HomeMy WebLinkAboutKING SOOPERS FUELING STATION (CEDARWOOD PLAZA) - PDP - 40-07 - CORRESPONDENCE - (31)Number: 53 Created: 3/25/2008
[5/15/08] The monument sign is not allowed to be in the ROW per Section 24-1 of the
Municipal Code. The sign must be on private property.
[3/25/08] Both of the monument signs appear to be in the ROW once the additional ROW is
dedicated. They have to be on private property. Additionally, Sec. 3.8.7(G)(2) requires that a
ground sign has to be at least 15' from an interior side lot line. If the facility is addressed off
Elizabeth, then the south lot line is the rear lot line and the Taft Hill sign meets this
requirement, but the Elizabeth sign is then closer than 15' to the west lot line, which becomes
the side lot line. If the address is off Taft Hill, then the opposite is true (the Elizabeth sign is
ok, but the Taft sign isn't.
This completes staff comments at this time. The one significant issue that was discussed at
the staff review meeting on May 2 1 " deals with a workable water quality Best Management
Practice solution for the site. This requires working directly with Basil Hamdan of
Stormwater and Randy Maizland of Engineering to hopefully reach an agreed upon solution
in a timely manner so that the public hearing can be scheduled. A "formal" re -submittal by
the applicant and 2-week round of review by staff (ending in a Wednesday morning meeting)
is not necessary.
Be sure and return all red -lined plans if / when you re -submit. Most of the issues expressed in
this comment letter can be dealt with after the public hearing, with the Final Plan submittal.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970)221-6341.
Yours Truly,
Steve Olt,
City Planner
cc: Randy Maizland, Engineering
Basil Hamdan, Stormwater
King Soopers
Current Planning File #40-07
Page 6
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Water/Wastewater
Number: 70 Created: 4/l/2008
[5/19/08] As previously noted, in addition to the water tight plug at the main, plug the end of
the service on -site with non -shrink grout.
[4/l/08] It appears that the existing sewer service connects to the manhole in Elizabeth;
therefore, to abandon the service, excavate and cap/grout service on site AND install a water-
tight plug in the manhole.
Number: 71 Created: 4/l/2008
[5/19/08] Back flow preventer must be upstream of frost -proof yard hydrant. Will the
backflow preventer be in a pit (separate from water meter pit)? If yes, show pit on the utility
plan? If no, how will the water service and backflow preventer be winterized?
[4/l/08] Frost free yard hydrants not allowed unless proper backflow prevention is provided.
Contact John Nelson (221-6677) for information regarding notes and details to be included
on utility plans.
Number: 73 Created: 4/l/2008
[5/19/08] Revise note as shown on redlined plans.
[4/l/08] Add note to coordinate with Water Utilities (416-2165) on re-routing of the water
service and re -location of the meter pit.
Number: 91 Created: 5/19/2008
[5/19/08] Show location of existing curb stop on the utility plans. The proposed re-routing
of the water service must occur downstream of the curb stop. Move the proposed water
meter pit to the location shown on the redlined plans.
Number: 92 Created: 5/19/2008
[5/19/08] Add water service and water meter pit standard details to the utility plans.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes
Topic: Zoning
Number: 52 Created: 3/25/2008
[5/15/08] The logo sign shown on the north elevation of the canopy is still 33" tall, when
only 30" is allowed.
[3/25/08] Per Section 3.8.7(E)(13), only 2 signs are allowed on the canopy, one on the east
fascia and one on the north fascia. The plan shows 4 such signs, one on each fascia. The
south and west signs need to be removed. Per Section 3.8.7(E)(8), the maximum allowed
height of logo and cabinet signs is 30", the plan indicates that the logos on the canopy are 33"
tall. Also, the maximum size allowed for the one canopy sign on the north fascia is 12 sq.ft.
(Sec. 3.8.7(E)(13), but the logo and letters combined is more than 18 square feet (the logo
can't be considered as one sign and the letters as another, because then there would be two
signs when only one is allowed. So as one sign, it can't exceed 12 sq.ft.)
Page 5
Number: 100 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please call out all curb opening/chase drains with the LCUASS standard detail and
provide the detail on the detail sheet 6 of 6.
Number: 101 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please add the City standard signature block to sheet 6 - details.
Number: 102 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] An overpayment of $250 was made. I believe this was a result of the confusion on
the ROW dedication by separate document. We can apply this 'credit" toward the easement
review fee that is necessary for the off -site cross lot access arrangement and associated off -
site improvements. An email was sent to Matt regarding ROW and Easement dedications on
5-20-08.
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: 1
Number: 46 Created: 1 /4/2008
[5/21/08] PFA requires permits to be issued when installing and/or removing underground
fuel tanks, and requires that two sets of plans be submitted for review. Plans must show the
layout of the USTs, number of tanks, size and construction materials.
[1/4/08] PERMITS: Permits from Poudre Fire Authority are required prior to removing
current fuel storage tanks and installing new tanks.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Denise Weston
Topic: General
Number: 103 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] No Comment
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Drainage Report
Number: 94 Created: 5/19/2008
[5/19/08] Please provide a drainage report. Include water quality calculations as well as all
other drainage and erosion control calculations. No report was included with this latest
submittal package.
Topic: Water Quality design
Number: 93 Created: 5/19/2008
[5/19/08] The detail for the landscape detention should be clarified. Please provide actual
dimensions, elevations and slopes. Please provide a separator material between the native
soil and the landscape detention material. This can be in the form of a poly liner.
Why is there an impermeable liner at the bottom of the porous landscape detention pond?
It seems that a meeting to discuss adequate water quality measures is needed before the next
submittal. A representative from the Engineering Department should also be invited to this
meeting.
Page 4
,J
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 59 Created: 3/26/2008
[5/20/08] The proposed monument sign at the northeast corner of the site cannot be in the
street right-of-way.
[3/26/08] The 2 proposed monument signs (items #31) cannot be in the street rights -of -way.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland
Topic: Engineering
Number: 78 Created: 4/l/2008
[5/20/08] A letter of intent for the cross lot access arrangement and temporary construction
easement are needed prior to scheduling a hearing for this project.
[4/l/08] Please submit a signed letter from Cedarwood Plaza (prior to scheduling a hearing)
indicating that they are OK with the cross lot access arrangement proposed on the plans on
the NW corner of the parcel.
Number: 79 Created: 4/l/2008
[5/20/08] The monument sign is still shown in the ROW. No signs will be permitted in the
ROW. Please also see Zoning department comments from Peter Barnes.
[4/l/08] Monument signs may not encroach into the new ROW area. Please pull these signs
out of the ROW limits.
Number: 95 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please add "Utility Plans For" on the cover sheet over the tile for the Utility Plan
set.
Number: 96 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please add (For Reference Only) to the Index for the ALTA survey. See red -lines
for clarification.
Number: 97 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please remove variances number 2 and 3 from cover sheet General Note 48. The
lighting is a modification to the Land Use Code processed by Planning and not a part of the
Utility Plan set. Number 3 will not be permitted by the City. The monument sign must be
removed from the ROW. See red -lines.
Number: 98 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] The plan shows a small portion of the canopy structure overhanging the new ROW
dedication. No part of a structure is permitted to encroach into the ROW. Please revise the
plans accordingly.
Number: 99 Created: 5/20/2008
[5/20/08] Please add the City's standard street cut note to the demolition plan and utility plan
sheets. I have provided this note in the red -lines.
Page 3
b. The proposed monument sign cannot be in the right-of-way (ROW).
C. The standard street cut note must be added to the utility plans.
d. Sheet 6 of the utility plans is missing the standard signature block.
Light & Power / Rob Irish:
a. Light & Power needs an 8' clearance in front of the transformer (east side, for access) at
the northwest corner of the site.
Stormwater / Basil Hamdan:
a. The water quality details as submitted are not acceptable.
Poudre Fire Authority / Carie Dann:
a. Storage tank permits are needed.
b. The address for this site will be on the kiosk.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 56 Created: 3/26/2008
[5/20/08] Still one area of concern - detention pond along the north side.
[3/26/08] To ensure full legibility of plans, please avoid overlapping of text with line work.
Number: 105 Created: 5/27/2008
[5/27/08] The transformer at the northwest corner of the site must have 8' clearance on the
east side for access by Light & Power. However, there must be landscaping as possible to
provide adequate screening of the transformer box.
Number: 106 Created: 5/27/2008
[5/27/08] For scanability purposes, there is still one area of concern: the detention pond at
the northeast corner of the site.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Number: 62 Created: 3/27/2008
[5/27/08] Carried over just as a reminder.
[3/27/08] Section 3.2.4(B) of the City's Land Use Code (LUC) states, in part, that all
development shall submit a proposed lighting plan that meets the functional security needs of
the proposed land use without adversely affecting adjacent properties or the community.
Section 3.2.4(D)(3) states, in part, that light sources shall be concealed and fully shielded and
shall feature sharp cut-off capacity so as to minimize up -light, spill -light, glare and
unnecessary diffusion on adjacent property. Under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -
mount, flat lens light fixtures as part of any newly constructed canopy or remodeled canopy.
Page 2
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
Galloway & Company Date: 5/27/2008
c/o Matthew Duhaime
5350 DTC Parkway
Greenwood Village CO 80111
Staff has reviewed your submittal for KING SOOPERS FUELING CENTER, PDP -
TYPE 1, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt
Topic: General
Number: 3 Created: 12/27/2007
[5/19/08] This is now General Note 8 on the Cover Sheet.
[3/26/08] Did not receive revised Cover Sheet.
[12/27/07] General Note 16 on the Cover Sheet states that "construction is scheduled to
begin in June, 2006". This note must come from a previous set of plans for another project.
Number: 4 Created: 12/27/2007
[5/19/08] This is now General Note 9 on the Cover Sheet.
[3/26/08] Did not receive revised Cover Sheet.
[12/27/07] In General Note 17 on the Cover Sheet, please add: Both pole and building -
mounted fixtures, including under -canopy lighting, will feature down -directional and full
cutoff luminaries. The word 'cutoff is inappropriately shown twice in this note.
Number: 50 Created: 1 /4/2008
[5/19/08] The project signage will not be approved by the Hearing Officer at the required
administrative public hearing. The information provided on this Exterior Elevations - Project
Development Plan drawing is for reference only. The actual signage (content and size) will
be reviewed with the Building Permit application. Therefore, the reference to "AND
SIGNAGE" should be removed from the title.
[3/26/08] Repeat. See Zoning comments #52 & #53.
[1/4/08] All project signage is subject to the City's Sign Code that is administered by the
Zoning Department. Please contact Zoning for information on the sign allowance and
locations for this development proposal. They can be reached at 970-416-2745.
Number: 104 Created: 5/27/2008
[5/27/08] The following comments were expressed by City staff at the review meeting on
May 21 st with staff and the applicant:
Engineering / Randy Maizland:
a. A letter of intent is needed from the property owner to the west (the shopping center)
for the drive connection between the properties.
Page 1