Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLORADO IRON & METAL - PDP - 20-09 - CORRESPONDENCE - (6)10/09/2009 09:19 97e2254139 USPS PAGE 01/01 Fort Collins REVISION Current Planning COMMENT SHEET PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 90522-0580 rax. 970-224-6134 DATE: September 30, 2009 TO: Post Office PROJECT PLANNER: Emma McArdle #20-09 COLORADO IRON & METAL PDP - TYPE I 2nd Round of Review PLEASE NOTE: Please return all comments to the project planner no later than the staff review meeting: October 14, 2009 Note - Please identify your redlines for future reference 0 No Problems Problems or ncerns (see below, attached, or DMS) TO& A PS Name (please print)LS'•-�ll a �Mr� ���y �5�� G�►wi ��1✓ra%v� CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS Plat _Site _Drainage Report _Other _Utility _Redline Utility -Landscape [10/16/09] The City's standard water quality outlet structure needs to be incorporated into the design. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington Topic: WaterMastewater Number: 49 Created: 5/15/2009 [10/13/09] Label the clean -outs on the sewer service as" traffic rated". [5/15/09] The sewer service for the proposed building must connect at a manhole. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: Zoning Number: 1 Created: 4/30/2009 [10/8/09] [4/30/09] Parking. The maximum number of parking spaces is based on the number of total employees. 63 proposed spaces exceed what is allowed. If you are seeking "alternative compliance", please review section 3.2.2(K)(3) for the process to request alternative compliance. 10-8-09 - Based on narrative in follow-up letter regarding parking maximum's please submit alternative compliance request. Parking is based on the principle use which is industrial and fabrication and recycling fall under the "industrial" use category. Number: 3 Created: 4/30/2009 [10/8/09] [4/30/09] Handicapped parking spaces are based on the overall number of parking spaces. 34 Parking spaces would require 2 handicap spaces, 63 parking spaces would require 3 handicap spaces. Of those HC spaces, one needs to be van accessible with an overall width of Wand signed as "Van Accessible" Please note parking stall dimensions on the site plan and label all HC spaces. 10-8-09 - Of those HC spaces, one needs to be van accessible with an overall width of 16' and signed as "Van Accessible" Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Emma McArdle City Planner Page 6 n Topic: Site Plan Number: 65 Created: 10/14/2009 110/14/09] The site plan needs to include the legal description of the property. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 66 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/09] The legal description on the utility plan cover sheet is incomplete. Number: 67 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/091 There are several line over text issues. Number: 68 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/09] Two details on sheet 9 have text that is illegible. Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque Topic: Stormwater Number: 46 Created: 5/15/2009 [10/16/09] A letter of intent for the off -site drainage easement required for the outfall pipe needs to be provided before the public hearing. [5/15/09] Drainage easement are required for all ponds and other drainage improvements. The proposed drainage pan along the east side of the property would need a drainage easement for the on -site and off -site portions. For any off -site drainage easements, a letter of intent is required before the public hearing. Number: 48 Created: 5/15/2009 [10/16/09] Half of Buckingham street along this sites frontage that will still drain to the off - site existing detention pond needs to be detained as well. Does the existing pond account for these flows? Please provide documentation if so. [5/15/09] All detention calculations need to include half of Buckingham Street along the site's frontage. Number: 69 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] The east detention pond is also a metal scrap stock pile area. This stock pile will take up volume as well as be a water quality concern. This issue needs to be discussed further and a solution agreed upon before the public hearing. Number: 70 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] The outfall for this site is proposed to drain into the Lincoln Channel. Larimer County needs to approve this outfall location. The County owns and maintains this channel. Number: 71 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] Please provide documentation to back up the 20% reduction in volume and reduced drainage easement for the existing detention pond. Number: 72 Created: 10/16/2009 [10/16/09] The slope of the detention pond bottom should be 2% or .5% with a drainage pan. Number: 73 Created: 10/16/2009 Page 5 CM Number: 58 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] What are you intending to build on the N side of the road? Need to show what grading will occur to accommodate these planed improvements. Number: 59 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] Two benchmarks need to be provided, so far only one has been identified on the plans. Topic: Landscaping Number: 16 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09) Now shown on the utility plans, but is still not labeled as to if it is temporary or permanent. [5/12/09] The office trailer is not shown on the utility plans. Is this a temporary or permanent structure? Topic: Plat Number: 18 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Repeat — I included copies of the prior plat of this site and the plat for the New Belgium site to the north. [5/12/09] The plat indicates that there is 58 feet of existing row on Buckingham Street. From prior plats and that dedicated by separate document last fall I calculate that it is 76 feet in width. Number: 52 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] A drainage easement between the two ponds along the south property line is needed for the drainage pipe that is proposed. Topic: Site Plan Number: 50 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] Notes 1 and 2 regarding the building timing conflict. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Jennifer Petrik Topic: General Number: 60 Created: 10/13/2009 [10/13/09] Please include an emphasized pedestrian crossing between the sidewalk and the building such as a raised crossing. Number: 61 Created: 10/13/2009 [10/13/09] Bike facilities/parking have been included in plans. No issues. Department: Technical Services Issue Contact: Jeff County Topic: Plat Number: 62 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/09] If the area at the northwest corner of the property is to be dedicated as ROW, then it must be included in the outer boundary. Number: 63 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/09] There are line over text issues on the plat. Number: 64 Created: 10/14/2009 [10/14/09] The boundary and perimeter legal description close. Page 4 P drop in the centerline of the road. It is doubtful that the road section could drop this much without the waterline needing to be lowered. So it is very doubtful that the road would ever be rebuilt with the design you have shown. If you are going to show a possible future profile it needs to be something that might occur. A profile following minimum grades is something that would likely be built. [5/12/09] For the south profile to the east of the site. What is being shown? It looks as if you are tying into the existing curb and gutter in the plan view, but the profile appears to be all new and not matching the existing grade. Number: 30 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Still applicable. [5/12/09] A soils report will need to be submitted with the final submittal. Number: 31 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Still applicable [5/12/09] A striping plan will need to be submitted with the final plans. Number: 51 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] The site plan shows that there is a desire to place a 12 foot high wall over the 30 foot wide utility easement that runs adjacent to the building. This is a problem. A 12 foot high wall is considered a structure and will require a building permit — a building permit is not suppose to be issued for anything in an easement. The utilities will probably have an issue with this wall over their lines and the footings adjacent to the lines. Number: 53 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] The building square footages have changed since the last review. The application fees (TDRF) increased due to the increase in the size of the buildings. The project owes an additional $349. This can be paid at the time of final submittal with the final submittal fees. Number: 54 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] A gate at the south end of the property to accommodate the access easement through the site needs to be provided. This connection goes through the detention pond — how is the access to be maintained across the pond? Is this access still needed? If not will need something from the adjacent property owners identifying they no longer need it and verification from PFA that they no longer need it. Number: 55 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] It looks like the existing fire hydrant and the widened driveway are too close together. Number: 56 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] An off -site easement for the storm pipe is needed with this design. A letter of intent from the off -site property owner(s) is needed prior to being able to schedule this project for hearing. Number: 57 Created: 10/12/2009 [10/12/09] Add some notes to Buckingham plan and profile sheet. Identify the location of the curb openings to be built with this project. Label the locations of future curb inlets or curb openings. Label at which station curb and gutter is to start. Page 3 Topic: Site Plan Number: 36 Created: 5/13/2009 [10/22/09] All addressed but no more context has been shown. [5/13/09] Please add the following to the Site Plan: North Arrow on Vicinity and Site Plan Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking Percentage and square footage of landscaped area Show # of spaces and decipher handicap Where is bicycle parking? Please label existing and proposed s.f. on footprint Show some context, what is beyond these boundaries (150') What is the proposed treatment of the perimeter, fencing? Please label land uses, heavy ind, recycling... What are Recycling Roll-ons? What is happening with the temporary parking spaces on the west side of the building? Number: 75 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] Please be consistent with "trash" vs. "dumpster" enclosure. The label says one thing the detail says another. Number: 76 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] Take landscape info off the Site Plan, trees, turf, mulch... Leave paving details on though. Number: 77 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] Please show easement on site and landscape plans. Number: 78 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] Are roll -off moved into building #2? If so how do they get in? Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Langenberger Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12109] [5/12/09] See plans for additional redline comments. Number: 25 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Repeat at final will need to provide phasing plans showing what is to be built, graded and installed with each phase. [5/12/09] IF you are planning on phasing construction you will need to include phase lines and notes as a part of the final plans. Number: 26 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Need to show how the grading at the SW corner of the site will tieback into existing grades. It appears that off -site grading or construction easements will be needed. Letters of intent to grant these easements will need to be provided prior to the project being scheduled for hearing. [5/12/09] Few grade lines at the property lines do not tie to anything. Number: 28 Created: 5/12/2009 [10/12/09] Thanks for the reply — This design needs to be shown at minimum grades or at least close. The design you have shown would likely never be built due to the 1.5 — 2 foot Page 2 City of F6rt Collins Troy Jones MTA Planning & Architecture 171 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW Date: 10/22/2009 Staff has reviewed your submittal for COLORADO IRON AND METAL PDP - TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Advance Planning Issue Contact: Emma McArdle Topic: Fencing Number: 79 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] The tall fencing is warranted for buffering. The 10' fence along the west side of the lot extending from the building front to the front of the lot needs to meet code requirements though. Section 3.8.11 C states that "fences or walls shall be no more than 4' high between the front building line and front property line." A modification of standard would be required for the 10' fencing, with justification meeting the criteria set forth in 2.8.2 or the fence needs to meet standards. Topic: General Number: 74 Created: 10/22/2009 [10/22/09] Please show Revision Dates on all Plans. Topic: Landscaping Number: 37 Created: 5/13/2009 [10/22/09] Has Tim Buchanan been involved in deciding which trees stay and go? Raised walk, see Section 3.2.2(E)5. [5/13/09] Please address the following issues on the Landscape Plan: Are there any trees to be removed? Hard to decipher sidewalk, label or use fill. Full stocking of trees not met in front of Building 2. Recycling Roll-ons in place of potential landscaping, may need mod. Of standard. There is a fence and gate shown, what type? Please describe. Parking lot perimeter trees and street trees are not adequate, there needs to be shrubs and trees between sidewalk and parking lot. There are too many street trees, street lights are not shown, street canopy/shade trees need to be 40' from street lights. Landscape islands shall have a shade tree with at least 80 s.f. Of ground to support. Is there fencing along the sides and rear of the property? Show existing street lights Show where bike parking is. Is the walk through the parking lot raised? Please label existing trash enclosure. Will this still be used? Number: 80 [10/22/09] Please show % of trees. Created: 10/22/2009 Page 1 MUM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL City of Fort Collins To: _12a __�:0 V) Date: � = Z Z /C- Project: Co —_Ia c vn --t— TRANSMITTED HEREWITH ARE: ,14 Redlined Utility Plans ' See attached sheet for number of copies to resubmit. Resubmit copies to: ❑Current Planning ❑Engineering ❑ Redlined Storm Drainage Report See attached sheet for number of copies to resubmit. Resubmit copies to: ❑Current Planning ❑Engineering ❑ Development Agreement Please sign, seal, date, and return all copies of this agreement. Changes in the agreement take two (2) days to process if they are acceptable to the City. Please take this into account in your schedule. Again, all copies must be returned. ❑ Original Mylars Needing Revisions Please return with the "post -it" notes intact. ❑ Original Mylars with City Signatures Please return one (1) mylar and _ for our files. signed and stamped blueline print copies ❑ Development Construction Permit Application Please fill out and return to Engineering counter with application fee and all required attachments. ❑ Development Construction Permit for your Signatures Please sign (but do not date) and return. ❑ Attached is your Copy of the Development Construction Permit ❑ Draft Development Agreement For your review and comments. Please call with your comments or questions. Let me know if everything is okay. ❑ Attached is your Copy of the Development Agreement. ❑ Other: Transportation Services — Engineering Department 281 North College Avenue — P.O. Box 580 — Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 -- (970) 221-6605