The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKAUFMAN & ROBINSON OFFICE DEVELOPMENT - PDP - 40-08 - CORRESPONDENCE - (9)6" REVISION C;cyof tort Coll;ns Planning and Zoning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-416-2020 DATE: February 12, 2008 TO: Zoning PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt # 40-08 KAUFMAN & ROBINSON OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PDP — TYP 2nd Round of Review PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: February 25, 2009 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference No Problems ❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) I�Vfr- 4a Name (please print) -(g--L)O? CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS _Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape Planning and Zoning PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Fax: 970-416-2020 REVISION COMMENT SHEET DATE: February 12, 2008 TO: Technical Services PROJECT PLANNER: Steve Olt A C # 40-08 KAUFMAN & ROBINSON OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PDP —TYPE I 2" d Round of Review PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff l 1-ipuvVA-0-Y IfCcoses, review meeting: 2, MIA 0A Lf AJC 0V&Z 1 t ACT 5G*,.)A A1e1 /SSdCS D� S/T�GAA✓DScA0E UT1G/TyP�.4,fJS� /�}AIP a� N)1DR,4A1r�;;/ ir. �ebruary 25, 2009 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference ❑ No Problems N Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS) Name (please print) CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat tSite _Drainage Report _Other Utility Redline Utility )LLandscape J cc: Andrew Carney Kaufinan & Robinson, Inc. Delta Construction JLB Civil Engineers Current Planning file #40-08 Page 5 -J Number: 36 Created: 2/26/2009 [2/26/09] Pending final driveway location; suggest making transition from attached sidewalk ramp (shown on plans NE of drive) to detached walk more of a natural curve transition instead of angular. This will follow the more natural path for pedestrians and wheel chair users. Number: 37 Created: 2/26/2009 [2/26/09] At the T-intersection of Blue Spruce and Red Cedar, please provide an ADA ramp to sidewalk along project property. See Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards manual. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 28 Created: 12/17/2008 [2/27/09] A letter of intent from the off -site property owner is required before a hearing. [12/17/08] There is currently no record of a drainage easement for the privately owned Evergreen West detention pond. A letter from the Evergreen West detention pond property owner stating knowledge of and permission to construct the outfall storm sewer on this property is required. Also, please give the owner of this property a set of utility plans for their review. Contact information is: Ed Zdenek phone: 493-4105 email: Ed@zticonstruction.com Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: Water/Wastewater Number: 38 Created: 2/27/2009 [2/27/09] No comments at this time; however, if site layout changes, provide revised plans for further review. Several issues were expressed at the staff review meeting on February 251' that require another round of review before the project can be scheduled for a public hearing. Red -lined plans from City departments are included with this comment letter. This proposal is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal requirement (from the date of this comment letter, being March 5, 2009) as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. The number of copies of each document to re -submit is shown on the attached REVISION ROUTING SHEET. Be sure and return all red -lined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341. Yours Truly, AtevMO41t&�_ City's Project Planner Page 4 11 Number: 30 Created: 12/18/2008 [3/2/09] [12/18/08] The driveway does not meet LCUASS standards as the traffic volume does not warrant a high volume driveway design as shown. Please revise and provide spot elevations. The LCUASS standard for driveway radii for a drive of this kind is 15 feet, not the 25 feet shown. This requirement is table 8-2 in LCUASS. Number: 31 Created: 2/ 19/2009 [2/19/09] Please remove the proposed asphalt in the driveway to the ROW line. Asphalt is not permitted in public ROW. I Number: 32 Created: 2/19/2009 [2/19/09] Neither the driveway alignment nor the curb return comments from conceptual review and the first round of review were addressed for this round of review. Also, no variance request has been submitted for the driveway location or any proposed variance to the driveway radii. Please refer to table 8-2 in LCUASS for curb return radii and section 1.9.4 in LCUASS for variance request requirements. Number: 39 Created: 3/2/2009 [3/2/09] Please see the red -lines from Technical Services for their comments. Number: 40 Created: 3/2/2009 [3/2/09] City signature block is too large - please revise Number:41 • Created: 3/2/2009 [3/2/09] Additional comments to follow with any change in site layout or design. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Justin Fields Topic: General Number: 33 Created: 2/25/2009 [2/25/09) No comments Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Jennifer Petrik Topic: General Number: 34 Created: 2/25/2009 [2/25/09] Please provide bike parking on a hard surface, in a well lighted area, convenient to the building entrance. Number: 35 Created: 2/25/2009 [2/25/09] Please provide an enhanced walkway for connectivity from public sidewalk to the front entrance. The 30' required setback with landscaping would provide a space for a continuous uninterrupted sidewalk to the building entrance. Page 3 J Number: 51 Created: 3/5/2009 [3/5/09] Two (2) additional trees are needed along the south side of the south tier of parking. Also, additional shrubs are needed in this area to satisfy Sections 3.2. 1 (E)(4)(a)&(b) of the Land Use Code. Topic: Site Plan Number: 43 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] Please remove the landscaping from the Site Plan. There is a separate Landscape Plan for that purpose. Also, move the New Tree & New Shrub information from the Site Plan to the Landscape Plan. Number: 44 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] City staff had a lengthy discussion about the location of the entry drive into this development. Staff would like to meet with the applicant for the purpose of looking at alternative locations for the drive that could possibly align with one of the streets or drives to the west, across Blue Spruce Drive. Number: 49 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] The development to the north, with 2 separate buildings and parking between, satisfies the direct pedestrian connectivity requirement set forth in Section 3.5.3 of the Land Use Code. Could this development proposal be revised to satisfy the requirement? Department: Engineering Topic: General Number: 10 [3/2/09] Issue Contact: Andrew Carney Created: 12/15/2008 [12/15/08] The title on the Plat needs to match the title of the Utility Plans. Please revise. Number: 25 Created: 12/17/2008 [3/2/09] [12/17/08] In Conceptual Review, it was suggested that the driveway align with Red Cedar Circle. The current layout does not meet the required separation distances and may cause a safety concern for vehicles turning left out of the site and vehicles turning left from Red Cedar. For the current layout a variance request must be submitted for review and consideration. - Number: 26 Created: 12/ 17/2008 [3/2/09] [12/17/08] The following comments are from Technical Services (See Redlines): 1) Minor scanning issues with the site and landscape plans. 2) Plat title must match utility plan title. Page 2 r City of Fod Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Basis Architecture P.C. c/o Matthew Heiser 1692 Big Thompson Avenue, Suite 100 Estes Park, CO 80517 Date: 3/5/2009 Staff has reviewed your submittal for Kaufman & Robinson Office Development, Project Development Plan (PDP) - Type 1, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: General Number: 50 Created: 3/5/2009 [3/5/09] The driveway location into the site requires that a variance request be submitted to the Engineering Department for review, with the City Engineer ultimately approving or denying the request. It cannot be processed as a modification of standard as 3) in the MODIFICATION of STANDARDS document submitted by the applicant is requesting. Department: Current Planning Topic: General Number: 29 [2/25/09] No comments. [12/18/08] no comments. Issue Contact: Dana Leavitt Created: 12/18/2008 Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt Topic: Landscape plan Number: 45 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] Please label the 2 phases of the building on the plan, similar to how it's done on the Site Plan. Number: 46 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] Please identify the parking spaces on the Landscape Plan by showing the lines between spaces. Number: 47 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] There are standard notes that must be shown on Landscape Plans. An example plan is being forwarded to the applicant. Number: 48 Created: 3/4/2009 [3/4/09] A standard Plant List would be more appropriate than the Tree and Shrub Inventory as shown. An example plan is being forwarded to the applicant. Page I Page 1 of l From: Steve Olt To: matthew_heisera@basisarchitecture.com Date: 3/5/2009 12:03 PM Subject Kaufman & Robinson comments Matthew, Attached is the staff comment letter for the Kaufman & Robinson Office Development, Project Development Plan that was discussed at staff review on February 25, 2009. The hard copy of the letter and red -lined plans can be picked up at the Development Review Center pick-up counter at 281 North College Avenue. Steve Olt, Project Planner file://C:\Documents and Settings\solt\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 3/5/2009