Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGISTRY RIDGE, 5TH FILING - FDP - 32-95J - CORRESPONDENCE -Swale design is shown on both the grading sheet (G2) and the detail sheet (DT4). The swale located on tract D should be designed such that the swale can carry the 100 year design flow + a 33% freeboard without the water surface elevation encroaching on the lots to the east. Please add a swale cross section to plans showing property line and water surface elevation with freeboard. Swale design is shown on both the grading sheet (G2) and the detail sheet (DT4) Topic: Utility Plans Number: 89 Created: 4/13/2007 [6/12/071 [4/13/07] At final please show 100-year HGL on all storm sewer profiles and details. 100-HGLs are now shown on the storm line A. Storm Lines B & C were calculated by culvert master. Please add a drainage summary table to the drainage plan Drainage summary has been added. Provide swale cross sections showing 100 year water surface elevation and elevation for 1.33 times the 100 year discharge. Swale design is shown on both the grading sheet (G2) and the detail sheet (DT4). Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Zoning Number: 107 Created: 6/13/2007 [6/13/07] Plant notes need to include that no CO/TCO will be issued without completion of landscaping or financial securment in the amount of 125% of materials/installation Note has been added. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Shelby Sommer Associate Planner Page 9 Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Erosion Control Plans Number: 88 Created: 4/13/2007 [6/12/07] Please use City standard notes only. City standard notes are now being used. [4/13/07] Erosion control notes reference the Sunrise Ridge development, please correct. Please use only City standard set of erosion control notes. Erosion control calculations should also be submitted at final. City standard notes are now being used Topic: Landscape plans Number: 79 Created: 3/23/2007 [6/12/071 Please provide some landscaping along swale in back of lots 5 through 13. The swale is landscaped. [3/23/07] Please provide a copy of the proposed landscape plan for stormwater review, none was received. Acknowledged. Topic: Plat Number: 109 Created: 6/15/2007 [6/15/07] Please add landscaping notes to the plat. A note on the landscape plan has been added. Topic: Swale Design Number: 86 Created: 4/13/2007 [6/12/07] Please call out lot numbering on grading and erosion control plans. Lots are now called out. [4/13/071 The Swale going through lots 17 through 22 should be carefully designed. Please minimize the amount of area contributing runoff to this swale if possible. Provide a design for the swale showing how much runoff is expected in that swale. Landscaping restrictions notes should be added to the grading plan as well as to the plat. Page 9 Number: 121 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Because you are using separate FL and CL stationing, we will require that you add spot elevations on the CL stationing sheet (in lieu of cross sections) so that we can determine that the minimum 2% cross slope is being met. Please place spot elevations at all VC's (sag and crest) and all PCs, beginning and end. Also, put spots cutting through the street widenings as well. See redlines or we can go over it real quick in person too Cody - whichever is easier! : ) Spots have been added. Number: 122 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] See 12.2.2 for minimum cover requirements over structures. There's a couple of stormlines that look like we're not quite making it. With the squeeze between the sewer line and top of grade it is close, but I have close to 2.5 feet cover. Topic: Utility - Utility Sheet Number: 114 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Need to show the proposed work tying into the existing on the east side of the project (like the grading sheet does). Proposed work is now shown. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire Number: 68 Created: 3/21 /2007 [6/13/071 [3/21/071 REVIEW APPLICABLE TO STRUCTURES: PFA reviews the right to further review of the project when specific structures and their locations are proposed. Acknowledged. Number: 95 Created: 4/18/2007 [6/13/07] [4/18/07] PFA has no further comments or concerns related to the current documents submitted. Acknowledged. Department: Traffic Operations Topic: Traffic Engineering Number: 101 [6/11/07] The TIS is acceptable. Issue Contact: Eric Bracke Created: 6/11 /2007 1 don't need any additional information. Page 7 Number: 112 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please provide a soils report. Provided. Number: 116 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 Please remove the shaded box that represents the trailer (?) from all sheets except for the existing conditions sheet. Trailer has been removed. Topic: Utility - Grading Number: 118 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please show and label all removals. See redlines - I circled a what I think is just a mistake in two of the contour lines. Let me know... All removals are now shown on the demolition sheet. Number: 119 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please add the little box with the X in it to the legend. The symbol has been added. It is a central mail unit. Topic: Utility - Intersection Details Number: 123 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Thanks for doing such a nice job of presenting the information Cody! It's the nicest intersection detail sheet I've ever seen. I really appreciate that you showed the slope percents for me. It saved me a LOT of time doing the talcs by hand. Just missing a couple of spots otherwise you're good to go! Spots have been added. Topic: Utility -Kudos! Number: 125 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] This was the most complete, most excellent submittal ever! I had very little to comment on and appreciate the hard work you put into this set of plans Cody. Phenomenal job! Thank you. Topic: Utility - Plan and Profile Number: 120 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please call out the various dimensions as shown in figure 7-24 for all street widenings in the plan view. Dimensions are now shown. Page 6 [6/18/07] Please add "to be dedicated by this plat" to the 9' utility easement so there's no doubt that while one utility easement is being vacated, there is a new one being dedicated. Thank you : ) "Dedicated per this plat" has been added. Number: 128 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 It looks like a layer from the utility plans was left on - the rip rap and FES is showing up. Please remove. The xREF was taken out of the drawing. Number: 129 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 Please label the existing sight distance easement to the north and west of the development. Existing sight easement has been labeled. Topic: Utility - Detail Sheet Number: 124 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] A couple of the details will scan a little blurry but you can fix that by reducing the pen thickness a tad. That, and add details 1606a and 1607. Thanks! Details have been modified. Topic: Utility - Existing Conditions Number: 113 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Existing trailer needs to be labeled and whether or not it is being removed. Are those existing water and sewer services to the trailer or is that a sidewalk? If so, will you be removing them too? Need to show and label all removals on the utility sheet. Existing trailer is labeled and shown on the demo plan to be removed. Topic: Utility - Gen Notes Number: 111 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Under General Notes, add line 49 and refer to the Soils Report. There is reference to the soils report on the cover and on the grading sheets. Topic: Utility - General Number: 110 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please remove all color from the plan set. Color has been removed. Page 5 note that no construction is being proposed in the future park area. If you can think of something better Cody, I'm up for it, just let me know! : ) Added another sheet to show the park. Number: 132 Created: 6/18/2007 (6/18/07] Please see comments under all plan sets for items that will need to be coordinated so that all of the plan sets match. Acknowledged. Number: 133 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 See redlines for other comments. Acknowledged. Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 130 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 Please show the proposed Improvements to the east tying into the existing (like the site plan did). Proposed improvements are now shown. Number: 131 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please label and dimension all easements. Easements have been labeled and dimensioned Topic: Plat Number: 108 Created: 6/14/2007 [6/14/07] From Technical Services: 1. Plat close 0.05' 1:71188 2. Why not dedicate the south FC easements on this plat rather than by separate doc? (From Susan - I've passed on the reason why to tech services, no issue). 3. We have copies of the separate docs and they do not match this plat. 4. See relines for other problems. Number: 126 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] Please remove all shading from the plat. It doesn't scan well unfortunately... Shading on the vicinity map has been removed. Number: 127 Created: 6/18/2007 Page 4 Number: 100 Created: 6/7/2007 [6/7/07] What is the large grey box shown on lot 13 on the site and landscape plans? Please remove if it is the existing construction trailer. The large grey box was a trailer and is shown to be removed on the demo sheet. Topic: Plat Number: 105 Created: 6/12/2007 [6/12/07] Please change the City Signature Block to say "Tract H of the Corrected Plat of the Registry Ridge PUD First Filing" and the Lennar Signature Block to say "Tract C of the Corrected Plat of the Registry Ridge PUD First Filing." This will help clarify who owns which portions of the previous PUD, since this new filing does not have a Tract H and also has a new Tract C. The City Signature Block now states as Tract A and the Lennar's Ownership is Tracts B-C and Lots 1 — 27. Topic: Site Plan Number: 103 Created: 6/12/2007 [6/12/07] Please add on to site notes # 4 and #9 indicating that modifications to the solar orientation and density standards were requested and approved with this Project Development Plan. Notes have been added. Number: 104 Created: 6/12/2007 [6/12/07] Please change that maximum building height on the site plan from 40 feet to 2.5 stories. The maximum height has been changed to 2.5 stories. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 115 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/071 There is an existing sidewalk between lots 104 and 105 in the neighborhood to the south that is being removed and replaced a little to the east of its current location. Nothing is shown for how the peds will cross the culvert or where it will tie into. The existing sidewalk is to be removed and replaced because of the sanitary sewer line. The park will be designing the connection. Number: 117 Created: 6/18/2007 [6/18/07] All plan sets need to show the same area being platted. The utility plans can show a matchline to one sheet combining grading, utility, drainage etc with a Page 3 The existing water tap and fire line are to abandoned at the main. The existing sewer service is to be abandoned in place and mortar fill the service connection. 5. The proposed sanitary sewer connection to the existing manhole is to be made by core drilling. The inverts for the existing manhole need to be shown. A note has been added. 6. The District requires .2 feet of drop through the proposed sanitary sewer manholes. As talked about, a note has been placed on both the utility sheet and the sanitary sewer sheets holding the manufacture responsible. Drops of .2 were used every possible. 7. Are basements proposed for all lots? If so, will there be any sanitary sewer pump systems? There are proposed lots and lots 1-7 and 19 will have sewer pumps. 8. The proposed 4 inch sanitary sewer drop is to be eliminated and connected to the proposed 8 inch sanitary sewer line. The drop manhole has been taken out. 9. All District references on the revised "Lot 25 Sewer Service Connection" are to be removed. The word extent in the note should be extend. The sanitary sewer line is PVC not VCP. The reference to the city has been removed and PVC has been corrected. 10. The District will require another review due to the nature of the above comments. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 104, if you have any questions or require additional information. Topic: General Number: 99 Created: 6/7/2007 [6/7/071 The TIS Memo still reflects the original proposal for 31 single-family dwelling units. This is not critical change to make at this stage, but I do want this comment on the record. The trip generation will likely be less than was is estimated in the original TIS. Acknowledged. Page 2 (Mics STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins BUD CURTIS/CODY SNOWDON Date: 06/18/2007 NORTHERN ENGINEERING 200 S. COLLEGE AVE. FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for REGISTRY RIDGE 5TH FILING PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLANS, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Shelby Sommer Topic: Fort Collins Loveland Water District Number: 102 Created: 6/12/2007 [6/12/07] Terry Farrill (Fort Collins Loveland Water District): 1. The drawings indicate that Tract F, Registry Ridge PUD First Filing was dedicated as a pedestrian, landscape and drainage easement, not sanitary sewer. The District requires minimum 30 foot wide easements for the sanitary sewer lines, on the District's standard easement form, that are not located within the public ROW. Tract F will be defined as a pedestrian, landscape, drainage and sanitary sewer easement by your document. 2. Adequate easements and easment rights need to be conveyed to lots 25 and 26 for the sanitary sewer service line easements. Typically, a 15 foot wide easement is not adequate to replace or repair the service line. The homeownel is responsible to provide locates for the sanitary sewer service to their property. The side lot easements are also used for other utilities which will create problems for lot owners with respect to maintenance, repair, replacement, access and locates. The easement has been defined with a width of 15 feet. With having the service profiled at a five foot depth, the width of the trench to ASHTOO standards will fit within the easement. 3. Access to the sanitary sewer line, in Tract A, for maintenance needs to be addressed. Addressed through your standard form. 4. The existing water tap, fire line and sanitary sewer taps are to be abandoned in accordance with District requirements and specifications. Page I