HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROVINCETOWNE P.U.D., FILING NO. 2, FIRST REPLAT - PDP - 73-82W - CORRESPONDENCE - (12)FORT COLLINS-LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT (2(0
SOUTH FORT COLLINS SANITATION DISTRICT
October 2, 2002
Mr. Steve Olt, Planner
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: 473-82W Provincetowne PUD 2nd Filing
Replat of Multi -Family
Dear Mr. Olt,
The Fort Collins - Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District have reviewed
the above mentioned replat and have no objections or comments.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 14, if you have any questions or require additional
information.
Respectfully,
Mr. T�iy W. Farrill
Systems Engineer
RECEIVED
OCT 0 � 200
CURREti i PLANNING
xc: Mr. Michael D. DiTullio, District Manager
Manhard Consulting Engineers
5150 Snead Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone (970) 226-3104 Fax (970) 226A186
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341.
Yours Truly,
9AOA-
Steve Olt,
City Planner
cc: KB Homes Colorado Inc.
Sheri Wamhoff, City Engineering
Page 4
Department: Zoning
Topic: zoning
1
Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Suggest they use the work "replat" rather than "amendment" in title of subdivision.
Department: Current Planning
1
Issue Contact: Steve Olt
The Planning Certification on the cover sheet should refer to the Director of Planning,
not the Planning and Zoning Board & Secretary of the Board. Please see the copy of the
replat red -lined by Current Planning.
2
The streets, sidewalks, and parking lot improvements cannot be shown on this replat,
being a subdivision plat.
3
The wetland delineation and wetland buffer as approved on the original subdivision plat
must be shown on this replat. Please see Sheets 4 & 5 of the recorded subdivision plat,
enclosed.
4
All of Condo Block 1, as approved on the recorded subdivision plat, is not shown on this
replat.
5
This should be the First Re lat, not Amendment.
6
City of Fort Collins Technical Services (Mapping & Surveying) indicated that if this is
a subdivision plat then the outer boundary (boundaries) must be monumented. A lot of
changes must be made to this document.
This completes staff comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
This development request is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal (from the
date of this comment letter) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use
Code. A copy of a Revision Routing Sheet, indicating the number of copies of the
revised subdivision plat to re -submit, is attached to this comment letter. Be sure and
return all of your red -lined plans when you re -submit.
Page 3
6
The building envelopes cannot extend into the easements. Building Envelope #20 has a
corner that is shown extending into the easement.
7
Building Envelope 19 is showing a portion of the sight distance being vacated. This
cannot be vacated. The building envelope needs to be revised so that it does not
extend into the sight distance easement.
8
The replat is missing the 50 foot wetland buffer and building setback line.
9
The replat is missing the limits of wetlands line.
10
The 9 foot utility easement adjacent to Building Envelope 30 cannot be vacated.
11
See additional comments on the plans.
13
Need to identify and label the new building envelope sizes and make it clear that the
areas being vacated are to be a part of the appropriate building envelope.
14
Do not include the streets and other improvements on the replat.
15
Need to make it clear what is being vacated and that those areas now become a part of
that adjacent building envelope.
Department: Light & Power
Topic: 6enervl
Issue Contact: Janet McTague
2
No problems with easement vacations/additions as long as existing electric facilities
are not impacted
Department: Natural Resources
Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: 6enerol
12
Show and label wetland delineation on replat.
Page 2
6a
CitvoE Fort Collins
Manhard Consulting LTD.
c/o David Miller, P.L.S.
8232 E. Park Meadows Dr.
Littleton, CO. 80124
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Date: 10/10/2002
Staff has reviewed your submittal for PROVINCETOWNE PUD, 2ND FILING, REPLAT,
and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: Genera/
16
Len Hilderbrand of Xcel Energy (Public Service Company) offered the following
comments:
a. Public Service Company (P5CO) has conflicts in several areas where easement
vacations are being requested. P5CO has existing gas mains in two locations,
Buildings 4 & 30.
b. The customer will need to provide P5CO with a drawing showing exact locations
of gas mains and buildings in easements asking for vacations of those easements.
C. Any relocation of gas mains will be at the developer's expense.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Topic: Genera/
3
Need to provide dimensions for all the easements shown and for the property
boundary.
4
It needs to be clear as to what the property boundary of this plat is. The streets can
not be included in the replat. The applicant has not included all of Condo Block 1 on this
replat.
5
Label all the existing easements.
Page 1