HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTORYBOOK 2ND FILING - MOD. OF STAND. - 49-98B - DECISION - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION_�� e_�_��G Y b e �
� 90o u. _n_6 � � r y__it'_�
� �a _3 9� �'
Storybook 2nd PDP, Modifica,,ion of Standards
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
January 13, 2005
Page 5 of 5
The Applicant shall include a notation on the Project Development Plan prohibiting
construction of sideyard fences on Lots 61 and 63, Storybook PDP, Second Filing,
abutting the pedestrian path located within Tract A.
Dated this 14th day of January 2005, per authority qranted by Sections
1.4.9(E) and 2.1 of the Land Use Code.
Current Planhing Director
Storybook 2nd PDP, Modifica:,on of Standards
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
January 13, 2005
Page 4 of 5
The second requested modification, which includes a lack of street connection to
the abutting property to the north, is also justified. The abutting property is
owned by Poudre School District and is a potential future high school site. The
School District has determined that promoting vehicular traffic flow through the
Storybook subdivision is neither necessary nor desirable. To accommodate other
modes of transportation, the applicant is appropriately providing a multi -use hard
surface path connecting the neighborhood to the school site. Considering the
transportation needs of the area and the potential for negative traffic impacts with
a through connection, the Hearing Officer finds that the proposed design
performs equally well.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
A. The Storybook, 2"d Filing PDP Modification of Standards is subject to
administrative review and the requirements of the Land Use Code (LUC).
B. With respect to the Modifications Subsection 3.6.3(D) — Spacing of Limited
Movement Collector or Local Street Intersections with Arterial Streets and
Subsection 3.6.3 (F) — Utilization and Provision of Sub -Arterial Street
Connections to and from Adjacent Developments and Developable Parcels of the
Land Use Code:
1. Granting the requested modifications would not be detrimental to the
public good and would not impair the intent and purposes of the Land Use
Code. In both instances, multi -use paths are provided which will continue
to serve the needs of public users.
2. Granting of a modification to the spacing of local intersection spacing is
justified based on the existing stormwater drainage pond area, which has
created an exceptional physical condition that results in undue hardship
on the owner.
3. Granting of a modification to the street connection requirements to the
adjacent property is justified given the potential negative traffic impacts to
the Project and the adjacent potential future school site to the north.
DECISION
The Storybook, 2"d Filing Project Development Plan Modification of Standards, #49-98B
is hereby approved by the Hearing Officer subject to the following condition:
Storybook 2nd PDP, Modificimoon of Standards
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
January 13, 2005
Page 3 of 5
FACTS AND FrNDINGS
1. Site Context/Background Information
N: LMN- undeveloped (potential future school site)
E: LMN- undeveloped (potential future school site)
S: LMN- undeveloped (potential future school site)
W: LMN- attached single family residential (Storybook)
The property was annexed in August 1983 as part of the Country Club East and
East Vine Drive 7th Annexations.
2. Compliance with the Criteria for Granting Modifications to the Land Use
Code:
The Hearing Officer has reviewed the request for modification to the street
pattern and connectivity standards. These standards set forth the requirements
that:
• A collector or local street intersections with arterial streets be spaced at
intervals not to exceed 660' unless rendered infeasible due to unusual
topographic features, existing development or a natural area or feature.
• All development plans shall provide for future public street connections to
adjacent parcels by providing a local street connection spaced at intervals
not to exceed 660' along each development plan boundary that abuts
potentially developable or redevelopable land.
With respect to the lack of a public street connection from the development to
Mountain Vista Drive, the Hearing Officer concurs with the applicant's assertion,
and the staffs position, that an intervening stormwater detention pond
constructed for the existing Storybook development poses a significant physical
hardship. Constructing a bridge crossing would create an undue hardship for the
applicant as well as adversely impact stormwater detention capacity.
Furthermore, the transportation system will not be unduly compromised with a
lack of street connection; a multi -use path within this area will still allow
pedestrians and cyclists a direct route between the development and Mountain
Vista Drive.
City of Fort Collins
Comm, ,.ity Planning and Environmenta ervices
Current Planning
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
TYPE I ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATE:
PROJECT NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
HEARING OFFICER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
January 13, 2005
Storybook, 2"d Filing PDP Modification
of Standards
...::
Stewart & Associates
c/o Jack Blake
103 South Meldrum Street
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Nebarado Construction, Inc.
c/o Jack Blake
6804 Aaron Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Cameron Gloss
Current Planning Director
The Applicant has submitted a stand-alone request for modifications of standards found
in Section 3.6.3- Street Pattern and Connectivity of the Land Use Code (LUC), more
specifically Subsection 3.6.3(D) — Spacing of Limited Movement Collector or Local
Street Intersections with Arterial Streets and Subsection 3.6.3 (F) — Utilization and
Provision of Sub -Arterial Street Connections to and from Adjacent Developments and
Developable Parcels. The property is located on the north side of Mountain Vista Drive
(E. County Road 50), east of Turnberry Road (North County.Road 11), and west of N.
Timberline Road (County Road 9E).
SUMMARY OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION: Conditional Approval
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
Storybook 2nd PDP, ModificaLion of Standards
Administrative Hearing
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
January 13, 2005
Page 2 of 5
ZONING DISTRICT: LMN — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established
no controversy or facts to refute that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice
published.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Hearing Officer, presiding pursuant to the Fort Collins Land Use Code, opened the
hearing at approximately 4:25 p.m. on January 13, 2005 in Conference Room A, 281 N.
College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
HEARING TESTIMONY, WRITTEN COMMENTS AND OTHER EVIDENCE:
The Hearing Officer accepted during the hearing the following evidence: (1) Planning
Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting documents
submitted by the applicant and the applicant's representatives to the City of Fort Collins;
and (3) a tape recording of the public hearing. The LUC, the City's Comprehensive
Plan (City Plan), and the formally promulgated policies of the City are all considered
part of the evidence considered by the Hearing Officer.
The following is a list of those who attended the meeting:
From the City:
Steve Olt, City Planner
From the Applicant:
Ken Forbes
Jack Blake
From the Public:
Gary Mackey, 6804 Aaron Dr.
Written Comments:
None.