The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutREGISTRY RIDGE, 5TH FILING - PDP - 32-95I - CORRESPONDENCE - (14)Topic: Water Quality Pond Number: 85 Created: 4/13/2007 [4/13/07] The water quality pond located on future park property is not functional, since it has no outlet. It is recommended that this pond be eliminated and that water quality be achieved by using the existing swales that lead to the larger detention pond serving the entire Registry Ridge development. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. Please schedule a Final Plan submittal appointment if your project is approved at the administrative public hearing. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me. at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, �bq&Aur Shelby Sommer Associate City Planner Page 5 [3/12/07] (FC) Please provide flowline profiles. Anything related to the flowline profiles could not be reviewed obviously so I couldn't get those kind of comments to you early. : ) Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 95 Created: 4/18/2007 [4/18/07] PFA has no further comments or concerns. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Erosion Control Plans Number: 88 Created: 4/13/2007 [4/13/07] Erosion control notes reference the Sunrise Ridge development, please correct. Please use only City standard set of erosion control notes. Erosion control calculations should also be submitted at final. Topic: Off -site sanitary sewer Number: 87 Created: 4/13/2007 [4/13/07] Please add a note indicating that all areas disturbed during the construction of the off -site sanitary line shall be restored to equal or better during the condition than existing. This includes the -existing storm culvert and riprap that will be affected located to the south of the development. Topic: Swale Design Number: 86 Created: 4/13/2007 [4/13/07] The swale going through lots 17 through 22 should be carefully designed. Please minimize the amount of area contributing runoff to this swale if possible. Provide a design for the swale showing how much runoff is expected in that swale. Landscaping restrictions notes should be added to the grading plan as well as to the plat. The swale located on tract D should be designed such that the swale can carry the 100 year design flow + a 33% freeboard without the water surface elevation encroaching on the lots to the east. Please add a swale cross section to plans showing property line and water surface elevation with freeboard. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 89 Created: 4/13/2007 [4/13/07] At final please show 100-year HGL on all storm sewer profiles and details. Please add a drainage summary table to the drainage plan. Provide swale cross sections showing 100 year water surface elevation and elevation for 1.33 times the 100 year discharge. Page 4 Topic: Landscaping Number: 81 Created: 4/11 /2007 [4/11/07] Looks great! The only scanning problem I see is the shaded in triangle piece by the detention area. Is there another way to call this out? What does it represent? Thanks. Topic: Plat Number: 4 Created: 3/6/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) (FC) Looks really good Cody! Just a couple of things. You'll need to take off the color at mylars but otherwise you got it. [3/6/07] (FC) Please see Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements. Please remove shading and correct all overlapped labeling. Number: 98 Created: 4/25/2007 [4/25/07] From Technical Services: 1. Boundary closes. 2. Outer boundary monuments not defined. 3. Show line and arrows at street name change = +- Middle of Tract C. 4. No color in V-Map, "fuzzy" street names in V-Map. Topic: Site Number: 9 Created: 3/6/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) The shaded triangle probably won't scan well. Can we call this out another way somehow? What does it represent? Also, please remove the color; just use good of black, white and grey. Thanks! [3/6/07] (FC) Please see Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements. Please remove all shading and correct all overlapped labeling. Number: 11 Created: 3/6/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) Sorry Cody, I know this is picky but please call all the walks "sidewalks" so that its tied to the city detail and its known that they're made out of concrete. Thanks! [3/6/07] (Hearing) Please dimension all sidewalks and parkways. Topic: Utility - Detail Sheet Number: 56 Created: 3/12/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) Just need this for Final. Good to go for hearing. [3/12/07] (FC) Please provide a detail(s) sheet. Topic: Utility - Plan and Prortle Number: 45 Created: 3/12/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) Just carrying the comment forward for Final Compliance. Don't need these for hearing : ) Page 3 Topic: Site Number: 90 Created: 4/16/2007 [4/16/07] Minor comments for Final Plans: sheet numbering for both site and landscape plans reference sheet (S1 and 1-1) "of 2 sheets" - should be "of 1 sheet." (see redlines) Number: 91 Created: 4/16/2007 [4/16/07] Minor comment for Final Plans: Site Note #6 should say "of the Land Use Code" instead of "of the Residential Building Standards." Number: 92 Created: 4/16/2007 [4/16/07] Minor comment for Final Plans: Site Note #5 - please remove "if alternate lighting...." and replace with "All site lighting shall conform to Section 3.2.4 of the Land Use Code." Topic: Utility Plans Number: 96 Created: 4/18/2007 [4/18/07] Terry Farrill (Fort Collins Loveland Water District/South Fort Collins Sanitation District): The response comments indicate that all of Tract "B" was dedicated as a sanitary sewer easement. The drawing and plat indicate a pedestrian, landscape and drainage easement as well. The District requires minimum 30 foot wide easements for the sanitary sewer lines, on the District's standard easement form, that are not located within the public ROW. Adequate easements and easement rights need to be conveyed to lots 28-30 for the sanitary sewer service line easements. Typically, a 10 foot wide easement is not adequate to replace or repair the service line. The homeowner is responsible to provide locates for the sanitary sewer service to their property. Access to the sanitary sewer line, in Tract A, for maintenance needs to be addressed. The District will require another review due to the nature of the above comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104 ext. 104 if you have any questions or require additional information. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 83 Created: 4/12/2007 [4/12/07] (FC) Please see David Averill regarding the sidewalk connection through the detention pond. It would be nice to try connect these somehow. Number: 84 Created: 4/12/2007 [4/12/07] Definitely ready for hearing - Great job!!! Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins BUD CURTIS/CODY SNOWDON Date: 04/25/2007 NORTHERN ENGINEERING 200 S. COLLEGE AVE. FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for REGISTRY RIDGE 5TH FILING PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: General Number: 58 Created: 3/19/2007 [4/16/07] [3/19/07] Craig Foreman (Park Planning): Granting of the S.S. across park being done by Lindsay in Real Estate Services. Number: 82 Created: 4/12/2007 [4/12/07] The following departments/agencies have no concerns with this proposal: Comcast, PFA, Post Office Number: 94 Created: 4/17/2007 [4/17/07] Craig Foreman (Park Planning): I understand the "water quality pond" will become the swale along the park east edge per Basil. Could the developer's engineer show us a design so the new trail connection can get through this area, i.e. small pipes, etc. Thanks. Number: 97 Created: 4/20/2007 [4/20/07] This project is ready for an administrative public hearing. The hearing has been scheduled for Wednesday, May 9, 2007 at 5 pm. Staff will support your requests for modification, and will also require a condition of approval requiring a continuation of the pedestrian path through the water quality/drainage swale area. I will need a "fresh" set of plans (site, landscape and plat) to use at the public hearing and would prefer to have those as soon as possible since I will be returning my redlined set to you with this comment letter. If you project is approved at the public hearing, you will be required to submit final plans (revised per this comment letter) along with a $1000 development review final plan fee and $1000 transportation development review final plan fee ($2000 total). Topic: Landscape plans Number: 93 Created: 4/16/2007 [4/16/07] Please add tree protection notes to the Final Landscape Plan (Section 3.2.1(G) of the Land Use Code) so that existing street trees will be protected during construction. Page 1