HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAPLE HILL 4TH REPLAT - PDP - 18-10 - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-HEARING (3)City of
Fort Collins
Current
Planning
PO Box 580 ' Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750' 970.224.6134 - fax
DATE: July 23, 2010
TO: GIS
PROJECT
COMMENT
SHEET
PROJECT PLANNER: Emma McArdle
# 18-10 MAPLE HILL, PHASE 7,
4TH FILING PDP - TYPE I
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
August 11, 2010
Note - Please identify your redlines for future
reference
+� QL-,,wuc,a-ruFzeCLkIMS-ra aE a V�o0g8'2�1 �rJ2k 1V�woSae 4�
No Problems ,_ �.�N y Us"CD 6N
❑ Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
7EXCELLENCE
COMMITTED T
August 3, 2010
Emma McArdle, Project Planner
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
RE: #18-10 Maple Hill Ph 71 4t' Fil PDP
Preliminary Plat Review
Dear Emma;
Steve Miller, Assessor
200 West Oak Street, Suite 2000
PO Box 1190
Fort Collins, CO 80522-1190
I reviewed the Maple Hill Ph 7 preliminary plat and I have a question about
ownership. We currently have the City of Fort Collins owning Tract V, Maple Hill,
conveyed by a warranty deed recorded 4/7/2004 at reception # 20040032681.
How will this be handled when the lots are created? Will the City of Fort Collins
own all of the tracts designated on the prelim plat as Tracts A — C, utility
easements etc... The plat is not very clear about this.
Thank you,
Megan Harrity
Subdivisions, Larimer County
970-498-7065
mharrity0larimer.org
Phone:970-498-7050 Fax:970-498-7070 www.larimer.org/assessor
City of
Fort Collins
Current
Planning
PO Box 580 ' Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750 ` 970.224.6134 - fax
DATE: July 23, 2010
TO: County Assessor
PROJECT PLANNER: Emma McArdle
# 18-10 MAPLE HILL, PHASE 7,
4TH FILING PDP - TYPE I
Please return all comments to the project planner no later than
the staff review meeting:
August 11, 2010
Note - Please identify your redlines for future
reference
❑ No Problems
E Problems or Concerns (see below, attached, or DMS)
) D7
Name (please print)
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other
_Utility _Redline Utility _Landscape
4 40
[7/29/10] Dwelling, single-family attached shall mean a single-family dwelling attached to
one (1) or more dwellings or buildings, with each dwelling located on its own separate lot.
Dwelling, two-family shall mean a dwelling containing two (2) dwelling units.
As shown on the drawings, the units on lots 47, 48, 65 and 66 are considered ATTACHED
SINGLE FAMILY not duplexes. In other words, a duplex (Dwelling, two-family) is two
dwelling units attached on ONE lot. Attached dwellings on separate lots are ATTACHED
SINGLE FAMILY. Please make changes on the site plan HOUSING TYPES and PARKING
sections.
Number: 2 Created: 7/29/2010
[7/29/10] Lot 48 and lot 65 don't meet the required minimum 50' lot width.
Number: 3 Created: 7/29/2010
[7/29/10] LMN setbacks are 15' - front, 8' fear, 5' interior side and 15' corner side. It doesn't
look to me like any configuration of units, A, B or C will fit on lots 47 or 65. (Attached SF
lots)
Number: 4 Created: 7/29/2010
[7/29/10] Rear setback noted on elevations pages states 15'. 8' rear setback is required not
15
Number: 5 Created: 7/29/2010
[7/29/10] Elevations page: Change DUPLEX to ATTACHED SINGLE FAMIILY.
Number: 6 Created: 7/29/2010
[7/29/10] Elevation C - where is the front door? If on the side it does not meet 3.5.2(C)(1)
Number: 10 Created: 8/4/2010
(8/4/10] Include a note on the landscape plan referencing Landscape installation prior to
issuance of a CO see 3.2.1(1)(4)
Number: 11 Created: 8/4/2010
[8/4/10] What is the square footage of each lot? I don't see a curve table included in the
plans.
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Ted Shepard
City Planner
Page 9
Number: 53 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please add "City Of Fort Collins" to the title blocks of the plat. See redlines
Number: 54 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please add a note or table showing who owns & maintains the tracts.
Number: 55 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please add the square footage for all lots & tracts to the plat.
Number: 56 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please add bearings & distances to the westerly lines of tract "c". It is not
locatable. See redlines.
Number: 57 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Why is the ELCO waterline easement now exclusive? Previous Maple Hill plats do
not show it as exclusive.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 58 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please change the development name on the site plans, from "Phase 7" to
"Fourth Replat". See redlines.
Number: 60 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please correct the street name "Forcastle" to "Forecastle" on the site plans.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 62 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Benchmark 34-01 on the utility plans cover sheet has an incorrect elevation.
Please contact the City of Fort Collins Surveying (221-6605) or Technical Services (221-
6588) for a current copy of the City of Fort Collins Vertical Control Network.
Number: 63 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/101 Please change all "Phase 7" on the utility plans to "Fourth Replat".
Number: 64 Created: 8/10/2010
(8/10/10] Please change "Forcastle" on the utility plans to "Forecastle".
Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque
Topic: Stormwater
Number: 38 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Stormwater is ready for a public hearing. Additional comments may follow at final
compliance.
Number: 82 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] At final, please revise the hydrology calcs per Fort Collins standards. Specifically,
please calculate the c-factors per the Fort Collins Stormwater Manual.
Department: Zoning
Topic: ZONING
Number: 1
Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
Created: 7/29/2010
Page 8
'6
so so
• Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter
• Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler
systems.
PLEASE NOTE the difference in flow/location from commercial (multi -use buildings) to
single-family residential.
2006 International Fire Code 508.1 and Appendix B
Number: 78 Created: 8/11/2010
FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT
Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless
hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. NFPA 13 (2007) 23.1.3
Number: 79 Created: 8/11/2010
KEY BOXES REQUIRED
Poudre Fire Authority requires a key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in approved location(s)
on every new building equipped with a required fire -sprinkler system or fire -alarm system.
2006 International Fire Code 506.1; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20
Number: 80 Created: 8/11/2010
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
Fire department connections shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the
street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest
point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official.
2006 International Fire Code 912.2 and PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Policy
Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 59 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please change the development name on the landscape plan, from "Phase 7" to
"Fourth Replat". See redlines.
Number: 61 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please correct the street name "Forcastle" to "Forecastle" on the landscape plans.
Topic: Plat
Number: 49 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] The legal description does not close by 0.05'. The boundary closes. The legal
description & boundary do not match.
Number: 50 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please change the plat title to "Maple Hill Fourth Replat".
Number: 51 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please change the misspelled street name "Forcastle" to "Forecastle".
Number: 52 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please correct the mislabeled "6PM" to "Sixth PM" or "6TH PM". See redlines.
Page 7
ft 00
inches by tilling, discing or other suitable method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of
soil amendment per one thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area.
• A permit must be obtained from the City forester before any trees or shrubs as noted
on this plan are planted, pruned or removed on the public right-of-way. This includes zones
between the sidewalk and curb, medians and other city property. This permit shall approve
the location and species to be planted. Failure to obtain this permit may result in replacing or
relocating trees and a hold on certificate of occupancy.
• The developer shall contact the City Forester to inspect all street tree plantings at the
completion of each phase of the development. All trees need to have been installed as
shown on the landscape plan. Approval of street tree planting is required before final
approval of each phase. Failure to obtain approval by the City Forester for street trees in a
phase shall result in a hold on certificate of occupancy for future phases of the development.
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Janet McTague
Topic: General
Number: 7 Created: 8/3/2010
[8/3/1 0]
We need to know the square footages of the lots - it isn't indicated on the final plat. Also -
where is curve data?
Number: 8 Created: 8/3/2010
[8/3/101 Please let the developer/builder know that the electric meter needs to go on the
same side of the house as the electric stub.
Number: 9 Created: 8/3/2010
[8/3/10] Street trees need to be 25' from an ornamental tree and 40' from a
Department: PFA Issue Contact: Carie Dann
Topic: Fire
Number: 70 Created: 8/10/2010
Please carry all my comments from conceptual review, with the exception of the comment
about the EAE for the rec trail (Tract V). Thank you for your responses.
Number: 71 Created: 8/10/2010
AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS
The multi -use buildings (commercial and residential) are required to have an approved fire
sprinkler system that meets NFPA 13 requirements. (An automatic sprinkler system shall be
installed in accordance with 061FC Section 903.3 throughout all buildings with a Group R fire
area. 903.2.7).
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 77 Created: 8/11 /2010
WATER SUPPLY
Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district having
jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum
requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include:
• Commercial and multi -family dwellings 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter
Page 6
- M N
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 30 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Correct "Vicinity".
Number: 31 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Correct the County Road names shown on the vicinity map to the correct names
and correct the cutoff labeling.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 45 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please dimension all sidewalks and label as existing or proposed.
Number: 46 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Just a reminder... no inlets allowed within the curb return. The one on Forcastle
will need to be shifted to the north if it's not currently located outside of the curb return. It's a
little hard to tell from the drawings but you might want to look at that early and design
accordingly.
Number: 76 Created: 8/11/2010
[8/11/10] Please dimension all curb return radii.
Topic: Utility Plan - P&P
Number: 47 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please provide all of the dimensioning shown on Figure 7-24 for the street
widening at Lynnhaven and Middlebury so we can see that it has been designed to
standard.
Department: Forestry Issue Contact: Tim Buchanan
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 81 Created: 8/11 /2010
[8/11 /10]
Forestry Comments Maple Hill, Phase 7, 4th Filing PDP
Tim Buchanan
8-11-10
Street Trees need to be selected from the current street tree list. Ash in no longer on the
street tree list and needs to be substituted with another species from the list.
Adjust tree species used to meet Minimum species diversity 3.2.1 D 3. Projects with more
than 60 tree should the maximum percentage of any one species used should be 15% or
less.
Add landscape notes including these:
• The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be thoroughly
loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil amendment shall be
thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape areas to a depth of at least six (6)
Page 5
I
[8/10/10] The project title is incorrect. Please see technical services for the correct title and
change all plan sets so that they match.
Number: 43 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] All plan sets need to show all existing features within 150' of the development.
Please include sidewalks, driveways, ramps, etc, so that we,can see how your development
ties into the rest of the neighborhood.
Number: 44 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] All T-Intersections require a ramp across the street on at least one side. Please
see Figure 16-2 in Chapter 16 of LCUASS.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 28 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Show all existing and proposed utilities.
Number: 29 Created: 8/10/2010
(8/10/10] Remove all sight distance triangles as there are none being dedicated or required.
Topic: Plat
Number: 32 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Rotate the view so that is not shown sideways.
Number: 33 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please change the vicinity map to a one line map and show and label all of the
streets. See the site plan for an example.
Number: 34 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/101 Please correct the language under the first paragraph and provide the Surveyor's
Statement. Email me at sjoy@fcgov.com and I will send you the word doc.
Number: 35 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please provide a Tract Table and state who owns and maintains each of the
Tracts and what they are for.
Number: 36 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please provide a Curve Table.
Topic: Site and Landscape Plan
Number: 24 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please remove the contours.
Number: 25 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please remove the revisions in the title block (this is not an approved set being
revised).
Number: 26 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please show, label and dimension all proposed and existing easements.
Number: 27 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Remove the tracts shown in the public row. This plan set must match the plat.
Page 4
N N
Number: 19 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Are there existing cross walks where the trail will connect?
Number: 20 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Please tell me the subdivision to the south.
Number: 21 Created: 8/9/2010
(8/9/10] What types of easements are running along some property lines and along the rear
of some lots? The 9' Utility Easement is labeled but the others are not.
Number: 22 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] What is the trail, paved, gravel, etc? Please label or use fill and have in legend.
Number: 39 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] The letter in the submittal dated February 10, 2010 from Ted Shepard talks about
the proposals need to meet the Neighborhood Center requirements in 4.5(D)(3). The letter
says the proposed mixed -use dwelling units and neighborhood support/recreation facility will
meet the criteria of this section, I do not see any mixed use dwellings proposed in this plan.
Number: 40 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] 4.5(D)(2)(b) states that lot sizes and dimensions shall be varied. I do not see any
variation besides corner lots meeting this standard.
Number: 41 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/101 1 am not seeing the 3 housing types that are required in Section 4.5(D)(2)(c),
attached single family and standard single family only count for 2 types, 3 are required in
Maple Hill due to the overall size of the development.
Number: 42 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Please provide me with the information for the overall Maple Hill housing types
with percentages of each. Section 4.5(D)(2)(d) restricts standard single-family constituting
more than 90% of the total, please verify that the development meets this standard.
Topic: Utility Plan
Number: 87 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] These comments are entered for Fred Walker with Boxelder Sanitation from a
letter dated August 10, 2010.
Sheet #2 The record drawings the has on file for Maple Hill indicate that there is a sanitary
sewer stub out located on Maple Hill Drive approximately341 feet east of the sewer manhole
at the intersection of Forecastle Drive and Maple Hill Drive. The same type of note about
abandonment of this sewer access should be shown.
Sheet #4, Note 2: Boxelder staff has met with Maple Hill representatives on a number of
occasions since their decision to submit a change in the type of residential housing in this
phase. Boxelder and Maple Hill have not agreed upon a layout of the sewer service laterals
that will connect to its collector lines within the Maple Hill development. Until there is
agreement, Boxelder will not provide service to .this phase.
Department: Engineering
Topic: General
Number: 23
Issue Contact: Susan Joy
Created: 8/10/2010
Page 3
so
It
Number: 83 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] Some trees are mislabeled as Bur Oak on the south end of the trail, I assume
these are supposed to be Austrian Pine.
Number: 84 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] 1 would like to see a few more trees added along the trail system, especially near
Lots 47-50.
Number: 85 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] Pine trees are not shown in the legend. Also, please add driveway fill to the
legend.
Number: 86 Created: 8/12/2010
[8/12/10] Please see the City's Tree List available at:
hftp://www.fcgov.com/currentplanning/pdf/plantlistlO-2009.pdf.
Topic: Plat
Number: 72 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] All lots shall be 50' wide.
Number: 88 Created: 8/12/2010
(8/12/10] The County Assessor brought to my attention that the City is the owner of Tract V,
this means the City needs an Ownership Certification on the Plat.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 12 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Please identify the number of bedrooms per unit you are basing your parking
calculation on, the calculation now is based on 3 bedrooms per dwelling unit.
Number: 13 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Just to make sure I understand, your intention is to have 4 total single family
attached units, each on their own lot. Please add a note next to Duplex units saying (single-
family attached), just to clarify the use of differing terminology.
Number: 14 Created: 8/9/2010
(8/9/10] Please label one of the driveways as typical.
Number: 15 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/101 All ramps shall be directional. Please add note indicating this.
Number: 16 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/101 Why does the existing sidewalk stop along the swimming pool site? What's
happening here?
Number: 17 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Is there a grading plan in the Utility Plan set? If so, it is not necessary on the site
plan, I would prefer that grading be taken off.
Number: 18 Created: 8/9/2010
[8/9/10] Please add ROW dimensions.
Page 2
M
Fort Collins STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
COMPLETE COMMENT LETTER from Vt Round of Review
Linda Ripley Date: 8/16/2010
Ripley Design, Inc.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Staff has reviewed your submittal for MAPLE HILL, PHASE 7, 4TH FILING PDP - TYPE I,
and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning, Issue Contact: Emma McArdle
Topic: Elevations
Number: 68 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] There are no materials shown on the attached single family elevation.
Number: 69 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/101 Will the three housing types also have mirror options?
Number: 73 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] 1 would like to see a corner lot option where the garage entrance is on the side of
the house rather than the front.
Number: 74 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] The single-family attached unit example does not show two garages, the site plan
indicates that these units would have garages both facing the same street. The example
provided looks like a corner lot example. The 2nd entrance is not dominant enough, it looks
like a large single-family not like two units.
Number: 75 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Can the porch on Option 1 be looked at again? This seems to me like it should be
a more dominant feature of the fagade, it is really hidden with the current design.
Topic: Landscape Plan
Number: 48 Created: 8/10/2010
(8/10/10] Please add percentages to the tree table to verify the project is compatible with
3.2.1(D)(3).
Number: 65 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Street trees should be a maximum of 40' spacing, the trees are spread out further
than in majority of locations, unless there are easement or lighting conflicts is areas, please
revise plans to meet the 40' spacing. Trees don't need to all be exact, some will be closer,
some will be a little further, but now there are too many outside the 40' max.
Number: 66 Created: 8/10/2010
(8/10/10] Please have street lights on plan so we can see if trees conflict.
Number: 67 Created: 8/10/2010
[8/10/10] Contour line delineation between 1' and 5' are not different enough to be legible.
Page 1