The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS - PDP - 2-08 - CORRESPONDENCE - (37)City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-41 G-2020 PROJECT COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Trans. Planning PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, o DMS) e OAL C-A& elmss waSLGS w+ Q vv�, Vr e. Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat Cite _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT Cityof Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET Planning and Zoning PO Box 580 Forl Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-41 G-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Environmental Planner — Dana Leavitt PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems -S Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat XSite _Drainage Report XOther L4 iq _Utility _Redline Utility z<Landscape PROJECT rCIEW` ED FEB 1 1 2008 Cityof_ COMMENT SHEETLNT: Planning and Zoning PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-41 G-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Louden Irrigation Canal PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems [r Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) No heAd � AZ*44 I fa.,.. 0--t U'12,'►.t d iiV"_ &JW_lt t . Po n c+ o-".) .% ls�c,�.a�o T L-o ✓t2C2✓l. 4i `wt i % `} t,314_c Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat VSite 'Drainage Report _Other , Utility _Redline Utility v: ,andscape PROJECT Cityof_ Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-416-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Q Nv pie,-fi- a G �5 �,� d w .S � r� � � �► �� s c�-o � �o � ltrc c. vo6- '1"l2a �z- F" Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape ,a PROJECT Planning and zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Foil Collins, CO 80522-0580 Far: 970416-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Xcel Energy PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE H i�X 15 `7k6j NACU r2* t. m A-1 A) "e*Tl� ffAl S . S1,6,,r_- z)F Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: d 0AII-Y 6VL -/-0 February 27, 2008 Note -Please identify your redlines for future reference E3— lo— Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) • "o `TEES WIT-4 10 q' OF &kS Sld_�,t C CE_S (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS mat 48lte _Drainage Report _Other ity _Redline Utility `Landscape RECEIVED MAR 2 4 ZUUG, l/l 'd Sti9ti'ON SNI1100 A03 13DX WdLZ:S 20OZ 'bZ''EW I ZA(qft PROJECT Cityaf_ Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fns: 970-4 /h-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Post Office PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems �f Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) NUe reccmweKw Mal`/ dell et S/Kf/e 1po1kil, A he drs/r['doled' in house- -k reS14v11 s Growth C00rdinator-9onnle Nam GBVB 301 F. Boardwalk Pert Collins Co 80626.8888 Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS / Plat -'Site _Drainage Report _Other Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape FCity of Planning, Development & Transportation Services ort COLLins Neighborhood & Building Services 44TT��TTppei+mere renewal is a way of life Sduri�'"-=c Codes and Standards Updated 2-25-2008 All construction within the City of Fort Collins shall comply with following adopted codes: Residential- Includes sinale familv houses, duulex and property -line townhomes: 2003 International Residential Code with local Amendments 2005 Fort Collins Residential Energy Code (IRC chapter 11 amended entirely) 2005 National Electrical Code Accessibility -State Law CRS 9-5 (4 or more units in one building) ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure to be determined site specific Roof Dead Load: 15 PSF min. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF min. Ground Snow Load 30 PSF Frost Depth 30 inches Seismic Design Category B Commercial & Multi -family: 1997 Uniform Building Code with local Amendments 2003 International Mechanical Code w/Amendments 2003 International Fuel Gas Code w/Amendments 2003 International Plumbing Code 2005 National Electrical Code Fort Collins Nonresidential Energy Code, an amended version of ASHRAE/IES 90.1-1989 Fort Collins Multi -family residential energy code, 1995 Model Energy Code with amendments Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998, State Law CRS 9-5 Wind Load: 100-MPH Exposure 8 or 90-MPH Exposure C Roof Dead Load: 15 PSF min. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF min. Ground Snow Load 30 PSF Frost Depth 30 inches Seismic Zone 1 All Projects except Single Family and Tenant Finishes require a Pre -submittal Code Review Meeting with the Fort Collins Building Department. For questions or to schedule this meeting call Plan Review at 416-2341. For questions regarding zoning, please call 416-2745. For questions regarding Contractor Licensing, call Delynn Coldiron at 221-6767. 281 North College Avenue — P.O. Box 580 — Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Building—(970) 416-2740; FAX (970) 224-6134 Neighborhood-(970)224-6046; FAX (970) 224-6050 PROJECT Cityof_ Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-41 G-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 TO: Building Inspection PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) FLE,k� FIND Pt-r7w AJgr> TrtE GuRAe-A-r cocES Pwn '�->T DS _ Pr fPt--SU&A1TT1VAC I'�F�itrj6 � PASS S�Ui'—1 C� BUIL.�Ir�IG GVCE (��vP-D��ITS F-1 C4=- L. - LP„t s fp.> UYaT Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape PROJECT City of_ Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-416-2020 DATE: February 7, 2008 FR W: Park Planning , PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 2-08 MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP — TYPE II Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 27, 2008 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) "'rE! C%/y /ApRKI � ,OVA 4,o� /2Z SouRc,Es IV.es r WXAJ IA. A-&XrAl A.0u oEr" .001r4il n Name (please print) v CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ,Plat YSite. _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape A fire line was not shown from the District's water line. The District does not anticipate a fire line connection to District facilities based on the submittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 226-3104, ext. 104, if you have any questions or require additional information. Respectfully, Mr. Terry W. Farrill, P.E. District Engineer xc: Mr. Michael D. DiTullio, District Manager Mr. Kevin Forbes, P.E., Stewart & Associates Realty Care LLC FORT COLLINSLOVELAND WATER DISTRICT \ SOUTH FORT COLLINS SANITATION DISTRICT v r February 22, 2008 Mr. Steve Olt City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: #2-08 Meadowview Campus of Fort Collins PDP — Type I First Submittal Dear Mr. Olt, The Fort Collins - Loveland Water District has reviewed the above mentioned project and submits the following comments. General note number 5 needs to be corrected to indicate the following; All water line construction shall conform to the Fort Collins — Loveland Water District standards and specifications current to the date of construction. All sanitary sewer line construction shall conform to the South Fort Collins Sanitation District standards and specifications current to the date of construction. General note number 13 needs to be corrected. The District requires a minimum bury depth of 5 feet and a maximum of 6 feet. The District's old signature block needs to be replaced with the current signature block. The current signature blocks can be obtained by contacting Ms. Sue Vest, Engineering Technician, at 226-3104, ext. 107. Construction note E.1. on sheet C1.1 needs to be corrected, see above comments. The proposed new manhole is to be located in the street at least five feet from the face of the curb. The Districts commercial review packet needs to be obtained from the District completed and submitted with the next review. The District does not allow trees, tree canopies or landscaping within the District's easement or withinl0 feet of District facilities. The District's 2 inch Meter typical needs to be included on the drawings. The District does require a Back -Flow -Prevention -Device on the domestic serve line. 5150 Snead Drive, Fort Collins, CO 80525 1 Phone (970) 226-3104 Fax (970) 226-0186 [2/15/08] There are 2 project signs shown on the site plan along Triangle Drive which don't appear to be attached to the building. Therefore they are monument signs. This is in the residential neighborhood sign district, where only one such sign is allowed along each street. Also, since this is in the neighborhood sign district, any proposed wall sign locations must be shown. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to.call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Steve Olt City Planner Page 10 detention. This will also require the addition of a water quality outlet structure per the City's standard detail. Number: 59 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] Please submit documentation showing where the irrigation ditch on the western edge of the property would overtop in a spill condition. Number: 60 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] A letter of intent for any off -site drainage or grading easements is required before a public hearing. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: Zoning Number: 6 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] Remove the "setbacks" from the Land Use Breakdown table on the site plan. The setbacks listed on the plan aren't what's shown, and they aren't what's required by the code. Number: 7 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] In the MMN zone, only portions of buildings that are within 50' or 75' of the ROW of intersections are allowed to be 4 stories. Otherwise, 3 stories is the max. height allowed. (Section 4.6(E)(1)(d) and 4.6(E)(2)(a) and (b), Land Use Code). Unless the Building Department determines that the portions of the building which appears to have 4 stories are really only 3 stories with a garden level/basement, then I don't believe what's shown meets code. Number: 8 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] The maximum number of parking spaces allowed is .33 spaces per bed (Section 3.2.2(K)(2)). Assuming one bed per unit, plus an additional bed in each of the 8, two bedroom units, there should be 98 beds. This means the max. number of parking spaces based on beds is only 32. The Code allows an additional parking space for every two employees on the major shift. So in order to be allowed 48 spaces, we'll need to know whether or not there will be at least 32 employees on the major shift. If there won't be that many, then they'll either need to reduce the number of spaces or do alternative compliance per Section 3.2.2(K)(3). Number: 9 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] Need to label the depth of the parking stalls in the permiter parking rows. Number: 10 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] Is there going to be a trash enclosure or compactor? If so, show location. Number: 11 Created: 2/15/2008 [2/15/08] Need a bike rack or racks. Number: 12 Created: 2/15/2008 Page 9 outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter. These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 97UFC 901.2.2.2 Number: 39 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] COMMERCIAL COOKING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM An approved fire -protection system shall be installed in hood -and -duct locations where grease -laden vapors are produced from cooking operations. A permit and plan review is required by the Poudre Fire Authority for the installation of required hood -and -duct fire extinguishing systems. Two sets of plans, along with an application, are required to be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau at 102 Remington St. 97UFC 1006.1; 1006.2. Department: Traffic Operations Topic: traffic Number: 62 [3/3/08] Did not receive a landscape plan with the next submittal. Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Created: 3/3/2008 Please provide current plan or provide Number: 63 Created: 3/3/2008 [3/3/08] Conducting a signal warrant study to get the current status of the College and Triangle intersection operation. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Denise Weston Topic: Transportation Planning Number: 13 Created: 2/26/2008 (2/26/08] If possible, the northern sidewalk should connect with existing sidewalk on College Ave to the east as well as continue to the edge of property on the west. Need crosswalks along driveway entrances for pedestrian safety. Need bicycle racks located near the building, with easy access. Concerned that this type of facility is not located within the Transfort para-transit-boundary. ` Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewaterlssue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 57 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] The drainage study needs to compare the previous drainage study's flows into the existing detention pond with the proposed flows under the current rainfall standards and proposed impervious areas. The proposed flows need to be equal or less than to what was calculated in the original study in 1997. If the proposed flows are higher, than additional quantity detention would be required. Number: 58 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] Water quality is required for this site. Water quality was not included in the 1997 drainage study. Water quality volume should be in addition to the quantity Page 8 Number: 32 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire lane side. of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. If possible, a fire hydrant shall be located within 100 feet of the FDC. PFA Bureau Policy, Number: 33 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Number: 34 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] KNOX BOX REQUIRED Poudre Fire Authority requires a "Knox Box" to be mounted on the front of every new, building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20 Number: 35 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS This proposed building shall be equipped with aan pproved, automatic fire -sprinkler system. Number: 36 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] TURNING RADII Minimum turning radii for emergency -response apparatus on any fire apparatus roadway is 25 feet inside, 50 feet outside. (This comment pertains to the parking lot drive aisles.) Number: 37 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] ADDRESS NUMERALS Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable). 97UFC901.4.4 Number: 38 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] WATER SUPPLY Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include: Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, . spaced not farther than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter; residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not farther than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter; residential Page 7 Please provide a check for $10,825 or the difference of the other calculation from what was paid at the time of next submittal. If you choose to go with the second calculation we will need the information that was used to make that calculation also provided at the time of the next submittal to verify the fee calculation. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Rob Irish Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 2/14/2008 [2/14/08] Existing 3-phase power along the south side of Triangle Drive with a conduit stubbed under the road to feed this site. Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the developers expense. Number: 2 Created: 2/14/2008 [2/14/08] Developer will need to coordinate a transformer location with Light & Power on the plans. This location will need to be within 10' of an all weather drive over surface. Number: 3 Created: 2/14/2008 [2/14/08] The utility plan is showing an existing power transformer near the southwest corner of the site. I do not think this transformer exists and does not show on our system. Number: 4 Created: 2/14/2008 [2/14/08] Developer will need to provide a C-1 form and One -line diagram with power requirements to Light & Power. Number: 5 Created: 2/14/2008 [2/14/08] Developer will be responsible for Electric Capacity & Building Site charges. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann Topic: Fire ` Number: 30 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] STANDPIPES AND FIRE PUMP Buildings four or more stories in height are required to be equipped with firefighting standpipes in every stairwell. The standpipe system must be capable of supplying a minimum 100 psi to the top floor; an approved fire pump may be required to obtain this minimum pressure. IFC 905.3.1 Number: 31 -' —Created: 2/27/2008 - [2/27/08] STAIRWELL SIGNAGE Approved stairwell identification signs shall be posted at each floor level in all enclosed stairways in buildings four or more stories in height. 97UFC1210.4 and Appendix I-C Page 6 Number: 26 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please fix all line over text conflicts throughout the plan set to meet LCUASS Appendix E scanability requirements (TYP). Number: 27 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] On Sheet 5, Utility Plan, please clearly show and label the approximate limits of street cuts needed to connect utility services and provide the standard street cut note provided. Number: 28 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] For both driveway Entrance Details on Sheet C6, please call out the construction of new high volume driveway per LCUASS Detail 707. The ramps are also constructed per Detail 707. Show truncated dome panels on the ramps and call out the radius of the curb return. See redlines for clarification. Number: 29 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Site Plan — Please label all retaining walls, unknown lines and existing pedestrian ramps. See redlines. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Langenberger Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] The Transportation Development Review Fee (TDRF) for this project was not calculated correctly on the application that was submitted with the project. There are two ways that the application fee can be calculated and to know which way would be more beneficial (cheaper) to the applicant we need some additional information. 1. The fee can be calculated by just using the square footage of the project, the acreage and the flat $2000. Calculating the fee this way the application fee would be: (90,000 sq ft x .25 cents/ sq ft) + (3.86 acres x $250/ sq ft) + $2,000 = $ 25,465 Calculating the fee this way the applicant owes $10, 825 more for the submittal. 2. The fee can be calculated by using a combination of square footage and number of dwelling units in the project. We do not have enough information at this time to be able to fully calculate the fee in this manner, but the formula to do so would be as follows: (57 dwelling units (units that have kitchens) x $115/ unit) + ((total building square footage — the square footage area of the 57 dwelling units) x .25 cents/ sq ft) + (3.86 acres x $250/ sq ft) + $2,000 = the total fee. If you have questions on how to calculate the fees please call Sheri Langenberger at 221-6605. ` Page 5 Number: 18 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please place a bold note on both sheets of the Plat reading - For Reference only. Number: 19 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] There will be additional right-of-way needed on College Ave. in order to construct widening improvements. The City needs to coordinate with CDOT to determine exactly how much will be needed and that information will be provided to you as soon as possible. It does not appear at this time that the R.O.W. dedication will interfere with the detention pond as shown on the plans. Any new R.O.W. dedication can be done by a re -plat or by separate document. The City review fee for dedications is $250 per document + any County recording fee. Number: 20 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please clearly label and dimension the existing ROW on College and on Triangle on the Dimension Control Plan, Sheet C2. Dimension the existing sidewalks. Label existing driveways and pedestrian ramps on this sheet as well. See redlines for clarification. Number: 21 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please provide cross sections on the grading plan as shown on the redlines. Clearly label all retaining walls and provide top and bottom of wall elevations at reasonable intervals. If any of the retaining walls are more than 40 inches from bottom of footing to top of wall, please place a note that the wall is under separate permit by the Building Department. Number: 22 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Off -site grading is shown on the nursery property to the north. A deed of dedication or letter of intent for a construction easement must be submitted prior to scheduling a hearing for this project. The easement will be dedicated to the City and recorded by separate document. The review fee for said easement will be $250 + County recording fees. Number: 23 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] The font size for the new grading contour elevation information is too small. Please enlarge all text to minimum size as required by LCUASS Appendix E for scanability. Number:24 . Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please call out all drainage improvements (inlet types, pipe & size etc...) on the Grading Plan and provide adequate details. Number: 25 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please show and. label all existing pedestrian ramps on all sheets (TYP). Page 4 [2/27/08] Please see Peter Barne's comment (#8) about the allowable number of parking spaces. Number: 45 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] Under PARKING on the Site Plan it indicates that there will be 26 visitor spaces and 2 handicap accessible spaces, equaling 28. Assuming these to be the surface spaces in the lot at the southwest corner of the building, that lot shows 29 spaces. Please reconcile. Number: 46 Created: 2/27/2008 (2/27/08] The building does not satisfy the requirements set forth in Sections & (b) of the Land Use Code dealing with "build -to" lines for Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings. In this case, the institutional use building shall be located no more than 15' from the right-of-way for Triangle Drive, which is smaller than a full arterial street. At least 30% of the total length of the building along Triangle Drive shall be extended to the build -to line area. A modification of these standards may be requested by the applicant, based on the criteria set forth in Section 2.8.2(H) of the Land Use Code. The Planning & Zoning Board will be the ultimate decision maker on the request. Number: 47 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] Section 4.6(E)(1)(d) of the Land Use Code limits the building height to a maximum of 3 stories in the MMN - Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District, except that portion of a building within a 50' radius of the right-of-way of any street intersection (except arterial/arterial) may contain an additional fourth story. No portion of the proposed building is within 50 of the South College Avenue (arterial) and Triangle Drive (collector) intersection. Therefore, based on the Elevations Plans, it would appear to be necessary for the applicant to request a modification of the standard in the aforementioned section of the code. Similar to the previous comment (#46), a modification request must be based on the criteria set forth in Section 2.8.2(H) of the Land Use Code. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Randy Maizland Topic: Engineering Number: 15 Created: 2/26/2008 (2/26/08] Please provide two (2) City of Fort Collins Bench Marks per LCUASS requirements. Number: 16 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please list all consultants information on the cover sheet (i.e. Geotechnical, Traffic, Architect etc...) Number: 17 Created: 2/26/2008 [2/26/08] Please provide plan review comment letters from the Louden Ditch Company and Fort Collins -Loveland District with your next round of review,_ prior to scheduling a hearing. Page 3 Number: 53 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] Please label all retaining walls and indicate how high they are. Number: 54 Created: 2/28/2008 [2128/08] Additional shrub plantings are needed to screen the parking areas from Triangle Drive. Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan. Topic: Lighting Plan Number: 61 Created: 2/29/2008 [2/29/08] There is some information on the Lighting & Photometric Plan that is not real clear. * Where is it said what the pole heights are for lighting types AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, and FF2? * The information for lighting types FF and B in the LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE appears to be identical. What is the difference between the 2 types? * There is a column in the LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS table headed by MN. What does this column mean? * What does the information in the Max/Min column in the STATISTICS table mean? * On Sheet LP2 there is information on the EPIC COLLECTION. The LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE table does not show any EPIC light fixtures. They are all STS or ECM. Topic: Site Plan Number: 40 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] Please remove all of the existing landscaping (trees) from the Site Plan. That information on the Landscape Plan is sufficient. Number :41 Created: 2/27/2008 ' [2/27/08] There a number of lines, elements on the Site Plan that are not identified and labeled as to what they are. Please correct, per the red -lined plan. - Number: 42 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] Please label the widths of the two vehicular accesses into the development. Number: 43 Created: 2/27/2008 (2127/08] Any outside trash/recyle enclosure must be shown on the. Site & Landscape Plans. The enclosure must be compatible with the building and properly screened. Number: 44 Created: 2/27/2008 Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Fred Fuller & Assoc Date: 3/3/2008 306 E Magnolia St Fort Collins, CO 80524 970-402-1958 Staff has reviewed your submittal for MEADOWVIEW CAMPUS OF FORT COLLINS PDP- TYPE II, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Building Elevations Number: 55 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08]. Based on the way building heights are detemined in Section 3.8.17(A)(1) of the Land Use Code, Planning & Zoning have determined that the "average" height of this building is less than 40'; therefore, the applicant is not required to provide the Building Height Review information as set forth in Section 3.5.1(G) of the code. Number: 56 Created: 2/2812008 [2/28/08] The scales on the Building Elevations Plans appear to be somewhat different and difficult to use. Please help define what they are. Topic: Landscape Plan Number: 48 Created: 2/27/2008 [2/27/08] The 2 scales on the Landscape Plan are conflicting. One says 1" = 30' and the bar scale says 1" = 40'. Number: 49 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] There are 2 street trees, either side of the primary access into the site, that are shown to be removed. Why do these trees have to be removed? They do not appear to conflict with the access drive. Number: 50 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] Additional street trees are needed on South College Avenue and Triangle Drive. Please see the red -lined Landscape Plan for locations. Number: 51 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] There are several lines, elements on the Landscape Plan that are not identified and labeled (see red -lined plan). Please label them. Number: 52 Created: 2/28/2008 [2/28/08] Additional trees are needed on the east, north, and west sides of the building to satisfy the "full tree stocking" requirement set forth in Section 3.2.1(D)(1)(c) of the Land Use Code. Page 1