HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEDERSEN AUTO PLAZA - PDP/FDP - 26-97 - CORRESPONDENCE - (20)From: Sheri Wamhoff
To: CPES.SOLT, TS.STR.KREAVIS
Date: 2/10/98 2:48pm
Subject: Pederson Auto Plaza Meeting -Reply
Kathleen
What we discussed yesterday was the issues that stormwater and
engineering/transportation that still need to be addressed.
Stormwaters concerns:
* They don't have adequate detention - Stormwater feels that they may have
entered the wrong rainfall amounts into the model.
* They have done nothing to address water quality from the site. Per the LUC
they are required to provide some type of water quality using best management
practices.
Engineering/Transportation concerns:
* Per the LUC (Sections 3.2.2(C)(6), 3.6.5(A) and 3.6.5(B) ) and the Transit
Design Standards and Guidelines items # 2 and 7 (referenced in the code
sections) the applicant shall provide an access easement for a pedestrian/
bicycle connection across the site. This access easement shall be 12 feet in
width in accordance with detail D-4 of the Design and Construction Criteria,
Standards and Specifications for Streets, Sidewalks, Alleys and Other Public
Ways.
Paul Eckman had a meeting with the applicants attorney to discuss the Citys
ability to require this of the applicant. We have not heard anything back on
the results of that meeting or on Pauls interpretation on if we can do what we
are asking for. Both Steve and I have asked Paul to keep up updated on what
is happening.
As the 12 foot easement width is not part of the LUC, but a part of our street
standards the applicant can submit a variance request to modify this standard.
If this request is received it would need to be reviewed by Gary Diede and Tom
Frazier.
* The landscaping and site plan as is now shown will not work with the future
installation of a path connection. The light poles will not be allowed in the
easement as they are a structure. The landscaping and tree placement needs to
placed with consideration for the path. Since a 5 foot landscape strip is
required this may have to be accommodated partially outside of the access
easement as the easement is not wide enough to accommodate 5 feet of landscape
and the path.
Basil and Steve if you don't think I properly represented what was discussed
and determined please let me know.
Sheri
CC: wu.usc.BHAMDAN