HomeMy WebLinkAboutMASON STREET NORTH - MAJOR AMENDMENT - 4-97B - CORRESPONDENCE - (8)Response to 11 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
10
Response to 20 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 21 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 22 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 23 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 24 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Zoning
Response to 1 (Jenny Nuckols)
Landscaping has been graphically removed from the site plan.
Response to 2 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
Response to 3 (Jenny Nuckols)
Noted.
Response to 4 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
Response to 5 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
Response to 6 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
Response to 7 (Jenny Nuckols)
The parking lot east of Mason Court had been removed.
Response to 8 (Jenny Nuckols)
They are private garages. Labels added in this resubmission.
Response to 9 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
Response to 10 (Jenny Nuckols)
Provided.
7
Response to 93 (Joseph Gerdom)
Understood.
Stormwater Utility
Response to 15 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 16 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 17 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 25 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 26 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 90 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 91 (Wes Lamarque)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Transportation Planning
Response to 14 (Kathleen Reavis)
Bike racks around Building A have been relocated. The racks by the northwest
corner of Building B are very close to the two of the residential entrances, as well as to
the entrance of the courtyard. Also, it makes sense to provide these bike racks at the end
of the Mason Court roundabout. Additional racks added by the plaza provided along the
Cherry Street for those who approach the project from South.
Water Wastewater
Response to 18 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 19 (Jeff Hill)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
0
Response to 13 (Janet McTague)
The developers thank Light & Power for their willingness to help finding creative
solutions for serving Mason Street Court Project.
Natural Resources
Response to 95 (Doug Moore)
Details for trash enclosures have been added on the site plan.
Response to 96 (Doug Moore)
The mentioned parking lot has been removed.
PFA
Response to 80 (Ron Gonzales)
Understood.
Response to 81 (Ron Gonzales)
Understood.
Response to 82 (Ron Gonzales)
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 83 (Ron Gonzales)
Understood.
Response to 84 (Ron Gonzales)
All buildings will be fully sprinkled per code requirements.
Response to 85 (Ron Gonzales)
Understood. Building directories along with the whole project information will be
provided in visible outdoor locations.
Response to 86 (Ron Gonzales)
Knox boxes will be provided per each building.
Response to 87 (Ron Gonzales)
Understood.
Police
Response to 92 (Joseph Gerdom)
Eastern parking lot has been removed.
7
Response to 73 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 74 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.11.
Response to 75 (Katie Moore):
Provided
Response to 76 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 77 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.9.
Response to 78 (Katie Moore):
The Cherry Street parking lot is rearranged with single driveway, in order to allow
a plaza arrangement between the parking lot and Cherry Street, which is also close to the
bus stop. However, the layout is still violating the LCUASS setback and driveway width
requirements. Please find the attached variance request for our justifications for not
conforming to mentioned LCUASS standards.
Response to 79 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.10.
Response to 97 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 98 (Katie Moore):
See response to 35.
Response to 99 (Katie Moore):
Provided
Response to 100 (Katie Moore):
Provided
& Power
Response to 12 (Janet McTague)
A 14' electrical easement with a vertical minimum 1 O'clearence has been included
on our drawings in this resubmission.
Response to 58 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 59 (Katie Moore):
The mentioned parking lot has been removed.
Response to 60 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 61 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 62 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 63 (Katie Moore):
See attached variance request.
Response to 64 (Katie Moore):
The layout of the Cherry Street parking has been changed in a way to reduce the
number of driveways.
Response to 65 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 66 (Katie Moore):
Garages are rearranged.
Response to 67 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 68 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 69 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 70 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 71 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 72 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
5
Response to 43 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 44 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 45 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 46 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.1.
Response to 47 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 48 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.4.
Response to 49 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 50 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 51 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 52 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 53 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 54 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 55 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 56 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 57 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
H
Response to 28 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 29 (Katie Moore):
Landscaping has been graphically removed from site plan.
Response to 30 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 31 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.3.
Response to 32 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.4.
Response to 33 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 34 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 35 (Katie Moore):
Understood.
Response to 36 (Katie Moore):
Understood.
Response to 37 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 38 (Katie Moore):
Landscaping on the round about has been revisited to meet sight requirements.
Response to 39 (Katie Moore):
Provided in landscaping plan.
Response to 40 (Katie Moore):
See response to 106.5.
Response to 41 (Katie Moore):
Provided.
Response to 42 (Katie Moore):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
W
5. The skinny sidewalk has been removed. (Since some upgraded materials, such
as brick or colored concrete pavers, will be used for these parking stalls in
order to create a "plaza" effect, continuing the pavement all the way to the
building wall will enhance the effect we are aiming at.)
6. An additional study has been commissioned and completed by Terracon. This
study outlines the subdrainage conditions on Lot 12 in detail. Project team
will continue to work with Terracon during the architectural design phase.
Mentioned study is attached.
7. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
8. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
9. The bus stop will be relocated as shown on the site plan.
10. The trash dumpsters are removed from the easements. More information has
been provided about the trash dumpsters on the site plan.
11. The developer is progressing in convincing the Burlington Northern Railroad
Company to provide a letter. However, as in everything with the railroad
companies it is taking time since the bureaucracy in national firms works
slow. At this point we would like to remind the city that there is a use
easement provided by the owner to the Burlington Northern Railroad
Company and that the Company does not own the land.
Response to 107 (Steve Olt c/o Kathleen Reavis):
Bike racks around Building A have been relocated. The racks by the northwest
comer of Building B are very close to the two of the residential entrances, as well as to
the entrance of the courtyard. Also, it makes sense to provide these bike racks at the end
of the Mason Court roundabout. Additional racks added by the plaza provided along the
Cherry Street for those who approach the project from South.
Response to 108 (Steve Olt):
Details for trash enclosures have been added on the site plan.
Response to 109 (Steve Olt):
See response to 7.
Response to 110 (Steve Olt):
Understood.
Response to 111 (Steve Olt):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Engineering
Response to 27 (Katie Moore):
An additional study has been commissioned and completed by Terracon. This
study outlines the subdrainage conditions on Lot 12 in detail. Project team will continue
to work with Terracon during the architectural design phase. Mentioned study is attached.
2
Current Planning:
Response to 101 (Steve Olt c/o Len Hilderbrant):
1. The project team have contacted to Len Hilderbrant of Excel Energy and
worked out a solution that is outlined in our utility plans. According to this
scheme Mason Street North can be served without Excel Energy using the
utility easement along Mason Court for gas lines. Therefore, 9' easement
proposed in original Martinez PUD has been reduced to 8' for this
submission.
2. Understood.
Response to 102 (Steve Olt c/o City's Technical Services Department):
See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 103 (Steve Olt c/o Craig Foreman):
1. The first application is submitted to the city prior to the August 16, 2001
meeting. This resubmission reflects the agreements reached in the meeting on
the August 16, 2001.
2. The parking on the Park land (east of Mason Court) is removed.
3. The staircase north of parking lot of 6 (North of Building C) is removed.
4. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
5. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 104 (Steve Olt c/o Rick Lee):
Understood. We met Mike Gebo and Rick Lee to go over accessibility issues and
agreed to provide 2 type A units and 6 type B units in Building C (the total number of
units in the entire project is 20). We will be in touch with them as we progress with
architectural plans further.
Response to 105 (Steve Olt c/o Wes Lamarque and Basil Hamdan):
1. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
2. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
3. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
4. See engineering responses by Shear Engineering.
Response to 106 (Steve Olt c/o Katie Moore):
1. Understood
2. The buildings are removed from easements
3. The sidewalk along the north side of Mason Court has been removed.
4. The median is removed from this application. This median will be designed
and constructed by the developer in contingent with a Downtown
Development Authority fund and therefore will be included in a separate
application in the future. Rather than rushing the design for this application
the developer will take time and design something worthwhile in the future.
RESPONSES TO
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
MASON STREET NORTH
FORT COLLINS
November 2, 2001
0 777 PEARL 8T. M 210, BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 TEL. 303.447.2786 PAR 303.447.2968 EMAIL wla4?wlareh.aom 0