles in the multifamily area need to be 24' wide to meet the double -loaded parking requirement in the land use code. Also, where parking space is provided in front of garage doors, a minimum of 20' should be provided so that cars don't park and overhang the drive aisle/emergency access. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins e Progressive Living Structures Date: 04/06/2005 c/o Vignette Studios/Terrance Hoaglund 144 North Mason Street, Suite 2 Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for RIDGEWOOD HILLS, 4TH FILING, TRACTS N 6 T, PDP - #55-84N, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: 6wwml Number: 89 Created: 4/6/2005 ,[4/6/05] The backing distance / emergency access needs in the 20' wide private drives on Tract T present potential conflicts. Number: 94 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] The applicant's response letter (dated 3/8/05) to City staff's comment letter dated 12/8/04 does not include responses to the Current Planning comments (#'s 62 - 69). Number: 96 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Please see Current Planning Department's red -lined plans for comments. Topic: 6r+ading Number: 92 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] The drainage plan needs to show how the flows for the lots on the east side of Tract N will be accommodated. Topic: Landscape plan Number: 95 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Who is responsible for the initial installation of plant materials in both Tracts N & T? The Landscape Plans do not identify this. Topic Light 4 Power Number:.90 Created: 4/6/2005 [4/6/05] Electric service to the dwelling units cannot come off private drives. Page 1