HomeMy WebLinkAbout220 EDWARDS STREET - PDP - 36-07 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - APPLICATIONPDP Checklist
Submittal Checklist: Project Development Plan (PDP)
The following information is required to be submitted with all applications, unless
waived by staff. Any item waived must be dated and initialed by a planner with the
City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department.
f4° /Wa
Application form, filing fee (plus .75 cents for each APO label), and sign posting fer, afad/
d Transportation Development Review Fee — please contact En ineering at
221-6605 for�information.
'two 2 0
T*-e& lists ($) of names and addresses of all owners of record of real property within at
least 800' of the property lines for the parcel of land for which the project is proposed,
exclusive of public right-of-wayLb=;d=cib11e'icSotVpy
typed on -rh5iling labels (33 names.per-
sheet)°and the other list on a re of those labels).
1,
Statement of planning objectives (27 copies).
Copy of applicable conceptual letter and response letter explaining how issues have
been addressed (27 copies)
� % Complete list of proposed street names for the development.
Legal description of the site (one copy on 8'/z x 11" sheet).
Name and address of each owner of property within the boundaries of the development
plan area.
List of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers involve as either
applicants or owners.
` , Development phasing schedule. —^
jt0 J, Site plan drawings. (Refer to the submittal requirements for specific information to be
presented on the site plan.) (31 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
o Subdivision Plat (23 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
X;Architectural elevations (8 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
;X�Landscape Plan (Refer to the submittal requirements for specific information to be
presented on the landscape plan.) (21 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
o Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) (7 copies). 6L%rU-)
AmE Sl�bmt-�j-E, ' 22-t - &&W
Fevised Februer 2, 2007 FOP Chec-Aiist
Additional Information (if Applicable):
CERTIFICATION
I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge,
consent, and authority of the owners of the real property, as those terns are defined in Section I-2 of the City Code (including common areas legally connected to or
associated with the property which is the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action could not lawfully be accomplished.
Pursuant to said authority, 1 hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting of public notice on the
Property.
Name (Please PRINT): r�IIIX4 ,Je/hhInr+,S
Address: 3�0-1 iG tG,hw�tOt..cl
Telephone: 9 70 — 9'
Signature: (and title showing authority to sign, if applicable) c,
ia
utv..f rnrt corona
8 o?ol-Z a
Development Review Application
For Office Use Only eF Date Submitted /1- l °I - C'1
General Information: List all property owners having a legal/equitable
Current Planning File # - 07 '0 Planner oj4r8 e CLt
interest in the property (attach separate sheets if necessary).
Owner's Name(s): <{'I H/J&/ �f /// rL rliV i �I
Project Name: 92-0
Project Location (Street Address): A4,,J S
rr77 Street Address: YO (1,ox 91;0n15
Project Description:
City/State/Zip: F rUf e e.
tt��
Uyx i e5I, e," ISn
Telephone: !).y6-yq'—/(n/-7 Fax:
T„
Applicant's/Consultant's Name:
Land Use Information:
Gross Acreage/Square Footage:
Name of firm: R
Existing Zoning: IUcm Proposed Use:
r-7—d�
Contact: rQDti JNh,.t6reff�
Street Address: �3(4'-1 e Yl 921 vX
Total Number of Dwelling Units: 1J1
Total Number of Affordable Dwelling Units:
City/State/Zip: i=�F Co l// n_s Cis
Percentage of Affordable Dwelling Units (out of total):
Telephone: W-9'7/r) Fax: �19,3-19.33
Total Commercial Floor Area:
E-mail:
Type of Request
Please indicate the type of application submitted by checking the box preceding the appropriate request(s). Additional handouts are available explaining
the submittal requirements for each of the following review processes.
❑ Annexation Petition with Initial Zoning REQUESTED ZONE: _
Fee $1,188.00 + $50.00 sign posting fee + $.75 for each APO label
❑ Rezoning Petition REQUESTED ZONE:
Fee $977.00 + $50.00 sign posting fee + $.75 for each APO label
❑ Overall Development Plan (ODP)
Fee: $1,599.00 + $50.00 sign posting fee + $35 for each APO label
❑ Project Development Plan (PDP) without Subdivision Plat
Fee: $50.00 sign posting fee + $35 for each APO label
❑ Proj Development Plan (PDP) with Subdivision Plat
Fe $5,879.00 + $50.00 sign posting fee + $.75 for each APO label
F al Plan without Subdivision Plat
e: $1,000.00
❑ inal Plan with Subdivision Plat
Fee: $1,000.00
❑ Modification of Standards/Text and Map Amendment /
Fee: $200.00+ $50.00 sign posting fee
Basic Development Review
Fee: Varies: Check with the Zoning Department
Major Amendment
Fee: $3,206.00 + $50.00 sign posting fee + $.75 for each APO label
Non -Conforming Use Review
Fee: $1,389.00
Vacation of ROW or Easement
Fee: $5.00 per sheet of filing document
Small Project Fees 47ZO6.6l7
Fee: Varies -Check with the Current Planning Department
Street Name Change
Fee: $5.00
Extension of Final Approval
Fee: $566.00
Site Plan Advisory Review
NO FEE
J* CERTIFI TION ON REVERSE MUST BE SIGNED. p ll UPoArEU 912012006
Sf
lddgP�
i} X
A
Ilk
I
"OV
3
0
u
.low
aiv`
i
T"7•\�111111
7 �1
lip
Compliance phases of development review by City staff and affected
outside reviewing agencies. Also, the City's newly -adopted
Transportation Development Review Fees will apply to this
development proposal. The fees are paid directly to the Engineering
Department. Please check with Susan Joy, at 221-6605, for the actual
amount for the fees that must be paid.
11. This development proposal is subject to the requirements as set forth in
the City's LUC, specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development
Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and
Article 4. [Zoning] Districts, particularly Division 4.8 - NCM,
Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density District.
Ii
Operations Department, at 224-6062, and David Averill of the
Transportation Planning Department, at 416-2643, to determine
what, if any, information may be needed in the TIS pertaining to
Level of Service for vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes
of transportation.
b. All existing damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk must be repaired
or replaced in conjunction with the construction of the new
dwelling unit.
Please contact David Averill, at 416-2643, if you have questions about
these comments.
8. Karen McWilliams, a historic preservation planner with the Advance
Planning Department, indicated that the existing building is well over
50 years old (built in 1905). The existing property does have historic
designation; therefore, the proposal to make a minor modification to the
existing residence and add a new dwelling unit on the property is subject
to the requirements set forth in Section 3.4.7 of the LUC. You can
contact Karen, at 224-6078, if you have any need to discuss this historic
preservation issue further.
9. This development request will be subject to the City's Development
Review Process, which is a 2-step process consisting of.
* a complete Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal and review,
culminating in a public hearing in front of the Planning & Zoning
Board; and,
* a complete Final Compliance Plan submittal. These plans will be
reviewed by City staff and, if determined to be in compliance with
approved PDP documents, will be approved and recorded by staff.
Prior to submittal of a formal PDP proposal the applicant/developer
must hold a City -facilitated neighborhood meeting. Please see Sections
2.2.2 and 2.2.6 of the LUC for neighborhood meeting and notification
requirements.
10. This development request will be subject to the current Development
Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning
Department office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the
required documents for the Project Development Plan and Final
7
C. Dedication of street right-of-way and easements may be required if
/ as needed.
d. The required on -site parking area for the residential dwelling units
must be paved. The parking area must meet the parking standards
and setback requirements.
e. This request will be subject to a Larimer County Road Impact
Fee.
f. Any improvements in public right-of-way will be subject to the
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards.
g. All existing damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk must be repaired
or replaced in conjunction with the construction of the new
dwelling unit.
h. Any overhead utility lines across or adjacent to this property must
be undergrounded as part of the PDP.
If on -site detention and a drainage study are required, per the
Stormwater Utility comments (above), then the standard utility
plan documents will be required with the PDP submittal for review
by City staff.
j. A Development Agreement between the developer and the City
may be required and a Development Construction Permit will be
required for the site improvements.
k. The City's newly -adopted Transportation Development Review
Fees will apply to this development proposal. The fees are paid
directly to the Engineering Department. Please check with Susan
Joy for the actual amount for the fees that must be paid.
Please contact Susan, at 221-6605 or 221-6750, if you have questions
about these comments.
7. The Transportation Planning Department offered the following
comments:
a. A TIS, addressing all modes of transportation, may be required
with your PDP submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic
Cel
b. The City-wide development fee is $3,070 per acre ($0.0705 per
square foot) for new impervious area over 350 square feet. No fee is
charged for existing impervious area. The fee is to be paid at the
time of issuance of a building permit.
C. If there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 1,000 square
feet then a drainage and erosion control report and constructions
plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Colorado. A grading plan is
required when there is between 1,000 and 350 square feet of new
imperviousness, but no drainage study is required. There are no
requirements for less than 350 square feet. If the existing garage is
taken down the impervious area of it can be added to the 1,000
square feet of new imperviousness.
d. On -site detention is required with a 2-year historic release rate for
water quanti and extended detention is required for water quali
treatment only if there is an increase in imperviousness greater
than 1,000 square feet. If there is less than 1,000 but more than
350 square feet of new imperviousness then a site grading plan is
all that is required.
Please contact Glen Schlueter, at 224-6065, if you have questions about
these comments.
6. Susan Joy of the Engineering Department offered the following
comments:
a. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development request. The
fee will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits.
Please check with Matt Baker of the Engineering Department, at
224-6108, for the exact amount of this fee.
b. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS), addressing all modes of
transportation, may be required with your PDP submittal. Please
contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Operations Department, at
224-6062, and David Averill of the Transportation Planning
Department, at 416-2643, to determine what, if any, information
may be needed in the TIS pertaining to Level of Service for vehicle,
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation.
5
b. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main in the north - south
alley along the west side of the property.
C. Sanitary sewer service to the existing house may need to be
relocated so that it is not under the proposed additional dwelling
unit.
d. Separate water and sanitary sewer service taps are required for
dwelling unit in the proposed two-family dwelling on the property.
e. Plant investment fees and water rights will apply and they will be
collected at the time of issuance of building permits.
Please contact Roger, at 221-6854, if you have questions about these
comments.
3. Monica Moore of the Light & Power Department offered the following
comments:
a. There is existing 125 amp electric service along the north property
line.
b. Any electric service modifications associated with this development
request will be at the developer's expense.
Please contact Monica, at 221-6700, if you have questions about these
comments.
4. The Parks Planning Department has indicated that the new dwelling
unit will be subject to both the Neighborhood and the Community
Parkland fees, which are based on the square footage of the dwelling
unit. The fees will be collected at the time of issuance of building
permits.
5. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following
comments:
a. The design of this site must conform to the drainage basin design
of the Spring Creek Master Drainage Plan, as well as the City'§
Design Criteria and Construction Standards.
19
h. Sections 3.2.1(E)(4) & (5) of the LUC set forth the perimeter and
interior parking lot landscaping requirements.
Section 3.5.2(D)(2) of the LUC sets forth the required building
Setback from Nonarterial Streets, which is 15' from the street right-
of-way (property) line along Edwards Street. The existing house is
already out of compliance and the porch addition will put it further
out of compliance. Also, based on the conceptual plan, the second
dwelling unit could be out of compliance. Therefore, it would be
necessary to submit with the PDP a request for a modification of
the standard in the aforementioned section of the LUC that would
be reviewed and possibly approved to allow the diminished
setback.
j. The next step in the City's development review process, after this
conceptual meeting, would be to conduct a neighborhood meeting
facilitated by the City planner, with the applicant/developer
present. This meeting must occur before any formal submittal of a
development plan to the City for review. Please see Sections
2.2.2(B), (C), & (D) of the LUC for the neighborhood meeting
requirements. The applicant is responsible for providing the City
with a list (on sticky -back labels) of Affected Property Owners
(APO's) within at least 800' of the property in all directions, as set
forth in Section 2.2.6(D) of the LUC. The City will then mail a letter
to all the property owners on the list, using the sticky -back labels
provided by the applicant, notifying them of the upcoming
neighborhood meeting. The City planner will help you schedule the
place, date, and time of the meeting.
k. The first step in the City's formal development review process
would be a complete submittal of a Project Development Plan (PDP)
to the Current Planning Department for a staff and Planning &
Zoning Board review and public hearing.
Please contact Jenny, at 416-2313, if you have questions about these
comments.
2. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the
following comments:
a. There is an existing 8" water main in Mathews Street and an
existing 4" water main in Edwards Street.
91
b. The amount of residential square footage that can be constructed
is dependent on the size of the property. Section 4.8(D) (1) of the
LUC states that the minimum lot area shall be the equivalent of
2 times the total floor area of the building(s), but not less than
5,000 square feet for the permitted type of use intended, a two-
family dwelling in this case. The "total floor area" determination is
defined in this section of the LUC. IN this case, with the lot area
being 7,000 square feet, the total floor area of the proposed two
dwelling units (in a two-family dwelling) cannot exceed 3,500
square feet.
C. Section 4.8(E) of the LUC sets forth the "dimensional standards"
requirements in the NCM District. The minimum lot width for the
proposed two-family dwelling is 40' along the street frontage. The
minimum front yard setback is 15', with garage doors at least 20'
from the back of the public sidewalk. The minimum rear yard
setback is 15' from the rear property line. The minimum side yard
width is 5' for all interior side yards; however, whenever any
portion of an exterior wall exceeds 18' in height then that portion
of the wall shall be set back from the side lot line an additional 1'
for each 2' of wall height that exceeds 18'. The minimum side yard
width is 15' for the street side of any corner lot. The existing and
proposed building setbacks as shown on the conceptual plan
would require a modification of the building setback standard.
d. Per Section 4.8(E)(5) of the LUC, the maximum building height
shall be 2 stories.
e. Section 4.8(F)(1) of the LUC sets forth the Building Design
standards for this property.
f. Section 4.8(F)(2) of the LUC sets forth the Bulk and Massing
standards, dealing with building height and eave height.
g. The minimum off-street parking requirements for this proposed
residential development are set forth in Section 3.2.2(K)(1) of the
LUC. The requirements are based on the number of bedrooms per
dwelling unit. On -site bicycle parking requirements are set forth in
Section 3.2.2(C)(4) of the LUC. On -site handicap parking
requirements are set forth in Section 3.2.2(K)(5) of the LUC.
Pa
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS
City of Fort Collins
MEETING DATE: December 11, 2006
ITEM: 220 Edwards Street - Minor remodel to existing house. Add
second dwelling unit, either attached or detached.
APPLICANT: Rentfrow Design, LLC
C/o Jon Rentfrow
205 Allen Street
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
LAND USE DATA:
Request to do a minor remodel (new front porch) to the existing single-family
residential structure at 220 Edwards Street and construct a new second
dwelling unit (either totally detached from, or attached to with a breezeway, the
existing residence) on the back portion of the lot. The property is 7,000 square
feet in size and is located at the northwest corner of Edwards Street and
Mathews Street. It is Lot 12, Block 8 of the Crafts Resubdivision and is in the
NCM - Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density Zoning District.
COMMENTS:
1. Jenny Nuckols of the Zoning Department offered the following
comments:
a. The property is in the NCM - Neighborhood Conservation, Medium
Density Zoning District. The proposed new "attached" dwelling unit
is permitted in the NCM District subject to a Planning & Zoning
Board (Type 2) review and public hearing, as set forth in Section
4.8(13)(3)(a) of the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC). This is
defined as a "two-family dwelling' in the LUC.
The potential "detached" dwelling unit (single-family residence) is
not permitted because there is not enough lot area (7,000 square
feet) for a second single-family dwelling unit. Per Section 4.8(D)(1)
of the LUC, there must be at least 5,000 square feet of lot for each
detached single-family residence on the property.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Comn ity Planning and Environments. ; ervices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
December 18, 2006
Rentfrow Design, LLC
c/o Jon Rentfrow
205 Allen Street
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Jon,
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff s comments concerning the request
for 220 Edwards Street - Minor remodel to existing house. Add second dwelling unit,
either attached or detached, which was presented before the Conceptual Review Team
on December 11, 2006.
This is a request to do a minor remodel (new front porch) to the existing single-family
residential structure at 220 Edwards Street and construct a new second dwelling unit
(either totally detached from, or attached to with a breezeway, the existing residence) on
the back portion of the lot. The property is 7,000 square feet in size and is located at the
northwest corner of Edwards Street and Mathews Street. It is Lot 12, Block 8 of the
Crafts Resubdivision and is in the NCM - Neighborhood Conservation, Medium Density
Zoning District.
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed
components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments
maybe made at the time of formal review of this project.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the
review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6341.
Sincerely,
Otev&eOlt,
Project Planner
cc: Stormwater Utility
Traffic Operations
File
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
Son 9� "rnf frow- Vanayr
2o5 A& S'freef, `Forf Coffins, Colorado 86525
g70-4+2-3400
Project: 220 Edwards Street, Fort Collins, Colorado
This Document Prepared by: Jon R Rentfrow
Construction Schedule:
March 2008
Lot cleanup (vegetation) and Excavation
March/April 2008
Foundation and Utility work
May -July 2008
Exterior Construction (Framing/roofing/stucco)
August/Sept 2008
Exterior Site (Driveway, landscaping)
Interior Construction (Drywall/finishes, etc)
Son "R, l?,pnOrow-- Vanayer
2o5 Affn Street, cFort Coffins, Colorado 86525
g70-4f2-3400
Project: 220 Edwards Street, Fort Collins, Colorado
This Document Prepared by: Jon R Rentfrow
Owners of Property:
Mark Tavill
6816 Stanley Avenue
Carmichael, CA 95608
Phone- 916 752 6506
Email- mtavill@sbcglobal.net
Marshall Williams
PO Box 8125
Truckee, CA 96162
Phone- 530-448-1617
Email- marshallawilliams@hotmail.com
Son P 'RunfProw- Manaser
205 Alin Street, CFort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-4r23400
Project: 220 Edwards Street, Fort Collins, Colorado
This Document Prepared by: Jon R Rentfrow
Legal Description:
Lot 12, Block 8, Crafts Resubdivision of Lake Park Addition
To the city of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado.
I.4r-R- I - I
Son "P, r'enf'row- Vana
2o5 A17n Street, rFort Corms, Colorado 86525
970-4+2-3400
To whom it may concern,
Troy Jennings and myself, Jon Rentfrow, are representing the owner of 220
Edwards, Marshall Williams.
We are requesting a modification to the following:
4.8D1- Land Use Code. Due to the size of this lot, 220 Edwards, we are
not able to build a detached dwelling. We are allowed to construct
an attached, new dwelling, but due to resistance from Historical
Preservation we are asking for this modification to allow for the `overall'
best street presence.
4.8E3- Minimum Rear Yard Setback. We are requesting modification
to allow us to set the new structure more consistent with the existing
structure. The existing structures are approximately 4'-6" from the rear
property line. We are requesting a rear setback of 5'-0". This request is
based on the conclusion that the rear of the property is based on a 220
Edwards address, not a possible `original', Matthews street address.
3.2.2D3C- Type of material used for Driveway. We are requesting a
modification to allow for the driveway surface to be something other than
asphalt/concrete. We will farther explore the use of crushed
granite/asphalt or `grass-thru' pavers. This is to keep us from exceeding
1,000 square feet of impervious surface.
4.8D2- Over 1,000 square feet of New Construction. We are requesting
a modification to allow for the total square footage to not exceed 1,200
square feet, rather than 1,000.
We believe that the above modifications will provide for a more pleasant street'
presence on Edwards Street.
Thank you for your consideration.
Signed,
Jon R. Rentfrow
Son PN, 9�pYltfroW- VaY{aye
205 AlT n Sfreef, `fort 001nr, Colorado 80525
970-4+2-3400
To whom it may concern,
Troy Jennings and myself, Jon Rentfrow, are representing the owner of 220
Edwards, Marshall Williams.
This is in response to the initial review dated 7-18-07:
Please see the attached drawings, in answer to some of the issues concerns
defined in the review notes.
From Zoning, Number 5. We are asking for the 5' setback on the rear of the lot. We
intend to place the building 6'6" from the back property line. We believe the 6'6" is a
good place in relationship to the existing structures. Much closer to the street and it may
over power the existing building.
From Zoning, Number 6. Due to the fact that this project has Historical Significance to
Fort Collins, we have worked hard in collaboration with Karen McWilliams. Since the
beginning, Karen has directed us to create a design that is `subservient' to the Historically
Recognized Home. The term subservient has been explained to us, as something that is
less massive, has less architectural detail, and does not over -power the existing building.
Our fast design solution was to create an `addition' to the house, which would conform
to zoning laws. But Karen McWilliams was not happy with the design of the addition, it
definitely failed to be subservient, and was just not as welcoming as the existing building
is. Also, the initial design required us to remove the existing Historically Significant
detached garage. So, we chose to design a `detached addition' that allows us to keep the
fore -mentioned, detached garage, as well as looking to down play the impact onto the
existing home. We feel that this design (the detached addition) better suites the
neighborhood, not only because it is smaller, but also the fact that it is on the other side of
the lot. Thus, allowing the Historically Significant Home to remain as the predominant
structure on the lot, as it sits on the corner by itself. We also feel that as the lot is viewed
from the south, this creates better balance on the lot. In summary, we feel that this design
improves the neighborhood, by adding an attractive home that does not dominate the
street front and allows the Historically Significant Home to remain `obvious'.
Thank you for your consideration.
Signed,
Jon R. Rentfrow
107
Son P, `'ant frow-- Manayer
205 Ah n Street, `Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-4f2-2400
Project: 220 Edwards Street, Fort Collins, Colorado
This Document Prepared by: Jon R Rentfrow
Statement of Planning Objectives:
The above stated property was purchased as an investment, via a rental property.
The existing structure is a two bedroom home. The owner would like to add on to this
structure an additional `house/residence', again, for the purpose of an investment.
Through the research process with the city, it has become clear that purely adding
on to the structure would begin to tarnish the homes Historical Significance. Therefore
we have pursued a `detached' structure rather than an `attached' structure.
The existing two -car garage has also been declared Historically Significant.
Therefore it will not be torn down, but will be repaired to made more usable.
The new structure will have a separate parking area (for two cars) accessible from
the alley, running north from Edwards Street.
X— Utility plans (existing and proposed utility systems) (14 copies 24" x 36" — unfolded).
✓o Requirements for utility plans checklist (1 copy). ANO &LdbouNSh
VI"o_ Drainage and erosion control report (4 copies). nme 5ubmt*vt�,
❑ Soils Report (3 copies).
o Lighting Plans (4 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
❑ Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis (4 copies).
❑ Street cross sections schematics (if not included in the utility plans) (8 copies 24" x 36" — folded).
�j Explanation of any variance request(s). — �t7ex�tJIp� ` 6vt� v,-"'
A�N�G S-U.bM�f�D � ``VQ�7
c Signed letters of intent indicated that all required off -site easement and off -site rights -of -
way can be negotiated in time for final development plan submittal.
P1e 5tk6*rv#?,b
❑ Other information that the Director may require:
— Natural area or environmental study (4 copies)
— Wetland Delineation (4 copies)