HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST RIDGE C-STORE - PDP - 33-98G - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO APPLICANTSteve Olt - RE: East Ridge C-Store, PDP nment letter & red -lined plans Page 1
From: Steve Olt
To: Matt
Date: 05/03/2007 2:01:27 PM
Subject: RE: East Ridge C-Store, PDP comment letter & red -lined plans
Matt,
You will not see car washes w/fuel sales in the Land Use Code (LUC) because they do not exist in Fort
Collins. Convenience retail stores w/fuel sales are, of course, prevalent and may or may not contain a car
wash (as an accessory use). Car washes as a principal use (defined as vehicle minor repair, servicing
& maintenance) are not permitted in the LMN District.
Secondly, you are correct about there being several tracts in the East Ridge development that were
approved as Future N/C (neighborhood center) on the PDP and are proposed to remain as such on the
Final Plans. They are in close proximity to one another. City Planning staff has discussed the East Ridge
C-Store PDP proposal and agree that, as a phase of the neighborhood center, it contains just one use: a
convenience retail store w/fuel sales (and an accessory car wash). However, there are 3 other tracts
identified as part of the 'overall' neighborhood center that can & must provide at least one more use other
than a c-store, as listed in Sections 4.5(13)(2)(c)3, 4.5(13)(3)(c)l, and 4.5(D)(3)(c) of the LUC. Also,
somewhere within or adjacent to the overall" neighborhood center there must be an outdoor space that
satisfies the requirement set forth in Section 4.5(D)(3)(e) of the LUC. Staff recommends that East Ridge C-
Store PDP Site Plan recognizes this requirement and, in some way, states that one or more other non-
residential uses and an outdoor space will be provided on Tracts D, E, and V.
Please let me know if you need further clarification
Steve
>>> "Matt" <mattb@jimselldesign.com> 05/02/2007 2:04 PM >>>
Steve,
I have a couple of questions regarding comment number 29 about carwash w/
fuel sales. Could you tell me which district allows for carwashes w/ fuels
sales, I am not seeing any? Also, the second part of the comment mentions
that 2 uses are required in the neighborhood center, this is only one parcel
out of several that will eventually comprise the neighborhood center of East
Ridge, so does this parcel need to contain 2 uses?
Thanks,
Matt
-----Original Message -----
From: Steve Olt fmailto:SOLT(a)fcgov.coml
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Matt B
Subject: RE: East Ridge C-Store, PDP comment letter & red -lined plans
Matt,
The comment letter is attached.
Steve