HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLORADO IRON & METAL - FDP - FDP110005 - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)00 se
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 2 Created: 04/29/2011
042912011: Label buildings as "proposed" and "ebsting". (The)re labeled on the fencing
plan, but not on the site plan). Label the width of the drive aisle.
Response: OK. See revised site plan.
1 Fi
Department Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Number: 1 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Provide a separate water service from the water main in Buckingham to Bldg
2.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 2 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Show the sanitary sewer crossings in the stone profile.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 3 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Add standard details for the water service and the meter pit.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department Zoning
Contact: Peter Bames, 970-416-2355, pbames@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 04292011
04/292011: Building 93 has been relocated a considerable distance from where it was
shown on the PDP. Is this still considered to be "consistent with the PDP" as required be
Sec. 2.5.2(H)
Response: I checked article 5 of the Fort Collins Land Use Code, and the term "consistent" is not defined.
Dictionary.com defines the term as follows:
con•sist•ent
adjective Aen_sistenV
1. (of a person, behavior, or process) Unchanging in achievement or effect over a period of time
- manufacturing processes require a consistent approach
2. Compatible or in agreement with something
- the injuries are consistent with falling from a great height
3. (of an argument or set of ideas) Not containing any logical contradictions
- a consistent explanation
The proposed location of the proposed building moved, however both locations are in the rear yard of a
large industrial complex. There is no change in character, or substantial change or effect, nor do there
appear to be any logical contradictions as a result of the different location. I suggest that the new location is
therefore consistent with the PDP approval.
00
Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Number: 4 Created: 05262011
05262011: Sheet C10: Please cleanup the signing and striping plans so the curbs, and
new lane lines stand out from the existing info. Please minimize the grey scale of the
station line and markings.
Response: Acknowledged.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 1 Created: 05262011
05262011: Please move Relocated Tree # 11 further west. It is within the sight triangle of
the east access drive.
Response: OK. See revised landscape plan.
Number: 2 Created: 05262011
05262011: Please verify that the Patmore Ash shown just west of the middle access
drive is not within the sight triangle for the west access.
Response: OK. See revised landscape plan.
Number: 3 Created: 05262011
05262011: Please move the Hackberry shown just east of the west access out of the
sight triangle area.
Response: OK. See revised landscape plan.
Topic: Offsite Work
Number: 5 Created: 05262011
05262011: Lemay is to be down -graded to a residential street someday. Since that plan
is unfunded and development continues to be proposed in the area it causes the need for
City transportation staff to debate the issue with each new development proposal. The
debate is whether it is appropriate to require typical improvements at the
LemayBuckinham intersection. Per Figure 8-1 of LCUASS a left turn lane is required on
Lemay at Buckingham and since this development's traffic will impact that intersection it
would have the responsibility to construct the north bound left turn lane. The Church
proposed near the intersection had the responsibility placed on it when it was in the City
development process. The Church has yet to be constructed and as such I feel I'm left
with no alternative than to require the same responsibility from this project. This item will
be discussed at our next Transportation Coordination meeting. Until the requirement is
removed, LCUASS requires a north bound left turn lane at Lemay/Buckingham and would
be this projects responsibility to provide.
Response: It is our understanding that after further discussion, this comment has been removed by
Ward Stanford.
1.14
so
N
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 5 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: No comments.
Response: Acknowledged.
Topic: Plat
Number: 1 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: The boundary and legal close.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 2 Created: 05/172011
051172011: The reception number for the 11' of Buckingham Street ROW will need to be
added prior to mylars.
Response: OK. Please see the revised plat.
Number: 3 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Please correct the typos in the 5' utility easement description, and in the
adjoining subdivision plat names.
Response: OK. Please see the revised plat.
Number: 8 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Please "dean up" the area where the Emergency Access Easement &
Drainage Easement cross.
Response: OK. Please see the revised plat.
Number: 9 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Should "Fredrick Land Surveying" be in Survey Note #2?
Response: The surveyor originally on the project, however they went out of business. Please see the
revised plat.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 4 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: No comments.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Traffic Operation
19
00
ft
Number: 5 Created: 05/192011
05/192011: Please provide a detail for the outfall into the Lincoln Channel, including
erosion protection.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 7 Created: 05/192011
05/192011: Please add a note on the site plan that the detention pond can not be used for
metal stockpiling.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 8 Created: 05/192011
051192011: To meet the detention pond landscape standards, please add a few trees
along the perimeter of the detention pond that lies next to the property boundary.
Response: OK. See the revised landscape plan.
Department Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Number: 6 Created: 051172011
05/172011: No comments.
Response: Acknowledged.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Number: 7 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: Please correct the north arrow on sheet C9.
Response: The north arrow has been removed, since the sheet only shows sections views.
Topic: Easements
Number: 10 Created: 051172011
05/172011: The Drainage Easement legal description does not dose.
Response: Please see the revised legal description and diagram.
Number: 11 Created: 05/172011
05/172011: The boundary of Lot 9-A on the Drainage Easement does not match the plats
we have on file.
Response: A boundary line adjustment was done in accordance with Section 1.4.7(B) of the Fort Collins
Land Use Code in coordination with Peter Barnes on 6/9/2008.
11
i
so
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: Floodplain
Number: 6 Created: 05/19/2011
05/19/2011:
Drainage Report:
-Please change Major Basin Description paragraph to reflect that the project is within the
Poudre River 500-year floodplain.
-Please include site on the FEMA FIRMETTE and flood risk figure in the appendix.
Response: Acknowledged.
Plans:
Please include note on plans indicating the project site is within the Poudre River 500-year
floodplain.
Response: Acknowledged.
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 06/17/2011
05/17/2011: The final signed off -site drainage easement is required before signing of
mylars
Response: Acknowldeged.
Number: 2 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: Written approval is required from Larimer County for the outfall draining into
the Lincoln Channel before signing of mylars.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 3 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: An analysis of the emergency spill is needed up to Lincoln Avenue. The City
requires that the spill get to a right-of-way without inundating any structures.
Response: The spill path to the existing west borrow ditch along Lemay Avenue has been added to the
plans. Generally, the spill is towards the east and into the existing detention pond for the site.
Number: 4 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention pond and
outfall storm sewer.
Response: Acknowledged. We are currently finalizing the easements, which will be dedicated via
separate instrument.
M M
- Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
- Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane
(26 feet on at least one long side of the building when the structure is three or more stories
in height).
If the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic fire -sprinkler system, the
fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet.
KNOX PADLOCKS: The two proposed gates, if locked, must be equipped with a Knox
Padlock. PFA sells these padlocks for cost in the Fire Prevention Bureau.
ALSO, the proposed EAE is acceptable. Approved signage (NO PARKING - FIRE LANE)
must be installed prior to CO.
2006 International Fire Code 503.1.1, 503.2.3, 503.3, 503.4 and Appendix D
Response: We are platting an emergency access easement loop through the site.
Number: 3 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: FIRE SPRINKLERS
No fire line is shown on the utility plan.
Response: The existing fire line to the existing building has been added to the plans.
Number: 4 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: ADDRESS NUMERALS
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and posted with a
minimum six-inch high numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on
brown brick are not acceptable). If the numerals are mounted on a side of the building
other than the side off of which it is addressed, the street name is required to be posted
along with the numerals.
At such time buildings 2 and 3 are approved and constructed, we can discuss addressing
of these buildings.
2006 International Fire Code 505.1
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 5 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: FDC CLEARANCE:
The fire sprinkler connection must be Gear of all vegetation (other than ground cover) and
any other obstruction, within 36 inches. Please note this clearance for the planting areas.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 6 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS:
All existing and proposed structures shall meet requirements for type of occupancy.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
2
9"
N 00
Number: 3 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the
owner's expense.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: PFA
Contact: Carte Dann, 970-219-5337, CDANN@poudre-frre.org
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 05/18/2011
05/182011: WATER SUPPLY
Fire hydrants, where required,.must be the type approved by the water district having
jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet
minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing
requirements include:
- Commercialandmufti-family dwellings 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter
- Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter
- Residential.outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced
not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler
systems.
PLEASE NOTE: No existing hydrants are. shown on the plans. The existing hydrant near
the entrance to the site meets the distance requirements for the existing structure and the
phase 2 proposed building. However, we need to meet to discuss and resolve
water -supply issues for the phase 3 structure.
2006 International Fire Code 508.1 and Appendix B
Response: We are showing a new hydrant to serve the proposed building #2 in addition to the existing
hydrant.
Number: 2 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: REQUIRED ACCESS
Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall. be provided for every facility, building or portion of a
building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFA's jurisdiction when any
portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is
located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the building or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and
signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for
approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant
standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements:
- Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable
of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for
temporary fire lanes or at construction sites.
- Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable.
R
00
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 05/10/2011
05/10/2011: No comments.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 05/19/2011
05/19/2011: Some of the existing tree locations appear that they may not be accurate.
The applicant can meet on site with the City Forester to determine species of existing
trees. This information can be included in the tree mitigation notes.
Trees species to be transplanted to the parkway strip along Buckingham should be
suitable species for street trees. See the City of Fort Collins Street Tree list. Some appear
to be evergreen trees that would not be suitable as street trees.
A landscape note should include information that the method and timing of transplanting
trees would follow industry standards and recommendations.
A Patmore Green Ash is shown as one of the new street trees. Green Ash is not on the
City street tree list. Select a species from the list such as Greenspire Linden or Skyline
Honeylocust
Response: Tim and I met out on -site this week, and we have revised the existing trees sheet and
landscape plan accordingly.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: Owner is responsible for additional square footage charges that were not
previously paid by the Vanworks Sub 2nd Filing.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 2 Created: 05/17/2011
05/17/2011: Contact Light & Power with any change in power requirements. Owner will
need to submit a C-1 form and a One -line diagram to Light & Power for any additional
increase in power requirements. Electric Capacity Fees and Building Site charges will
apply for any increase in power.
Response: Acknowledged.
N 00
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 8 Created: 05123/2011
05/18/2011: Please provide the following statement on the grading sheets. "The top of
foundation elevations shown are the minimum elevations required for protection from the
100-year storm."
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 9 Created: 05/23/2011
05232011: On sheet C8, it does not appear that the proposed flowline and centerline
grades are shown, please display the preliminary design for the flowline and centerline in
this location. The minimum grades need to be carried out to the full 500' off site.
Response: As we discussed on the phone, the south curb/gutter and sidewalk east of the site are
already constructed. The proposed future ultimate improvements in this area consist of construction of
the north half of the street. Therefore, the south flowline and centerline will not change with the ultimate
future condition.
Number: 10 Created: 05232011
05232011: To finalize the project, both a Development Agreement (DA) and a
Development Construction Permit (DCP) will be needed. To begin both please contact
Andrew Carney (221-6501, acamey@fcgov.com) to obtain applications for both
documents, as well as, more information regarding both processes.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 11 Created: 05232011
05232011: To finalize the emergency access easement, a legal description and an
exhibit showing the easement will need to be submitted and reviewed. Also, a Deed of
dedication will need to be completed and submitted along with the TDRF easement
dedication fee and the applicable recording fees to record the final document with Larimer
County.
Response: Our Emergency Access Easement is contained entirely on -site, and is dedicated by the plat.
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 04282011
04282011: The project still owes $349 that remains due from the PDP submittal
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com
M N
dedication fee and the applicable recording fees to record the final document with Larimer
County.
[4/6/10]Letter of intent received. Final easement will be needed prior to approval of plans.
Processing and filling fees will be due for the processing and filing of off -site easements.
[10112109] Need to show how the grading at the SW comer of the site will tie back into
existing grades. It appears that off -site grading or construction easements will be needed.
Letters of intent to grant these easements will need to be provided prior to the project
being scheduled for hearing.
[5/12/09] Few grade lines at the property lines do not be to anything.
Response: We have included this easement (with diagram) in our re -submittal.
Number: 4 Created: 05/17/2011
05/18/2011: To finalize the off -site drainage easement and the Emergency Access
Easement, a legal description and an exhibit showing the easement will need to be
submitted and reviewed. Also, a Deed of dedication will need to be completed and
submitted along with the TDRF easement dedication fee and the applicable recording fees
to record the final document with Larimer County.
[4/6110] Letter of intent received. Final easement will be needed prior to approval of plans.
Processing and filling fees will be due for the processing and filing of off -site easements.
[10/12/09] An off -site easement for the stone pipe is needed with this design. A letter of
intent from the off -site property owner(s) is needed prior to being able to schedule this
project for hearing.
Response: Our Emergency Access Easement is contained entirely on -site, and is dedicated by the plat.
We have included the offsite drainage easement (with diagram) in the re -submittal.
Number: 5 Created: 05/17/2011
051182011: 1 did not see this detail included in the utility plan. Please include it (should be
detail D-12B) and call it out on the utility sheet.
[4/6/101 The concrete sidewalk culvert should be used since water is entering the site
from the roadway. I taped a copy of this detail to the plans.
Response: This detail is located on sheet C13.
Number: 6 Created: 05/172011
05/182011: On the utility and grading sheets, show the extent and boundary of the off -site
grading and drainage easements and simply call them out as being dedicated via separate
document.
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 7 Created: 05/172011
05/182011: On the grading sheets, finish grade elevations are needed for all streets, lot
comers, and finish floors/top of foundation of buildings for all lots. Several spot locations
are missing.
N
00
[1022/09] All addressed but no more context has been shown.
[5/13/09) Please add the following to the Site Plan:
North Arrow on Vicinity and Site Plan
Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking
Percentage and square footage of landscaped area
Show # of spaces and decipher handicap
Where is bicycle parking?
Please label existing and proposed s.f. on footprint
Show some context, what is beyond these boundaries (150)
What is the proposed treatment of the perimeter, fencing?
Please label land uses, heavy ind, recycling4
What are Recycling Roll-ons?
What is happening with the temporary parking spaces on the west side of the building?
Response: Acknowledged.
Number: 11 Created: 05232011
/23R1111: If there are no curb and cutter to be installed in the parking lot, then you need
eel mai in the sidewalk widths. Please show these on the plans.
CommenM8 t
[4129/10] Please dean up plan sets to show curb/gutter info everywhere, curve tly it is
missing in some areas. 1 1
Response: We are now showing wheel stops as requested.
bSt/ E m�jg�ring vel ;pm �nt Review
C-o�ntact:A dre" v3 Ca 970-221-6501, acamey@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 2 Created: 05/17/2011
05/18/2011: Comment carried forwarded, Please dearly show phase lines on the
util /grading/etc she�gjts to dearly delineate what is included in each phase. � 11� n e j4or7teti�ildis,
tshowing what is to be done with each phase. Need to
7► show w sgs will be constructed out to the public sidewalk
gh a 2 rt:ow will the street drainage go through Phase 2 until the
parking lots are built? Are sw les to be constructed?
110/12/091 Repeat at final will need to provide phasing plans showing what is to be built,
graded and installed with each phase.
[5/12/09] IF you are planning on phasing constriction you will need to includeiase lines
and notes as a part of the final plans.
Response: Grading Plans are provided for each phase, and notes have been added to the plans to
define the phasing.
Number: 3 Created: 05/17/2011
05/182011: To finalize the off -site grading/slope easement, a legal description and an
exhibit showing the easement will need to be submitted and reviewed. Also, a Deed of
dedication will need to be completed and submit along with the TDRF easement
N
N
Response: Please see the newly created phasing plan, and the revised landscape plan.
Number: 22 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: What about landscaping in the detention pond?
Response: Although the original PDP was submitted prior to the adoption of the new detention pond
landscaping standards, we're happy to add a few trees as requested by Wes Lamarque.See the revised
landscape plan.
Number: 23 Created: 05232011
05232011: 1 don't like that landscaping in front of building #1 is in phase 2.
Response: We now propose the shrubs within the planting bed in front of the building #1 to be in phase
1.
Topic: Site Plan
Number: 16 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: Please label existing vs. proposed buildings.
y' 1 qq 9 Response: Please see the revised site plan. N;
o i r to
%� Nu�m��r � 17 Cr��t�:•E�11826�
051182011: Some of the surfaces aren t labeled. Please check for consistency, some
sidewalks have the same fill but in lighter colors. Are some existing? Or should they be
the same? If you don't want to call out the fills each time, a legend will help.
Response: Please see revised plan set.
f aA- Apk&+ Sid
Number: 18 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: lam confused by the easement callouts. Can you have the callout identify
both edges of the easement not just one? See plan for clarification.
cr
Response: Please see revised plan set. S ��
dumber: 20 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: What color is the dumpster enclosure? To match building materials?
Response: The intent is to match the color of the existing building. Please see revised dumpster
enclosure details.
Number: 1 Created: 05232011
05/232011: This should have been addressed prior to hearing, it may have been my error
not noticing that it was not addressed. It obviously is unnecessary at this point, but please
be aware in the future we do need more context show on plans.
Comment #36 from previous letter.
[4/6/10] 1 asked in my original comment to show at least 150' of off -site context, it is still
not shown. You will need to change the scale of the drawings to do this.
4
N so
- What is happening along the east property line? Is there fencing?
-Either label something or take them off this plan completely, the grayed out items should
only be the basics.
Response: The intent is that the neighboring property owner will be offered the opportunity to
tie into the fencing scheme, however it is intended that that property owner seek his own
building permits for such fencing. If that property owner chooses not to tie in, our intent is to
bring our portion of the fence to the property line. We were told in an earlier submittal that if
we show the fence on the neighbor's property, we would need to get an easement in order to
do so. Rather than that, we'd like to just leave the fence to the neighbor to decide whether or
not he wants to tie in.
Number: 12 Created: 05/23/2011
05/2312011: We either need some realty good notes describing this or separate plans.
Comment #99 `
[4/29/10] Let's discuss the addition of notes regarding phasing, there are two dptions to
address parking lot landscaping. I want to make sure that staff reviews the parkiinvt and
landscaping even if the entry feature is not built. So the parking lot shall either be tied to a
certificate of completion or the CO of the entry feature.
Response: The intent is that both the entry feature (the center entry on the existing building)
and the northeast parking lot will be in the last construction phase. Please see the new sheet
called "Phasing Plan." I believe the information on this sheet will clarify the issue.
Number: 13 Created: 05/23/2011
05/23/2011: If there is no entry feature then you need to work on redirecting traffic to the
other door. Now it is very unclear where you enter the building the way the design is
proposed. I am concerned about getting rid of this as it was part of the plan that was
approved at hearing. Please reconsider or lets talk about options.
[4/29/101 The entry feature does not show the entry door very dearly, let's get a little
definition on this elevation.
Response: We are fine adding the center entry as requested. Please see the "Phasing Plan"
sheet for the interim entry and walkway condition.
No
Number: 24 Created: 05/24/2011
i
05/242011: I'm very concerned about the removal of the entry feature. I strongly sugges f �
reconsidering this as the whole plan leads you to this feature. I'm happy to sit down an�V
discuss options if you like.
Response: We are fine adding the center entry as requested.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Number: 21 Created: 05/182011
051182011: The entry feature is highlighted by the landscaping design. Need to figure out
what you are doing here.
9
N
Response to Comments
Colorado Iron & Metal, Final Plan
June 1, 2011
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Emma McArdle, 970-221.6206, emcardle@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Number: 14 Created: 05/18/2011
"'Ix05/182011: Please take PDP off all the title blocks. No need to change it to FDP or Final
Plan, we do not need this on the recorded plan.
Response: We have modified the drawings as requested. See revised submittal.
Number: 15 Created: 05/182011
05118201I- Signature block for Current Planning Director should be Director of
Community Development and Neighborhood Services.
Response: Modified as requested. See revised submittal.
Number: 19 Created: 05/182011
05/182011: What is happening with the phase 2 areas until phase 2 is built? I either need
a clear note on the site and landscape plans telling me this or potentially another plan
showing this if it cannot be described adequately.
Response: We have now included a sheet entitled "Phasing Plan" that clarifies the phasing. Also, note
that the landscape schedule calls out which phase the various plantings are in.
Number: 6 Created: 05232011
05232011: This is asking about fencing, the response referred to landscaping in the
Minor Amendment. Will the fence that was proposed to go in front of the existing building
stay? It doesn't appear in the plan.
Comment #91
[4/6/10] Will any of the fencing that will be added through the minor amendment stay?
Response: None of the minor amendment improvements, including the fencing, was ever
installed. The owner decided not to proceed with the approved minor amendment. The intent
is to proceed with improvements as shown in this full blown development approval rather than
to proceed with any of the improvements approved by the minor amendment.
Number: 8 Created: 06232011
05232011: Just wondering how the area between this facility and the neighboring
property to the east will be handled? Is there shared security around both facilities?
Comment #93
[4/6/10] Please see the redlined Fencing Plan. There are several things that I need
clarification on:
-Darken line weight of fencing, there is barely a difference in some places,