HomeMy WebLinkAboutKING SOOPERS FUELING STATION (CEDARWOOD PLAZA) - PDP - 40-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - (22)Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue
Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 45 Created: 1 / 3 / 2008
[1/3/08] No water quality or spill containment measures were provided.
Please provide new water quality measures for site per City criteria.
Response: Spill containment has been provided as requested.
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue
Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 24 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] Show existing water and sewer services that extend to the existing
building. Is water/ sewer service planned to the proposed building? If yes, show
proposed connection points and water meter location. If no, include
abandonment of the existing services at the mains, and add notes to coordinate
abandonment with Water Utilities (970-221-6700). -
Response: The plans have been revised to show the existing water and
sewer lines as well as the proposed connection to the water service.
This completes staff (and outside reviewing agencies) review and comments at
this time. Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this
comment letter. Additional comments and red -lined plans may be forthcoming.
Another round of staff review is determined to be necessary. This proposal is
subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of
this comment letter, being January 4, 2008) as set forth in Section
2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when
you re -submit. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown
on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. Once re -submitted, the revisions
will go through a 2-week round of review before being discussed at a
Wednesday morning staff review meeting.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to
this project, please feel free to call me at 970-221-6341.
Yours Truly,
Steve Olt
City Planner
cc: Randy Maizland
King Soopers
Current Planning File #40-07
Pale 9
Response: Signature block has been added.
Number: 39 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 Please revise the Site and Landscape plans to reflect changes
made on the Utility Plan set with respect to ROW and sidewalk improvements.
Response: The plans have been revised.
Number: 40 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[ 12 / 31 / 07] The PDP Transportation Development Review Fee was not fully
paid. In addition to the base fee of $2000, an additional calculated cost of $250
per gross acre for the site should be included. Please provide this additional
calculation and payment with your next submittal.
Response: The remaining fee will be paid with this submittal.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Alan Rutz
Topic: Light & Power
Number: 21 Created: 12 / 28 / 2007
[12/28/07] Locate round electric vault at West Elizabeth Street to determine if
there is any conflict with the proposed sidewalk relocation. Locate electric
service starting at the round vault and going to the ATM located at the
southeast corner of the site. Show vault and service line on the Site and Utility
Plans.
Response: Note has been added per conversation with Alan Rutz.
Number: 22 Created: 12 / 28 / 2007
[12/28/071 A 10' clearance is required between the proposed trees and the
existing transformer.
Response: Noted.
Number: 23 Created: 12 / 28/ 2007
[12/28/07] Contact Light and Power with electric load requirements.
Response: Noted.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 46 Created: 1 / 4 / 2008
[1/4/08] PERMITS: Permits from Poudre Fire Authority are required prior to
removing current fuel storage tanks and installing new tanks.
Response: Noted.
Number: 47 Created: 1 / 4 / 2008 [ 1 / 4 / 08]
EMERGENCY PHONE: For unattended fueling, a telephone for emergency
notification is required to be on -site. I assume this is what the pay telephone
shown on the plans is for. Please ensure that this phone has the capability of
calling 911 without the use of money (free emergency notification).
Response: Notes have been revised.
Page 8
Appendix E. Available online. List all variance requests under note 48 (i.e.
driveway - intersection separation etc...).
Response: The L. C. U.A. S. S. standard notes have been added.
Number: 31 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] Please submit a variance request letter signed and stamped by a
licensed C.E. for the driveway/intersection separations shown. See LCUASS
Table 7-2 for min. requirements for spacing.
Response: A variance request letter will be submitted with this submittal.
Number: 32 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] Please provide the standard indemnification statements on the
cover sheet (provided with redlines). Please add all consultant info on the
cover sheet (i.e. Traffic Eng, Geotech, Architect etc...). -
Response: Indemnification statements have been added.
Number: 33 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[ 12 / 31 / 07] Please label in bold print FOR REFERENCE ONLY on the
bottom right corner of sheet 2.
Response: Noted.
Number: 34 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 Please see the red -lines, Sheet 4, regarding ROW & Easement
dedications and sidewalk location and width requirements.
Response: The sidewalk and ROW have been revised.
Number: 35 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] No water or sewer service connections being shown on the
Utility Plan??
Response: The plans have been revised to show the existing water and
sewer lines as well as the proposed connection to the water service.
Number: 36 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] Please call out the new access driveways with the LCUASS
standard DWG 707 showing truncated domes at both sides. Max driveway
width is 36 feet. No cross walk striping required at the access driveways. Max
cross slope is 2 percent for pedestrians.
Response: The plan has been revised.
Number: 37 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] No stormwater detention/water quality being shown. From
previous meetings and the conceptual review meeting I was under the
impression that at a minimum, some water quality detention would be
required, maybe in the parkway strip, if not on -site. It appears all drainage is
surfaced drained directly to the street through the access driveways?? I will
defer to stormwater for comments regarding drainage detention requirements
on this site.
Response: Spill containment has been provided as requested.
Number: 38 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[ 12 / 31 / 07] Please add a standard signature block to sheet 5.
Page 7
Number: 16 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 There are several symbols on the Site Plan that are not labeled.
They should be removed. Please see the red -lined Site Plan.
Response: The plans have been revised.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland
Topic: Engineering
Number: 25 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 At the June 18 Conceptual Review meeting, it was stated that
new additional right-of-way (ROW) dedications would be needed for both
South Taft Hill Road and West Elizabeth Street. 57.5 feet from centerline and
42 feet from centerline respectively. Based on the scale 1=20 shown on the
plan, it does not appear that enough ROW exists and no new ROW is being
proposed ??? A 15 foot utility easement must also be dedicated behind the
new ROW. Please see the redline comments.
Response: The plans have been revised to show the additional ROW.
Number: 26 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 The new concrete detached sidewalk must be a minimum of 6 feet
wide and located in the ULTIMATE location at the new ROW. This may require
additional off -site ROW or access easement dedications to get the new
sidewalk to tie back into the existing sidewalk at both ends.
Response: The sidewalk and ROW have been revised.
Number: 27 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 New ROW and easement dedications may be made by a replat or
by separate document. If done by separate document, the City will
collect a $250 review fee per document. No additional fee is collected if done by
Plat.
Response: The ROW and easement dedications will be done by separate
document.
Number: 28 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 The Site, Landscape, Lighting and Elevation plans should be
separated from the Utility Plan set. They are filed separately. Please revise the
index on the cover sheet. A detail sheet will be required at the final
compliance review stage.
Response: The plans have been separated.
Number: 29 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/071 Two City of Fort Collins bench marks are required on the plans.
Please provide this information on the cover sheet.
Response: Two benchmarks have been provided.
Number: 30 Created: 12 / 31 / 2007
[12/31/07] Please use the standard General Notes (1-48) from L.C.U.A.S.S.
Page 6
Response: The signature block has been removed.
Number: 8 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 On the Site Plan, please note that Cedarwood Plaza Shopping
Center is to the south and west of the King Soopers Fuel Facility (see red -
lined plan).
Response: The plans have been revised.
Number: 9 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] Denote the widths of the drive aisle entries into the site from the
streets and the shopping center.
Response: Dimensions for the drive aisle widths have been added.
Number: 10 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] The 4 parallel parking spaces are shown to be 20' in length.
'Standard' car parallel spaces must be 23' in length, 'compact' car spaces
can be 20' in length.
Response: The Parking Spaces have been removed per client request.
Number: 11 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] Based on the symbol in the Utility Legend, there are 2 proposed site
lights in the right-of-way for South Taft Hill Road that would normally be street
lights installed by the City Light 8& Power Department.
Response: The lights have been relocated.
Number: 13 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] Please remove the Existing Telephone Pedestal text and symbol
from the plan and Utility Legend. They are off -site and have no significant
relationship to this development proposal.
Response: The plans have been revised.
Number: 14 Created: 12 / 27/ 2007
[ 12 / 27/ 071 What is the rectangular -shaped 'thing' near the southeast
corner of this site? Is it an ATM machine?
Response: The ATM machine has been denoted.
Number: 15 Created: 12 / 27/ 2007
[12/27/071 There are several items under the Schedule on the Site Plan
that should be removed from the list as well as on the plan. They are:
11. Proposed fill valve on tanks.
21. Existing telephone pedestal to remain.
38. Existing monitoring well to remain.
39. Existing monitoring well to be removed.
These items probably should not be removed from the Utility Plan.
Response: The plans have been revised.
Page 5,
the proposed ROW and will require either an easement or an agreement
for this location.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 17 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 Under Landscape Guarantee and Maintenance, add: #4. All
landscaping shall either be installed or the installation shall be secured with a
letter of credit, escrow or performance bond for 125% of the value of the
landscaping materials and installation prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the building.
Response: The required note has been added to the plans.
Number: 18 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] Remove the gas tanks from the Landscape Plan.
Response: The tanks have been removed from the landscape plans.
Number: 19 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] There is an unlabeled line from the kiosk going to the
northwest. Please remove this line from plan.
Response: The utility line has been removed from the landscape plans.
Number: 20 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 According to Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, Swamp
White Oak does not survive in Fort Collins soils. Please replace them
with Chinkapin Oak, Quercus rriuehlenbergii.
Response: The substitution has been made as requested on the landscape
plans. There is a statement on the plans questioning adequate screening
of the plant materials in the sight triangles. Typically these areas are
not used for screening, we have provided plant material that creates
seasonal interest and complements the layering of materials. Per
discussions with Tim Buchanan, the other tree species were changed to
more acceptable species. Amur Maple for the Redbud and Shademaster
Honeylocust for the Goldenrain tree.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 6 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] The Site Plan must be separated from the Utility Plan. Another set
of plans including the Cover Sheet, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Exterior
elevations and Signage Plan, and Lighting Plan must be created. This is the
system used by the City of Fort Collins.
Response: The plans have been separated.
Number: 7 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
112/27/07] The Utility Plan Approval block must be removed from the Site
Plan.
Page 4
utilities before construction.
Number: 48 Created: 1 / 4 / 2008
[1/4/08] Ward Stanford, the City's Traffic Engineer, indicated that he did not
require a vehicle Transportation Impact Study for this development; however,
he is advising the applicant to contact Transportation Planning (at 970-224-
6058) for the pedestrian and bicycle needs.
Response: Transportation has been contacted and has no comments on
the site plan.
Number: 49 Created: 1/4/2008 [1/4/08]
The following comments were expressed at the City staff review meeting on
January 2, 2008:
Stormwater / Basil Hamdan (970-224-6035)
a. No water quality treatment provision, as required, was done with the
current submittal.
Response: Spill containment has been provided as requested.
Water & Wastewater / Roger Buffington (970-221-6854)
a. Is water and sanitary sewer needed for the kiosk building?
Response: The plans have been modified to show the existing service
supplying a yard hydrant for irrigation purposes.
Engineering / Randy Maizland (970-221-6605)
a. No water quality treatment provision, as required, was done with the
current submittal.
Response: Spill containment has been provided as requested.
b. No additional street right-of-way (ROW) for South Taft Hill Road and
West Elizabeth Road is being dedicated with the current development
proposal. Additional ROW is needed for both streets, as stated in
comment #2.e, page 3, of the conceptual review comments from June
18, 2007. The required additional ROW may impact the site layout as
currently proposed.
Response: The plans have been revised to show the additional ROW.
Number: 50 Created: 1 /4/2008
[1/4/08] All project signage is subject to the City's Sign Code that is
administered by the Zoning Department. Please contact Zoning for
information on the sign allowance and locations for this development
proposal. They can be reached at 970-416-2745.
Response: The Zoning Department has been contacted for sign
allowances. There will be two monument signs on site. One will be in
Page 3
Number: 2 Created: 12/27/2007 [12/27/071 The required Owners
Certification, Notary Public Certification, and Director of Planning & Zoning
Approval signature blocks must be added to the Site Plan, etc., set of plans.
Examples of these signature blocks are attached to the Staff comment letter.
Response: The required signature blocks have been added.
Number: 3 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 General Note 16 on the Cover Sheet states that "construction is
scheduled to begin in June, 2006". This note must come from a previous set of
plans for another project. June, 2006 will be hard to meet.
Response: The note has been revised.
Number: 4 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/07] In General Note 17 on the Cover Sheet, please add: Both pole and
building -mounted fixtures, including under -canopy lighting, will feature down -
directional and full cutoff luminaries. The word 'cutoff is inappropriately shown
twice in this note.
Response: The note has been revised.
Number: 5 Created: 12 / 27/ 2007
.[12/27/07] In General Note 11 on the Cover Sheet, please add: Maximum
building height is 24'. Minimum building height is 20'.
Response: The note has been revised.
Number: 12 Created: 12 / 27 / 2007
[12/27/071 Please add the reference to South for Taft Hill Road.
Response: The plan has been revised.
Number: 41 Created: 1 / 2 / 2008 [ 1 / 2 / 08]
Rick Lee of the Building Department indicated that he is forwarding to the
applicant the Codes and Standards that will apply. Also, please schedule a
pre -submittal meeting (970-416-2341) to discuss specific Building Code issues.
Response: Noted, a pre -submittal meeting will be scheduled.
Number: 42 Created: 1 / 2 / 2008
[1/2/08] Bonnie Ham of the U.S. Postal Service indicated that it is
assumed that any mail would be addressed to the store. If mail is to be
addressed to a separate place that will be used for receiving mail, please
contact her.
Response: Noted.
Number: 43 Created: 1 / 2 / 2008
[ 1 / 2 / 08] Dennis Greenwalt of Comcast Cable indicated that they do have
facilities on this site. Please have locates and potholes done before demolition
starts.
Response: The notes on the plans direct the contractor to locate all
Page 2
P�j
Galloway ss Company Date: 1/4/2008 c/o
Matthew Duhaime
5350 DTC Parkway
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Staff has reviewed your submittal for KING SOOPERS FUELING STATION,
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) - (TYPE 1),' and we offer the following
comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: Building Elevations
Number: 44 Created: 1 / 2 / 2008
[1/2/08] Section 4.23(E)(3) of the LUC sets forth requirements for design of
canopies. The Exterior Elevations and Signage Plan does not satisfy several
standards in this section. Sections 4.23 (E) (3) (b) (c) require a pitched roof or
shallow -pitched roof, false mansard or parapet to present a more residential
character to the canopy. Please see the existing canopy for the King Soopers
fuel station in the Shops @ Rigden Farm center, near the South Timberline
Road & Custer Drive intersection in Fort Collins.
Response: The elevations have been revised to show a mansard roof as
requested.
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 12/27/2007 [12/27/07]
The set of plans as submitted must be broken up into 2 sets as follows:
* 1 set ... Cover sheet
Site Plan (separated from Utility Plan)
Landscape Plan
Exterior Elevations and Signage
Lighting Plan
* 1 set ... Cover Sheet
Alta/ACSM Land Title Survey
Demolition Plan
Utility Plan (separated from Site Plan)
Grading and Drainage Plan
This the way the City of Fort Collins records and files development plans.
Response: The plans have been separated into 2 sets as requested and
outlined above.
Page 1