HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRAKE CROSSING WTF - PDP - 19-10 - REPORTS - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGNeighborhood Information Meeting
Project:
Meeting
Date: CT--T I I lJ
-Fzi�i I i -
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
s
i l
OPEN�[I�.IL/�.'
�6/A
19) What are the other sites considered?
A: Blevins Junior High School was a site T-Mobile considered. We had a 6 month
dialogue before the school administration decided they were not interested. A
local Lutheran Church was also contacted; however they were not an ideal
location.
4
CM square for field exposure. Transmission measurements at the base of the
tower, in any direction, are very minimal —under 1 %.
11) Q: What are the limits on exposure? Are the limits in effect 24 hours a day?
A: The occupational limit is 6 minutes for 5 mW and the public limit is 30 minutes
for 1 mW per square CM. Anything below those levels not considered harmful.
12) Q: Your previous statement is really only applicable if you are directly in front
of it, correct? If you are directly in line with the antenna, or directly below the
antenna does that make a difference in terms of radio frequencies?
A: The area in question is a 60 degree "pie slice," horizontally. Vertically
speaking, most of the energy is focused within 5 to 10 degrees. The energy at
the front and sides of the antenna diminish substantially. Out side of 30 or 40 feet
is measurable but not substantial.
13) Q: Let's say you were 30 feet away from the wireless telecommunication
facility for 30 minutes, is that type of exposure harmful?
A: You would have to literally have to "hug" the antenna for 30 minutes to exceed
the federal limits. The public limit is less than 20 % of the occupational limit.
14) Q: Are children more vulnerable to these radio frequencies than adults?
A: I am not qualified to answer that question.
A: Chris Stryker: Adams 12 School District is one of our (T-Mobile) landlords.
They required a before and after radio frequency study in which inside and
outside levels are tested at the school. There is typically more frequency emitted
by monitors, wireless routers, and microwaves than output from a cell tower.
Additionally, most studies that are made available to the public are focused on
handsets, not cell towers. If you are a cell phone user and the tower is close,
they are actually going to reduce exposure.
15.) Q: Are the photo simulations an accurate representation of the "look" of the
proposal?
A: Yes, it will look like a light post.
16.) Q: In this neighborhood, vandalization exists. Who would be responsible for
graffiti clean up?
A: T-Mobile would be responsible for clean up of graffiti. The T-Mobile tech would
service the site and clean it up.
17) Q: Would T-Mobile provide additional landscaping?
A: No, we are not proposing additional landscaping at this time; we would just
provide a fence.
18). Q: Will the facility take away parking spots?
A: Yes, the ground equipment will require the removal of 4 parking spots.
3
For example, a very rural area with a large tower would have a large area so
towers in that area may be farther apart. However, in a suburban area, towers
need to be closer for topographic and population concentration reasons. A single
tower can only support a finite amount of users.
4) Q: How many towers are in Fort Collins?
A: There are approximately twelve (12) towers in Fort Collins.
5) Q: How many towers are in a mile or two radius of the proposed "Drake
Crossing" tower?
A: There is a 70' tower located south of S.Taft Hill Road and Harmony Road.
There is another tower south as well at King Soopers. Additionally, a tower is
proposed at CSU stadium and another proposed at the drive-in theater.
6) Q: If those sites were to be approved (CSU Stadium and the Drive-in Theater),
would this site still be necessary?
A: Yes this site at Drake Crossing would still be necessary in order to create the
network. A popular analogy to think about regarding wireless networks is
watering your yard with a sprinkler system. You don't want to over soak but you
also don't want to not water enough. In terms of wireless network coverage we
plan these facilities in order to mitigate over lapping coverage. Overlapping can
possibly create more interference.
7) Q: What are some examples of wireless primary carriers?
A: Examples of wireless primary carriers are: Cricket, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile,
Clearwire, and Sprint, to name a few.
8) Q: Isn't there roughly about a dozen wireless carriers?
A: Yes, there is roughly about a dozen wireless carriers. Wireless carriers utilize
stealth technology so they have minimum impact on the community.
9) Q: Did you contact Pouder River Power Authority . (PRPA) regarding
opportunities to co locate on their power line poles?
A: PRPA is not interested in having wireless companies co -locate on their
property. They find that maintenance on their lines and facilities can become
cumbersome when having multiple wireless carriers up on their poles.
Additionally, PRPA has to lower to the voltage in order to keep their wires
maintained, which causes more problems on their end. Ultimately, it is PRPA's
choice and they have declined co -location.
10) Q: What is the health issues associated with cell towers?
A: The frequencies that T-Mobile uses are high and degrade rapidly. The power
output per channel is 20 Watts. T-Mobile utilizes a three (3) antenna
configuration that operates independently. For example, the north facing antenna
is directing its transmission in only one direction and the FCC regulates 1 KW per
2
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
PROJECT: Drake Crossing — Wireless Telecommunication
Facility P.D.P.
DATE: August 17, 2010
APPLICANT: Mr. Chris Stryker, T- Mobile Representative, Stryker
Site Services
CITY PLANNER: Courtney Rippy, City of Fort Collins
The meeting began with a description of the proposed project. This is a request
for the construction of a new 50 foot wireless telecommunication pole and facility
in Safeway's west parking lot adjacent to Hampshire Road. The proposed
structure will resemble existing light poles in the surrounding area and also
include a 6 foot wood screening fence at the base. The site is located on the
corner of West Drake Road and Hampshire Road and is bounded by Valley
Forge Avenue to the north and South Taft Hill Road to the east. This site is
zoned N-C, Neighborhood Commercial, and Wireless Telecommunication
Facilities are permitted, subject to an administrative hearing.
Unless otherwise noted, all responses are from the applicants or the consultants.
QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS
1) Q: Is the tower located at the King Soopers to the south a T-Mobile tower?
A: Yes, there is a tower at that location. It is disguised as a light pole in the alley.
We made the tower taller in order to accommodate additional carriers such as
Verizon.
2) Q: What are the potential benefits to having a cell tower near my property?
A: Cell coverage would be the primary benefit.
Q: I already have adequate cell coverage.
A: Our research has indicated to us that home buyers take the areas cell
coverage into consideration when deciding to purchase a property. Additionally,
with more cell towers, the market can become more competitive and drive the
price of cell phone service down.
3) Q: What is the maximum distance to connect the two towers?
A: About a mile and a half: Terrain and topography plays a part. The distance is a
function of the amount of signal loss and the place the user is using the phone.