HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-146-10/02/1984-ADOPTING THE FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES RELATING TO THE 1985 FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION 84- 146
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ADOPTING THE FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT
POLICIES RELATING TO THE 1985 FINAL BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Council have reviewed various
financial and management policies in conjunction with the annual budget
process and five year plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Collins is committed to sound financial
planning and direction; and
WHEREAS, these policies form the basis for various decisions affecting
the 1985 final budget; and
WHEREAS, City Council wishes to formally adopt these financial and
management policies in conjunction with the adoption of the budget ending
fiscal year 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that the following financial and management policies be, and the
same hereby are, adopted as the basis for the resolution adopting the 1985
Budget for the City of Fort Collins:
FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT POLICIES
RELATING TO THE 1985 BUDGET
INDEX
I. General
1. Form of Government
2. City Council
3. City Manager
4. Budget
5. Categorization of City Services
II . Revenues
1. Revenue Policy
2. Sales & Use Tax Distribution
3. General Fund Fees and Taxes
4. Revenue Sharing
5. Private Contributions
III. Expenditures
1. Administrative Charges
2. Affordable Housing
. 3. Art in Public Places
4. -Building Maintenance Costs
5. Energy
6. Improvement Districts
7. Lease/Purchase
8. Medical Insurance
9. Open Space & Trails
10. Payment-in-Lieu-of-Taxes
11. Pensions
12. Performance Pay Plan/Comparable Worth
13. Poudre Fire Authority-Revenue Allocation Formula
14. Rebate Programs
15. Transfort
IV. Reserve Policies
V. Investment Policy
VI . Debt Policy
VII. Capital Improvement Policy
VIII. Various Funds
1. Enterprise Funds
2. Light & Power
3. Water & Sewer
4. Storm Drainage
5. Cultural Services & Facilities Fee Policy
6. Parks and Recreation Fee Policy
GENERAL
I.1. FORM OF GOVERNMENT
The municipal government provided by the Charter of the City of
Fort Collins is known as the "Council -Manager government" .
Pursuant to its provisions and subject only to the limitations
imposed by the State Constitution and by the Charter, all powers of
the City shall be vested in an elective Council , hereinafter
referred to as "the Council " . All powers of the City of Fort
Collins shall be exercised in the manner prescribed by the Charter,
or, if the manner be not therein prescribed, then in such manner as
may be prescribed by ordinance.
Powers of the City
The City shall have all powers granted to municipal corporations
and to cities by the constitution and general laws of this State,
together with all the implied powers necessary to carry into
execution all the powers granted.
Powers of the City Council
All powers of the City and the determination of all matters
of policy shall be vested in the Council except as otherwise
provided by the Charter of the City of Fort Collins .
I .2. CITY COUNCIL
Membership
As provided by the City Charter, the Council has seven members.
Three of the Council members are nominated and elected from the
City at large. The remaining four members are nominated by each of
the City's four districts and are elected from each district by the
City at large. The term of office of all members of the City
Council is four years each.
The Council elects a Mayor and assistant Mayor from among Council -
members, for a term of one year each .
Powers
As provided by the City Charter, all powers of the City and the
determination of all matters of policy are vested in the Council
except as otherwise provided by the City Charter. Without limita-
tion of the foregoing, the Council shall have power to:
(a) Appoint and remove the city manager;
(b) By ordinance create, change , consolidate and abolish
offices , departments or agencies , whether created by
the Charter or otherwise, and to assign functions and
duties to the same and to any offices , departments
or agencies established by the Charter; provided that the
functions established in the Charter for any department
shall not be abolished;
(c) Adopt the budget of the City;
(d) Authorize the issuance of bonds by ordinance as provided
by the Charter;
(e) Inquire into and investigate any office , department ,
or agency of the City and the official acts of any
officer or employee thereof, and to compel by subpoena
attendance and testimony of witnesses and production of
books and documents ;
(f) Adopt plats ;
P >
(g) Adopt and modify the official map of the City;
(h) Provide for independent audits of all funds and accounts
of the City.
I.3. CITY MANAGER
Powers
As provided by the City Charter, the City Manager shall be respon-
sible to the Council for the proper administration of all affairs
of the City and to that end shall have power and be required
to:
(a) Appoint and, when necessary for the good of the service,
remove all heads of departments and employees of the City
except as otherwise provided by the Charter;
(b) Prepare the budget annually and submit it to the Council
and be responsible for its administration after adoption;
(c) Participate in discussions of the Council in an advisory
capacity;
(d) Prepare and submit to the Council as of the end of the
fiscal year a complete report on the finances and admin-
istrative activities of the City for the preceding year,
and make written or oral reports to the Council when
required by it as to any particular matter relating to the
affairs of the City within his supervision;
(e) Keep the Council advised of the financial condition and
the future needs of the City, and make recommendations to
the Council ;
(f) Enforce the laws and ordinances of the City;
(g) Perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the
Charter or required of him by the Council not inconsistent
with the Charter.
I .4. BUDGET
On or before the first Monday in September of each year, the City
Manager shall submit to the Council a proposed budget for the next
ensuing budget year with an explanatory message. The proposed
budget shall provide a complete financial plan for each fund of the
City and shall include appropriate financial statements for each
type of fund showing comparative figures for the last completed
fiscal year, comparative figures for the current year, and the City
Manager's recommendation for the ensuing year.
The budget estimates are open to the public for inspection and
copy. Within ten days, Council sets times for public hearings , at
which time the public may comment upon the proposed budget. After
the public hearings, and before the last day of October of each
year, the Council shall adopt the budget for the ensuing fiscal
year.
I.5. CATEGORIZATION OF CITY SERVICES
In 1983, the City Council reviewed and categorized all City ser-
vices in order to set priorities for allocating available money.
These categories are:
Basic or Core Services - these are services that are best performed
at the local eve] and are most closely linked to protecting the
health and safety of citizens . Legally mandated services or commit-
ments are also included in this category.
Maintenance of Effort Services - these are services which the
City has traditionally provided or which reflect a major capital
investment requiring an expenditure of funds to maintain.
Quality of Life - these are activities which are provided for
more specialized groups and enhance the desirability of Fort
Collins as a place to live.
These categories were applied to City services in the following
manner:
Basic or Core Services
Debt Payments
Fire
Light & Power
Police
Storm Drainage
Streets
Water and Sewer
Maintenance of Effort Services
Cemeteries
Engineering
Facilities
General Administrative Services
Internal Service Activities
Library
Park Maintenance
Street Lighting
Transfort
Quality of Life
Community Services
Golf
Lincoln Center
Museum
Open Space
Recreation
REVENUES
II.1. REVENUE POLICY
Generally, the City reviews estimated revenue and fee schedules as
part of the budget process . Estimated revenue is conservatively
projected for five years and updated annually . Proposed rate
increases are based upon:
0 Fee policies applicable to each fund or activity.
0 The related cost of the service provided.
0 The impact of inflation in the provision of services .
0 Equity of comparable fees .
The Revenue Policy for the City of Fort Collins includes these
informal policie
s s with the addition of:
0 Maintenance of a diversified and stable revenue system to
shelter the City from short run fluctuations in any one
revenue source.
II.2. SALES & USE TAX DISTRIBUTION
In 1985, the City's Sales & Use Tax totals 2.754, developed as
follows:
1968 — General City uses 1.004
1980 - General City uses 1.00
1982 - General City uses .25
1984 - "Necessary" General City Capital Projects .25 *
1985 - Pool/Ice Rink Facility .25 *
TOTAL 2.754
*Excluding sales of grocery food.
Revenue generated by the Sales & Use Tax will be distributed based
on adopted budgets, as follows:
TAX ON ALL SALES & USES: 2.25�
Sales & Use Tax Fund Reserves - fixed dollar amount
Debt Service Fund - fixed dollar amount
Fort Collins/Loveland Airport Authority - fixed dollar amount
Balance remaining after coverage of fixed dollar amounts distributed to:
General Fund
Seven Year Capital 0 & M 15%
Transfort 5%
Other 64%
Capital Projects Fund
General City Capital Projects (essential ) 16%
TOTAL 100%
Actual Sales & Use Tax revenue generated by the 2.254 tax in
excess of budgeted amounts will be transferred to the General
Fund.
TAX ON ALL SALES & USES - EXCLUDING GROCERY FOOD: 0.504
Capital Projects Fund
General City Capital Projects (necessary) 50%
Pool/Ice Rink Facility 50%
TOTAL 100%
Actual Sales
& Use Tax revenues to excess of budgeted amounts will
be transferred to, and be retained in, Capital Projects Fund until
all authorized projects have been completed. Upon completion of the
designated projects, excess revenue will be transferred to the
General Fund (50%) to reduce property taxes and to the operation of
the Pool /Ice Rink Facility (50%) .
II.3. GENERAL FUND FEES AND TAXES
The City of Fort Collins imposes a number of miscellaneous licenses ,
fees and taxes, which are reviewed annually in conjunction with the
Revenue Policy, to determine rates and fee schedules for the
ensuing year.
II.4. REVENUE SHARING
In order to avoid dependency upon federal funds , which may not
continue, for basic or core service areas , the City currently
utilizes Revenue Sharing monies only for one-time and/or capital
costs. The exception to this policy is the use of Revenue Sharing
funds for social service programs on an on-going basis (i .e .
private, non-profit agency contracts , Rebate Programs for Property
Tax, Utility bills, Sales Tax on Food, and the Volunteer Program) .
II.5. PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS
The City's services in the category of Quality of Life consist of
the following:
Community Services
Golf
Lincoln Center
Museum
Open Space
Recreation
Quality of Life programs represent an "extra" that we have been
able to provide in Fort Collins in the past and may not be able to
provide at the same level without additional support in the future.
Therefore, efforts should be made to secure private contributions
in support of these programs and services , as these contributions
are an integral part of their successful operation.
EXPENDITURES
III .1. ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES
The General Fund provides services to all funds , requiring a
formula for the allocation of Administrative Charges . The formula
utilized in the allocation is as follows:
0 Allocation of 50% of the cost based upon the ratio of each
fund's budget (operation , maintenance, and capital ) to the
total City budget (excluding Light & Power' s Purchased
Power) ; and
0 Allocation of 50% of the cost based upon the number of City
employees in each fund to the total number of City employees.
This policy is applied to all funds in 1985, with the exception of
those funds which are subsidized by the General Fund.
III.2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
There are many families within the City of Fort Collins who are
unable to afford adequate housing. With the difficulty of reaching
families in the lowest income range with private financing, and the
low probability of renewed federal funds in the near future, the
City has made a commitment to assist those families in need of
Affordable Housing through the Housing Authority.
Based upon the availability of City resources , the City will
provide the Housing Authority with funds to support a rental
subsidy program, as well as a program to construct housing for
low-income families in the City.
III.3. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
The City of Fort Collins is encouraging the development of the arts
not only as a highly satisfying end in itself, but also to improve
the quality of life via creative surroundings in the community.
Visually, a community is sterile until the quality of the environ-
ment is enhanced by the addition of visual arts to public build-
ings, parks , and plazas. To this end, City Council and staff have
developed a program to provide art in public places for the
City of Fort Collins .
1. Art in Public Buildings
An art acquisition program for the City's major public
buildings housing employees and for public gathering places
was developed in 1982. As appropriate works of art are
identified, staff will make the necessary recommendations
to Council .
2. Art in the Parks
The budget for each new park will include $1,000 to $5,000
for active sculptures and passive art as a part of the
unique park experience. This is to be designed into the new
park construction schedule.
3. Jury Policy
A policy for a jury of at least three persons with diversi-
fied professional arts background has been established to
determine commissions and selections of artworks for public
places .
4. Center for the Study of Contemporary Art
The City staff and community will be encouraged to become
involved with CSU in the development of the Center for
Contemporary Art . This should expand the community ' s
awareness and appreciation of contemporary art.
III.4. Building Maintenance Costs
As part of the 1985 Budget process , Council considered the City's
policy relating to the maintenance of City buildings . Such main-
tenance has been classified into three categories :
1. General
2. Renovation
A. Minor
B. Major
3. Replacement
Priorities associated with the categories have also been estab-
lished:
1. Life/Health and Safety
2. Repair
3. Protecting Capital Investment
4. Quality/Enhancement
By using this system of classification and prioritization ,
the needs of each building can be clearly identified.
A consultant will be retained in January, 1985, to do a Building
Maintenance Audit. The audit will provide the following products
and information:
1. Preventive maintenance program
2. Procedures manual
3. Life expectancy of each building
4. Recommended action for improvements to buildings
5. Appropriate staffing levels
6. Cost of deferred maintenance
The result will be a viable Building Improvement program for the
City.
III .5. ENERGY
The City recognizes a responsibility in energy management conser-
vation . The City assumes a multi -facetted role in this area. The
City's roles are: 1) a consumer of energy in municipal facilities ,
2) a corporate agency of the community to facilitate energy objec-
tives of the community, and 3) a supplier of energy and energy
services .
As a consumer, the City does building retrofits, utilizes alter-
native fuels and modifies operating practices . These efforts save
energy as well as money and/or enable the City to benefit from new
technologies.
As a corporate agency of the Community, the City has developed
various ordinances and development guidelines to encourage energy
conservation and the use of renewable energy.
As a supplier of energy and energy services , the City has initiated
an agressive outreach effort to provide energy education and
facilitate the expanded use of conservation and renewable energy.
Toward these ends , the City Council will look for implementation
of the following programs and policies :
1. The in-house Energy Management Program will continue to hold
a high priority. The decentralized approach has worked well ,
and because this strategy promotes more innovation and greater
departmental involvement, it remains the preferred approach.
2. The principal goal of the program is cost savings . To this end,
funds are budgeted annually for energy conservation retrofit
work in City facilities .
3. Whenever possible, and to the extent practical , life cycle
costing will be used in developing bid specifications and
awarding contracts.
4. The greatest long-term benefits from energy conservation will
result from broad participation by the community. To facilitate
this participation, the CHOICE program has been initiated.
The program, which relies heavily upon a citizens ' committee,
provides the means to look at broad community energy concerns
and provide citizen input and leadership.
5. To further encourage energy conservation, City Council will
look for ways to channel community resources for community
problems . The use of CDBG monies for the zero interest loan
program is one example. The HOT SHOT program provides another
example, wherein the electric utility front-ended the cost
of this program and savings are used to pay off the "loan" and
provide a rebate to participants.
6. City Council recognizes the important role of the private sector
in long-term energy conservation and will take steps to be
involved with the community in a way which encourages energy
conservation in building design and community layout . One
example of the potential of this private/public tie is the
Showcase Home program in the fall of 1983 and the winter of
1984.
7. The alternate fuels program will be continued and expanded,
ensuring operating cost savings and a reduction of vulnerability
through foreign oil reliance.
III.6. IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
The City occasionally determines that certain road and related
improvements can best be accomplished through the creation of a
Special Improvement District (SID) . The costs of such districts are
shared between the City and property owners in the district. The
following outlines the benefits of creating SID's:
-- Improvements to arterial and collector streets are constructed
in a coordinated manner. There are fewer gaps in the improve-
ments and the motoring public has a better street system for
travel .
-- The Street Oversizing payments to developers can be more
closely associated with the revenue derived from the completed
developments. Districts give the City the opportunity to defer
all or part of the repayment that it is obligated to make to
developers who construct arterial streets . In effect, the
oversizing payments become a part of the assessment. When the
actual building permits are taken out, the normal oversizing fee
is waived. This process can have a significant positive impact
on the cash flow of the Street Oversizing Fund.
-- The cost of development is reduced. At present , there is a
measurable difference in the interest rates between an Improve-
ment District and conventional financing . If districts are
generally accepted and used, staff believes that the cost
savings will be passed on to the ultimate buyer by market
pressures.
-- A less tangible, but still significant, benefit is a reduction
in the staff time required to administer a Special Improvement
District compared to a standard district formed and administered
by the City. In the Special Improvement District process , the
developer and his engineers and attorneys do most of the work.
City staff still is involved in the review; however, this is
much less intensive than actual administration.
i •
The result of the districts will be miles of improved arterial and col -
lector streets that will be available to the public much sooner than if the
developments had put in each segment on their own schedule.
By Resolution 84-91, dated June 5, 1984, Council adopted the following
relating to SID' s:
1. All public improvements as described in Chapter 16 of the City Code
shall be eligible for inclusion in an improvement district. However, the
City may exclude certain improvements when it deems such improvements are
not in the best interest of the City.
The improvements considered are water and sewer mains , storm drainage
facilities, sidewalks, curb and gutter, pavement, street lighting, and
bridges . All of these improvements must be included in dedicated public
rights-of-way or easements . Gas, telephone, cable TV, and electrical lines
are excluded.
Specific improvements that are otherwise eligible may be excluded, if
their benefit to the public cannot be shown , the timing is not right, or
for some other reason the improvement would not be appropriate to include
within the district .
2. The City reserves the right to deny for cause the creation of any
district .
This policy gives the Council the opportunity to deny the petition to
create a district for any reason it chooses . Developers have a concern that
the reason for any denial not be arbitrary. Staff is certain Council would
not abuse this power.
3. The proposed district should be consistent with the Master Street Plan
and other planning documents of the City. The district should have an
approved Master Plan. An approved preliminary plan may be required if local
street or utility improvements are to be included within the district. The
City may also require a storm drainage plan to be submitted.
This policy gives the staff and the Planning and Zoning Board an oppor-
tunity to consider the proposed improvements and their compatibility with
surrounding and future infrastructure and environment of the City. The
staff must have a certain amount of technical information in order to
evaluate the proposed district.
4. The total cost of the district should not exceed the appraised value of
the improvements and the land to be included in the district.
This policy prevents the overloading of future owners of the lands in the
district with assessments that are greater than the value of the improve-
ments and the land.
5. The amount of encumbrances on the land in the district including
the assessments of the district should not exceed 90% of the value of the
land including the improvements without being acknowledged by subordinate
lien holders , or the posting of a surety from a recognized company for 100%
of the principal and interest of the construction cost of the district.
Petitioners for the district should have a substantial equity interest in
the lands of the district. This policy is intended to protect lenders who
have liens that are prior in time to the district but are junior by
operation of law.
6. The Cost to be borne by the City in a district must be currently avail -
able or minimized and/or deferred through credits or other mechanisms.
The various costs to the City for water, sewer, or street oversizing
must be available before the City can commit to a project. If the City does
not have the funds , then some means of arranging for credits against
projected fees must be provided.
7. The City has the option to require property owners within the district
to manage construction of the improvements themselves or through profes-
sional engineers where it is to the City's advantage to do so and the
proposed managers can demonstrate experience and competence.
Where developers are experienced in managing the construction activities,
the City can avoid additional burden on the staff or having to increase
staff, by allowing the developer to manage the actual construction either
directly or through the services of a professional engineer. The City's
role can be that of a coordinator and overseer of the process. The de-
veloper has a keen interest in swift completion of the project, and the
City still retains control of the funds and has final approval of the
work.
8. The City has the option to require privately-managed districts to bid
and award contracts for construction of the public improvements when
provided for in the District 's Master Agreement and performed in confor-
mance with the City Charter.
This policy is justifiable on the same basis as the preceeding policy.
9. Construction activities of district improvements should not cause
extraordinary inconvenience to properties choosing not be be a party to the
district.
Frequently in large voluntary districts , there are smaller developed
parcels that are not ready or able to participate in the cost of improve-
ments. This policy protects the interests of those outparcels in terms of
maintaining access to their property, reducing or mitigating environmental
effects, or causing financial harm. This policy is not intended to forgive
those excluded properties from paying for improvements installed by the
district for which repay agreements have been submitted by the district
property owners and approved by the City.
10. Should a default in the assessment payments of a district occur, the
City shall have the right to immediately proceed with all legal remedies
including a tax deed and sale of the affected land .
This policy commits the City to protecting the interests of the bondholders
who have financed the district. It also protects the interests of the other
citizens of the community who could be burdened by coming to the aid of
property owners being assessed for improvements.
11. The City Manager may establish administrative policies and procedures
for the improvement district process and may recommend appropriate fees to
the City Council .
The City Manager would establish routine procedures such as submittal
deadlines for documents, etc. related to the processing of applications.
The City Manager may also bring to the Council recommendations for appli-
cation fees or other charges. This was another very controversial policy
statement to the development community. Staff wants to analyze the question
of appropriate fees further.
12. Proposed improvements should be of benefit to the City within a rea-
sonable timeframe.
Proposed districts should demonstrate some merit or benefit to the com-
munity in order to be considered for the district process . Such benefit
could be completion of an integral segment of the street system, water
distribution system, wastewater collection system, or contribute to some
significant land use planning goal of the City.
III.7. LEASE/PURCHASE
The City of Fort Collins has used lease/purchase financing for the
provision of new and replacement equipment, vehicles and rolling
stock in order to:
0 ensure the timely replacement of equipment and vehicles;
0 ensure that annual vehicle replacement requirements are
included in the annual budget.
Other advantages that lease/purchase financing can offer over
the traditional cash method of financing are:
1. Decreasing the impact of inflation on the purchase of new
and replacement equipment.
2. Reducing the initial impact of the cost to user depart-
ments by enabling acquisition costs to be spread over the
useful life of the equipment.
3. Safeguarding the opportunity to use cash assets to earn
higher interest than the interest cost of lease/purchasing.
Finally, it should be noted that the City is able to discontinue
the equipment leases at its discretion so that future City Councils
will have the option to continue or discontinue the policy of
lease/purchasing City equipment.
III.8. MEDICAL INSURANCE
The City of Fort Collins entered into a partially self-funded
medical insurance program in October, 1981. This program allowed
the City to cut out profit paid to a private carrier , invest
available money (at higher rates) , and maintain better cash flow.
The initial savings were as high as expected and the program
continues to provide a cost effective and very desirable employee
fringe benefit .
The partially self-funded insurance program is enhanced by a
consortium of cities to collectively bid administrative services,
stop-loss insurance for unexpected emergencies , and life and
accidental death and dismemberment insurance, resulting in lower
rates .
III.9. OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS - ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
The City of Fort Collins is committed to preserving valuable
remaining open space resources.
In 1983, the Subcommittee on Open Space was formed in response to a
need for effective action in preserving such valuable remaining
open space resources. Each year, the subcommittee recommends to
Council specific applications of Colorado State Lottery funds for
the acquisition and development of open space and trails, which is
the Council -approved use of such lottery funds received by the
City.
Resources are provided within the Capital Improvement Program
(Conservation Trust Fund and General City Capital Improvements
portion of the Capital Projects Fund) in the 1985 Budget for
expenditures relating to the acquisition and development of open
space and trails.
In the 1985 Budget, only a portion of the available resources from
lottery funds are appropriated for expenditure from the Conserva-
tion Trust Fund. During 1985, the Subcommittee on Open Space will
recommend to Council specific uses for the funds which have been
received and may recommend additional appropriations , based
upon actual resources available in the fund at that time.
Amounts appropriated for expenditure in the Capital Projects Fund
in the 1985 Budget are intended to supplement the expenditures
authorized by Council from lottery funds in the Conservation Trust
Fund.
III .10.PAYMENT-IN-LIEU-OF-TAXES (PILOT)
In accordance with the City Charter (Art. IX Sec. 6) regarding
municipal utility rates and finances , the water, sewer, and
electric utilities "pay into the General Fund in lieu of taxes
an amount at least equivalent to City taxes and franchise permits
if the utility were privately owned" .
The PILOT rate, as established by Council , for the Water, Sewer,
and Light and Power Utilities is 5% of operating revenues per
year for each utility. The 5% PILOT rate accomplishes the following
objectives :
0 Establishes a rate approximately one and one-half (1-1/2)
times the rate that would be charged if the utilities were
privately owned; and
0 Provides a more consistent rate for all utilities.
III.II.PENSIONS
The City of Fort Collins contributes to five (5) pension plans,
including:
0 Police
0 Fire
0 General Employee Retirement
0 State Pension - Police
0 State Pension - Fire
The Police , Fire , and General Employee Retirement Plans are
administered by the City of Fort Collins . The rate of contribution
for the City administered plans is based upon an annual actuarial
analysis for the normal cost and unfunded liability of the number
of employees participating in each pension plan.
In 1981, an actuarial study of the costs and the benefits of each
plan was completed which recommended:
0 The reduction of the City ' s normal contribution rate
due to changes made in the actuarial assumptions.
0 The amortization of the unfunded liability over a twenty
(20) year period in order to provide for soundly financed
pension plans.
0 An adjustment to the benefits provided by the General
Employee Retirement Plan in order to maintain comparability
with benefits provided by other front range communities .
The City's current pension policy is based upon the aforementioned
actuarial study and consists of the following provisions:
1. The City will maintain contribution rates at a level
sufficient to meet all current normal costs of each pension
plan.
2. Any unfunded liability incurred by the individual pension
funds will be amortized over a period not to exceed twenty
(20) years.
3. A thrift plan for City employees is an adjunct to the
general employee retirement plan, to maintain comparabil -
ity with benefits provided by other Front Range communi-
ties . Employee participation in this plan is optional .
The 1985 Budget incorporates the following rate requirements to
continue this policy:
GENERAL EMPLOYEE
NORMAL COSTS POLICE FIRE EMPLOYEE THRIFT PLAN
estimated
City Contribution 8% 8% 4.385% 3%
Employee Contribution 8% 8% -- 3%
TOTAL 16% 16% 4.385% 6%
GENERAL
UNFUNDED LIABILITY POLICE FIRE EMPLOYEE TOTAL
City Contribution $46,000 $125,000 $227,000 $398,000
III.I2.PERFORMANCE PAY PLAN
The City ' s goal as an employer is to attract and keep quality
employees. To help accomplish this goal , the City has established
a performance pay plan. The performance pay philosophy has been
maintained for five general reasons .
1. To attract quality employees,
2. to retain quality employees,
3. to operate the City with fewer employees than com arable
P YP
jurisdictions,
4. to provide an incentive and a reward for productivity, and
5. to recognize cost savings generated by productive employees.
Every effort will be made to provide the economic adjustment
necessary for the performance pay plan by January of each year.
If this is not financially feasible, as much as can be provided
(given the priority demands on available resources ) will be
given in January.
In reviewing the employee compensation mechanisms incorporated in
the 1985 Budget , Council determined that it is desirable for the
City to evaluate the existing classification system and examine
options for fine-tuning the performance based pay system. The study
will provide a basis to explore the issue of comparable worth,
which is concerned with compensation of individuals based upon
their comparable worth to the organization .
III .I3.POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY - REVENUE ALLOCATION FORMULA
In December, 1981 , the City entered into an agreement with the
Poudre Valley Fire Protection District, creating the Poudre Fire
Authority (PFA) , which provides fire protection services to the
City.
By Resolution 83-7, passed on January 1 , 1983, Council adopted
the following Revenue Allocation Formula as the City' s contribution
to the PFA for the years 1983-1987 :
REVENUE ALLOCATION FORMULA
Annual Operations and Maintenance Budget - the City will
contribute to the Poudre Fire Authority a sum equal to
.303 of 1¢ of existing Sales and Use Tax and 6 mills of
existing property tax from the General Fund to provide
for the annual operation and maintenance of Poudre Fire
Authority. (These funds are in addition to funds contributed
by Poudre Valley Fire Protection District .)
The City revised its property tax mill levy in 1984, and , accord-
ingly, the 1985 Budget includes an allocation of property tax to
the PFA, maintaining the relative proportion of property tax mills
as allocated to the PFA in Resolution 83-7.
The City also increased the Sales and Use Tax rate by 0.250 (ex-
cluding grocery food) on July 1 , 1984, for "necessary" General
City Capital projects and will increase the rate by another
0.25¢ (excluding grocery food) on January 1 , 1985 for a Pool/Ice
Rink Facility. Since the revenues generated by these increases are
dedicated for the specific purposes intended, the 1985 Budget
includes an allocation of 0.303 of 1� of the City' s 2.250 Sales
and Use Tax applicable to all taxable sales and uses to the PFA,
in accordance with Resolution 83-7 .
Since the Revenue Allocation Formula represents the City' s contri-
bution to the PFA for its operation and maintenance costs only, the
City' s 1985-1989 Capital Improvement Program provides for addi-
tional contributions to the PFA for capital expenditures, in the
Capital Projects Fund.
III.I4.REBATE PROGRAMS
The City is sensitive to the fact that certain segments of its
population, specifically the handicapped, and senior citizens on
fixed incomes, may be unable to keep pace with increasing taxes
and utility costs . The City also recognizes that the Sales Tax
on Food has a relatively greater impact on low-income residents
than it may have on other residents. In an effort to partially
offset the cost of Property Taxes , utility billings and Sales
Taxes on these segments of its population, the City has established
several rebate programs, as follows:
Property Tax and Utility Charge Rebate Program
To provide financial assistance to those applicants (handicapped
and senior citizens ) who qualify under established guidelines
(e .g . , income, residential , disability certification , etc . ) .
Income guidelines are adjusted periodically in accordance with
State income levels established for such programs.
Sales Tax Rebate on Food Program
The City recognized the regressiveness of the Sales Tax on food
and specifically excluded the sale of grocery food when enacting
a voter-approved 0.254 Sales and Use Tax increase for Capital
Projects, on July 1, 1984 and another 0.25¢ to be implemented on
January 1, 1985, for a Pool/Ice Rink facility.
In addition to these measures, the City will implement a Sales
Tax Rebate on Food Program with the 1985 Budget, providing for
an annual rebate to members of qualifying households in the
City, on the basis of residency and income guidelines.
III.I5.TRANSFORT
The City's current Transfort System is financed by:
0 A contract with CSU
0 User fees (non-CSU)
0 Federal revenues
0 A General Fund operating subsidy
The 1985 Budget includes a continuation of this City's commitment
to the Transfort and Care-A-Van services. A General Fund subsidy
of $654,533 is expected to be partially offset by incoming Federal
revenues of $358,811 , resulting in reduced City subsidies of
$285,222 for Transfort and $10,500 for Care-A-Van . Federal mass
transit funding (Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982) has
been formally approved through 1986. The 1985-89 financial state-
ments do not include federal funding beyond 1986. An increased
marketing effort is planned during 1985, with a goal of continuing
to improve Transfort ridership and decreasing the needed City
subsidy accordingly.
The City will continue to work toward establishing a Quality
Transfort System as soon as is practicable, to be phased in as
funds become available . Such a system could provide for the
following:
0 Nine peak hour buses serving 85% of the community and all
major service areas at reasonable intervals .
0 Operation of the system 14 hours per day, 6 days a week.
0 Operation of a downtown shuttle.
0 Partial funding by fares .
Working toward the Quality Transfort System, the City designates
Transfort to be an essential service to all the community, and
will pursue coordination efforts with Care-A-Van and the School
District , grant awards where available, and increased revenues
through advertising and contracts .
IV. RESERVE POLICIES
Formally adopted reserve policies are an important factor in
maintaining the City of Fort Collins in good fiscal health.
There are three primary types of reserves:
A. Operating Reserves
B. Capital Reserves
C. Debt Reserves
The degree of need for these reserves differs based upon the type
of fund or operation involved. However, one policy statement for
each type of reserve can be uniformly applied to most funds. (Refer
to Policies VIII.2 and VIII .3 for Light and Power and Water and
Sewer Utilities ' policies.)
A. OPERATING RESERVES
There are two types of operating reserves:
1. An appropriated contingency which provides for unexpected or
unanticipated expenditures during the years. It is typically
budgeted at an amount equal to 2% of the annual operating
expenditure budget by fund, but may be a fixed amount de-
pending upon available funds .
2. Revenue reserve of working capital is established to provide
for unforeseen revenue losses. If something happens to the
economy, there is flexibility without worrying that current
expenditures will exceed the total revenue available. The
revenue reserve is calculated at an amount equal to 2% of
projected annual operating revenue by fund.
This revenue reserve is not appropriated as part of the
annual budget, but may be utilized at the end of the fiscal
year, if necessary.
B. CAPITAL RESERVES
Capital reserves are established in order to provide for normal
replacement of existing capital plant and additional capital
improvements financed on a pay-as-you-go basis.
The amount of the reserve is determined by averaging the dollar
value of capital needs as shown in the Capital Improvement
Program.
A second type of capital reserve is an appropriated capital
contingency, typically 5% of the amount annually appropriated
for capital construction, which provides for the conceptual
study and preliminary design of unanticipated capital improve-
ments.
Debt financed capital improvements by definition are financed by
the proceeds of bond issues and do not require capital reserves .
NOTE: Because of the incorporation of Project RECAP recommenda-
tions into the 1985 Budget process and the subsequent adoption
by Council resolution of a 1985-1989 Capital Improvement Pro-
gram, the reserves retained annually in the General City Capital
Projects portion of the Capital Projects Fund for the years
1985-1989 are determined by the excess of resources over identi-
fied expenditures.
C. DEBT RESERVES
Debt reserves are established to protect bond holders from
payment defaults . Adequate debt reserves are essential in
maintaining good bond ratings and the marketability of bonds.
The amounts of debt reserves are established by bond ordinance
in association with each bond issuance.
These policy statements are intended to apply to the various funds
of the City. However, it is recognized that various Federal , State,
and local laws and regulations , and specific financial policies may
supercede these policies.
V. INVESTMENT POLICY
The City operates under the following Investment Policies:
1. The City analyzes the cash flow of all funds on a regular
basis to ensure maximum cash availability.
2. In order to obtain the best possible return on all cash
investments, the City pools cash from several different
funds for investment purposes.
3. Market conditions and investment securities are analyzed
on a daily basis to determine the maximum yield to be
obtained.
4. The City invests at least 99% of its idle cash on a
continuous basis.
5. The City invests in quality issues and complies with
City Charter and State Statutes regarding investment
requirements.
VI. DEBT POLICY
The City of Fort Collins will use debt financing when it is appro-
priate . It will be judged appropriate only when the following
conditions exist:
1. When non-continuous capital improvements are desired .
2. When it can be determined that future citizens will receive
a benefit from the improvement .
When the City of Fort Collins utilizes long-term debt financing it
will ensure that the debt is soundly financed by:
1. Conservatively projecting the revenue sources that will be
utilized to pay the debt.
2. Financing the improvement over a period not greater than
the useful life of the improvement.
3. Determining that the cost benefit of the improvement ,
including interest cost, is positive.
Additionally, the City has the following policies in relation to
debt financing.
1. Total general obligation debt will not exceed 10% of
assessed valuation in accordance with the City Charter.
2. Where possible, the City uses special assessment, revenue,
or other self-supporting bonds instead of general obliga-
tion bonds.
3. Fort Collins maintains good communications with bond rating
agencies about its financial condition.
Annual budgets include debt service payments and reserve require-
ments for all debt currently outstanding for all proposed debt
issues .
VII. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT POLICY
Citizen Participation
The development of the Capital Improvement Program was significant-
ly modified in the 1984 and 1985 Budgets by Resolution #83-86,
dated May 3, 1983. Council stated its intention "to develop and
implement a program for soliciting citizen involvement and partici-
pation in formulating a Capital Improvements Program and the
funding therefor" . This was accomplished with the adoption of
Resolution #83-94, dated June 7, 1983, creating a Citizens' Advi-
sory Committee on Project RECAP (RE-evaluation of CApital Projects) .
Council directed the Citizens ' Advisory Committee on Project RECAP
to make recommendations on the capital improvement needs of the
community, The Project RECAP Committee was instrumental in the
determination of the General City Capital projects to be accomp-
lished in the 1985-1989 Capital Improvement Program. On February
21, 1984, Council passed Resolution #84-38, indicating specific
General City Capital projects to be incorporated into the 1985-1989
Capital Improvement Program. Appropriations for each year ' s
expenditures will be authorized with the adoption of the City' s
annual budget for each of these years .
In addition, at the City's May 1, 1984 election, the City's voters
approved the imposition of a 0.254 increase in the Sales & Use Tax
rate (excluding grocery food) , effective for a five year period
commencing July 1, 1984, to finance "necessary" General City
Capital projects, as well as a 0.254 increase in the Sales & Use
Tax rate (excluding grocery food) , effective for a five year period
commencing January 1, 1985, to finance the construction of a
Pool/Ice Rink Facility in the City.
Capital Improvement Policy
With the above-mentioned modifications to the process of identify-
ing the City's capital needs, the City will continue to operate
under its existing Capital Improvement Policy:
1. The City will develop a multi -year plan for capital
improvements and update it annually.
2. The City will make all capital improvements in accordance
with the adopted Capital Improvement Program and the
Capital Project Management Control System.
3. The City will identify estimated costs and funding sources
for each capital project requested before it is submitted
to City Council .
4. The City will use intergovernmental assistance to finance
only those capital improvements that are consistent with
the Capital Improvement Plan and City priorities and whose
operating and maintenance costs have been included in the
operating budget forecasts .
Capital Financing
Based on Council ' s direction in the 1983 Budget process , the
financing of capital projects is generally based upon the different
types of capital improvements (see Section VIII of these policies
for specifics on Water, Sewer, and Light & Power capital policies) .
Capital Projects are categorized as follows, with financing as
noted for each category:
1. REPLACEMENT - capital expenditures relating to normal
rep a— ce�of worn or obsolete capital plant .
In general , capital expenditures relating to the normal
replacement of worn or obsolete capital plant will be
financed on a pay-as-you-go basis, with debt financing con-
sidered where appropriate.
2. EXPANSION - capital expenditures relating to the construc-
tion of new or expanded facilities necessitated by growth.
Capital expenditures relating to the construction of new or
expanded facilities necessitated by growth will be financed
primarily on a pay-as-you-go basis, but when the City' s
share of the new improvements can be determined to benefit
the overall population in the future, debt financing may be
appropriate .
3. UNUSUAL - capital expenditures for improvement that enhance
the quality of life in Fort Collins and are consistent with
the City' s goals, but cannot be categorized as essential
for the provision of basic services or maintenance of life.
The policy relating to unusual capital expenditures directs
the City to look to the ultimate beneficiary of each
capital improvement in order to determine the source of
funding. As projects are identified, they will be funneled
through a decision process in order to:
a. determine whether projects are acceptable from the point
of view of municipal goal achievements or cost benefit
analysis ,
b. evaluate each capital project's relevant cash flow in
order to determine if a project is financially viable,
and
c. prioritize capital improvements based upon these
findings .
Prioritization of General City Capital Projects
With the incorporation of the recommendations of the Citizens ' Advisory
Committee on Project RECAP into the 1984 and 1985 Budget processes, a new
mechanism for categorizing General City Capital projects has been developed
in order to determine priorities for the allocation of available funds to
projects .
General City Capital needs are first identified as relating to one of the
Council -adopted "categories of service" , as detailed in Policy I .3. :
I. Basic (or Core)
II. Maintenance of Effort
III. Quality of Life
Within each category, projects are then ranked as:
A. Essential
B. Necessary
C. Desirable
The following matrix demonstrates the resulting order of priority in terms
of access to available funds:
MAINTENANCE QUALITY
BASIC SERVICES OF EFFORT OF LIFE
Essential (1) Essential (2) Essential (3)
Necessary (4) Necessary (5) Necessary (6)
Desirable (7) Desirable (8) Desirable (9)
Basic service essential projects are considered top priority and Quality of
Life desirable projects last priority.
VARIOUS FUNDS
VIII.1. ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The City currently has six Enterprise Funds: Cemeteries, Golf,
Light and Power, Sewer, Storm Drainage, and Water. The Enterprise
Fund classification has been used to account for various services
for which there exists a significant potential for financing
through user charges . In many of these funds, a subsidy from the
General Fund has been necessary to cover operating expenses .
Historically, services were accounted for in an enterprise fund
only if they were financed more than 50% by user charges . In
the 1985 Budget, all Enterprise Funds, except for Cemeteries , are
recovering 100% of their costs in 1985-1989. Cemeteries Fund
anticipates recovery rates of 65 to 71% in the upcoming five year
period .
There has been a nationwide trend toward the regulation of the
demand for governmental services through user fee mechanisms. The
Fort Collins City Council supports this concept. The long term goal
of all enterprise accounts is self sufficiency. Toward this end ,
those funds which are not presently self sustaining shall incre-
mentally adjust their rate structures to achieve a positive income
position.
Those operations which cannot achieve a positive income position
within a five year time frame may be accounted for as subsidized
operations and not as Enterprise Funds. In the case of the Ceme-
teries Fund, efforts will be undertaken to improve recovery rates
in 1985 and beyond. Possible reclassification will be considered,
if needed.
VIII.2. LIGHT AND POWER UTILITY
The financial policies of the Light and Power Utility are admin-
istered in accordance with the City Charter as more specifically
defined in Resolution 77-68, as amended from time to time by City
Council action .
The 1985 Budget/Five Year Plan was prepared in compliance with the
following:
A. FUNDAMENTAL PURPOSE
"To efficiently manage the City of Fort Collins' energy systems
and services with sensitivity to the environment , the community,
and conservation of resources. To enhance the quality of life
for the consumers and the community through provision of suffi-
cient electrical energy, reliably and economically."
B. ELECTRIC RATES
Electric rates will be based upon the cost of service approach
to reflect full distribution of costs to appropriate rate
classes in order to effect equitable sharing of costs. Rates
shall be established and maintained at a level sufficient :
1. To pay the full cost of operation and to maintain the elec-
tric utility in good repair and working order;
2. To provide an operating reserve equal to eight percent (8%)
of budgeted operating expenditures , excluding the cost of
purchased power;
3. To provide a future capital improvements reserve in an amount
which shall , as nearly as possible, be equal to the average
annual cost (excluding debt financing) of the approved
five-year capital improvement plan, considering any changes
which, from time to time, may be made in such plan provided,
however, that the amount in such reserve shall be permitted
to vary from year to year if approved by the Council during
the annual budget process for the purposes of achieving
stability and predictability in rates and to minimize changes
adverse to electric consumers ;
4. To pay into the General Fund of the City of Fort Collins in
lieu of taxes and franchise permits a percentage of revenue
from the sale of electric energy equivalent to five percent
(5%) of operating revenues .
C. EXCESS RETAINED EARNINGS
After retained earnings are reserved as specified above, any
excess retained earnings shall be added to the future capital
improvements reserve.
D. OPERATING RECORDS
1. The Light and Power Utility will maintain a standard system
of accounting which shall , at all times, correctly reflect
all financial operations of the system and keep such other
records and data as are generally used by the electric
utility industry.
2. The accounts of the Light and Power Utility shall be kept
separate and distinct from all other accounts of the City and
shall contain proportionate charges for all services per-
formed by other departments, as well as proportionate credits
for all services rendered to other departments .
VIII.3. WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
Formally adopted financial policies are an important factor in
planning the financial operations of the Water and Sewer Utilities.
Comprehensive financial policies include statements concerning:
A. Net Income Requirements
B. Rate Requirements
C. Reserve Requirements
D. Capital Cost Financing
Policy statements have been developed for each area listed above
and incorporated into the five-year financial plans for the Water
and Sewer Utilities, as follows:
A. NET INCOME
The net income of the Water and Sewer Utilities shall be at
least equal to the annual cost of the following:
1. Principal reductions of outstanding bonds ,
2. Loan repayments to Federal or State agencies, and
3. Annual operating reserve increases.
B. RATE REQUIREMENTS
Utility rates shall be set at a level to provide for the
net income requirement in each fiscal year. Levelized rate
increases are preferred and, when possible, should be achieved
through levelized expenditures .
C. RESERVES
The following reserves shall be established and maintained
in the applicable utility.
1. Operating reserve - at least equal to two percent (2%) of the
projected annual operating revenue.
2. Plant Investment Fee reserve - equal to the annual fees less
annual costa ovate to ystem Expansions.
3. Capital reserve - equal to the amount of bond proceeds
ai avlable at the end of one fiscal year to be expended in the
next fiscal year.
4. Debt reserve - equal to the amount required by individual
Fond ordinance.
D. CAPITAL COST FINANCING
Annual capital cost shall be identified as one of three types ,
and financed as noted.
1. Normal replacement of the existing system.
Financed on a Pay-As-You-Go basis from a reserve for depreci-
ation funded from current rates.
2. System improvements that benefit the existing and future
population .
Debt financed over the life of the improvement and the annual
debt service shall be funded from current rates.
3. System expansions that benefit future populations.
Debt financed over the life of the expansion, and annual
debt service shall be funded from a combination of Plant
Investment Fees and Contributions In Aid of Construction.
Federal and/or State grants may be utilized to fund portions of,
or all of, capital costs .
VIII.4. STORM DRAINAGE FUND
The primary purpose of the Storm Drainage Fund is to meet the
public need for effective stormwater management, including flood
control , capital improvements and the operation and maintenance of
drainage facilities . The Financial policies have been developed for
the following categories :
A. Operations and Maintenance requirements
B. Capital Project needs
C. Capital Cost Financing
D. Reserves .
A. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
Utility rates will be set at a level to provide for the opera-
tions and maintenance requirement for each fiscal year. The rate
is structured on a base rate of $.000366 per square foot per
month and on a rate factor compiled at the category of develop-
ment , such as very light , light , moderate, heavy and very
heavy.
B. CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS
A master plan has been developed for each basin to identify
drainage needs, set fees, and determine capital improvement
requirements. In the effort to balance storm drainage risk and
liability, a 20 year storm drainage capital program has been
developed that relates to the system requirements of each basin
where a positive cost/benefit ratio exists.
0 `
To finance this capital program, a one-time basin fee is col-
lected with new development and a monthly capital fee from
property owners.
C. CAPITAL COST FINANCING
The financing of capital improvements will be accomplished
through the following :
1. One-time basin fee that is collected with new development.
2. Monthly capital fee collected from property owners .
3. Bond issues that will be financed over the life of the
improvement .
The annual debt service will be provided from the existing
monthly capital fees .
D. RESERVES
The following reserves have been established:
1 . Capital Reserve - equal to the amount of bond proceeds ,
monthly capital fees and one-time new development fees available
at the end of one fiscal year to be expended in the next fiscal
year.
2. Operating Revenue Reserve - equal to 2% of the projected
annual operating revenue.
3. Debt Reserve - equal to the amount required by the individual
bond ordinance.
VIII.5. CULTURAL SERVICES & FACILITIES FEE POLICY
The Cultural Services and Facilities Fund shall budget to recover a
minimum of 40% of its total cost in revenue generated through fees
and charges . This shall be accomplished through implementing the
following policy.
1. Total revenue from fees and charges shall cover a minimum
of 55% of Lincoln Center operation and maintenance and
Performing and Visual Arts Programming budgets . This
includes revenues generated at the Lincoln Center from
rentals, equipment, concessions and other miscellaneous
sources and all total direct revenues from the Performing
and Visual Arts Programming. The difference between 55%
and 100% will be funded by a transfer from the General
Fund.
2. The Cultural Services and Facilities Administration and
Museum and Historic Landmarks budgets provide minimal
financial support and will be funded by a transfer from
the General Fund.
i
3. Major capital improvements and renovations will be financed
through sources other than Cultural Services and Facilities
Fund.
4. Solicitation of funds through donations , fund-raising
events, and non-traditional sources shall be encouraged
by the City staff, Lincoln Center League, the Cultural
Resources Board and the City Council .
Funding collected for any special purpose shall be ear-
marked for that purpose, and these funds will be processed
through the Fort Collins Foundation .
VIII.6. PARKS AND RECREATION FEE POLICY
In 1981, the City Council adopted the following fee policy for
Parks and Recreation, which continues in effect.
1. The Recreation Division shall recover a minimum of 50°%
of its total costs in revenue generated through fees
and charges .
2. Total direct revenue from all Recreation programs shall
not fall below a 100% recovery of total direct costs .
3. Categories have been created for the Recreation programs
in order to evaluate which programs must cover total or
partial expenditures. These categories are:
A. Total Support
1. Sports
2. Dance and Fitness
B. Partial Support
1. Aquatics
2. Outdoor Recreation
3. Arts and Crafts
4. Special Interests
C. Minimal Support
1. Senior Citizens
2. Special Events
3. Therapeutics
4. Youth Centers
5. Northside Recreation
Total revenue from fees and charges shall cover a minimum
of 80% of "Total " and "Partial " support program costs . The
difference between 80% and 100% will be supported by the
General Fund as well as for those programs requiring
minimal support.
4. Revenue generated from rentals, concessions, and other
miscellaneous sources shall be considered an equal priority
with class registrations when establishing fees and charges .
5. The Recreation Division shall provide designated programs
for senior citizens and developmentally disabled persons
at 1/2 the established fee, and to low-income citizens
at 1/3 the established fee.
6. The Recreation Division shall charge rental for rooms,
pool time , gym, ball field, and special equipment , as
specified in written policies.
7. An admission fee shall be charged at the Northside Com-
munity Center for use of the weight room, locker room, and
gym, during drop-in hours .
8. Solicitation of funds through donations , fund raising
events, non-traditional sources, and various other needs
shall be encouraged by the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board and City Council .
Funding collected for any special purpose shall be ear-
marked for that purpose, and the utilization of foundations
for the furtherance of this goal shall likewise be encour-
aged .
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of tA City Council held this
2nd day of October, 1984.
M or
ATTEST:
Ci
�� V V y Cler