HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-095-07/18/2000-ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN RIVER CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM RESOLUTION 2000-95
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN RIVER CORRIDOR
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1997 - 1999 City Council Policy Agenda, a program was
initiated in January, 1998, to develop the Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program(the
"Program"); and
WHEREAS,over one hundred meetings have been held with City Council,City boards and
commissions,community groups,property owners associations and individuals to gain input on new
projects in the Downtown River Corridor(the "Corridor"); and
WHEREAS,various public events and symposiums have been held to aid in the adoption of
the Program; and
WHEREAS, as a result of said meetings, symposiums and public events, the staff has
developed and presented to the City Council a Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program
Report which is intended to coordinate the implementation of existing and new projects involving
natural features, recreation, public infrastructure, historic resources, flood mitigation and
development in the Corridor; and
WHEREAS,the Program uses as its foundation the elements of City Plan together with the
standards contained in the Land Use Code, as well as adopted area plans; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, Natural Resources Advisory Board and the
Downtown Development Authority have recommended certain amendments to the Program and have
recommended to the City Council that it accept and approve the Program as proposed to be amended;
and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board has recommended to the City Council that it
accept and approve the Program; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fort Collins has determined that it is in the best
interests of the citizens of the City that the Program be accepted and approved.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that the Council hereby accepts and approves the Downtown River Corridor
Implementation Program, including: (1) the list of prioritized projects, (2) directions for the
formation of a"River Team" to guide Program implementation,(3)directions for the investigation
and pursuit of funding sources and(4)the provision of public outreach throughout implementation,
all as described in the Report attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A".
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 18th day of July,A.D.
2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
u &
City Clerk
EXHIBIT
Downtown
uver Corndor
f bl
Implementation
Y � X
i
s Program
�)ummary
DRAFT
July 10, 2000
3
F
I'
City of Fort Collins
3
City of Fort Collins
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Advance Planning Department
Downtown River Corridor
Implementation Program
Sum mary Report
City of Fort Collins
Community Planning and Environmental Services
Advance Planning Department
DRAFT
July 10, 2000
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary...............................................................................................................................I
Introduction............................................................................................................................................3
Purposeand Intent...............................................................................................................................................3
StudyArea and Context......................................................................................................................................3
PlanningProcess...............................................................................:.................................................................5
ExistingFramework...............................................................................................................................9
Basisof the Program...........................................................................................................................................9
LandUse Regulations.........................................................................................................................................9
HistoricResources............................................................................................................................................. 10
NaturalResources............................................................................................................................................. 10
Floodplains........................................................................................................................................................ 10
Previous Plan Actions and Strategies................................................................................................................ 15
AreaIssues........................................................................................................................................................ 15
ExistingPublic Projects.................................................................................................................................... 16
PrivateProjects.................................................................................................................................................. 19
NewProjects.........................................................................................................................................21
Key Features of the Program.............................................................................................................................21
Downtown River Corridor Themes...................................................................................................................21
Descriptionof New Projects.............................................................................................................................23
Project Priority Recommendations.................................................................................................................... 31
ImplementationPlan............................................................................................................................33
Timing of Project Implementation.................................................................................................................... 33
Interdepartmental Downtown River Corridor Lead Team("River Team")....................................................... 33
Funding....................................................................................................................... ........33
..............................
Brief Description of Funding Sources...............................................................................................................37
Infilland Redevelopment..................................................................................................................................38
AppendixA -Relevant Plans and Programs.....................................................................................39
AppendixB: Actions From Relevant Plans.......................................................................................41
AppendixC-Diary of Events.............................................................................................................43
AppendixD-Public Comments..........................................................................................................47
Appendix E: Resolution to Acquire Certain Floodplain Properties...............................................71
Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Downtown River Corridor Location.............................................................................................4
Figure2: Existing Zoning...............................................................................................................................11
Figure3: Historic Resources..........................................................................................................................12
Figure 4: Natural Areas and Natural Habitats and Features.....................................................................13
Figure 5: Poudre River and Old Town Floodplains...................................................................................14
Figure 6: Existing Project Locations.............................................................................................................18
Figure7: Illustrative Concept Plan................................................................................................................29
Table1 : Theme Areas....................................................................................................................................22
Table2: Project Priorities..............................................................................................................................31
Table3: Implementaton Matrix...................................................................................................................35
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program
Executive Summate
The Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program (DRCIP) is a plan of action for the area
along the Cache la Poudre River near Downtown Fort Collins. The Program is intended to
coordinate the implementation of existing and new projects involving natural features, recreation,
public infrastructure, historic resources, flood mitigation and development.
The Program does not suggest changes in City Plan or the Land Use Code. Instead, the Program
builds on existing projects and programs, especially City Plan. As spelled out in City Plan, the vision
for the Downtown River Corridor is for enhancement and restoration of natural features of the
river, an extension of Downtown uses and character towards the river landscape, and the integration
of cultural and recreational opportunities into the area.
The Program consists of two distinct phases. The first phase,which concludes with this report, has
been the process of identifying priorities, recommending next steps, and providing public outreach.
The list of projects and descriptions,which resulted from this process, are crucial for coordinating
projects and pursuing appropriate funding sources. The second phase will consist of actual project
implementation.
The following are actions recommended to implement the Program:
1. Form an interdepartmental staff"River Team" to coordinate the implementation of projects
between departments and between the City and non-governmental entities.
2. Through the River Team, investigate and pursue existing and new funding sources and
coordinate public outreach through all phases of implementation.
3. Implement the following projects:
15,Priority 2^d Priority
Cache la Poudre River Habitat Restoration Environmental and Cultural Interpretive Program
Linden,Willow and Lincoln Streetscape Improvements Cache la Poudre River Trail Amenities
Jefferson/Linden Intersection Improvements Linden/Willow Urban Design Features
Jefferson/Riverside Streetscape Improvements Gateway at Mulberry and Riverside
Off-Street Public Parking
Contaminated Site Assessments 3rd Priority
Recreational River Channel Enhancements Feasibility Study Gateway Features
Oxbow-Acquisition for Public Use Downtown Shuttle Service
Flood Protection Improvements for the Buckingham
Neighborhood
N. College/Vine-Flood Protection
Triangle(Lincoln Avenue) -Flood Protection
Lemay Avenue Levee
Bank Stabilization
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 1
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 2
Introduction
Purpose and Intent
Despite community aspirations over many years to restore and revitalize the environs along the
Cache la Poudre River near Downtown Fort Collins, few enhancements have come to fruition.
Only a few isolated enhancements have been completed. Recently, the 1997-99 Council Policy
Agenda identified the need for a more coordinated approach towards actions in the Downtown
River Corridor ("Corridor' . The completion of City Plan in 1997 also provided further impetus for
a process and mechanism to improve the relationship of the city to the river in this area.
In January 1998, a committee made up of staff from a variety of City departments began work on
the Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program ("Program"). The Program's mission was
to coordinate City projects in the Corridor and to identify, filter and prioritize future projects
recommended in various planning documents done over the years. The intent of the Program was
to build on existing documents and studies rather than add a new vision for the Corridor. This
report contains information and recommendations from the first phase of the Program. The second
phase will consist of implementation of the new projects contained in this report.
Study Area and Context
The Downtown River Corridor is an
approximately 330-acre area adjacent to
Downtown along the Cache la Poudre
River. This area is bounded by Vine
Drive on the north, Martinez Park on
the west,Jefferson Street/Riverside
Avenue and Mulberry Street on the
south, and Lemay Avenue jogging over
to 1"Street on the east (see Figure 1). In 41
City Plan, the Corridor is described as a
sub-district of Downtown, and as the
"Historic and Cultural Core Segment" of -a..-" 3, •
the Poudre River Corridor.
The area around today's Linden and
Willow intersection was the parade
grounds of the military fort established in 1864. After the army relinquished ownership in 1872,
various uses served the area such as flour milling, retailing, farming and ranching,lodging, animal
feed production, housing, and the City dump.The portion of the Corridor between Jefferson Street
and Willow Street is part of the Old Fort Collins National Historic District. The entire Corridor is
part of a "national river corridor",which Congress designated in 1996 for the Cache la Poudre River
to recognize its critical historical value in the westward expansion of the U.S. One of the most
significant physical changes that occurred in the past century was the channelization of the river
between Linden Street and Lincoln Avenue. This resulted in the relocation of the river from the site
now known as the "Oxbow" to the south in its present location. The river has scoured the channel
in this section down to bedrock.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 3
ur
Ml
ri ra�•r.
��� • Felt:
ir WA
El
JR"' r7 Z� f.. �.
C L•� i =i i l W.
�� w m ter.
Lo
low A
■a Lj
U.l IL:Ji l
■� inri
13'— �. Cr`• Grin in i
MEN
Ili-Z-; ;a�L viN i.�ice: NO i i
[TI•.•RJ Q7
� -•�. I i-1r ZJ f'L Tr r�i�1 [A 1W r>n•S-J M� ■a
® • . . r . 1.
Today, the Downtown River Corridor contains a diverse mix of commerce, heavy and light industry,
offices, recreation, and housing. Union Pacific has a rail line passing through the area, and there are
several working and abandoned rail spurs. There are 72 different landowners in the area, the largest
of which is the City of Fort Collins. Residences are scattered throughout the Corridor and
residential and commercial uses are not clearly
separated. The residences are found singly or in small '`
iA
clusters, often immediately adjacent to business and °E
industrial sites. The Buckingham neighborhood is
located just to the east of the Program area. A variety
of community service agencies are within the Corridor
including a United Way center, the Education and Life
Training Center,The Mission and the Open Door
Mission. The Downtown and the Old Town area are
immediately to the west of the Program area, although
separated by Jefferson Street/Riverside Avenue,which
serves as a state highway and major truck route.
Approximately 30% of the land area within Corridor is city owned. A significant portion of this
percentage is within natural areas,including Udall Natural Area and the Gustav Swanson Nature
Area. Other public lands are the former Fort Collins Light and Power Plant,Northside Azdan
Community Center and Old Fort Collins Heritage Park, Buckingham Park,Wastewater Treatment
Plant#1, and the former Dreher Pickle Plant site.
There has been a limited amount of newer development within the Corridor. Two significant
buildings recently constructed include the United Way building in 1985 and the New Belgium
Brewery in 1997.
The proximity of the Poudre River to Downtown presents unique opportunities for increasing
public awareness of and access to this valuable resource. In addition, protecting and enhancing
wildlife habitat is eased by the lack of development in many areas immediately adjacent to the river.
However, providing the right degree of balance between conflicting uses remains a challenge in
some areas. City Plan, the Land Use Code, and this Program provide a framework for appropriate
change, protection,and development in the Corridor
Planning Process
As mentioned earlier, this Program synthesizes the work of earlier plans. Each of these was
developed through an extensive planning process that included many opportunities for public
participation. In addition, the Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program included a two-
and-a-half-year process with public participation.
The planning process was conducted in three stages: identifuation of relevant implementation actions,
filtering of actions into a manageable list, and prioritising of filtered projects. Specific milestones and
outreach techniques are listed below:
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 5
January. 1998—June, 1998
Significant Milestones. Outreach:
■ Inventory of existing plans, studies and ■ Meetings with "Working Group" (diverse
programs community members)
• Collection of background information ■ Presentations to City Boards and
• Identification of potential actions Commissions
■ Joint organization of Poudre River Trust
Symposium Way 30
July_ 1998—December. 1998
Significant Milestones: Outreach:
■ Identify sub-area themes ■ Series of property owner design workshops
■ Begin filtering potential actions ■ Formation of web page
■ Presentations to City Boards and
Commissions
■ Meetings with interested parties
January_ 1999—June" 1999
r
Significant Milestones: Outreach:
• Complete project filtering and selection ■ Property owner design workshops
based on themes and community input ■ Community Open House (May 26)
• Develop initial project feasibility analysis ■ Presentations to City Boards and
• Begin research on implementation strategies Commissions
■ Meetings with interested parties
■ Council Study Session (February 23
July" 1999—December. 1999
Signficant Milestones. Outreach:
■ Develop recommended priorities for ■ Community Meeting(October 6)
projects not in Poudre River floodplain ■ Presentations to City Boards and
• Prepare initial project cost estimates Commissions
■ Meetings with interested parties
Tanuary.2000—August. 2000
Signficant Milestones Outreach:
• Develop recommended priorities for ■ Community Open House (April 3)
projects within Poudre River tloodplain ■ Meetings with community organizations
• Prepare revised project cost estimates ■ Presentations to City Boards and
■ Prepare Program report Commissions
• Council review of staff's recommendations ■ Planning and Zoning Board Hearing
(Apt 6)
■ City Council Study Session (April 11)
• City Council Regular Meeting ul 18
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 6
The ongoing public involvement process resulted in hundreds of comments representing a broad
spectrum of views. Public participation was key in identifying the most important projects for
implementation and providing feedback on project descriptions. One of the most significant
milestones for the project was the creation of a property owners association in the Corridor. This
has provided an efficient mechanism for effective ongoing dialogue between City staff and owners.
£
3F Y` i
j ( 04
A P s <
a
i
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 7
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 8
Existing Framework
Basis of the Program
The Program is principally based on policies contained in City Plan. These policies describe a unique
river setting balancing uses with sensitivity towards the river environment. Some key excerpts are:
Downtown District-Poudre River Subdistrict Policy DD-1.6 Land Use. Principle land uses
adjacent to Downtown include a mix of public conservation and recreation areas, retail,
offices,residential and light manufacturing. Development and redevelopment
opportunities,including both public and private activities,will enhance and extend the
existing Downtown uses and character toward the river,provide an adequate buffer
between new development and the natural riparian environment, and integrate cultural
and recreational opportunities into this area.
Water Corridors-Policy PRC-1.2 Historic and Cultural Core River Segment(College Avenue to
Lemay Avenue). This segment of the river includes many of the community's oldest and
most significant historic and cultural features, the Old Town Historic District, and the
Downtown. Land uses in the area should be more flexible than in other river segments
and emphasize connecting the river to Downtown, providing multi-purpose spaces that
celebrate the historic relevance of the river to the community, continue the important
and unique relationship between the waterway and surrounding urban environment, and
maintain those natural elements of the river as it passes through the Downtown. To the
extent feasible, the floodplain will be protected and natural habitat and floodplain values
will be maintained. Redevelopment opportunities will be permitted.
One way of summarizing the vision more simply would be:
Create a unique Downtown River character that enhances the natural river
environment, increases pedestrian vitality and recreation,protects historic
resources, and capitalizes on opportunities for land use change.
Land Use Regulations
No changes to the Land Use Code or Zoning Map are proposed as part of the Program. Zone
districts in the Corridor include River Downtown Redevelopment (RDR), Community Commercial-
Poudre River (CCR), River Conservation (RC), Public Open Lands (POL),Employment (E),
Industrial (I), and Transition (T). These districts allow for a wide variety of uses,including
commercial, housing,industrial, recreation and open lands (see Figure 2).
Existing uses are permitted and existing buildings can be enlarged if they meet certain conditions.
Owners are not required to pursue redevelopment or to change the use of their structures.
However, the RDR zone district "offers opportunities for more intensive redevelopment of housing,
businesses and workplaces to complement Downtown...Redevelopment will extend the positive
characteristics of Downtown such as the pattern of blocks,pedestrian-oriented streetfronts and
lively outdoor spaces." The CCR zone district "provides locations for redevelopment or
development of moderate intensity uses that are supportive of Downtown, subject to floodplain
restrictions."
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 9
Historic Resources
The protection of historic resources is an important value for the Downtown River Corridor. Part
of the area is within the Old Town National Historic District. There are three buildings designated
as Fort Collins Landmarks within the Corridor: the Harmony Mill, Ranchway-Feeds (Lindell Mill),
and the Old Light and Power Plant. There are also several undesignated locally significant historic
buildings: the Union Pacific Freight Depot, the Union Pacific Passenger Depot, the Poudre Valley
Elevator Company Complex, the Giddings Machine Company building and a few smaller structures.
Besides the protection of significant resources through local landmark designation and demolition
review,historic resources can be preserved through Section 3.4.7 in the Land Use Code. This
section provides for the preservation and adaptive use of historic resources and requires that new
buildings are compatible with the historic character of adjacent historic buildings (see Figure 3).
Natural Resources
There are two city-owned natural areas in the Corridor: the Gustav Swanson Nature Area and the
Udall Natural Area. The Natural Habitats and Features Inventory Map shows approximate locations of
natural habitats and features (see Figure 4). New development or significant redevelopment
projects near the Poudre River trigger development standards dealing with natural habitats and
features. The exact locations of the features are defined through a development proposal. Buffer
zones are established to protect the ecological character of the habitat from the impacts of activity
associated with the development. General buffer zones along the Poudre River within the Corridor
are 200 feet north of Lincoln Avenue and 300 feet south of Lincoln Avenue, except for the RDR
zone district,where a landscape buffer is required but no specific width is stated. Zone distances
may be increased or decreased by the City decision maker based on performance standards. They
may also be modified if the application of buffers imposes an undue hardship on the developer.
Floodplains
A portion of the Corridor, primarily on the northeast side of the river, is within the Poudre River
floodplain (see Figure 5). Recently adopted revisions (2000) to the floodplain standards for the
Poudre River prohibit new development in the floodway and product corridor. The product
corridor is the area where the product of the depth of flow times the velocity is equal to or greater
than 6. In addition, new residential development is not allowed in the 100-year floodplain. The City
has also adopted a program to purchase property in the floodway, product corridor, and floodplain
from willing sellers (see Appendix E). Priority properties for acquisition are those properties with
structures located in the floodway or product corridor. This provision affects about 14 structures
near the College Avenue and Vine Drive intersection. In addition, the City has designated the
construction of improvements to protect the Buckingham neighborhood as a high priority.
Several areas to the southwest of the river are within the Old Town floodplain (see Figure 5).
F000dplain standards require elevation for residential structures and elevation or floodproofing for
non-residential structures. A stormwater project in the vicinity of Linden Street is planned to
remove properties from the Old Town floodplain in the next several years. Stormwater capital
projects are more fully described in the section "Existing Public Projects."
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 10
--�� -'
- 1
S 7
1 i
u u
u�
s ZI
s rr�
All
%Yo ,, ■
JbIbM
Ir
Is
LEG
■ !f r!
1 err �L'
7.L J 1
_ o
E .Cotddor Study Area
J
1 . .
...
zbnin
-
M:
„1 "Density ! ni
I^ a -
RC-River Coarcrystion
k
®�
'• Open. ♦i®
+tea
cc-Community comm=cw
conege
« _ -
CL-Cmamocricial Limited
w
�r
—_
Figure 3: Historic Resources_
DoO Uo-
0�
Q
9
Q
o c•
aawar Plsrt a Art o.co
0
� 0.8
QLk"Mm
z
oaT� a •n � ❑
� o mm o_ o
I�
CarbehPaatke Rnc
T®
®� EO® FE 9 0
e *A
rpmEa
LEGEND ��` •
Q Corridor Study Area
Railroad
River or Other Water Feature
dings
® Parks s
Historic Resources
B° o ❑
* Local Historic landmark Properties 00
Properties Surveyed for Historic Significance g g,: R s �a °::a�
(may or may not be eligible for designation)
x
National Historic District
Approximate Location of Anny Fort
(most buildings and parade grounds) °00 ° °0D 100 r� 12
Figure 4: Natural Areas and
Natural Habitats and Features
�o.
,a
-9,1 V
f4
I LL--LE
W
krY'.
s I cad.
s
�^
1
f� OHTo.a
i
{® 73ae MomuinA® Cache In Poadm River
rs. o
} � A �� �®
I RIM P Pm
LEGEND -
rml Corridor Study Area
fV Railroad may,,,ip City Ownership
Natural arras ®� mm RIM ®®
Natural Habitats and Features
Aqua
Grasslands I II 11 II I I I�
Marsh&Wet Meadow N
0 Riparian Forest
'DO
Weedy Forbland B0° 1001�`
�'`'"` 13
FigurePoudre River andTown Floodplains
op
--.ram.._. .. �, .
J'! I
I J
• '
J„
1,
�r� _� ii 7 1�111111 i111111 � �Nil IM
11
_ ✓ O
ME Ord
:gym ■_ ■. ■111111 ___ =_ _�► - =.��f- :.�'�
LEGEND
HIM
. • Area
_ River . Water Feature AN mm Imm _■ In " i
/Ii V
City Ownmhip
10 Year ProductCorridor .�
■ o,J> +r
11 Year Floodplain
ShallowOld Town Floodplain
Flooding
1 Year Floodplain q
11 Year Floodplain
Previous Plan Actions and Strategies
Besides City Plan, there have been numerous plans and studies prepared over the years for the Cache
la Poudre River as it passes through Fort Collins. These plans provided a source of potential
actions within the Downtown River Corridor. A list of plans is provided in Appendix A. Actions
and strategies from these plans are provided in Appendix B and are organized by area.
Area Issues
The Downtown River Corridor is facing a number of issues that must be dealt with if the City Plan
vision is to be achieved. The primary issues are:
■ Degraded wildlife habitat decreases the presence of wildlife and hampers important wildlife
movement;
• Deteriorated appearance of river banks and bed resulting from dumping of debris;
■ Potential for flooding;
■ Erosion of riverbanks, such as below Ranch-Way Feeds,which may threaten the stability of
adjacent property;
■ Deteriorated pavement and poorly aligned intersections hampering business access and
movement of people into and through the area;
• Missing sidewalks, curbs and bike lanes resulting in unsafe conditions;
• Poor existing parking and lack of parking opportunities for new development;
• Possible hazardous contamination;
• Deteriorated appearance of some properties discourages investment in the area and reduces its
attractiveness for recreation and shopping;
• Unused railroad spurs hinder transportation access and development opportunities.
In addition, the Corridor is facing coordination issues resulting from a variety of projects affecting
the area. For example, in order to avoid repeated disruptions to existing businesses and to reduce
costs, stormwater and street improvements should be constructed simultaneously.
e 5,
F.� S
I
Downtown River Comdor Implementation Program 15
Existing Public'Projects
One of the primary goals of the Program has been to coordinate the implementation of existing
projects in the Corridor (see Figure 6). Prior to the start of this planning process, several projects
were already in the planning, design or construction stage.
Flood Protection Improvements for the Buckingham Neighborhood
Resolution 2000-71 identified the construction of the improvements to protect the Buckingham
neighborhood as a high priority and directed staff to pursue the design and construction of the
necessary improvements as soon as reasonably possible. This project is identified in the Draft Poudre
Master Drainagemay Plan.
Revisions to the Old Town Floodplain Regulations
Stormwater Planning staff is conducting a public process on possible revisions to the City's
floodplain regulations. The review of the Old Town floodplain regulations will take place after
review of other basins.
Poudre River Floodpllain Property Acquisition Program
Resolution 2000-81 directed the City Manager to actively pursue the acquisition of non-conforming
structures and vacant land in the floodway, product corridor, and floodplain on a "willing seller,
willing buyer" basis. Priority is given to non-conforming structures in the floodway and product
corridor. Purchase is subject to the appropriation of the necessary funds.
Udall Natural Area Restoration
Restoration of the Udall Natural Area will improve wildlife habitat through revegetation, creation of
shallow detention basins, and other elements that will be incorporated into the stormwater treatment
component of the Mountain Avenue storm sewer project. The project will include a water quality
element, access and circulation through a trail system, and interpretation.
Linden Street/Mountain Avenue/Udall-Natural Area Stormwater Improvements
Stormwater improvements will address floodplain issues south of the Poudre River in the Old Town
Basin. Improvements would include storm sewers,water quality features and other systems.
Funding will come from Stormwater basin fees.
Downtown Railroad Track Consolidation Project
This project has resulted in the removal of unneeded exchange tracks along Willow Street from
Linden Street to Lincoln Avenue and other improvements. Additional work includes rebuilding of
crossings on Linden and Lincoln with signals and gates. Staff is currently identifying funding for the
crossing improvements and work is expected to be performed in 2001.
Vine Drive Paving
Pavement rehabilitation work on Vine between College and Redwood is expected in 2000.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 16
Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge over Poudre River at Mulberry
Components include a retaining wall,limited grading and trail connections to the Poudre River Trail,
Riverside and Lemay. This would be constructed in 2000 as part of the Mulberry/Lemay
Roundabout Project.
Lemay/Lincoln Intersections Improvements/Widening of Lemay
These improvements would be completed in conjunction with the Mulberry- Lemay Crossings
development.
US 287/SH 14 Access Management Plan
A joint City-Colorado Department of Transportation Access Management Plan was recently
completed to address the need for improved traffic flow and enhanced safety on Jefferson/Riverside
and North College Avenue. Implementation will take place through both short-term and long-
range improvements.
New Northside Aztlan Community Center
No decision has been made on a location for the new Northside Aztian Community Center. It may
be rebuilt in its present location if a better location is not found before Building Community
Choices funding becomes available in 2002. The building would be approximately 40,000 square
feet. The cost is estimated at$6,940,000.
Brownfields Assessment
The City of Fort Collins recently received a Brownfields Pilot Grant from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. The Grant will allow the City to identify contaminants, inventory affected sites,
identify responsible parties, and plan appropriate risk-based cleanups throughout the Corridor. The
City received $200,000 to apply to redevelopment areas and $50,000 towards greenspace purposes.
The assessments are scheduled to be completed by October 2002.
Inventory of Historic Properties
The City has identified a project to prepare an intensive level survey of historic properties
throughout the Corridor to determine their historic importance. This project will build on existing
surveys and inventory all historic structures and features.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 17
Figure 6: Existing Project Locations
❑❑
NmNard,eldeAzVm Center
TM Up
p Budd N Flood Pn>Dectlan
f
RnAelom b OW Tam CorNeni,atlan Aseesem
0
iFloodplWain
Re�eIl01K - -
sdx,wmw I emma
YlbleeCdon 3
e
tt} Dovsft m Relloed
ti Cmrfn I rowmanb �
CI
® EaammeeainA�
®� smmeeeter I
w1dem of
{� Amm Plan
4
MmTm
f go SUN/Pod BMW Owr Pouch A
j .rt Som
LEGEND
❑❑ ® ®®
MCorridor Study Area
ad
River orOther Water Feature I Ii l n n
- Parks N
0 Boundary of Downtown Development
Authority
• Existing Project 800 ° °00 10D P" is
Other Public Facilities
The Corridor has also been suggested as an alternative site for the new public library and performing
arts center. The City is currently conducting a site selection process with the assistance of
consultants.
Private Projects
At the time of this report, a project involving redevelopment of the Sears-Trostel building has been
through a conceptual review with the City. Plans for other redevelopment projects along Linden
Street have been suggested. The resolution of issues such as adequate parking, rail crossings, and
street improvements will require ongoing private and public cooperation because of their complexity
and high cost.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 19
� t•
4�
P � 3R1
TV AI
UZI
l{
N
i 5
S ts'�iH. '''"*,�"K-t•;:.3-;'z .P .R r r` f.G v+✓ =::a+„ r.'- 3 r'.X".£°�-',.�.'� �a�'��,-...��'�''s�,hf��, �•"y:r -°„`.
New Projects
Key Features of the Program
Based on an existing plan inventory, analysis of existing conditions, and public outreach, the
following are key features of the program:
■ restore the river to protect and enhance the natural environment
■ address hazardous contaminants
■ adapt recreational needs to the river environment
■ extend the Old Town pedestrian character into the area
• provide an appropriate transition between development and the river
■ pursue opportunities for public spaces and facilities
• build people places into the streetscape and trail system to add vitality to the area
• address basic infrastructure needs
■ protect and highlight historic features and the area's history
■ address floodplain issues,whether it be protection or mitigation
Downtown River Corridor Themes
With assistance from a working group made up of City staff and community citizens, staff identified
themes for specific areas along the corridor. The themes provided a consistent approach for
evaluating and filtering down the many potential future projects contained in plans and studies. If a
project was consistent with the theme for the area in which it was to be applied, then it was retained
for further analysis. In some areas where themes were not defined,it was assumed that little change
would occur in the near future.
i
xs
The following table describes themes for Downtown River Corridor areas:
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 21
Table 1 : Theme Areas
Area Theme
Poudre River at College Avenue ■ Flood mitigation
■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor
■ Gatewa
Old Power Plant Site ■ Retain existing,public use
■ Recreational opportunities
■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor
■ Site restoration/revitalization
■ Potential new minor public uses behind main Power Plant
building
■ Conscientious stewardship
Northside Azdan Community Center ■ Public,active recreation use (community center or other civic
Site use and park)
■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor(discovery points,stabilization,
restoration)
■ O ortunities for additional public ownership
Linden/Willow Area ■ Redevelopment or Existing Uses
■ Historic resource rehabilitation and interpretation
■ River edge restoration
■ Natural area buffer to river
Oxbow Site • Public space that maximizes natural resource values and provides
public access
■ Determine long-term use which merges river values
■ Transition to Buckingham neighborhood
■ Floodplain mitigation
■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor
Lincoln Street-Poudre River ■ Redevelopment opportunities
Triangle ■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor
■ _ Floodplain mitigation (building protection or washable
architecture)
■ Possible transportation-related uses
Link-N-Greens • Development opportunities (towards northeast)without
preclusion of existing Golf Course use
■ Natural area buffer to river
■ Enhanced wildlife corridor
■ Floodplain protection/discourage development
■ Integrated recreational access
■ Protect view corridors
■ Gateway
Pickle Plant Site • Settle major access constraints before determining ing use as
redevelopment or open lands
• Natural area buffer to river
■ Gateway
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 22
Description of New Projects
Area themes were used as the first cut at filtering projects down to a reasonable number for
implementation. Public participation also provided an important means to filter projects and to
refine and prioritize new projects. Significant public input was gained from the Poudre River Trust
Symposium in 1998, the May 1999 open house, the October 1999 community meeting and the April
2000 open house. In addition, City Board and Commissions provided valuable input, much of
which has been incorporated into this report.
The Program has been closely coordinated with the Revisions to the Poudre River Floodplain
Regulations project. Projects in the 100-year floodplain are consistent with the floodplain criteria
adopted by Council on June 20,2000 and related Council resolutions.
The Illustrative Concept Plan (Figure ') shows possible locations of most new projects. It does not
illustrate a proposal for any specific buildings; rather it illustrates general relationships between
possible future redevelopment areas, the river, and public spaces. Specific project locations will be
determined in the second phase of the Program.
Cache la Poudre River Habitat Restoration
Location: Degraded riverbanks and river channel from N. College to E. Mulberry
Description: The riverbed and riverbanks are in poor condition. A significant amount of concrete
debris and other trash has been dumped along the riverbanks and within the river channel. There
are areas of inappropriate public access to the river. In addition,weedy and non-native species exist
throughout the river corridor. These problems have degraded the habitat and aesthetic qualities of
the river. This project involves restoring and enhancing the banks of the Cache la Poudre River,
improving the wildlife movement corridor, enhancing aquatic habitat, and improving the riparian
habitat along the river corridor. Much of the restoration is anticipated to take place through the
implementation of projects on lands adjacent to the river.
Linden.Willow and Lincoln Streetscape Improvements
Location: Area between Jefferson/Riverside and river
Description: The current right-of-way lacks sidewalks and curb and gutter. The pavement is in
poor condition. Willow Street is offset from north to south as it crosses Linden Street. Parking
.along the street is random and informal. This project would provide streetscape improvements
including sidewalks, curb and gutter, realignment of intersections,paving, lighting, and street trees.
Improvements to Lincoln Avenue would entail the construction of another bridge over the Poudre
River because of the street's status as a four-lane arterial.
Jefferson/Linden Intersection Improvements
Location: Jefferson/Linden Intersection
Description: The Linden/Jefferson Street Intersection is intimidating to pedestrians. This project
would improve the pedestrian connection from Downtown to the river corridor along Linden
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 23
Street. Elements could include street trees,widened sidewalks, safety improvements for autos,
bicyclists and pedestrians, special crosswalk treatment, and a comer feature at Jefferson Street Park.
Jefferson/Riverside Streetscape Improvements
Location: Jefferson/Riverside
Description:This project would implement some of the recommendations contained in the draft US
287/SH 14 Access Management Report for Jefferson/Riverside. Elements would include improving
Jefferson/Riverside to a modified arterial street, constructing a bike path on the east side of
Riverside,providing street trees and sidewalks in some locations,providing street access restrictions,
and providing left turn lanes at N. College, Linden and Lincoln.
Off-Street Public Parking
Location: Developed area between the Poudre River and Jefferson Street
Description: It is anticipated that future redevelopment will result in the need for more off-street
parking. On-street parking will likely be insufficient to meet the demand. This project involves
coordination between the public and private sectors to identify the amount of parking needed and
the location of future lots. As a first step, a parking study will be needed to identify the parking
needs of future public and private land uses.
Contaminated Site Assessments
Location: Properties throughout the area
Description: Several areas are suspected of having hazardous contaminants. This project would
determine which areas have actual contamination concerns and provide a course of action for
cleaning up those sites. Funding for assessments and mitigation planning has been obtained through
an EPA Brownfields Pilot grant in the amount of$250,000. The portion of the project addressed by
the grant is expected to continue until 2002.
Recreational River Channel Enhancements Feasibility
Location: Within the riverbed between N. College and Lincoln Avenue
Description: This project would analyze the feasibility of providing water recreational opportunities,
including boating, fishing and other uses. Channel enhancements could include river rocks and
other natural materials added to the river channel to create a series of drop structures and pools.
Several access points could be constructed for river put-ins and take-outs. The feasibility study
would address several issues associated with the concept, including cost, environmental impact,
effects on wildlife,wildlife habitats, available water flow and gradient, and others.
Oxbow- Acquisition for Public Use
Location: Oxbow (Kiefer/Chandler Property) - 20 acres between Lincoln and Linden on east bank
of river
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 24
Description: Purchase from willing seller for public uses. Use possibilities include a natural area, an
amphitheater,gardens, and other uses.
Flood Protection Improvements for the Buckingham Neighborhood
Location: Oxbow (Kiefer/Chandler Property) -between Lincoln and Linden on east bank of river
Description: Resolution 2000-71 identified the construction of the improvements to protect the
Buckingham neighborhood as a high priority and directed staff to pursue the design and
construction of the necessary improvements as soon as reasonably possible.This project is identified
in the Draft Poudre Master Drainagemay Plan.
N. College Avenue/Vine Drive Area Flood Protection
Location: Properties in Poudre River floodplain near N. College/Vine
Description: Resolution 2000-81 directed the City Manager to actively pursue the acquisition of non-
conforming structures and vacant land in the floodway,product corridor, and floodplain on a
"willing seller,willing buyer" basis. Priority is given to non-conforming structures in the floodway
and product corridor. Purchase is subject to the appropriation of the necessary funds. Land
remaining in private ownership has opportunities for redevelopment subject to development
regulations.
Triangle (Lincoln Avenue) Flood Protection
Location: Properties in Poudre River floodplain in the Triangle (Lincoln Avenue south of
Buckingham Park)
Description: Resolution 2000-81 directed the City Manager to actively pursue the acquisition of non-
conforming structures and vacant land in the floodway,product corridor, and floodplain on a
"willing seller,willing buyer" basis. Priority is given to non-conforming structures in the floodway
and product corridor. Purchase is subject to the appropriation of the necessary funds. Land
remaining in private ownership has opportunities for redevelopment subject to development
regulations.
Lemay Avenue Levee
Location: Along Lemay Avenue north of Mulberry Street.
Description: This project involves construction of a levee to provide flood protection for the
Airpark area. The project is identified in the Draft Poudre Master Drainageway Plan.
Bank Stabilization
Location: Areas identified in the Draft Poudre Master Drainagemay Plan,including the river bank next
to Ranchway Feeds and several locations between Lincoln Avenue and Mulberry Street.
Description: Several river bank areas are eroding and may over time cause property damage and loss
of riparian vegetation. This project would determine the need for bank stabilization in specific
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 25
locations. If stabilization is deemed appropriate, bank protection could consist of either natural or
structural elements landscaped to provide habitat and a natural appearance. This project would be
coordinated with habitat restoration and other projects as appropriate.
Environmental and Cultural Interpretive Program
Location: In appropriate locations along the trail and in the developed area
Description: The Downtown River Corridor has a rich ecological and cultural history. Interpretive
features would raise public awareness of the history and ecology of the area. Signs, kiosks, and other
interactive displays would highlight the Old Fort Site and Parade Grounds, the influence the Cache
la Poudre River had on early settlement, and the ecological role of the river.
Cache la Poudre River Trail Amenities
Location: Along the trail between N. College and Lincoln Avenue
Description: This project includes installation of trail enhancements such as discovery points (river
access),benches,landscaping, small plazas, specialty gardens where appropriate along the trail. In
addition, the Old Power Plant Grotto would be restored. A crushed gravel walking path would be
constructed where needed.
Linden/Willow Urban Design Features
Location: Developed area between the Poudre River and Jefferson Street
Description: This project would enhance the pedestrian environment and add vitality and
uniqueness to the area. Pedestrian amenities could be constructed to complement typical streetscape
elements. The amenities could include elements such as small pedestrian plazas, a water feature
("mill race"), sculptures, and other unique features.
Gateway at Mulberry and Riverside
Location: Pickle Plant Site at Mulberry/.Riverside
Description: The City-owned Pickle Plant site is currently leased to a private party. It has major
access constraints due to the railroad lines paralleling Riverside and the site's close proximity to the
Mulberry/Riverside intersection. This project would determine the long-term use and provide site
enhancements to improve the area's attractiveness.
Gateway Features
Location: Three possible locations include the Lincoln Avenue, Linden Street and North College
Avenue bridges over the Poudre River.
Description: This project would implement the recommendations for gateways into Downtown by
the Downtown Plan. The project would consist of three separate improvements to improve entry
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 26
image into Downtown. Elements could include landscaping, signage, pedestrian plazas, improved
sidewalks and an improved trail crossing at the Linden Street bridge.
Downtown Shuttle Service
Location: Where appropriate
Description: The Downtown Plan recommends a shuttle between Downtown and other major
activity centers. In addition to Old Town, the Civic Center, CSU and the Mason Street Corridor
have been suggested as possible destinations. The Downtown River Corridor could serve as another
shuttle destination. This project would provide a quick and convenient mode of transportation and
could possibly reduce future parking needs.
1. n
C�
py
v'��„ •tiro "�`�
y
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 27
i
}
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 28
part 2 T c.
N
a+
L
m
0
Q �
A
• � C
A
61 v
� E
o
V
> PCs
•� a
c U
y r�
� yy�
1H Ri
n 3
v o
� 3
ep
0
M
X4Y_
Y
.-fir O
I 'y
m
�+ C
U v
Q a
O �
U
v a
Ln 4
°
N w
M-1
r 3
� o
3
�tued
Project Priority Recommendations
Projects were prioritized through an extensive community outreach process and City Board and
Commission input. All of the projects described above are considered important. The priorities
listed below define the order in which projects are recommended to be pursued. All of the projects
in each priority category (i.e., V, 2"d and 3`d priority) are of equal importance. However, there may
be unanticipated opportunities or demands for implementing lower priority projects before higher
priority ones.
Recommendation: Implement the projects listed below.
Table 2: Project Priorities
1"Priority
Cache la Poudre River Habitat Restoration
Linden,Willow and Lincoln Streetsca a Improvements
Jefferson/Linden Intersection Improvements
efferson/Riverside Streetsca a Improvements
Off-Street Public Parkin
Contaminated Site Assessments
Recreational River Channel Enhancements Feasibility Stud
Oxbow-Acquisition for Public Use
Flood Protection Improvements for the Buckingham Neighborhood
N. College/Vine - Flood Protection
Triangle (Lincoln Avenue - Flood Protection
Lemay Avenue Levee
Bank Stabilization
2"d priority
Environmental and Cultural Interpretive Program
Cache la Poudre River Trail Amenities
Linden/Willow Urban Design Features
-Gateway at Mulberry and Riverside
3'd priority
Gateway Features
Downtown Shuttle Service
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 31
i Iliii I� � 1
E
ii
2
1 4
K
nSi
445fr
stir
f
dj.
:tt
mew°.f'
.r....dr--
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 32
Implementation Plan
Timing of Project Implementation
The project priority table lists projects that would be implemented by both the public and private
sectors. The riming of projects will depend on funding,whether through private redevelopment,
capital improvements programming or another mechanism. The second phase of this Program is
expected to begin immediately after this report's adoption and will include analysis, design and
construction of each project. The best guess of City staff is that in the short term, some projects
could be implemented in as little as two years after adoption of this report. Many more could be
implemented within about five years and others may take ten years to implement fully.
Interdepartmental Downtown River Corridor Lead Team ("River Team")
Ongoing coordination of disparate projects is critical to the success of the Program. Leadership
with a focus on the Poudre River is also paramount because it can combine efforts,provide the
willpower to implement the necessary projects, and focus the efforts of developers and non-
governmental organizations.
Recommendation: Form an interdepartmental lead team made up of staff members from
affected service areas, including Community.Planning and Environmental
Services, Cultural, Library and Recreational Services,Transportation Services,
and Utility Service. Outside experts may be requested to serve on the team
ad-hoc or on an ongoing basis.
The River Team could be responsible for the following tasks:
1. Monitor the overall progress of the Program;
2. Advise the City Council and the City Manager of its progress and any problems with
fulfilling the mission;
3. Assign projects to the appropriate departments for design and implementation;
4. Review, comment and assist on specific project designs submitted by City departments or
private entities;
5. Create a timetable for project design, review and implementation;
6. Assist departments with cost estimates including identification of potential funding sources;
7. Coordinate with entities outside the City (e.g. Poudre River Trust,National Park Service,
etc);
8. Provide rapid response on unforeseen opportunities (e.g. new projects, additional funding,
etc.) for project implementation;
9. Coordinate public outreach efforts.
Funding
Currently, there are no definite sources of funding for many of the new projects, except for the EPA
Brownfields Pilot grant and possibly several stormwater projects. However, the diversity of projects
suggests a need to investigate and pursue a variety of funding sources. One of the issues that needs
to be resolved is the appropriate level of City participation in Corridor improvements. On one
hand, City Plan policies state that: "Development will pay its 'fair share' of the cost of providing
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 33
needed public facilities and services" (Principle GM-6). On the other hand, City Plan states that:
"The City will promote compatible infill development in targeted areas within the Community
Growth Management Area boundary" (Principle GM-8), and will "selectively correct infrastructure
deficiencies, such as storm drainage and streets, so that infill development does not pay an
infrastructure "penalty" to remedy past problems in existing developed areas" (Policy GM-8.1).
On May 23, 2000, staff presented to Council targeted areas for infill development and identified a
range of possible City roles to support infill. Council supported actions such as planning, technical
assistance to developers, development review streamlining and focused public investment. The
Downtown River Corridor was identified as one of the targeted areas.
Recommendation: Investigate a variety of funding sources suitable for specific projects through _
the River Team. Create public-private partnerships where appropriate for
implementing projects.
The "Implementation Matrix" (Table 2) shows the next steps, conceptual cost estimates and possible
funding sources for each project. It is intended as a starting point in the investigation of likely
sources.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 34
w
z � C4
d � � QIUllU UiU
qQ QQqu. V v � FwU q
F Q Q g Q U V V Q
V U U CJ
U
V
r` c
O r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g o
0 N, o .. ,; 0 0 0 0' 0 0' 0 O O W 00000Ln Ln 0g
OO G 00 " 0 N O" e-� 00 G� V l� Kl 7 M t�1 C C
p0 O If) 00 N 69 69 69 64 64 6 p yf 6. p
to O 0.
O bw 64 W 69
� r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 V .N..
p0 6 Ln 9 N O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O p
O co
6,h 00 O O o0 O &Ln O z Cq
O O O O O v, r, � , N 69 r, O u
M '�,. On 66" 0 69 69 6A 64 EA 6A 64
64 6A •,.+ Q v��i
64 64 C 'C
C
4 C
v
❑ ❑ ❑❑ p c E
NNp y NA NA Cy0 'b :4 v p
Q ❑C 2 v n ❑ Q Q C Q ❑ ❑ ❑C ❑ v�i op.� n u u
M Cp C C .Oq C CO bA b�0 bA yp is y
N N Vl p p N p N N Vl Vl •••� L W
v v C w v v •C •M v •„y v v v v (U
•C Q Q v t4 > E v
y 0 L L V
E � � ° 8 g � II z •w f� o �
L� u 0.1 Cf, fu LL O II R II II
¢ n II w
Z P-4
N �
V y
c a
v O
� w
c c > p�
O C
E a
v
>
c E aLd
v 0° a c L
u v O L
> > V
v v o E a 4° o G �w o v c
] u
C :u C yv, .0 FC ❑❑ v •K C E 'i` v
•�• q u
0
w
• �" p .b QO y C p O b p q v
A
Q a' 'S
v > v y c`c Q U o E [i o > Vv > w � C C a C N S cc,v_ P. U _n w o g 3
ry 3 > >
? v o
O' u 'J y N 4 C 7 cd (n 'O v C wL' U�3 !vtiyo' Ovp
c. o> a Dc io QVaE >1 >, y
>
3
O .. ',7 3 '�, •� C
e y Rr.
O
C Q O v p U 'i v Ca C. C va C R b a o v l l Q I I I I I I O C
F '' U E VC 0 [% zF �4 N wU C7 C7Q DCUUQwtiC7 �
_ ƒ .
3 ,
y ) 2 G
� f \
/ § g
0
) \ � u
$ « G / ± _
\ E \ ® t
\m / e
o\ 0 0
ƒ / E7
. 0 — _
\ \ 0 \ \
§ 0
( \ � � o /
{ ƒ � .
b § u
§ { J '0 0
33 cl � �
� )
>1 E / §2
( _ z
\ \ % BCD a
$ee 7 = o � � - j
g § «o
§ § & 7777777 /
/ 2 � .3 t H
,
§ e 2 7 i
\ \\ k \ \ / in. /
@ \
2 / \ \ / \ § \ \ \ \ 7 \
k �R� :sL Sr- R2 6
Brief Description of Funding Sources
A variety of funding sources will be needed to implement Corridor projects. Existing sources may
be insufficient and new sources may need to be pursued in order to complete projects.
Existing Funding Sources
• Conservation Trust Funds: Lottery monies are collected by the State and distributed to each
municipality based on a formula. The act that created the lottery stated that the monies were to
be used for the acquisition, development,improvements and maintenance of conservation sites
and for capital improvements and maintenance for recreational purposes. In October 1983, the
City Council narrowed the use of these monies to the Open Space and Trails programs.
■ Downtown Development Authority: State Statutes provide for the ability of the DDA to
generate revenue from the increment in general property or sales taxes. In addition, a 5-mill tax
levy is assessed against properties in the DDA district,which funds mostly operating expenses.
The DDA typically provides funding to support development and redevelopment projects,
pedestrian amenities, and development of parking facilities, although other types of projects may
be funded as well.
• Grants:A number of federal, state and non-governmental grants are available for a variety of
purposes. The City has been awarded an EPA Brownfields Pilot grant of$250,000 to assess area
hazardous contamination. GOCO grants provide a funding source for open lands related
projects. The State provides State Initiative grants for assessment and interpretation of historic
resources. The U.S. Corp of Engineers provides water restoration funding. Further
investigation may reveal other grant sources.
• Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Federal Transit: Some of the transportation
projects could be funded through these sources. For example, the Riverside Streetscape
Improvements could be a candidate for MPO funding. The Shuttle Service project would be a
candidate for Federal Transit funding.
■ Natural Areas Tax Revenues: Funding through "Building Community Choices" and the City's
share of the "Help Preserve Open Spaces" sales tax has been identified as a source for habitat
restoration or natural area purchases along the Poudre River.
■ Private: Private construction and payment of impact fees typically provide most infrastructure
improvements in developing areas. A public-private funding partnership where the City and
private developers share the cost of improvements can provide a means for addressing
infrastructure deficiencies.
• Stormwater: Stormwater funding through basin or impact fees is identified for floodplain
protection and bank stabilization projects.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 37
New Funding Sources
• New Capital Funding: Some of the Downtown River Corridor improvements could be included
in a future "Building Community Choices"-type package.
■ Foundation: Foundations have been used in some communities to raise money for public
projects. The Historic Arkansas River Project Foundation, a non-profit in Pueblo, Colorado
has raised millions of dollars through tax-deductible private donations.
■ River Improvement District: A new special entity could be formed to finance certain
improvements. There are numerous special authorities and districts which could serve in this
capacity,including Public Building Authority (PBA), Special Improvement District (SID), and
Business Improvement District (BID), and a General Improvement District (GID). District
financing is generally done through special assessments against property in a defined area.
■ Urban Renewal Authority (URA): URAs utilize property or sales tax increment funds (ITFs) for
pay-as-you-go or bond financing. The City first formed an URA in 1978 for the sole purpose of
implementing a proposed private development in Old Town. A second URA was formed in
1982 and is still in effect. City Council serves as the members of the URA. Because the URA
and DDA use the same financing strategy-TIFs - the URA may be only viable as a long-term
strategy.
■ User Fees: New user fees should be investigated for several projects, namely Recreational River
Channel Enhancements, Interpretive Features, and possibly other projects.
Infill and Redevelopment
The Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program does not recommend specific infill
development projects. Most development proposals for new buildings happen by initiative of
private owners. In fact, the Corridor is facing substantial interest from the private and public sector
in accommodating new structures and facilities. The Land Use Code defines the specific uses
allowed and regulates the design and context of buildings and sites.
New uses would entail substantial public infrastructure improvements. Some projects, such as street
improvements, on-site flood protection, and mitigation of hazardous contamination, are the
responsibility of the developer and are paid through direct improvement costs or impact fees.
However, experts say that the high risk and many constraints of infill development make it unlikely
that substantial private redevelopment would occur without public investment. Most new projects
Downtown have involved a significant government role, either through DDA funding or
infrastructure improvements. Other communities have used these and other techniques, such as
technical support, brownfield cleanups, and land assembly, to encourage infill development. These
communities have recognized that shifting the focus from greenfield development to appropriate
infill development can help address goals to increase mobility for transit,bicyclists and pedestrians,
promote vitality of downtowns, provide efficient utilization of existing facilities and services, and
increase community identity and pride. The Downtown River Corridor is an area that can benefit
from a larger public role, although one that is balanced against the needs of the larger community.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 38
Appendix A - Relevant Flans and Programs
■ Cache la Poudre River Landscape Opportunities Study, City of Fort Collins and CSU, October
1994.
■ Cache la Poudre River National Recreational Area Feasibility Study Final Report, City of Fort
Collins and Larimer County,April 1989.
■ Cache la Poudre River Natural Areas Management Plan (Draft), City of Fort Collins, in progress.
■ City Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted March 1997.
■ Downtown Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted September 1989.
■ Eastside Neighborhood Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted March 1986.
• Framework for Environmental Action, City of Fort Collins, adopted January 1992.
• Fort Collins Agricultural Resources Survey, City of Fort Collins, no date.
■ Fort Collins Land Use Code, City of Fort Collins, adopted March 1997.
■ Guidelines for the Management and Administration of Floodplains, City of Fort Collins,
adopted October, 1995
■ Historic Resources Preservation Program Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted November 1993.
• Natural Areas Policy Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted October 1992.
■ North College Avenue Corridor Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted March 1995.
• Northeast Area Transportation Study, City of Fort Collins, adopted September 1992
■ Northeast Fort Collins Truck Route Study, City of Fort Collins, 1999 (not adopted).
■ Old Town Basin Master Drainage Plan, City of Fort Collins, 1992.
• Parks and Recreation Policy Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted December 1996.
• Poudre River Corridor Fishery Plan, City of Fort Collins, Rocky Mountain Flycasters, and
Poudre River Trust,phases 1 - 4 (of 5) completed April 1987 and December 1988.
• Poudre River Land Use Framework, City of Fort Collins and CSU, February 1995.
■ Poudre River Master Drainageway Plan, City of Fort Collins, in progress (draft completed).
• Poudre River Trust Land Use Policy Plan, City of Fort Collins and Poudre River Trust, adopted
February 1986.
• Seeding Initial Development Study Reconnaissance Report, City of Fort Collins,August 1998.
• Transportation Master Plan, City of Fort Collins, adopted September 1997.
• Udall Natural Area Master Plan, City of Fort Collins, December 1995.
• U.S. 287/S.H. 14 Corridor Improvement Plan, City of Fort Collins, 1995.
■ US 287/SH 14 Access Management Plan Report, City of Fort Collins,2000.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 39
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program qp
Appendix B: Actions From Relevant Puns
Location: General
Improve Riverside Avenue/Jefferson Street streetscape
Improve Linden streetscape
Improve Lincoln streetscape
Extend trolley
Complete market analysis for the area
Expand the DDA Boundaries to encompass area or create a riverfront development authority
Identify and cleanup hazardous waste sites
Performing Arts Center somewhere in area
Urban fishery somewhere in area
2 Trails Along River.walking and other
Aquarium somewhere in area
Re-create.Auntie Stone's mill race(meandering stream landscape feature)
Location#1: Poudre River at College Avenue
Provide flood mitigation
Install gateway at N. College Avenue Bridge
Develop kayak course
Move gas pumping station(natural gas regulator)
Improve pedestrian access at N.College bridge
Amphitheater at Legacy Park
Location#2: Old Power Plant Site
Special redevelopment project(office,education,retail,entertainment,dining,etc.)
Protect structure-designated as local landmark
Create natural corridor from Lee Martinez Park across College Avenue
Potential amphitheater site (east side)
Redevelopment opportunities south of RR bridge
Privatize building w/covenants
Continue existing use
Build on water and historic heritage(i.e.Water Heritage Museum)
Relate building to river theme
Location#3: Northside Aztlan Community Center Site
Replace existing community center
Retain as park
Develop special river area-culture,arts,recreation,entertainment,open space,etc.
Develop special riverfront area,including housing,wildlife habitat,mixed-use development,urban design solutions
Redevelopment of site-unused portion outside of floodplain
Amphitheater site
Make no decision until new community center site decision reached
Location#4: River Redevelopment Area
Develop gateway at Lincoln Street Bridge
Develop gateway at Linden Street Bridge
Develop mixed-use housing
Develop retail
Redevelopment opportunities
Embankment project at Ranchway Feeds
Boutique environment(Breckenridge example)
Reduce Riverside/Jefferson pedestrian barrier. Improve connection to downtown
Pursue hotel/convention site(if better than other proposed sites)
Local drainageway improvements
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 41
Appendix B: Actions From Relevant Plans
Location#5: River Oxbow Site
Develop outdoor amphitheater
Restore wildlife habitat/natural area buffer
Floodplain mitigation project
Develop horticultural center
Develop public gardens
Develop`Boutiques"
Develop a habitat restoration and enhancement strategy for site
Linden Street"escape hatch"for Downtown
Transition but still urban
Modest development potential
Development closer to Linden Street to provide pedestrian connection
Match characteristics of Gustav Swanson-minors
Integrate both sides of River-locations #4 And#5 -for visual connection
Location#6: Lincoln Street-Poudre River Triangle
Opportunities for floodplain showcase(i.e.public private partnerships to develop flood mitigation strategies)
Special redevelopment project-office,education,retail,entertainment,dining,etc.
Amphitheater(washable architecture)
Showcase mitigation efforts. No development. Open space.
Important linkage from Link'N'Greens Site to Downtown
Parking-might relieve parking needed for Oxbow site. Mini-transit Center. Transfer to Downtown
Location#7: Link-N-Greens
Develop mired-use project including hotel,convention center,retail,housing,9 hole golf course,"Disney"main street, `
kayak course
Opportunities for floodplain showcase
Gateway at Mulberry/Lemay
Protect view corridors
Mixed density,types housing
Protect natural areas
Embankment project
Locate Lee Martinez foot/cycle bridge [e.g.Link'n' Greens to Udall]
Location#8: Pickle Plant Site
Provide as interim open space
Potential in long term redevelopment for retail,convention center,mixed-use development
Gateway at Mulberry/Riverside
Potential employment area-office/showrooms,incubator offices,retail/showrooms
Berming along Riverside/Jefferson where tracks will be abandoned,would help w/offsite floodplain mitigation
Potential of trade for floodplain areas(if access solved)
Area-Wide Elements ("Area Overlay")
Develop people-friendly transportation patterns
Consider pedestrian RADII(Walking Units)w/development
General river/railroad/fort site/education/heritage theme
Preservation of natural riparian zone
Overall River-floodplain management and stream stability
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 42
Appendix C - Dia y of Events
Organization Date
Working Group 01/27/1998
Council Growth Management Committee 03/16/1998
Working Group 03/17/1998
Environmental Brown Bag Group 04/03/1998
Poudre River Trust 04/15/1998
Transportation Board 04/15/1998
Chamber of Commerce River Committee 04/21/1998
Chamber of Commerce River Committee 04/30/1998
Planning and Zoning Board 05/O1/1998
Natural Resources Advisory Board 05/06/1998
Downtown Development Authority 05/07/1998
Poudre River Trust Symposium 05/30/1998
Environmental Brown Bag Group 06/05/1998
Poudre River Trust 06/17/1998
Working Group 06/23/1998
Poudre River Trust 07/15/1998
Citizen Planners 07/20/1998
Council Growth Management Committee 07/23/1998
Working Group 07/27/1998
Property Owner Meeting(sponsored by Poudre River Trust) 08/05/1998
Property Owner Meeting 08/11/1998
Poudre River Trust 08/19/1998
Phil Walker Show 10/23/1998
Property Owner Meeting 10/29/1998
Planning and Zoning Board 10/30/1998
Working Group Meeting 11/10/1998
Natural Resources Advisory Board Committee Meeting 11/16/1998
Natural Resources Advisory Board 12/02/1998
Council Growth Management Committee 01/11/1999
Natural Resources Advisory Board 01/20/1999
Property Owner Meeting 02/03/1999
Environmental Brown Bag Group 02/05/1999
Poudre River Trust 02/13/1999
Property Owner Meeting 02/17/1999
Council Study Session 02/23/1999
Property Owner Meeting 04/08/1999
Property Owner Meeting 04/15/1999
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 43
Appendix C: Diary of Events
Poudre Paddlers 04/19/1999
Chamber of Commerce River Committee 04/20/1999
Phil Walker Show 05/18/1999
Natural Resources Advisory Board 05/19/1999
Public Open House 05/26/1999
Planning and Zoning Board 05/28/1999
Sierra Club 06/28/1999
Downtown Development Authority 07/01/1999
League of Women Voters Forum 07/07/1999
Chamber of Commerce Legislative Affairs Committee 08/06/1999
Property Owners Meeting 08/12/1999
Council Growth Management Committee 08/23/1999
Parks and Recreation Board 08/25/1999
Downtown Development Authority Committee Meeting 08/27/1999
Natural Resource Advisory Board 09/01/1999
Environmental Brown Bag Group 09/03/1999
Planning and Zoning Board 09/10/1999
Poudre River Trust 09/15/1999
Transportation Board 09/15/1999
Chamber of Commerce Legislative Affairs Committee 09/17/1999
Poudre Paddlers 09/30/1999
Community Meeting 10/06/1999
Wheeler Realty 10/07/1999
Council Growth Management Committee 10/11/1999
Landmark Preservation Commission 10/13/1999
Council Growth Management Committee 11/08/1999
Interested Party 11/11/1999
Interested Party 11/12/1999
Council Growth Management Committee 12/13/1999
Property Owners 02/02/2000
Property Owners/Developers 02/08/2000
Property Owners/Developers 02/15/2000
Property Owner Meeting 03/03/2000
Poudre River Trust 03/03/2000
National Park Service 03/08/2000
Interested Party 03/17/2000
Martinez Park Neighborhood 03/20/2000
Parks &Recreation Board 03/22/2000
Water Board 03/23/2000
Sierra Club 03/27/2000
Poudre River Trust 03/29/2000
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 44
Appendix Q Diary of Events
Friends of the Poudre 03/29/2000
Planning& Zoning Board Worksession 03/31/2000
Open House 04/03/2000
River Corridor Property Owners Association 04/04/2000
Buckingham Neighborhood 04/04/2000
Property Owner/Developer Meeting 04/04/2000
Natural Resources Advisory Board 04/05/2000
Planning& Zoning Board Hearing 04/06/2000
Meeting of Historic Preservationists 04/06/2000
Council Growth Management Committee 04/10/2000
Council Study Session 04/11/2000
Downtown Business Association 04/12/2000
Chamber of Commerce -Local Legislative Affairs Committee 04/14/2000
Buckingham Neighborhood 04/18/2000
Transportation Board 04/19/2000
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 45
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 46
Appendix U - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic(if applicable) Comment
4/19/00 Trnntiportation Looks like agood focus in relation to transportation.
Board Under the 1"Priority list,Lincoln/Willow/Linden Streetscape and Bridge—shouldn't those be treated
separately?
"Off-street Public parking"- What exactly does that mean in here?Is there a plan for a public library in
that area? One possibility is in the Civic Center area at Maple and Howes and another possibility is
across From Fd Burrito.
1 see that the Oxbow project made to the 1^priority list-I don't agree with it
Access—make sure we provide mobility. The naming of the projects is everything. "Ist priority"could
be called"access'instead.
1 don't agree with the prioritization. There are important things at the end and even though you say you
can skip ro those,in general if you have items at the top,that's what is going to be the priority.
We are putting a lot of money inro street and transportation issues and we have our natural areas and
Floodplain protection at the bottom and I disagree with that They should be towards the top. In
respect ro the funding sources,I noticed on Linden/Willow and Lincoln,MPO is listed as a possible
source. I don't understand that
What about the General Improvement District? That isn't listed anywhere as a source.
The underlying concern that 1 have is-are some of there things what the community wants to see
prioritized tight now? We have the signal system,street maintenance,mad needs and they am
significant I don't think General Fund monies or things like that should be allocated to these topics
right now.A later version of this matrix will show no General Funding with the various improvements
because we heard from Council that they probably wouldn't use that kind of funding
Has there been a studv for the overall improvement as it affects VMT in the various corridors of the city?
As we do things like this,we need to know what the impact is going to be.
There is 5300M in transportation needs,so I can't support the 1"priorities on this list. We must look at
integrating facilities. There are two parking structures downtown and then:is a transit program,
although its not as strong as we would like it to be,but to not think about integrating the shuttle
system with present facilities and to talk about off-street public parking as a first pnorin?! We must
look at integrating these facilities first instead of asking if additional parking is needed after you make
use of that You can also look at the Mason Street project as a way to distribute parking throughout
the whole community. I can't support the I"priority based on that.
4/11/00 Letter from 1 am writing to you in support of the Recreational and Natural Riverbed Enhancement initiative that is
citizen listed as a top priority in the Downtown River Corridor Implementation Plan.
At the October 1999 Downtown River Corridor Planning Open House,numerous paddlers,many
anglers,and a few environmentalists echoed my opinion in rally—that our river needs attention now.
In vet another example of the nationwide dedication of paddlers and angles to river activism,our
group of supporters successfully raised the recreational and natural river enhancement initiative to a
level one priority.
Through months of dialogue,this project now has the support of many groups,including the Friends of
the Poudre,the Poudre River Trust,Poudre Paddlers,Trout Unlimited,the Colorado Rivers Alliance,
the Colorado\Fhitewater Association,and our Park Department Adjacent landowner Ranchway
Feeds is extremely supportive of the pmposal as well.
Also of now are the groups who do not plan to oppose the project at this point,including the Sierra Club
and the City's Stormwater Department. Both groups have been very helpful in the process of
formulating a conceptual plan for the enhancements,and are withholding final judgement and the
proposed feasibility study is performed,and the final plans are complete.
The specific stretch of river we am proposing for enhancement runs From the bridge at College Avenue
to the bridge at Lincoln Avenue,with the best possibility being the Linden to Lincoln area This pact
of river has unsightly concrete and re-bar lining the banks,has a south bank at Ranchway Feeds in
desperate need of reinforcement,and tics just north of our vibrant Old Town. This riverbed needs
repair from the dredging that occurred decades ago,which took the river down to the shale substrate.
The section also has enough gradient(5't 4)to produce some exciting whireyvater for recreation,
including kayaking and canoeing.
Out river enhancement project calls for the following actions...
River Cleanup—light&heavy trash,concrete,rebar
Concrete/Riprap Burial
Large Rock placement—for water aeration,restoration,ecological improvement,and recreation
Pool drop structures and deflectors(of mck)added to crate deeper pools
Re-vegetation of native plant species(cottonwood,etc)to stabilize bank—where needed as Army Corps
recommends.
Preserve safe woody debris in slower flow areas(eddies,etc)for food chain support
Create needed fish and waterfowl habitat with deeper pools and natural rock aeration
Establish fisheries and waterfowl management plan with the Colorado DOW
Monitor water quality with Friends of the Poudre and monitor over sediment and adjust where needed
Once completed,this project would create needed fish and waterfowl habitat by creating deeper pools of
water,improve ware[quality through aeration,and create fun play for paddles of all ages. In Fact,this
would create a stretch of over for after work paddling and angling,children s developmental Programs,
and river festivals,for a useable period of four in five months. Simply put,this project would finally
address one of the largest and fastest growing recreation groups in the country—paddlers. It would
create a complete focal point for the riverside community,while increasing the enjoyment for anglers,
walker,bikers,and skaters as well. And most impomandv,the enhancement would leave a great year-
mund benefit to the over and the community—forever.
This urban stretch of our riverbed has been completely overlooked for too mart Teas,and the time is
right for beneficial improvement Many other Colorado cities,including Steamboat,Boulder,Golden,
Denver(two parks),Durango,and Salida have already realized the reviralization these projects provide.
Many others plan to soon follow suit. Please support the Cache La Poudre recreational and natural
initiative as a whole,and help put the river back into Fort Collins. Thank you for vour time and
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 47
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
dedication.
4/10/00 Planning and On'I'hursday,April 10,21AAI,the Planning and Zoning Board heard the Downtown River Condor
Zoning Board Implementation Program. In general,the Board was supportive of the Prohmm. The Board also
made the following recommendations and comments:
Move floodplain protection projects including Oxbow for Flood protection only and purchase from
willing sellers(option 1)for N.College/Vine and Triangle to 1st priority.
Add Lcmav Avenuc/Anpark flood protection levee to the project list as a 1st Priority.
Separate Oxbow"Acquisition for Public Use"and"FloodpWn Protection."
Use Stormwater funds to pay for floodplain acquisition in N.College/Vine and-I'riangle and DO NOT
use natural area funding to pay for acquisition.
DO NOT use general funds for streetscape projects or off-street public parking.
Provide strong outreach for the off-strectparking project
Move Bank-Stabilization up to Ist priority.
The motion was approved 6-0
4/6/00 Historic Historic Preservation There are I story buildings in Downtown River Corridor. The co-housing project is out of scale. Don't
Preservation in Corridor like change of scale.
Mcceting Anticipate very little surface parking. Support nov Sears budding. Efficiency of scale means taller
buildings.
Your plans feel"Disneyfied".
Properties have to be able to"pay the freight." This Property has bo be completely renovared or
redeveloped to survive.
k6'e won't save buildings unless they are economically viable.
We need to do a survey and evaluation of the historic landscape.
The discussion has been towards a district
The purpose of this meeting is to make sure we don't leave historic concerns to last minute.
We are trying to have a collarbormw design with different groups,including historic preservation
The window of funding(3 years-stare grant)may be too long for a historic survey. Need to took for
another source.
4/6/00 Memo from The Board applauds and strongly supports the high priority given to restoration of the riparian habitat
Natural along the river through the downtown area
Resources The NRAB has long favored purchase of the Oxbow site as a City-owned natural area. However,we
Advisory Board believe the options for the Oxbow site,as presented in the DRCIP would lead people to the
conclusion that the site needs to be purchased in order to adequately Protect the Buckingham
neighborhood from flooding during a ltNl-year flood event. This is simply not true. Therefore,we
believe the Buckingham flood protection project should be presented separately from the Oxbow site
purchase or should not even be mentioned in the DRCIP. The Buckingham flood protection project
is identified in the draft Master Drainage Plan.for the Poudre and may not be appropriate to include in
the DRCIP.
The Board reiterates its support for purchasing the Oxbow site as a natural area. Ilowever,the City
should only purchase the property at a fair,appropriate,and reasonable price.One option for the Oxbow that has been presented is as a site for 2,500-scat amphitcamr. The NRAB is
strongly opposed to any public facility of this magnitude in the river corridor due to the negative
impacts the facility would have on the surrounding neighborhoods and the riparian corridor. Our
principal concerns include night lighting impacts on wildlife,amplified sound system impacts on
neighbors,traffic,and the high costs of public infrastmcture needed to support such a facility.
The DRCIP options include numerous references to purchasinglands for natural areas. In addition to
the Oxbow,these Properties include the so-called'friangle and the Properties at Noah College and
Vine Drive. The NRAB strongly opposes the use of natural-areas monies to purchase lands that have
not been identified by the Natural Resources Department(NRD)and NRAB as priority sites for
natural resource conservation. The Vine Drive and Triangle properties have not been identified as
priority sites because they contain little or no natural resource value.
The NRAB favors the private redevelopment of the Triangle site. We also bdicvc it is appropriate for
stormwater fees to be used to purchase the North College and Vine Drive Properties because they are
located mostly in the Poudre River lloodway. The Poudre River Master Dminaye Plan identifies
stormwater purchase of the Collcye and Vine Drive properties as a Potentially cost-effective solution
-to the high flood hazards that exist at that location.
-Ibe Board urges Council to ensure,in its adoption of the DRCIP,that the natural-ama buffers prescribed
in the Land Use Code(LUC)are observed under my new private development plans along the river.
These buffers range from 200 to 300 feet along the river comdor. We believe these buffers are a
critical element of the DRCIP that must be adhered m as strictly as possible.
The NRAB also strongly believes that natural-areas buffers are protected under the LUC and should not
have to be purchased by the City.
The Board has serious concems about the recreational enhancements described under the 1st priority
projects. One option is to modify the river channel to create a white water kayaking Pack We are
concerned about this proposal because it would alter the"plains rivee'character of the Poudre by
trying to make it into a"mountain river." We arc also concerned about the impacts that heavy
recreational use would have on the riparian corridor.
4/3/00 Open House Triangle(Lincoln Remove structures around College&Vine in floodplain. Convert south of Vine to natural area
Avenue) Option 1-this(triangle)is not suited for natural area Speculation means you sometimes win and
sometimes lose. No badouts at taxpayer expense.
Increase Priority of shuttle. Downtown shuttle service needed to make use of investment in new and old
parking structures.
Option I-Hold polluters responsible for cleanup.
Relocate bus and remm m natural area
No bailours of floodplain land speculators.
No oxbow development. Separate flood issue from development support.
Triangle-Buy and return to natural state. If finmcially feasible given the environmental Problems.
I-fowewer,buy with money other than natural areas money.
Option 1-I-Iold people who caused contzminamn responsible.
Option 1: good for water quality;good for the neighborhood;good for wildlife and recreation
Will landowners in Latimer County area(downtown airpark area)be invoked in these changes of the
city?
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 48
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Triangle&North College/Vine Drive-Option 1 is the best for public safety and also creates a legary for
quality life for our children and future residents. Expansion-Yes!But good things don't happen with
vision and cost
Public purchase of land in IIMI-year floodplain is great-BUT-funds for purchases should be drawn from
many sources,as these lands will serve many purposes.
Oxbow-Don't use natural area funds for this Purchase It is degraded land and should not be bought to
bailout a developer/landowner so he can profit at city expense. Let him cull it to someone from
Texas!
Can is before the horse here! How can you consider any options until the floodplain has been
established? Recommend at this point No further developmenq don't use Natural Resources$to
buy out
Triangle-GO WITH OPTION 1! Natural areas important to all who use them,wildlife,people,etc.
Makes for better boating! But-let us use our natural areas,don't put them off limits to people-like
out at Pineview!
Triangle should be purchased. However,due to the degraded nature of the area,it should not be
acquired with just Natural Areas tax. Establish floodplain regs first!
N.College-option 2-change area to 500 year pmd=area
Triangle-Purchase from willing seller. Tape contaminations into consideration whim land is appraised
Businesses along here were willing to relocate for baseball stadium so relocation is not an issue.
Triangle-Go with option 1!
Don't Buy! If you do buy DO NOT use natural areas funds. Use OTHER city funds. Not high priority
natural area
Oxbow site-1 st designate floodplains. 2nd-acquire Oxbow property. 3nd-Create use as a natural area
Don't encourage crowds to the area by creating an amphitheater.
Taxpayer-funded parking garages and other infrastructure that would promote development in the
corridor is NOT in the public's best interest.
Triangle. Don't use current natural areas money for this purchase. Better yet,don't make this purchase,
period!!
Triangle-Seems to me you wouldn't want a Petroleum facility in the 1(Md-year floodplam. Sure wouldn't
want to see the hazardous cleanup that would follow.
I feel that option 1 would be the best choice in that it removes structures that could be moo hams than
brood and that showed in 97. There could be repetitive damage,but at least water would have some
where to go and would provide safety for Fort Collins businesses and commumm.
Triangle-OPTION 1. Natural areas are EXTREMELY important for habitat along the river.
Why is most of property not in floodplain owned by the Ciry?
A special fund should be set up to purchase these sites since these are floodplain issues in all three areas.
Triangle Site-Option 1-my preference. If you can't afford to buy all properties at once,at the least
redevelopment should be restricted and city maintenance of in&asttuctum limited.
Triangle-Option 1. Good for the neighborhood. Good for the environment I have heard some of the
businesses ARE wiling. Lincoln Gromn would make an excellent City Park with a faidv low
conversion cost
Triangle-go for option 1. Allow regeneration of natural area Get help from nun-profits...ones water
and people to plan and fund the work.
No amphitheater on Kcifer/Oxbow property. Too close to residences. Already shortagr:of parking for
ball field at Buckingham Park. Amphinccamr may be more appropriate at the Center of Lincoln Green
Property-room for adequam parking lot there-Lincoln Green could make a nice and easy to convert
City Park similar in"City Park"
Triangle-Option. Make the owners who polluted the site clean it up-a min-super fund site. Use
floodplain/storm drainage fees to purchase land,NOT natural areas monies in clean up.
Triangle area-remove structures City buy convert to natural areas or very low intensity areas.
Public funds should be used only if the areas stay natural—open space—not commercial—like the
amphitheater ideas..
No development on 5M year floodplain. Remove contamination responsible party must pay. Do not use
open space findings. Secure additional funding.
Triangle: Option 1,suggest area=StMy year Product Area Oxbow Site: Separate acquisition from levee,
build on site—simple washable—native park like area—can be used for public gathering—parking is
BIG problem. Put lewce next to Buckingham—less noise—let river flood.
4/3/00 Memo from The Parks&Recreation Board is very supportive of the recommended projects in the plan and also
Parks and agrees with their priority rankings. The Parks and Recreation Mad is very supportive of the
Recreation Board Downtown River Corridor Implementation Plan. Implementation of the plan will sigmificandy
improve and continue the revitalization of downmwn Fort Collins. The Board is especially interested
in the parks and recreation projects associated with the plan.
4/3/00 Workshop I highly recommend against budding an amphitheater on the north side of the Poudm River. This
historical oxbox should be allowed to remain an overflow area for the river as this area will
undoubtedly flood sometime in the future(IIMI--years,500 years?). The area could be maintained as a
natural am and funding should be spend to further enhance this area for wildlife habitat(e.g.plantings
of grass seed,shrubs,trees). Presently I feel there am other issues of higher priority for the City of
Fort Collins than building a new amphitheater in a floodplain(e.g.UPDATING TRAFFIC
SIGNALSO. Furthermore,it appears to me that parking for the amphitheater will be a problem
situation. Building yet another parking garage for the amphitheater on either side of the river is not a
viable option and again.I feel there am other issues of higher priority for the City of Fort Collins than
budding another new parking garage.
I highly recommend that the final plan allow for a river buffer/intact floodplain on the south side of the
gold course,located south of Lincoln and on the north side of the river. 1 am highly in favor of
restricting the development of the golf course to outside the floodplain. A perfect example of a bad
situation can be found along the Poudm River where a recent and very costly "stabilization project'
was needed when the golf course built 0.5 mi.due south of Windsor Ronded because the developer
was allowed to build the fairway/gold green down to the river's edge!
My principal concern is the integrity of the Poudm River riparian corridor. Riparian corridor habitats are
among the most valuable to wildlife in the western United States. Yet these habitats have declined
dramatically and continue to decline w a result of hydrologic modification,river channel alteration,
development,and other man-made causes. Consequently,I am particularly conccmcd over any
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 49
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
actions that may further degrade or fragment riparian corridor habitats. In order that riparian zone
vegetation communities can perpetuate themselves,it is imperative that the inherent migration f the
river and its ability m periodically inundate the associated floodplain remain unimpeded. When riven
are constrained and confined,the associated riparian vegetation ultimately declines,is inevitable altered
in character,and may even disappear.
Because the entire system is interdependent,any effects to the riparian zone may have consequences for
waters of the United States. Alteration of or impacts to the riparian condor can substantially and
adversely affect the chemical,physical,and biological characteristics of waters of the United States in a
variety of ways. The river provides for both the establishment and perpetuation of riparian vegetation
communities. In rum,these communities substantially dic a te the nature of the chemical physical and
biological characteristics of the aquatic envimnment of the tiverine system. Alterations of and impacts
to the riparian zone can change nutrient loading,water chemistry,sedimentation,runoff retention and
filtration,water temperature,hydrology aquatic habitat,aquatic food resources,and other system
characteristics and functions.The two are mutually dependent and interrelated.
Riparian vegetation zones also serve as crucial connective corridon between habitats and wildlife
populations. When these corridors are fragmented,riparian corridor wildlife populations may be
eliminated w they become isolated from each other. Travel and dispersal functions among other
wildlife populations connected by these corrosion can also be eliminated,isolating those populations as
well from population and genetic support \5,thou[safe travel corridors,individuals are exposed to
increased risks of mortality. 'Therefore,it is a priority of the Service to retain or restore the inherent
dynamic characteristics of rivers and streams such that the natural riparian vegetation communities
attendant to them,along with the vital functions the v Is an be perpetuated or restored.
In the project vicinity,human activities have already adversely impacted the Poudre River and its
associated riparian communities. ndustry and development have substantially reduced wildlife habitat
in the area These factors make the residual riparian condor especially important to,local wildlife. I
believe it is important for wildlife both locally and downriver,that the riverine system be healthy,
intact,and functioning as naturally as possible. Because of previous adverse human alterations,the
river is currently out of balance. Both physical and hydrologic characteristics of this system have been
negatively influenced.
4/3/00 Workshop General project Restrict development on Link-n-Greens to outside the 100-year floodplain.
comments Riparian habitat restoration should be a mp priority.
Continuous riparian wildlife migration corridor should be preserved from Taft I lill Rd.to Prospect
Ponds.
Keep things mound—not so urbanized—like mall with a water feature.
No retail w/floaable hazardous materials in floodplain(anywhere that could have even ponding waters).
Caution driven not to drive through flooded alleys,streets,etc.
The City should buy propeM that might flood
The historic buildings on Lnk-rt-Greens should be preserved
"Naturalize"&stabilize Ranchway's bank Historical&commercial site.
Taxpayers are paying far 2 parking garages already—let development pay for parking.
Budd new Azdm Center at Old Site. Leave area around as open space for soccer,etc.
No rip-rap on bank stabilization.
My priority is habitat restoration and preservation over any smeascape beautification.
No new development in the floodway and floodplain.
No redevelopment in the floodway.
Poudre River Riparian Habitat Restoration should be top priority.
A continuous riparian wildlife migration corridor should be preserved from Taft Hill Road m Prospect
Ponds.
Preserve the historic buildings on Link-n-Greens.
Develop wetlands for waterfowl mihrtation!!!!(DCj
It's interesting to consider the historic tmlley downstairs,but not realistic. At present there is only ONE
trolley. Even though the trolley runs on protected greenways for most of its cop from City Park to
Howes and Mountain,two careless diners ran into this'living historic treasure'last summer. The
suggested extension raises the odds of the careless drivers destroying the trolley.
Option 1:Preservation of natural area is key hem!! Natural areas in Ft Collins am not balanced w/
- development
How about a recreational trout fishing recreational site near downtown.
Improve River Corridor through wildlife habitat restoration and recreation enhancements. Both am
important resources to Ft Collins and should not be overlooked
The river is a resource that should be used to the advantage of the community. Boulder,Golden,and
Steamboat Springs have all developed their rivers into great recreation sites for jogging,fishing and
boating. Fort Collins could benefit from similar enhancements.
Restoration of wildlife habitat is key all along the river.
Do not put development in floodplain. Keep our natural areas natural—open areas&open space is the
soul of a city. Please do not put an amphitheatre in Oxbow site.
Make restoration of the wildlife habitat/comdor a reality.
I'm in favor of a recreation enhancement at the College Avenue Bridge area
We want restoration of wildlife habitat—please keep out natural areas. We have enough cement
Development on Lincoln,Linden&Willow strects should PRECEDE street&sidewalk improvements.
Developments should pay toward smetscape improvements.
1st Priority:$7,650,000 for Linden,Willow,&Lincoln Streets is a massive subsidy to developers—
without which development wouldn't be feasible? This is misappropriation of the Ist order.
River Corridor--Re:First Priority Projects—Rivet restoration,cop,#1;Jefferson/Linden Intersection,
#2;Contaminated Sires,#1;Oxbow Acquisition,#1;move parking structure to 2nd or}rd priority
(very expensive);others might also move m#2 Re:Second Priority Projects—'triangle—purchase or
otherwise get contaminants off it;Gatewav at Riverside&Mulberry—o.k.,but probably expensive to
do something that would change that whole look—not as worthwhile as other expenditures.
Do not allow infll to raise structures above the floodway. No matter how much you"scoop out"in
accommodate water displacement,infill will:a)create more hydraulics(oldies,drops,current
differentials)to confuse floodwaters,causing greater hazards to safety,and b)create the need for
causeways,which will also back up more flood water.
First Priority for habitat restoration is excellent Street improvements should be up to businesses which
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 50
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
would profit,not at taxpayers expense. Recreational changes in river should be discouraged. Go up to
Poudre River itself for great kayaking.
Second Priority Projects—No San Antonio!
Enhancement is a must. Providing recreational opportunities is a bonus for all. As long as the
development is planned for the long-term. Very sustainable. Benefits kayaken,angicre,joggers,
walkers,bird watchers,visitors,and residents.
Emphasis whoudl be on floodpdain metrication and habitat restoration. Keep people and businesses out
of harm's wayl Protect the Oxbow—an amphitheatre is a high-impact development and doesn't
belong there! Keep retail development well away from the riparian corridor. Respect large setbacks.
Balance the uses among all. We need a restaurant for mono]&shops along River! All towns with
rivers are developing over frontage. Leave some for wildlife,too. Again,balance.
Second Priorities:Interpretive program a good idea Trail amenities ONLY if they an absolutely not
intrusive on wildlife/plant communities. Bank stabilization if it is natural materials. "Gateway"? Not
important at this point.
Restrict development at Link'N'Gnrns to outside 100-yr floodpWn. No rip-rap on banks of river. Put
things like library Se performing arts center downtown near existing Puking. There are far higher
priority uses for our taxes than an amphitheatre,e.g.,street maintenance.
]Paige,age—10 yeats]One of our state's nicknames is"Colorful Colorado",we might as well change that
to black and gray Colorado if we develop all open spaces. It's going to be notsv for the people who
live there because of the amphitheatte. What if the floodplain has a flood? Don't make our river look
like Disneyland!
OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE MUST NOT BE WASTED. Recreational enhancements are needed
to improve water quality,visual beauty,habitat for fish&wildlife,&recreation use The potential of
the urban paddling&fishing experience is untapped. Please improve this area with cleanup,rock
placcmettt,safe passage for boats,play features,&deeper fish pools.
Linder[,Willow,Lincoln streetscape improvements too great a scale$compared to others.
4/3/00 Often House Oxbow site Oxbow: Acquire,but keep it a natural area Find another site for the amphitheater,or have it not at all.
We don't need to become Denver along Cherry Creek. Parking and amount of usage would be
detrimental to this area and existing residents in Buckingham,
Oxbow Site: Levee should not be attached to"what to do with sire" If amphitheater developed it should
be OK to flood w normal m maintain vegetation. DONT PUT PARKING IN D IIS AREA
EITHER!
No amphitheater at Oxbow! How many other amphitheaters do we need in Fort Collins?
Keep Oxbow as natural area—needs restoration. —Levee at outflow fringes edge of flood plain good for
neighborhood.
From Big Thompsnn to Laramic liver,the Poudre is unique in lush habitat We am in a serni-arid
region,and water is snreu. River habitat is LINEAR habitat—easilv interrupted by unnatural light and
sound. Riverside setting would be nice for amphitheater but what about the effect of the theatm on
natural areas? Catastrophic!
Building a levee at the Oxbow site is the#1 priority to rcnove property(residential as well as
commercial,from the flood plain.
No amphitheater not fair to Buckingham area residents.
Oxbow,buy and keep as natural area. NO amphitheater.
Don't put an amphitheater in the Oxbow site.
#1 priority should be restoration of habitat. No river channels enhancements More trail away from
river. Developers pay for infrastructure improvements No amphitheatre,at Oxbow!
Amphitheatre yes.
No amphitheatre.
lit Priority:Oxbow—acquisition for Public Use. This is for Flood Protection. This is misappropriation
or misdirection,mixing apples&oranges.
Best to preserve Oxbow for low level use if City can purchase. "No lights',no sound systems after dale
No ampitheam,in oxbow area-unsuitable location.
Acquire Oxbow with new funding. No development
Oxbow is where the river's hem. Flood protectinn is different than public use. This is a clever(not so)
to bail out the current owner.
Oxbow,first have flood mitigation of Oxbow,don't put both together. Hood mitigation should be first
priority. Amphitheater should not be hem,impacts Buckingham.
Oxbow Sire acquire for natural area.
Why do we need the 7th,5th,or Pith amphitheater? Why let this drive development on south side of
river,at considerable PUBLIC expense? Why let this drive need for inFrestmcture(parking)at
PUBLIC expense? Pass flood plain revs find
Interpretation should be included in the City plans for Poudre River! You can't but interpretation!
Amphitheater and gardens would be major impmvemend The natural"concrete dump"is awful.
The bike trail was set back from river south of Timberline Bridge because of habitat disturbance. Bike
mil curfew is partly to reduce habitat disturbance. How consistent is an amphitheater with this river
policy?
Yes,amphitheater would be FANTASTIC. Provide relocation for residents if wanted.
C'mon folks..... The ONLY reason we have highways irrigation ditches and powedines today is
because"takings"(that dim word)were absolutely. Unless that option is included,this mgmt effort is
guaranteed to fad. Option#1,with muscle.
Ilcrm/levee at Oxbow site should remove MINIMUM amount of land from flood plain. Protect
Buckingham? Yes! Create dry land for an amphitheater? NO!
Don't use Natural areas monies to buy lands without natural values,or to bail out those who were NOT
good stewards of their lands.
Oxbow,acquire for public use and keep as natural area—no amphitheater!
Oxbow,would be great to keep natural;great areas as floodway;if any infrastructure,must be washable!;
if levy'keep natural. But that will seriously restrict the rived;Could muse flood problems!;riverbed
enhancements here!
Oxbow Site: Can't we just have a river? More can=noise,parking,congestion at an already busy part
of town. Preserve nature and preserve a downtown that people want to live in—void of urban
congestion and noise.
Noisv amphitheater will impact Buckingham Like Fiddlers Green in Denver.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 51
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Oxbow should remain as a natural area! Them should not be any more development in that area
Oxbow no amphitheater no parking lots.
Oxbow,restore as natural area. Keep as wildlife corridor.
Where is the riverwalk option(for south side only) Natural areas to the north(Option#1)
Noah College and Vine,option#1,we should not be manipulating rivers,such as constructing levees.
North College/Vine Drive,Option 1
Oxbow,no amphitheater. Plant it in native greases and let it go. Protect Buckingham with levee.
If you have money to construct an amphitheater,you should use it to purchase the land Don't use
natural resources dollars.
A$4 million 2,500 seat amphitheater is not good use of taxpayei s money! What would O&M cost?
1.Triangle for. Option 1;2.Oxbow site—keep natural no amphitheater,3.N College and Vine Option 1
Do NOT use open space funds for purchase of flood plain land purchase. Do establish new funding
source for purchase of flood plain land purchase. Do not use open space funds to build amphitheaters
Perforating arts centers,convention centers,or any other public infrastructure. Do acquire Oxbow
site for a natural area ONLY. Do=store river corridor ro natural conditions. THANKS! For
opportunity to give feedback)
North College/Vine,MOST favor Option 1;LEAST favor Option 3. 1 think it is critical to avoid
development in flood Plain.
An amphitheater can be build in other areas as well as other development—this is a chance to preserve a
very limited ecosystem along the front range corridor. Giving up development opportunities is a
wisdom not appreciated in the present but is an appreciated diamond for the future.
While the amphitheater sounds good for people it would be in compatible with wildlife values of the
Oxbow. We have pushed the wildlife out of many areas—enough is enough. Keep it natural/restore
the natural environment as much as possible.
North College/Vine Option I that is the best for all concern—
Interpretatusn on the Poudre would be FANTASTIC!
North College/Vine Drive Option I buy from WILLING sellers,mstom to natural conditions.
No major construction development in the oxbow area!!
4/3/00 Open House N.CollegeVine Drive Vine Drive-as long as both options 1&2 are high cost,go for option 1. It provides the most safety and
Option 3 natural areas.
N.College/Vine-We need a dedicated funding source for floodplain protection from stomt drainage
Fees, Don't use Natural Areas revenues to buy neglected,trashed out land with oil and other
hazardous wastes.
N.College-Vine Drive-*Purchase property with general funds or new source-(flood protection
national fund) -•
*No levees-Engineeted controls tend to fail
N.College-Vine Dove-Go with option 1! Less destruction to environment down the mad if we don't
allow option 2
Option 1 looks good
4/3/00 Open House Where is Include Mason Court(if that is the northem-most court on the map)in the gateway plan from the west -
Development end.
Allowed? East of Buckingham has been a cement dump site for decades. Public should know this.
Wal-Mart Amrrrghhh!
2/29/00 DDA Most important
reeornmendations (1)Project#6-Jefferson/Riverside Stmerscape Improvements -
(2)Project#8-Linden,Willow and Lincoln Stmeescape Improvemenrs
(3)Project#9-Off-street Public Parking
(4)Project#10b-Amphitheater on Oxbow site
(5)Project l la-Triangle area redevelopment(subject to floodplain rules)
(6)Project 12-Link-n-Greens development within floodplain rules
Very impotent
(1)Project#2-Environmental and Cultural Interpretive Program
(2)Project#3-Cache Is Poudre Trail Amenities(option 1&2)
(3)Project#5a-N College/Vine Dr.(development subject to floodplain rules)
(4)Project#7-Old Fort Sim Urban Design Features
(4)Project#13-Gateway at Mulberry and Riverside
(5)Project#14-Embankment Stabilization
Important
(1)Project#1-Riverbank and Wildlife Habitat Corridor Enhancement,
(2)Project#4-Cache Is Poudre River Natural and Recreational Enhancements
(3)Project #15-Gateway Fatures
(4)Project#16-Downtown Shuttle Service
(5)Project#17-Clean Up Contaminated Sites
The committee was very supportive of projects#5,#10,#11 and#l2 However,until the outcome of
the Floodplain issues is determined these have not been placed as top priority. Re-evaluation of the
above priorities will occur when the floodplain policy is finalized.
2/2/00 Downtown River Briefing on Identifying contamination of public land leads to concern over private lands.
Corridor Property Brownflelds Grant Need assurances that property owners am not on their own.
Owners Proposal Sham responsibility? Not sum if you can spread liability.
What are relationships with EPA regulatory side? We are really not dealing with those folks.
Are there additional moneys available for cleanup?
Stigmatize am if you find contaminants...Value could go less than zero. As a group,very few
disadvantages. One property problems a=all problems.
Write grant so that property owners can also have property assessed
10/14/99 Landmark Historic inventory of historical sites needed. Area is industrial=recognize this fact.
Preservation
Commission
10/6/99 citizen I just wanted to pass along my support for downtown river corridor restoration projects. I have mixed
feelings about the paddlei s park,but I fully support the restoration component of any project that
might go forward.
10/6/99 Workshop Grand Totals (1) Continue to Coordinate and Implement Existing Projects: 1st priority-85;2nd pnonry-12;3rd
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 52
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
priority-4;Not a priority-1;No opinion-5
(2) Linden/\Willow/Lincoln St=etscape Impmvemenn: 1st priority-55;2nd priority-31;3rd priority-
18;Not a priority-6;No opinion-2
(3))cffcnon/Linden Immncction lmpmw=nm: Ist priority-57;2nd priority-28;3rd priority-18;
Not a priority-6;No opinion-1
(4))effmon/Riverside Streetseape Improvements: Ist priority-53;2nd pnority-36;3rd priority-15;
Not a priority-5;No opinion-1
(5) Of6Stmet Public Parking: Ist priority-39;2nd priority-21;3rd priority-33;Not a priority-16;
No opinion-0
(6) Address Contaminated Sims: Ist priority-92;2nd priority-10;3rd priority-5;Not a priority-1;
No opinion-2
(7) Environmental and Cultural Interpretive Program: Ist priority-26;2nd priority-44;3rd priority-
28;Not a priority-12t No opinion-1
(8) Cache la Poud=River Trail Amenities: Ist priority-43;2nd priority-43;3rd priority-18;Not a
priority-3;No opinion-0
(9)linden/Willow Area Urban Design Features: 1st priority-14;2nd priority-38;3n1 priority-40;
Not a priority-18;No opinion-2
(10)Gateway at Mulberry&Riwnide—Gateway&Landscaping: Ist priority-16;2nd priority-41;3rd
priority-38;Not a priority-14;No opinion-2
(11)Embankment Sta adization: Ist priority-38;2nd priority-38;and priority-19;Nora priority-11;
No opinion-3
(12)Natural&Recreational Channel Enhancements: 1st priority-69;2nd priority-1Z,3rd priority-22
;Not a priority-11;No opinion-t
(13)Gateway Features at One or Mom Sims: 1 st priority-3;2nd priority-Z2;3rd priority-55;Not a
prionty-20;No opinion-5
(14)Downtown Shuttle Service: 1st priority-24;2nd priority-27;3rd priority-31;Not a priority-21;
No opinion-5
10/6/99 Workshop- Start with providing a natural riverscape. No"arts in public placcsl"
ciuzenti This plan should wait for the floodplain regs so priority can be appropriate set(Ditto)
comments Them
river is what will draw people to this area so it should be restored to natural state first
Them am no parks in Fort Collins for the boating community. This is the only one feasible(College-
Mulberry).
Enhance the riser environment to draw people of Fort Collins to it and to increase their over awareness
and appreciation.
Whitewater park enhances this appreciation-
Focus on the RIVER-not the roads!
I agree-many of the issues discussed had nothing to do with the river corridor!
Make the roads pedestrian-centric leave can elsewhere.
Ahitewater park and riverbed enhancements am compatible with a natural environment.
Plan seemed mom cnncemcd with gurten,not the river.
Use"Old Town"as a model. Don't have can parked near the river.
Kayak risks on shuttle! (or trailer)
Paddlers are an important population-please consider river enhancement with b ul&rs to cream
features.
Through the use of natural materials,the river should be restored/enhanced to positively influence the
recreational(boating)potential of the river.
As a Poudre School District teacher I know there is a need for a whitewater park for the youth of this
community.
No buildings in the floodplain!
I second that) Respect property rights but protect human life-Figure 51,Z50,IN a I as the value of a human
life and balance that against property value!
Ecological/biological science must have priority over recreational amenities whun considering ANY
riverbed enhancements. This includes impact of increased human presence in the heart of the river
corridor.
Coordinate DRCIP plan with floodplain revisions. -These two plans cannot work apart. There must be
coordination between the two.
Riverbed enhancement/streambank stabilization must be done,use ecological principles as the guide not
recreational needs.
10/1/99 Poudre Paddlers Channel 71re main issue we support is the Poudre River Natural and Recreational Channel Enhancement Program
Soapbox article Enhancements This program calls for the return of the Poudre to its mom natural state through the use of riverbed
landscaping. Natural over mck would be placed in the riverbed to add mom natural eddies,currents,
waves and pouroven. The benefit am numerous. The pmlect will:
" 1.Beautify the riverbank and riverbed,=coming it to a mom natural state.
2 Provide a recreation site in the city for paddlers,anglers and others.
3.Increase aeration of the water,thus improving water quality.
4.Improve fish and wildlife habitat
5.Create a friendly,controlled environment for instruction of youth paddlers and anglem
6,Seek to maintain or possibly increase the amount of flow in the river.
7.Improve the scenic benefits of the river for bicyclists,walkers,runners,and birdwatchen.
8.Increase the ecological awareness and personal responsibility of the river.
Please realize the city is not allowing nor are we seeking any artificial channeling through concrete
riverbank levies. The design will only contribute to and strongly enhance the riparian sections of the
river corridor. It should allow for"heavy-trash"riverbank cleanup activities,including removal of
dangemus concrete rebar. It should use a few compact and low-impact river access points from
College through Mulberry. It should allnw for a yearly selective cleaning of only channel-wide
obstructions that am dangerous in floods and thmughout peak flow. And,we stress that any design
must adhere to the proposed Revised Floodplam Regulations. As this project will only enhance
habitat,we arc Presently working hand-in-hand with all environmental interests on the Poudre,
including the Names]Resources Advisory Board,Friends of the Poudre,and the Sierra Club.
Mate•communities have already realized the benefit of river projects. Communities such as Steamboat,
Durango,Boulder,Golden,Vail,Aspen,and Salida have led the way. Now considered me projects in
Pueblo,Colorado Springs,Breckenridge,Gunnison,Palisade,and Loveland Even the downtrodden
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 53
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Continent
South Platte River in industrial Denver boasts a river enhancement project
Who's in favor of this locally? Many other organizations as well as long-tune resident who have seen the
river livened,dammed,dredged,and mined to its current state support his project
Where can we find the money for this project? The project should actually be quite affordable. The main
cost will be in the mck used for riverbed landscaping,and the labor to place that rock. Design fees
should be fairly minimal,and river access construction should require few dollars. Beautification and
cleanup could be done as a community project with city assistance. Overall,the benefits far outweigh
the costs. With Great Outdoors Colorado(GOCO)funding and some heavy-Jury local grant writers
available,we believe this project might be totally outside financed
9/29/99 Friends of the Cache la Poudre River We support the following being included in Priority t of the Poudre River Corridor Plan:
Poudre Position Restoration and 1. River cleanup and riverbanks natural stabilization(trees,grass,and other suitable vegetation's)
Paper Enhancements consistent with floodplain regulations..
Between College and 2. Riverbed landscaping through river rock placement in the storm bed with mck placed naturally to
Mulberry cream a river section with aesthetics,interest,and diversity of elements,and environmentally sensitive
boating and fishing modifications a the Coy Diversion Dam as proposed by the City of Fort Collins
Parks as a Priority 1 project.
3. Increase water aeration m improve water quality. In conformance with City Code.
4. Rock placement and habitat design to enhance fah environment With a minimum of channelization
or stabilization.
5. Low environmental impact boating(canoe,kayak,other)on surface of river seasonally from
established public put-ins and takeouts.
6. Substantial private funds could be available to this project and should be sought.
7. The project should commence as soon as possible in the low water season.
8. Out support is subject to our review of final plans.
9/27/99 Poudre River The following recommendations reflect a consensus of out Board on each of the proposed projects,
Trust without consideration to more specific dwiym criteria and funding sources.
1. Existing projects-1 st priority.
2 Project 8:Linden,Ardlow,Lincoln Strectscape-1st priority
3. Project 6:Jefferson/Riverside Streetcape-1st priority
4. Project 9:Off Street Public Parking-I st priority
5. Project 2 Environmental&Cultural Program-I st priority;Now that it is the opinion of this board
that private funding sources am both readily available and most appropriate for this project
6. Project 3:Trail amenities-Ist priority;Note above comment for the majority of possible
enhancement.
7. Project 7:Old Fort Site Design-2nd priority
8. Project 13:Gateway at Mulberry and Riverside-2nd priority
9. Project 14.Bank Stabilization-2nd priority .
10.Project 4:Natural and Recreational Enhancements-2nd priority;Note that private funding is also
most appropriate for possible project in this category.
11:Project IS:Gateway Features at Other Sites-3rd priority
12: Project 16:Downtown Shuttle Service-3rd priority;Now that this project should be pursued in
conjunction with the Downtown Business Association
13:Project 17:Address Contaminated sites-2nd priority
We are in agreement with your derision in suspend further discussion of those possible project which
may be affected by the outcome of the Floodplain Regulations process currently underway. Upon
completion of that process,we anticipate a similar outreach effort for the affected proposed project.
Nonetheless,we strongly encourage you to move ahead with the projects identified above so as not to
lose any momentum which you have worked so hard W create.
It is the opinion of this Board that out community is eager to embrace substantive progress in redefining
the Downtown Rivet Corridor as out most significant resource. Through the process of infrastructure
improvement,property rehabilitation,natural and recreational enhancements and community
awareness,we believe the Cache la Poudre River will once again be the reason we all choose to live
here!
9/16/99 Chamber of Concern=more basic services need to be addressed
Commerce,Local
Legs.Affairs
Committee.
9/15/99 Transportation Discuss pedestrian orientation in slide show. Separate trail=for resolving conflict. Transit should be
Board higher priority.
9/3/99 Environmental Prefer to see floodplam project discussed new. Need more floodplain process in schedule. See
Brown Bag problems with Old Town floodplain. Let community prioritize-do relative rankings. Can we
Lunch Group comment on Nortluside Azthm and other areas not addressed in program People concerned about
the...
9/1/99 Meeting Bring trail away from river. Have people places=like these things too. Ovedav of natural
w/Natural enhancement. Cleanup-not cleanup but"address"contaminated sites woven into project. Project
Resources #4,Poudre Rivet Corridor channel enhancement-low priority for me.
Advisory Board
8/27/99 Downtown Financial component=concerned about properties taken out of tax base. Desire compromise between
Development merwalk and natural. Like some ideas of both. Natural near river. Development can occur outside
Authority of buffer,access to rivet but not too much man-made development close by with access. The rivers
contrast is as greatest asset "Appropriate"development is OK
8/25/99 Meeting with Access to river is important=keep this in mind. Bank stabilization=careful about which ones we
Parks& choose. Look at moving trail. Manicuring is an improvement North of Lincoln. Look at some way of
Recreation Board using water=Steamboat Unmanucumd pan is more important than manicuring it. Access point.
But not cutesy shops along. Levee is important(Buckingham protection). Concerned about area west
of North College=not just parking but all along-clean up and beautify.
Suggestion that we begin to look for places to move the bike trail now rather than ov m armor against
flooding.
8/23/99 Growth Staff presented draft recommendations on the Downtown River Corridor Implementation Proyrtam in
Management the Committee. Council members discussed locations along the Corridor that were within the 100-
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 54
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Committee year Poudm River floodplain and areas affected by natural feature buffers. In general,the committee
agreed with the recommended project priorities. There was some disagreement with the initial
recommendations on projects affected by the Poudm River floodplain revisions,and it was suggested
that funding sources be identified for options not listed in the recommendation list The committee
felt that staff should not make recommendations on projects affected by the floodplain revisions wait
until after Council has decided on the revisions(eady in 2000),but that other projects should be
reviewed as scheduled(November 2). Finally,the committee agreed that a staff interdepartmental
team is the best method for initiating project implementation.
8/17/99 letter from We believe that the preservation and protection of the fiver—and the life it supports—is more important
Friends of the than modifying,containing or profiting by its beauty or utility. This is not to say that we an opposed
Poudre to any changes to the downtown river corridor,only those that would have a negative impart on the
river and the surrounding area Friends of the Poudre wants to ensure that m'erside clean-up,riparian
restoration,urban development and redevelopment,and other efforts that would change the natural
river corridor and its riparian area are accomplished in a way that protects and preserves the natural
river corridor throughout this area. The river is allowed to define its own course within the 100 yr
floodplain mapped by FEMA and the City of Fort Collins. We should always remember that this 100
yr floodplain is often a flash floodplain,meaning that floods in out region can and do occur very
rapidly and without much warning; The flood danger zone should be defined as those areas where the
500 year floodway overlaps the 100-year floodplam. To minimize future human tragedy and property
loss,new construction or redevelopment should occur beyond this zone;The total number of acres in
riparian wildlife habitat is increased or remains the same;A continuous riparian wildlife migration
corridor is preserved and enhanced from Martinez Park to Prospect Ponds allowing animals of all
kinds necessary movement and habitat;Native vegetation(for example Plains Cottonwood Choke
Cherry,Coyote Willow)are given a chance to establish and reestablish themselves and aggressive
exotics such as(but not limited to)Russian Olive,Canada Thistle,and Leafy Spurge are discouraged
and/or removed;Existing man-made sauctures and natural features(both up and downstream of the
downtown river corridor)remain unaffected by new development or redei-elopment This wdl lessen
the need for new channelization or bank stabilization efforts; Armoring or stabilization of stream
banks or adjacent ponds should be allowed only where necessary to protect significant existing public
or private infrastructure. Bank sublization projects often result in channclization of the river.
Chmnclization can lead to erosion and bank damage during flood events. All such projects should be
carefully analyzed on a case-by-case basis;Riparian habitats within the 101 yr flnodplain are allowed in
renew as a result of flood events;Water quality should be unproved beyond its current level and not
degraded by any changes made in the river corridor.
8/12/99 Property owners Prefer to see ALL projects make the list,not just those NOT AFFECTED by floodplain task force.
assn-Board of
Directors
8/6/99 Chamber of Keep moving forward despite floodplain rask fore schedule. Look at another TIF funding source.
Commerce; floodplain issue-we are an urban area Channelize,fad flow if you introduce wildlife into urban
Legislative areas.
Committee
7/l/99 Downtown What is the City's commitment to this program? \Ghat is the floodplain regulations schedule? The more
Development land taken out of private:development means I"on tax... Don't purchase private lands. Have you
Authority used projects from other communities as examples? What is status of Link N Givens proposal? Can
Ranchway be reused for different use? How is the DDA involved in this process?
6/l/99 Memorandum Proposed paddling Based on initial feedback from the paddling community and in combination with some businesses in
.sent to Timothy park("kayak coutse'� town that have long supported a paddling park along the Downtown section of the Poudre,we would
Wilder,Sally like to openly offer strong support to the Planning Department,Parks Dept,and the Planning and
Craig,and Greg Zoning Board Our preliminary research indicates that,indeed,it is fe;uiible to construct such a park.
We have a variety of contacts that can help the city flesh out any f casibdity assessment and insure that
Byrne the design would make this park an extraordinary addition to the recreational amenities available to
citizens.
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 5c: This is the option I most strongly support. Especially if they can convert the diversion structure into the
N.College/Vine Dr. kayak course. This is a place that will injure and drown When,rafters,swimmers and kayakers.
Floodplain Mitigation Unsafe structure. The City modified it and they need to mitigate it
and Area
Enhancement-Public _
purchase of land for
natural and recreation
uses
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 16: Where would you alleviate traffic congestion. Would that be all the traffic you want to move down to
" Downtown Shuttle those choice chunks of asphalt. You want in putdown in the floodplain. Transfort is pretty much a
Service dismal failure. I'm not sum I want to pay my tax dollars to watch a bunch of erripty busses drive
around
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 17, What...? Are you kidding? Why is this the last item on the list If this list reptes ertts.your planning
Clean Up priorities you need. To step back and reassess them.Of course it has to be cleaned up and it's the first
Contaminated Sims thing that you have to din.
5/29/99 E-mail General comments You seem to be headed toward some serious impact on the riparian area of the Poudre River. The
systems that you have in place now can't handle 20 year events. And you want to attempt to engineer
a solution for the 100 yr events. One thing that you have faded in take into consideration on the
impact of the 50 yr,100 yr,200 yr,etc events is going to be gmdy magnified by the fact that the
amount of bare land available in absorb the moisture has been reduced by at least 70M.,since the but
event by streets,parking lots,houses,sidewalks etc. If you tape a look nationally at the effects of levies
you find that they don't work IF you start messing with the flood plain of a river you are going to
effects up stream and down stream that you have not anticipated. Mark Twain has a quoit to cover
this. "If you live in a floodplain,you better count on getting your feet wet" So in conclusion the best
thing you can do for the 100 yr flood plain is attempt to return it to a riparian area and attempt to get
year around flows in the river bed.
You are also proposing very many high maintenance items. Who's going to do it and who is going to pay
for it If you male remote targets that are hard to monitor they will be vandalized. So I suggest that
you go with the KI.S.S.principle(Keep it Simple Stupid)The mom you enyimcr it,the mom concrete
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 55
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
and asphalt you pout the more its going to cost to maintain and repair when you build in a rives
historic flood plain.
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 2.' Nice idea Who will maintain? Will become targets for vandals. Ate you going to explain what role the
Environmental and old city dump had on the ecology of the rivet?
Cultural Interpretive
Programs
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 7: Support renovations to existing buildings to bring them back into their original character. Not support
Old Fort Site Urban additional development along this corridor so some developer could make big subsidies dollars
Design Features providing loft space and retail space,which would increase the traffic,and pollution from vehicles and
channel it to the river. (dripping oil,transmission fluid,tire rubber,cigarette butts,etc)
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 5b: Support the City purchasing the Property in the 100 yr floodplain and then restoring it to a natural
N.College/Vine Dr. riparian habitat
Floodplain Mitigation
and Area
Enhancement-
Privare uses-subject
to existing regulations
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 6: Not until you get the through traffic off 287. All the improvement and traffic calm stuff will do is
Jefferson/Riverside impede traffic flow increase the noise pollution from can and trucks in traffic admiring your
Streetscape marvelous trees and traffic calm devices.
Improvements.. .-.- _
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project ell I don't like any of the options. How about the City buy and let it be a natural&xsJplain.
a,b,c
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 15: Not a bad idea %Yho's going to maintain it? How will it be affected by 287 traffic? And who besides the
Gateway Features at "daim brxmaged"would want to hang out and sit on a bench between two lanes of traffic and suck
one or more sites: exhaust products?
Linden,Lincoln,N.
College,
Rivenldc/Mulberry.
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 5a: Prefer option 5b. Against the City mandating that the property owners in this section incur cost to meet
N.College/Vine Dr. the standards that you will undoubtedly develop.
Floodplain Mitigation
and Arcs.
Enhancement-
Private uses,subject
to existing regulations
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 3b: I would advocate benches and landscaping with native species m try and return the river corridor to
Cache la Poudre River riparian habitat. Introducing urban plants would crowd out native species and add annual
Trad Amenities- maintenance cost Suggest graded running path covered in wood chips.
Substantial Yuk! No urban design features(or at least minimal ones). They have a tendency to become ugly and
outdated,like I%Ys concrete designs.
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 13b: This site would be better developed as seen fit by the property owners
Gatewav at Mulberry
and Riverside-
Develop Pickle Plant -
a%natural area
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 3x How about getting rid of the noxious words along this section. Again,any structure you put up in a
Cache la Poudre River remote location will be vandalind.
Trail Amenities-
Minimal
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 9: Against it for the pollution reasons above,(project 7). This town is getting ton"cool"funky areas are ok.
OFF-Street Public
Parking
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 4: Encourage the City to develop this area as a white water recreation facility. Big problem would be getting
Cache la Poudre River enough water to make this functional.
Natural and -
Recreational
Enhancements
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 11 I support option c. Retum this area to a natural area Why do you want m keep sticking auto parking
a,b,c: closer to the river to increase the opportunity for car juices to get into the water way?
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 12 This is a pmperty rights issue. Pon Collins is the land of NIMBY. I'm not pleased to see a large
Link N Greens sprawling hotel go into the area as cumnt owners planned However,I do not believe the City has
Iloodplain mitigation the right,the power or the balls to restrict his development options. Especially if you want to keep
and natural am Paying over all these nice floodplains and making them into Parking lots and concrete structures.
enhancement-
development only
outside of 100-year
floodplain
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 8: This doesn't sound coo bad,but 1 wouldn't bother maligning the intersections. They grew that way
Linden,\Villow and historically and should be kept that way.
Lincoln Streetscape
Improvements
5/29/99 E-mail DRCIP,Project 13e I didn't know that they had illegal access. This site would be better developed as seen fit by the proper
Gateway at Mulberry owners.
and Riverside-Allow
Pickle Plant to
redevelop
5/26/99 Open I-Iouce DRCIP,Projcct I On, Stop the dumping of concrete,as of 99-05-241
Oxbow Site No(2)
Improvements- Sec option 10C
Private use,subject to 1)don
existing regulations No!No!No!
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 56
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
But 42"owners",all of whom want to get cub fmm the cuh-cow.
Not preferred. Current landowner should be required w dean up the spoils area regardless of future use.
I prefer option 3. Why isn't a levee required in this option as well? Is it required only when the city
owns the property?
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project Ilk: Yes! Protecting for natural areas shows so much foresight It will be greatly appreciated now and have
Oxbow Site benefits for wildlife and environmental quality now. These benefits will increase many fold as our
Improvements-City region becomes increasingly developed
Purchase for Natural Preferred-but no levee. Do not attempt to dramatize! It won't work. Buckingham is one of the oldest
Area communities. Recognize that it is in the flmdplain and subject to periodic Flooding,but address all
future developments to keep them out of the floodplain.
Good idea!
Best idea
Good
Do not include natural am protection w/Buckingham improvements.
If really this is a serious flood-prone area.
If needed
This would make more parkland-and is ctimently undeveloped so would be less expensive now than
later. Also would make good location for flood central measures-I'd agree to buying the land
["either near river or"marked out with comment)Let the high water wash over the am if its going w-
don't try to confine it to a narrow path-give it mom. I have to ask this-if Wal-Mart is built on a
filled am does the displaced water make Buckingham mote susceptible m flood damage-is the city
having to spend$S to protect areas which would have escaped flood had\Val-Matt not been build
_ . .. . .- 47 dots
Don't tic natural am protection to levee for Buckingham (4 agree)
GO FOR IT!!
5/26/99 Open Howe DRCIP,Project I la: I could live with it
Floodplain No(2)
mitigation/natural See Ilb.
am restoration- 13 don
Private uses subject to See I lc
existing regulations (underline"current")not current Contaminated land must be at Schrader oil by the landowner.
Development within the floodplain should be forbidden. No to this option!
5/26/99 Open I-louse DRCIP,Project 6: This should be the landowner/developer responsibility. Taxpayers should not pay for this. This means
Jefferson/Riverside nothing until the RR situation is addressed This should be attached to the Old Tuwn plans,not the
Stteerscape river comdor.
Improvements Wait all took by pass is in
A nice continuation of the theme in Old Town Square(formerly pact of linden). But it has a price tag!
This area needs improving
Combine this with encouraging preservation of hismrically significant structures.
Amen-this area needs to have some SS/improvements-I worry about the trucks-let's get the by
off the back bumer.
27 dots;
OX;
Yes.;
Gnod!;
Sounds reasonable
Yes-definitely need improved pedestrian crossings. Landscaping would be gnxsd,coo. I would like to,
see some?
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project llb: Would possibly be complementary in 10b. Seems appropriate use of riverbank area
Floodplain You(we)are going m have to buy out(buy off)owners of floodphun land&buildings
mitigation/natural I could live with it,except will people walk fmm this site
area restoration- g dots
Public purchase for Too far from Old Town&downtown unless a shuttle ser ice is provided. Natural areas should be
parking developed on the riser side of these properties. See option 3.
Don't need more auto packing
No
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 3b: No! Would be OK only if moved away from riparian habitat
Cache Is Poudre River Do 3a-save 3b for possible future.
Trail Amenities- Keep the bikes,skates,&skateboards off,please
Substantial Good! "Additional river buffen could be created to lessen impact on the natural environment"circled
Nice,but pricey.
Unnecessary-the hand of man cannot improve what should be a mom natural space. Way too busy and
capita intensive-creates maintenance burdens,bad for space-bad for ttv payun.
14 dots
Don't think this is necessary
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project ilb: No-we have enough parking!
Floodphun Do 11 c first. This can be done-or not-a later decade depending on how things develop
mitigation/natural
area restoration-
Public purchase for
parking
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 5e Don't need to acquire land if they can't develop in the floodplains. Outlaw it! No levee should be
N.College/Vine Dr. permitted-attempts to channel the river should be avoided. See Mississippi problems. It doesn't
Floodplain Mitigation work
and Am Yes except for the kavak facilities.
Enhancement-Public 4vee is not a good idea Coy diversion also provides grade control-removal would destabilize the river
Purchase of land for channel.
natural and recreation How would this affect the flow?
uses 18 don
No parking! (lets not encourage dining and parking lots where the oil and gas and litter wdl con off
close to the river-sounds like a bad idea!)
i would like city to own this land-keep as natural as possible-would accept a natural park area for public
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 57
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
-remove the diversion dam.
No kayaks
Would be in favor if I was convinced that kayaking would not harm river ecology
5/26/99 Opert House DRCIP,Project t: We have a great opportunity to allow the river to function in its natural stare by allowing the river to
Riverbank and evolve within the river corridor. Where the corridor is wide(Le.structures not built up to the banks)
Wildlife Habitat bank stabilization should focus on revegetation efforts and other"soft"means of protection.
Corridor However-where infrastructure is close m the banks-"hard"engineered bank protection will be
Enhancement required. Thu can still be done in an aesthetic way. That is protect the we of the slopes with"hard"
means using soft bio(?) techniques on the upper banks.
My concept of aesthetics is to emphasize natural-I expect that wood&concrete nick barriers will need
to be used to minimize erosion-ideally,I would like to be able in canoe/kayak that area-experience a
"natural"river.
"Enhance"? Should be dropped-restore banks to natural state. Wildlife habitat enhancement may also
require curtailing human activities in sensitive areas. Mosquito control is deleterious to many
songbirds. Fogging 0 etc.should not be pemsirted. live with the mosquito!
Be careful here! Enhanced means cleaned up not"improved"
We have only one opportunity in maintain a wildlife corridor through town,and that occurs BEFORE
any further NEW development
If the river is going to be a focal point-you're going to have to improve years of disturbance and restore it
We have a great opportunity to allow the river m function in its natural stare by allowing the river in
evolve within the river corridor. Where the corridor is wide(I.e.structures not built up to the banks)
bank stabilization should focus on revegetation efforts and other"soft"means of protection.
However,where infrastructure is close to the banks,"hard"engineered bank protection will be
required This can still be done in an aesthetic way. That is protect the we of the slopes with"hard"
means,using soft bio(?) techniques on the upper banks
Only restoration should be done where further erosion will damage essential items such as streets. The
river itself is the best"restorer'of a riverbank.
Trad section between Shields and College is falling apart Suggest soft path for running along the whole
trail,repair riparian habitat.
Great idea! The natural characteristics of the river are everyone's to enjoy-as well as providing vital
ecosystem services. We also need m provide a refuge for wildlife in habitat that is increasingly being
squeezed out
Good-natural resource area enhancement should be the primary goal of all the pmjecrs
Good-natural rcsoume area enhancement should be the primary goal of all the pmjects
Good-natural resource area enhancement should be the primary goal of all the projects
Be careful here! Enhanced means cleaned up not"improved"
\Vc have only one opportunity to maintain a wdd_liFe corridor through town and that occurs BEFORE
any fumhcr NEW development
37 dors. Sounds good(2)
Let it be a"free-flowing"river
If the river is going to be a focal point-you're going to have to improve years of disturbance and restore
it.
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 5b: Bur properties only when offered by willing sellers-maybe seek-Rights of First Refusal or purchase
N.College/Vine Dr. options on affected properties.
FloodpWn Mitigation
and Area
Enhancement-
private uses-subject
in existing regulations
5/26/99 Open I-louse DRCIP,Project 4: Fish structures are OK and needed-remove diversion structures. Whitewater slalom no! It will be a
Cache la Poudm River huge disturbance to sensitive wildlife at the critical spring period.
Natural and 27 dors
Recreational Fish-yes. Whimavater slalom-NO. Incompatible with fishing&peace&quiet
Enhancements It is not up to government to provide expensive recreational equipment to special interest groups. If
whitewater organizations wish to work on this on a volunteer basis-removing dangers such as fallen
trees etc.ok. Also they should have the right to float from hem to 1-25 rest stop(ic.Easements over
private land where required to portage dams) Don't spend government money on river channel-the
river does that
Looks good as is-enhance natural environment
Fish habitat improvement-YES! (Get more water) Slalom course means crowds-which the natural
habitat can't accommodate.
Is a whitewater slalom course compatible with over ecology&fish habitat?
Nothing"natural"about rafters&kayak&canoes
Fishing&kayaking do not mix. A ww course will be expensive for the few weeks itd be viable(&I'm a
kayaker)downtown with a flat grade is not the place for a ww course.
The effects of in-channei habitat improvement on the flood carrying capacity of the channel will have to
be balanced against the environmental gains.
My personal preference is not to have this but I would vote for it over a San Antonio use for the river.
My preference would be to have kayakets use upper river where this type of river is more natural. My
impression of this proposed area is a slower/lower gradient
I like the natural focus of this,but care must be taken with the slalom course not to disturb natural
habitat and the tranquility of those who want w enjoy it
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 10b: Afraid this will lead to degradation of habitat
Oxbow Sim Do option 10c and then in future this is still an option
Improvements-City 29 does
Purchase for Open Don't need it
Air Amphitheater This is a nice"concept"for the foothills-not the river
W1,v is the city promoting development in the 100-year floodplam?
Just don't make it too civilized.
An appropriate use for this floodplain area. Land use not an environmental threat to the river.
This is the best of the ideas considered
("washable"circled with comment(Very good-let it flood if its going to!
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 58
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
NO-An amphitheater is a dreadful idra! I am very much in favor of attracting people to experience the
beauty of the river. BUT attracting people to that area for activities that could just as well be located
away from the river is a negative and counter-productive move. Why locate this by the river at all,
when people going to events at the amphitheater are not going to visit the river and will increase
disturbance to habitat and people trying in enjoy the river? Also the effects of construction and
associated traffic increase in tomes of pollution will be big negative.
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 12 Yes-restrict development on 100-year floodplain.
Link N Greens Don't get tests generous with low-value land being bought by taxes
noodplain mitigation SAD-we don't need the development We do need the open space
and natural area The current use is a really good example of a riparian compatible private venture
enhancement- Is this where the conference center and hotel arc proposed? If you have mow information on this,how
development only can I get hold of it?
outside of 100-year Discourage development and especially intense development
tloodplain This makes sense,it permits development,outside of the floodplain. I like this ilea
No development in the 100-year floodplain
Do NOT allow development in 100-year floodpiain-see comment on loc.
Its private land-see option 1 under item 1la
Sounds reasonable
16 Jots
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 5b: You will[have]to"buy out"some owners
N.Cogege/Vine Dr. 16 dots;
Floodplain Mitigation Yes(2)
- -- --- and Area Further development or redevelopment within floodplains should be eliminated I do support acquisition
Enhancement- of land to expand and enhance natural area buffers. Currently,the corridor is too constricted in many
Private uses-subject places to provide adequate wildlife buffers.
m existing regulations Yes,56 is great No to the idea of parking in 5c-we have lots of parking in old town indices not get
more run-off pollution into the river. Lees encourage people to walk(as per the pedestrimization of
#6 and#7)or use public transport)
Again-no reason for City to bad out private land owners. wait until river takes them. The owners will
get flood insurance. City can then buy cheaper. The current private owners know and assume the
risks of owning pmperty there.
A compmmise between 5a&5c
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 7: Mill Race very wasteful. If Old Town"takes hold"this may be an option for future decades. Now is too
Old Fort Site Urban much gov emment-leave private.
Design Features 30 don
Great idea to improve pedestrimization. Las not disturb the peace of such areas be putting a parking lot
close by the river(.e.as in 5e). There are plenty of old parking spaces and new lots being developed
I'm more inclined to#6 than this-I'd vow to delay this project for a few years.
OK as long as it is out of the natural areas and buffca. What is a"mill race"? \\hat is its upkeep?
Just don't make too many such impmvxmcntc
Historic signs
Yes!
Good idea-but difficult to integrate with existing rad lines.
Mal race seems superfluous
Nice-with a price tag.
Please we do not need to"shop"on the river.
Great idea!
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 16: ibis is outside river planning. Busses should gn where people are or want to gn. As the nature of our
Downtown Shuttle use of that area changes-the busses will adapt
Service Way premature. Shuttles should be considered after development plans am finalized.
15 dots
Great idea!
At last,an excuse for the Mason Corridod
Yes. Too bad the vntea tuned down the Transportation Tax.;Yes!m
I'm afraid you have higher hopes for this than I do-maybe youll keep a few can o ff the mad-sum hope
you're right and I'm wrong
Good idea-tic in to Mason St Corridor for auto free zone-use natural gas busses or tmlleys
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 15: A WASTE--coo busy-not practical-too expensive-slows traffic. An open park would be nicer-mom
Gateway Features at friendly-less expensive.
one or more sites: 22 dots
Linden,Lincoln,N. Yes but not a top priority
College, You'll have to acquire the land on which to do this-nice but not necessary.
Rive rs ule/Mulberry. OK
Except for an outdoor amphitheater,there am no"outstanding features"that people need in be enticed
to"enter". This would be just a fancy gateway to cross the river.
Gateway in what? To the historic Old Town,or to some consumer traps
Yes&slow traffic to posted speed limits
Maybe we could delay this for a few years-think I'd like in see$f used on this until other projects are
finished.
If we are looking for a"gateway"it should be as one exits I-25 at Prospect,Mulberry&Harmony.
Lincoln&Linden are not"gateways".
1 person specifically indicated a preference for Linden St gateway
Yes
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 11c Purchase Western half and a strip along the river-but purchase of entire site also acceptable. Gasoline
Iloodplain storage next to river seems unsound when next flood hits.
mitigation/natural 28 dots
area restoration- Yes-a great idea for same reasons as lUe.
Public purchase for Yes(4)
natural area and Only if price is adjusted for the inevitable clean-up expense.
floodplain mitigation Would prefer this but I Is is OK
Preferred,although some parking in option 3 could be Permitted.
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 5a 8 dots
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 59
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
N.College/Vine Dr. Prefer 5b
Floodplain Mitigation No
and Area Define"enhancement". Banks should be left natural-but stabilized where necessary to keep river within
Enhancement- its historical flows(including floodplains). Any mvegetation should be natural.
Private uses,subject Don't really have to do anything here. Some day the river will take these properties. And then the City
in existing regulations can buy as park land at reduced cost
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 13b: 14 dots
Gateway at Mulberry Maybe a mix between this and 13b. while access is salt a problem you m likely to have less visitation to a
and Riverside-Allow natural area than a park
Pickle Plant to Yes
redevelop Can be developed as a park over a long time if the need is shown-start with natural area and let it be
developed if demand develops.
Not much habitat on the point itself Better habitat below the old plant site. Keep the lower elevation
for natural area.
If the trucks are ever re-routed
Preferred in a&c
Yes-for same reasons as 10C
23 dots
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 3a: 15 dots;Still all good;Prefer 3a
Cache la Poudm River This is my preference. Save 3b for Future and if needed. Don't do 3b now.
Trail Amenities- 3a is much more preferable to 3b, Construction of plaza and other urban design features counter to the
Minimal aim of"enhancing wildlife habitat"and"enjoying natural characteristics"and improving aesthetics,
stated in#1.
Move trails away from sensitive wildlife areas. Trails too close in the river hacc caused too much foot
traffic and bank destabilization. No plaza. Bench use is minimal at present and may not need to be
increased.
No problem with this;
Also good idea;
Keep simple and economical;
Sounds good;
Access needs m be provided for-but we don't need"caviar"amenities;
Yes
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 2 Why do we want to increase parking? I thought we wanted to decrease automobile dependency. People
OffStreet Public should be able to drive but they should have to pay for it. Bike parking should be free but not auto
Parking parking-except of course for the elderly and disabled
Another area with a need for parking. The lots can be stmetscaped. -
Good point(arrow pointing to"...not adjacent to the river area
17 dots
Parking is a problem-I'd strongly vote in favor of this in order to help sustain downtown-business
people always seem to complain about parking problems. Good idea!
No-we have enough downtown parking planned. No more asphalt
Parking must be provided if redevelopment of the area produces increase number of destinations
Let private interest provide for parking-CJ Burrim built a parking lot behind their restaurant. Mawsens
provides their own parking.
Location of parking lots away From the river should not be an aside(i.e."whenever passible . Please
make it a priority in your planning decisions. It impacts not only the wildlife,habitat,and water -
quality,but the enjoyment of those who wish to experience the natural river qualities.
Appears to be reasonable. Isn't it located a little too far away from Old Town For most folks to work?
Again,problem with RR tracks bisecting the area
Inconspicuous parking-shuttle service
There are other much mom suitable locations for a parking structure
5/26/99 Open Howe DRCIP,Project 8: This neighborhood should get in fair share of sidewalk and strett improvement Like with option 7. A
linden,Willow and by bmvemment rehab is out of place If private commercial interest wish to buy and change aspects of
Lincoln Streetscape neighborhood-let them pay for this.and not required.
Improvements Yes(2);
60 dots
Lighting is very important. A major concern of businesses in this area is parking. The NE&NW
comers of the Linden-willow intersection has limited parking
Minimize the improvements.
Same m#7(I'd vote to delay this for a few years)
Nice-with a price tag.
Minimize the improvements. Make a kind of urban natural area
Yes help needed
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project l3a Traffic and train is too dangerous for a Park Kids will be from surrounding neighborhood and probably
Gateway at Mulberry unsupervised Library park is only several blocks away.
and Riverside- Ok,as fun&history
Develop Pickle Plant It will give the kids and parents a nice view the waste water treatment land. If the winds just right they
as park can get a nose full of this wonderful amma
The Pickle Plant would be a nice am for a park But keep it simple.
Maybe a mix between this and 13b. BUT,access a still a problem.
9 dots
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 2 Simple displays locating old fort site OK The influence on settlement and ecological role unnecessary
Environmental and and wasteful.
Cultural Interpretive We should do this regardless of the rest of the River Corridor Plan
Program Good-maybe explaining ecology of river will increase likelihood that people will stav on the trails&
follow rules in general
History is brood
I'm all for historic interpretation
13 dots;Good idea!;"..and the ecological role of the river'!!!Yes
This would be good-an area for summer music for Oktoberfest activities-for Cinco de Mayo?for 4th
of July?
(Arrow printing to another location) Put it here-there's more room.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 60
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Yes,education is a great idea Please make sure the location of signs and gathering par"is far enough
from key habitats,not to disturb wildlife.
Good idea
5/26/99 Letter-3 citizens Native vegetation(for example Plains Cottonwood,Choke Cherry,Coyote Willow)are given a chance to
from Friends of establish and reestablish themselves and aggressive exotics such as Russian Olive,Canada Thistle,and
the Poudre Leafy Spurge ace discouraged and/or removed where appropriate;
We envision the Poudre River corridor as a biologically functioning,vital entity that changes from season
to season and from era to cra The river is a life-line for a wide variety of life,many of which are
almost completely dependent upon a healthy,unimpeded river. To many,the preservation and
protection of the river,and the life it supports is more important than the all-toe.-human desire to
modify,contain or profit by in beauty or utility. Thu is not to say that we are opposed to any changes
to the river corridor,only those that would have a negative impart We want to insure that riverside
clean-up,riparian restoration,urban development and redevelopment,and other efforts that would
change the natural river corridor and its riparian area is accomplished in a way that protects and
preserves the natural river corridor.
Armoring or stabilization of stream banks or adjacent ponds should be allowed only where needed to
protect significant public or private infrastructure. Bank stabilization pmjec"often result in the
unintended consequence of channelizing the river. This channelization can lead to damage during
flood events that otherwise would not happen. All such projects should be very carefully analyzed on
a case-by-case basis
The flood danger zone should be defined as those areas where the 500 year floodway overlaps the 100-
year floodplain. To minimize future human tragedy and property loss,new construction or
redevelopment should occur beyond this zone
A continuous riparian wildlife migration corridor is Preserved and enhanced from Martinez Park to
Prospect Ponds allowing animals(birds,mammals,reptiles,fish,and invertebrates)necessary
movement and habitat;
The total number of acres in riparian wildlife habitat is increased or,at the very least,remains the same;
Existing man-made structures and natural fixtures(both up and downstream of the downtown river
comdor)remain unaffected by new development or redevelopment This will lessen the need for new
channelization or bank stabilization efforts
The river is allowed to define its own course within the 101-,Year floodplain mapped by FCMA and the
City. We should always remember that this 11NI-year floodplain is ofian a flash floodplain,meaning
that floods in our region can and do occur very rapidly and without much warning
5/26/99 Opera House General comments I liclieve that whoever owns the land should have the first choice as to the future of the land I don't
believe the City should'surprise the owners!
Land and business owners have a responsibility to the community that transcends their rights of private
ownership. (1 agees)
We need dirt trail system along the river,but away from in banks to prevent erosion,but still allow
runners the option of din
Please no"washable"architecture,amphitheater in the Oxbow. This would be a pour misuse of an
existing riparian habitat
This is a very well done set of displays!
Kayaking and fishing don't mix. A white water course would be better situated where there is a steeper
grade. Downtown the course will be viable for about one month during the year.
Move the truck route w"y north out of city limits
We don't need[New Performing Area Center).Lincoln Center works fine!
We don't need this project[New Performing Am Center[near the river-keep it away.
The Lincoln Center is not currently adequate and as the city grows will not be able ti serve the
community
These involve two unrelated issues[New Performing Arts Cemer[. We need a center but not there.
Regional commuter rid sounds glad Flow about trolleys?
Why do we need another performing arts center? I like the Lincoln Center and I don't want mom
buildings near the rived
Keep the performing arts center as close to the new parking garage as possible so it can be used at night
Do not put it in the floodplain!
4 dots: San Ammnio Riverwalk-it won't happen in Fort Collins
Find a site for the arts center and amphitheater well away from the river and out of the floodplain
1C'ouldn't it be nice to have a few easy rapids for boaters,fisherman,walkers,bikers,painters,and writers
to sit by or use and enjoy?!
Highway 14 Relocation should be sited way north of Fort Collins: County Rd 58 or further north.
Would have liked mom info on how habitat would be protected with increasing influx of people and
=file.
" Buy up as much land as possible to protect it
Please keep truck traffic in mind when designing streets in area between Willow,Lincoln&linden.
Allow as much as possible the rarer to restore and renew,itself during flood events. Let it cote new
Features--even change course creating new oxbows.(1 agrees)
No kayaking etc.
The display is gent Amphitheater a negative. Would attract people to area for other reasons than
enjoying river-thus congest am reducing enjoyability of river experience.
Passive areas and natural area preferred:As little commercial as possible.
Something historic to interpret site of old Camp Collins.
No public$Ss that encourage development of the river corridor
Turning the golf course into a hotel is horrible. This is not a public use and would result in land taken
away from natural arts,teals,etc. (1 agmes)
We spend lots of$on soccer fields,softball diamonds,"zoo"farms,basketball courts,and other
amenities. Why not enhance our river with natural looking pour-oven,rocks and eddies? These
would benefit all of us with increased aeration of our water. We need to show,recreational use of our
water or well lose it to the Denver suburbs! We paddle there already,and the water needs aeration to
decrease stink)
We need river bed enhancement
It is not advisable to allow the river to move when there are structure-built right up to the banks.
Buckingham must be protected-levies seem a good idea
Downtown Rivet Corridor Implementation Program 61
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
River banks move. Don't wash money on stabilization. Let the river move its course.
We need to investigate the possibility of putting river back to its original course to restore meander and
stop erosion(1 agrees)
"Fort"theme needs to be re-established.
Yes,the City does care about you. Thais one reason for this open house. (3 agree)
We need a new performing arts center-I don't know where...We need the amphitheater at the Ox bow.
We need to beautify river bank behind Ranch Way.
For areas developed in the 100-year floodplam-relocation should always be an option. Recall events
along the Mississippi aft"the flood of 1993. Whole villages were relocated.
The City should allow no new development in the 10)-year floodplain. This is for 2 reasons:(1)safety in
a larger than 100-year flood(2)natural areas value-in a continuous corridor and
What about a defined"soft dirt"trail in areas/sections(e.Shields-Lee Martinez)and eliminate all the
spider web trails that impact riparian area-roots lose vigor.
1'd like to see the'Fori reconstructed on some river site.
This is an extremely good explanation and display that helps one understand the whole potential. Thank
you!
We don't need to spend government money on a white water course that is a private expense just give
river runners right in boas
This is really nice for everybody except we the people that live and have businesses hem. You don't give
a dam about us.
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 13c: Allow Pickle Plant to redevelop Could Pickle Plant site be traded for lands with great natural areas value
Gateway at Mulberry in the floodplain-say across the rivet?
and Riverside-Allow Redevelopment should be permitted only on the upper elevation adjacent to the RR tracks. Keep the
Pickle Plant ro lower elevation for natural area-in also pmbably in the floodplain. If redevelopment is allowed-the
redevelop developers should bear the cost of clean up-not the city.
No!
Seems a good location for riparian compatible private use. Possible complication is vista over a sewage
treatment plant(but a good sewage treatment plant)
Keep it public.in ownership and in use
Don't need this at this location.
Yes instead of the development of the golf course. Offer incentives.
5/26/919 Open House DRCIP,Project 14: Got to say yes to this-don't like the dumped concrete&old can at rip cop-this would be a big
Embankment improvement.
Stabilization Sounds good;Yes(3)
36 dots
It would be nice,albeit expensive,to get rid of the eye sores.
Again-only where critical facilities are ar risk Rivers"enhance"their own banks quite nicely.
Too vague! What are the several locations? What an critical facilities? Not enough information.
This should be done in replace the dumped concrete. It should work toward re-establishing natural bend
geometry.
As I am sure you know contact between riparian banks and water is vital for flood mitigation,water
fdmition and cleansing,and providing the interfaces from microscopic toxic-anoxic to macroscopic
levels. Please choose the stabilization method that best maintains habitat and ecosystem services.
5/26/99 Open House DRCIP,Project 17: In no way should the taxpayers bear the cost. Cleanup should go first to the landmmers,then any
Clean Up developers. Don't assign the cost to the city.
Contaminated Sips This is a must-do that should precede most other projects.
Good idea;24 dots
No cleanup with public money unless the land price is offset equally or more(2 agree),(Tuners should
pay for cleanup-not public,Assessed value of land should account for cleanup costs,Any
contaminant cleanup should be home by PRI VATC-money NOT public,Cleanup is the owners'
responsibility,Good investment-it will save a life. A liability now.
This seems like a no-brainct good idea. BUT-what would be done with the land once it is cleaned up?
Would it be developed or restored for natural areas? 1 would have appreciated mom information on
this.
I can certainly support the need in identify these areas BUT I'm not sure I'm happy about the city paying
- for the dean-up. lF'hose land is it-who caused the contamination? Sure hope city SS are only used to
identify the areas and identify those who should pay for the rehab.
Yes-I'm sure many people would volunteer to help with a project like this.
The city should not have to bear the majority of this expense. Either the owner cleans up the property
prior to sale,or the price is adjusted down to reflect the expense the city will incur.
Very expensive-is this a realistic M$wise)goal
5/25/99 Letter ftom concern for Has a problem with expanding Old Town into undeveloped areas near the river. Opposed to any plans
citizen environment that will develop currently undeveloped areas along the Poudre River in the downtown area. All areas
along the river should remain natural and protected. Absolutely no residential,commercial,or
business development should occur on the floodplain. Every time a field is developed,thousands of
plants are destroyed,and probably an equal number of creatures are killed or evicted in the process.
The undeveloped areas along the river should remain undeveloped,preventing any flood damage
problems in the future. Human convenience and economic gam should NOT take precedence over
survival rights of the environment and its non-human inhabitants!
5/19/99 Natural Do you have a feel for how much time,money and effort the NRD has spent on the Poudre River
Resources Corridor? They've spent millions of dollars for the purchase of open space land. It seems that would
Advisory Board outweigh any comments from the special interest groups. I hope you keep that in mind when,you
hear all the comments. In more;of contentious issues,how does the idea of no Jcvelopment in the
1(91-year floodplain impact this?
Who arc the main players?
We should refer to the Oxbow natural area,instead of the Oxbow amphitheater.
When you re making presentations in the Chamber and other businesses,what is their vision?
They're still considering sires near the river for a major arts complex,they'd like to gtit a close to the river
as possible. Don't want the City to be an enabler of river development Shouldn't invest a lot of
infrastructure in the atea The City shouldn't talk out of both sides of its mouth;no development-but
leis build a horticulture center or amphitheater. There are those who think cleaning up the rim
means picking up litter,removing np-rap and making it look like a park. Thais not what we want to
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 62
Appendix D - Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
do. I appreciate the work you're doing What s the time-table on this?
Where's the$200,000 boat chutes that are being funded out of conservation trust monies?
That's part of a settlement for a water rights cue. The City won a mcreational water right
We should have been in the loop.
Need to reiterate the issue of stabdvation,whatever we do to stabilize the river has impacts up-stream
and down-stream,potentially causing the need for additional stabilization. Stabilization should be
minimized,used only to protect critical facilities. The City ought to deal with the north side of the
river in terra of acquisitions. The south side is trashed and developed The north side is partially
trashed,but is pretty natural. If kayaking facilities are going to be developed and provided on the river,
the access points need to be placed in areas where they will do the least impact They most be
carefully planted Passing by has much less impact than landing on the bank and going ashore.
It's not just about qualification,but also making sure we do access points well to minimize damage.
It's interesting they want to Propose a slalom course in town and at Gateway Park
5/14/99 e-mail from I am aware that Central Pre-Mix is not light industry,1 do know what it is,and feel it should be limited.I
citizen look to the day when Central Pre-Mix and Ranchway leave,at that time I would hope that rezoning of
the entire area would come up for review. 1 feel that area is best suited for offices,small retail stores,
cafes and expensive condos. History will one day prove mu,correct The flood plain isn't so complex
that we can fad to see what is important and what is less so. Nothing is of more value than human life,
that is followed by real estate value&,we simply have m look at it from that point of view.
5/12/99 e-mail from I oppose any light manufacturing in that area...period! I would love to see both Rmchway,Kiefas and
citizen others relocated! I support strongly my and all effom to"eliminate the possibility of my flooding in
the downtown area...we must value human life and property values,more than anything else." Maybe
in the past it has flooded,this should only strengthen our resolve to prevent it in the future,regardless
of the cost The river must be"channeled safety through downtown"once it passes through the city,
then we can concentrate on other ideas,less costly to human life and property damages. I would like
to we an end to talk about 100-year floodplains,by relocating them to someplace more downstream.
5/3/99 Floodplain No new development If the area is already developed,then it should be allowed to redevelop as long as riparim areas are not
Regulations Task in the impacted
Force floodplain...Should Areas should be allowed to rebuild if they are elevated above the 100-year floodplain. An example would
areas like this already have structures on silts to allow the water to flow under the structure.
developed be allowed The area should be allowed to redevelop as long as the new structure meets cmera,resulting in a better
to redevelop? structure.
Redevelopment should not be allowed in the floodplain.
Areas that are disturbed in the floodplain should be reclaimed as open lands as much as possible.
If redevelopment is to take place it should be away from the bank of the river and on the outer edge of
the flondplain.Or was noted the current City P/nx buffer limits would require this.)
Structures should be allowed to expand if it can be shown there is less impact to the floodplain.
There should be a long range plan or vision for the river corridor and this would direct which areas world
be allowed to expand or redevelop and others when the lands should be reclaimed for open space.
Define"no development'so developed open space can't be tamed into structures.
Financial gain for property,owners should be defined as keeping property owricts whole.
Devclopmmt credits should be allowed for reducing the risk along the river corridor by transferring those
rights to lands where that risk doesn't apply.
5/3/99 Floodplam Should additions be You must either allow the expansion that would meet adopted criteria or purchase the pmpery. Treat
Regulations Task allowed for existing the alreadv developed areas differently than those areas that are open. Allow additions or expansions
Force structures? If so, as long as the floodplain and riparian areas are not impacted.
what would the For residential developed areas,expansion should be allowed as long as there is no impact to the
elevation, floodplain and riparian areas.
floodproofing
requirements be?
5/3/99 letter from citizen Recently visited a river project in Calgary,Alberta,Canada. They had a problem that we should address:
geese. Pond,amphitheater,plea,bile/pedestrian path attracted geese and ducks. Simple things like
an 18"metal flower border fence around the area can detract the geese from gathering
5/3/99 Floodplain Do you feel Fill should be allowed in areas that are already established,but not off by themselves. The City of Fort
Regulations Task exceptions could be Collins is currently mare restrictive than the FEMA minimum
Force allowed in certain Fill should be allowed to protect existing properties.
circumstances-for The topography shouldn't change in change the floodplain,i.e.compensatory storage.
instance to protect The current FEMA regulations allow properties to fill with in the floodplain and change the FE AA maps.
established Then anything would be allowed at that location because the floodplain restrictions arc removed with
neighborhoods-to a the map amendment It was felt that once in the floodplain,always in the floodplain and floodphun
.no fill"policy? regulations should always apply to that property no matter what the propert owner does with it
" The degree of impact will need to be defined.That impact may be defined as not creating my mom thin
a"zero"rise. It can't be arbitrary. The definition should stare"no-rise"and"no-rerouting"of the
channel.
The fill that is allowed should be such that properties are connected to dry land and not done in a way to
create islands.
Fill without rise is OK as long m it has no habitat impacts.
A completely"no-fdl"policy is OK and there shouldn't be any exceptions.
The river will do what it wants m do. Current design criteria for the city and FEMA requires the taking
into account the stability of the river.
Allow redevelopment and at the same time reclaim the river so everyone benefits.
Allow expansion of die Old Town area on the north side of the rem,but keep it outside of the
floodptain.
5/3/99 Floodplain What items would you Washable architecture would be allowed as long as;riparian areas are not impacted.
Regulations Task consider recreational Cost of these facilities isn't an issue.
Force related structures of Washable architecture should not be allowed in the floodplain.
nominal expense? Trails are being moved and located away from the riverbank as much as possible.
Pavement increases the volume of runoff and impacts water quality. There are measures that can be done
to mitigate these effects.
5/3/99 Floodplain Do you feel that If a property is destroyed by any means and is in the floodplahr,it should not be allowed to rebuild The
Regulations Task established residential property should be made whole by a combination of the collection of insurance and purchase of the
neighborhoods like remaining property.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 63
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Force this one should be Caution that degraded or blighted areas are not created.
protected from If we don't protect these areas,and then we're allowing them to be destroyed,so we can purchase them at
flooding if technically a lower price after the flooding.
feasible and cost Areas should not be protected from flooding. Floodproofing doesn't solve the problem.
effective? The course of action to either protect or allow structures or to keep areas structure free should be site
specific and based on a vision for that area
Protecting property should be an option if it is feasible,doesn't create a rise in the floodplain,and is cost
effective.
The current criteria allow destroyed properties to rebuild if they meet current criteria. This is too loose;if
destroyed they shouldn't be allowed back
If a master plan is developed and shows purchasing as the best option,then those properties should be
Purchased
Levees should not be allowed if they impact habitat
If levees are built and fail,then they should not be repaired and property owners ace on their own.
5/3/99 Floodplain Would this be Current criteria allow remodels to take place up to 5(P/of the value of the structure before that structure
Regulations Task allowed? Could this must comply with the code. That number is too high,it should be around 25'1/4.
Force be an exception in the The footprint shouldn't be allowed to increase.
no-fill policy? Should be allowed as long as there is not a rise in the floodplain.
(Remodels of existing
structures that exceed
W16 of the value of
the structure
4/27/99 letter sent to Bill We have reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of both the Lee Martinez Park site and the CSU site
Beztsehv We don't see any overwhelmingly compelling arguments for or against either of them. It appears
either would function adequately as a Horticulture Center. Locating the Horticulture Center in Lee
Martinez Park would have an important and positive impact on downtown Fort Collins. The sense of
community felt by the people of Fort Collins manifests itself in a notable manner they consider the
downtown area in be the heart of the City. R seems eminently sensible(and perhaps a responsibility)
to nurture and encourage this sense of community. We like the idea of a partnership.with CSU and
believe such a partnership could still function with the Horticulture Center in a downtown location.
4/26/99 letter sent to Jack objection to Notification of objection to application filed by the City of Fort Collins and the Union Pacific Railroad in
Baier,Public application filed docket#99A-131R regarding the grade crossing at Linden Street in Fort Collins.
Utilities
Commission
4/26/99 letter sent to John As a result of these workshops regarding the appearance and function of linden Street,it would seem
Fischbach from premature to construct the grade crossing until we know what the street is going to look like. As per
the Property the enclosed letter I have advised the Public Utilities Commission that I intend to protest the
Owners Assn. construction of this grade crossing. It would certainly be sensible for the Cin,to withdraw its
application with the PUC at this time and submit it later.
4/22/99 letter sent to Bill Thank you for recent letter. Look forward to continued cooperation between the Cin•and the River
Sears from James Corridor Property Owners Association both in the design and construction of storm drainage
Rose,Utilities improvements;in the area
Project Manager
4/20/99 River Corridor Fill and (Oxbow and Unk'n Greens sites)This is one of the most contentious sites along this piece of the river.
Task Force redevelopment in the If this site were to be considered for some type of re-development,what ideas arc there for this spot? -
1Gnutes downtown area If it were turned into something with a low intensity usage,would it still need to be an untouchable
area? What kind of redevelopment would be appropriate between Linden and Lincoln Street?
4/20/99 River Corridor Once you put structures in the floodphun,you have problems up and down steam. We Jon t want to
Task Force generate the need to armor the river up and down stream. Lets not exacerbate the situation by
Minutes building in the floodpWn. This is a logical area to use as an extension of the downtown. It's dose,it
has amenities that the downtown is missing;a park There is a lot of good potential there.
We need to remember that its the old river channel. If you start talking about this ripe of development,
you need to talk about how to protect this part of the river. I have many concerns about developing in
the Oxbow. Riparian areas are pretty resilient They tend to restore themselves rather quickly.
When you start talking about adding development,you increase the level of protection required for
that area The west side of the river has low vegetation. There would be an opportunity to restore
this. It would make the sight much more attractive. You would need some level of setback
Some son of public use such as an old-time park,a performing arts center or library small enough to keep
the riparian areas alone. There is about 18 inches of rise that would protect it from the floodplain.
Maybe some softer stuff such as an old-time park The truck mute could prove to be a large barrier. The
radmad tracks will eventually go away near Ranchwav Feeds.
On the eutside,nothing has been done to protect the residential area
Map shows that it is a riparian area and is in the floodplain and the flood way. Then is a section closest
to the met that has been a dump for cement products. Is there some sort of development along
Buckingham that would be consistent with maintaining a riparian habitat Clean up the concrete site,
but don't build there.
4/17/99 letter sent to Jay Thank you for appearing at 4/8 workshop. Appreciated assurances that the storm drain proposed to
Rose cress the Mawson and Kiefer properties will be mmuted onto existing City rights-of-way and would
not bisect those two properties.
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#5:Purchase Q:Should established neighborhoods be protected From flooding if technically feasible and cost
comments to areas where floods effective? A: We encourage purchasing floodplain properties...not budding levees. We believe them
Floodplain Task could cause loss of life is federal funding to help move people out of floodplains,and the costs of doing so now are probably
Force and personal danger, much less expensive than the costs of protecting floodplain residents from inevitable flooding...and
and convert to parks the costs of dealing with the consequences of such flooding.
or open spaces
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#4:Regulate the We an extremely concerned about this. The Chamber of Commerce appears it)want to redevelop this
comments to Old Town section of area We believe they would like to redevelop retail and restaurant space right up to the river bank
Floodplain Task the floodplain \C'e want to oppose this. The City needs to mandate that setbacks and pmtection for the river be
Force diffemndy than other honored to protect the river. Riparian vegetation should be restored wherever possible out to the
reaches(this section is nunumum setbacks required by Goy Plan.
fully developed with
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 64
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
lots of public
infrastructure).
4/15/99 land owner Neighborhood Why am bikes more important here than in 2011 block of linden? City response Bikes important here as
design charette Comments part of collector street links. Maybe this can be a dismount area,leave bike circulation on Trail and
Lincoln Avenue. This part of Linden is not the same character as other collectors(Swallow and
Boardwalk Drive) City response:May have a different character than other collector streets. Possibly
lower level of service for can,higher for pedestrians. Transportation response:Modeling must be
done to determine volumes. When will linden extend to Redwood? This extension will greatly affect
this area Semi trucks/access must be maintained! Fancy curbs might get tom up. Not just a token
access lane. Option D can not work because trucks cant turn left Option C is a great idea,or
dismount zone. Focal point north of river is a great idea. Can Tom Chandler(RE Kief rt/
Amphitheater Property) There is a need NOW for more packing especially near EI Burrito. Don't
forget potential for horticultural center in this area along with other potential projects. Keep current
access to businesses. Railroad crossing arms could be designed as unique,artistic.
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#1:No new Q: Should areas already developed be allowed to redevelop(tear down buildings and mbuild)?A No.
comments to development on the We believe that policies should encourage mlocation out of the 100-year floodplain.
Floodplain Task 100-year floodplain
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#2,No new Q: What items would you consider"recreation-related of nominal expense? Should these items be
comments to development on the "washable architecture"?(can be washed over during a flood without any damage). What about
Floodplain Task 100-year floodplain structures or landscape features designed to survive a I00-year event that am expensive to build? A
except for natural area Parks or natural am amenities(e:sign describing wildlife). We do not consider such items m be
Force and mcmtional- large,human-focussed structures that would change the floodplain.
related structures of
nominal expense.
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#8:Amend Subdivision/zoning code as floodplain/city regulations am amended so that all Cim mbvlations am
comments to zoning code consistent
Floodplain Task
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#G:Implement a Exceptions should not be allowed in certain circumstances to build levees to protect a neighborhood
comments to no till"policy for the
Floodplain Task Poudm River
Force floodplain.
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#2 No mobile Do NOT build mobile home parks on floodplam
comments to home parks on
Floodplain Task floodplain
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#10:Use Use variances in address special circumstances
comments to variances
Floodplain Task
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#7:Redefine the The definition should be expanded as: Presently NO critical facilities can be built on the 500-year
comments to term"critical" flaodplain. Currently,the requirements define"critical facilities"as:"structures or facilities that
Floodplain Task facilities produce,use or store highly volatile,flammable,explosive,tone and/or water mactive materials;
hospitals,nursing homes and housing likely to contain occupants who may not be sufficiendy mobile
Force to avoid death or injury during a flood;police stations,fire stations,vehicle and equipment storage
facilities,and emergency operations centers." Some members of the Task Forte would like the
definition to include large retail srom that store and sell toxic product;(automotive oil,cleaning
products,poisons,eta),as,well as daycare facilities(since young children may not be mobile enough to
avoid injury during a flood). -
4/15/99 Sierra Club Itern#fs:Implement a Q:If remodeling exceeds 50'!6 of square footage of the original dwelling,the remodeled dwelling must
comments to "no fill"policy for the meet flood elevation requirements(18"above base flood elevation),and this could involve fill. Could
Floodplain Task Poudre River this be an exception to the"no fill"policy? A: We strongly believe there should be a no exceptions -
Force floodplain. policy for the floodplain. We are concerned that any further modifications of the floodpiain/floodway
will have deleterious consequences downstream upstream
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#1&2 reactions Some Sierra Club members preferred#1;others preferred#2 However,them was a common concern
comments to that#2 would allow the City to build an amphitheater and possibly an arts center in the oxbow section
Floodplain Task of the downtown area The Sierra Club does not agree with such use of that area of the floodplain.
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#3:limit Development should be limited on the 500-ycar floodplain with mom restrictive requirements.
comments to development on 500-
Floodplain Task yr floodplain
Force
4/15/99 Transportation ConsiderJimey service for area
Board
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#1:No new Q. Should additions be allowed for existing structures? If so,additions would have to meet elevation and
comments to development on the floodproofmg requirements(may involve fill to meet elevation requirements--this is an issue for idea
Floodplain Task 100-yea floodplain #G).
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#12 Riparian Riparian Issue Restrict commercial development and prohibit fill. Also,look at development impact
comments to issue issues beyond just water surface elevation rise(for example,consider increases in stream velocity,
Floodplain Task erosion issues,habitat issues,etc.)
Force
4/15/99 Sierra Club Item#11:Notify Notify property owners of floodplain status through lenders,realtors,developers,community leaders,and
comments to property owners of public servants,utilities(phone,gas,water/sewer,and electric),and possibly through property tax
Floodplain Task floodplain status statements.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 65
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Continent
Force
4/8/99 Land owner Jefferson Street Make crossing Jefferson a pedestrian-friendly experience. Slow traffic to 25 MPH. Make the signal light
design charette at Linden mom pedestrian-sensitive. At Present it takes a pedestrian forever to get a walk signal.
Install walk lights at Pine with instant response to pedestrians like those at Oak and College. Install
visibly marked brick paved crosswalks(not raised like those on Cherry Street)to visually invite
pedestrians across Jefferson. Paint stop lines perpendicular to traffic for vehicles to stop behind like
we used to have,not the present guesswork crosswalk lines painted parallel to traffic. Personal
observation in other cities(and some places in Ft Collins)suggests to me that traffic snips much less
often inside the crosswalk when perpendicular lines are used. Lines painted perpendicular to traffic
create a visual barrier for can to stop behind. Pedestrians soon[cam they cannot safely trust the
content p2rallel4ined cross walks. Consider some kind of stone or brick enm posts,perhaps similar to
those at the north entrance ro the CSU oval.
4/8/99 Land owner Street Lights Install a double set high ones for lighting,low ones for visual effect They should be something like old-
design charette time gas lights or like the street lights from Ft Collins in the 1940s. The lower lights on Mason Street
and in Old Town would be too modem and out of character historically.
4/8/99 Land owner New sroms sewer across properties,35'wide,no buildings in easement,parking o.k Utility easements
design charette- need m be obtained From property owners,they need to know all issues about allowed uses within
Linden Street casements.BE HONEST! Property owners would prefer sewer be located in street or public R.O.W.
Group Linden Street Diagonal parking preferred by landowners over parallel parking.;S.Edministec Look
instead at off-street parking.;May need to look at partnering with city.;Employees will dominate on-
street parking. Need access for everything from bicycles to semis. Curb cut widths need to
accommodate large vehicles. Agricultural/Industrial theme rather than?Cutesv Retail????Urban?cafe
seating in 18'walks does not fit,maybe 6-10'wide. Or,may look at wider,urban walls if existing
uses are not affected Sidewalks should not preclude parking Redevelopment?options must not
preclude existing uses. Need object to draw pedestrians to river from Linden. River should be the
amenity. Enhance Gustav Swanson Natural Area,make safe. Nerd to mmove barriers blocking
pedestrian from getting to the river. Railroad tracks with additional barricades will be worse for
pedestrians. Need lighting for safety. Lighting should reflect industrial character. Amphitheater at
Keifei s property would make a strong community draw,but Keifer needs a home for his existing
business. Artist's studios,pottery studios would be appropriate mixed with industrial uses. Use
r ulmad as a theme. Opportunity for interpretation in park adjacent to Railroad Jefferson station as
Hub/Depot for future Light Rail. Amphitheater should be a?namal?rather than urban setting.
Railroad arms,if necessary,should be historic in character. Willow Street seems too small for null race
-look at river instead,possibly a water wheel. Use of water feature or fountain as a pedestrian draw
toward river,or series of features along Linden Street -
4/8/99 Land owner Coordinate smim drainage work with street improvements. Concern for future traffic volumes
design charette- (automobile)on Linden and Willow and speed of traffic. Intersection of Lincoln and%Villow=tnffic
Willow Street speeds am a concern. Shortage of parking Lack of police Patrol of area. Additional street lighting
street trees(no shrubs). Get funding support for street improvements. Reduce amount of time
Group businesses are"cut off"during construction. User-friendly(Pedestrian-f ietdly)
environment._sidewalks and mom parking needed. Embrace the river. Bike Police. Eclectic style
encouraged. -
4/8/99 Land owner Parking Undoubtedly we can use several strategically m located public parking lots. I already get cars fm Old
design charette Town parking in front of and beside my budding. Public parking would surely be utilized by parsons
and employees from Old Town as well as from our area. Select the curb-side parking style that is the
most visually appealing and functionally best for pedestrians and bike riders,probably parallel parking -
4/8/99 Land owner Bike Lanes In addition to bike lanes on Linden,locate bike lanes along the 200-and 44NI-bloc"-of Pine Street and
design charette connect them through the west end of the Jefferson Park,utilizing walk lights at Pine. The bike path
along the river already connects with in at R illow Street as well as at the Norrhside Community
Center. For bicycles the walk light at Pine and Jefferson would facilitate crossing Jefferson
4/8/99 Land owner Diminishing the Do not install signals or crossing yams. These add,not eliminate,a barrier. 1°ii in tracks so they are flush
design charette ndmad tracks as a with the ground and are pedestrian-friendly fmm Linden to at(east Jefferson Station. Make them
barrier visually invisible. Skaters,baby strollers,cm.should be able to safely cross them
4/8/99 Land owner Draw people across Have a major feature at the Poudre River plainly visible down Linden Street fmm Jefferson Street so it
design charette Jefferson draws people across Jefferson. Possibilities: a monument'gateway to the river,high arch over the
bridge,stone entry posts to the bridge,flags,a statue,spot lights at night,light the bridge,paint the
bridge using historical colon.
4/8/99 Land owner Landscaping Need lots of trees where feasible. 7i low,Linden,Lincoln)and as large as practicable. Install a
design charette generous number of benches. Each bench might be under a street light and a tree with pleasant
landscaping close by creating an inviting resting place. Install strategically placer"bike ticks. Use old-
style conventional bike racks,not the modem,ineffective,curvy pipe-things the city has gone to.
Create an inviting,elm,pedestrian-friendly corridor to the river.
4/8/99 Land owner Street signs Should follow historical theme,including lettering,design,and posts.
design charette
4/8/99 Land owner Sidewalks on Linden Same width as 20o block of Linden Street. Both sides. Same flower boxes as 21a1 block
design charerte Street
4/8/99 Land owner Jefferson Park Recognize that it is also a barrier at present(space people must walk past) Eliminate parking in park
design chasette Needs landscaping,including flower beds. At present it has only gnus and trees. Relocate sidewalk-
back from curb on Jefferson so pedestrians won't feel threatened by passing traffic. Consider a
feature,such as a lighted,active fountain. Should be historically appropriate. Should be well lighted
for safety and be inviting at night The park should not be a hangout or loitering place for anyone
Eliminate transients,drunks,pan handler,criminals,and drug dealers. Be sensitive to the needs of the
homeless. Need benches,picnic cables and lighted toilets. Consider an old-fashioned,historically
appropriate concession stand A visible police presence might be advantageous.
3/22/99 Letter from Site-specific ideas for Expressed appreciation for work on the DRCIP;intention to the Chamber River Task Force meeting on
citizen downtown corridor 4/20/99;Personal thoughts: Legacy Park revitalized w/increased parking area. Walking path around
Program perimeter-along river;possible dog Park Rehabilitate fitness tail at Lee Martinez Park Bridal path
along side bike trail between Lee Martinez Park and Taft Hill Road. Outdoor amphitheater at
"Martinez Island"(open area bounded by N.College,the river,the bike path,and the Hickory Street
access path). Commcmal/Light Industrial zoning along Vine Drive. Extcni ran of Gustave Swanson
nature area under RR bndgc,along river to College Avenue. Sire to include kayakmb put-in. Tires
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 66
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment.
planted between bike path and Power Plant. Refurbish storage buildings at Power Plant Suspended
pedestrian bridge Southeast side of RR bridge from Azdan to Gustav Swanson. Evergreens along
fence between Gustave Swanson and self-storage units. Tiered river embankment at Azdan to Linden
Street Purchase private property between Azdan and United Way budding for additional parking.
Picnic tables in area between United Way and Linden Street Raise Linden Street south of river in
accommodate pedestrian/bike tunnel under roadway. Pedestrian/bike bridge on east side of Linden
bridge. Sm tscape Linden m Vine Drive. Commercial zoning on south bank from Linden in Lincoln
Street with minimal buffer(30 Feet?)-Cafe,[coed shop,coffee bar,etc. Tiered embankment on both
sides from Linden Street to Udall natural area with river access points. Levee amund perimeter of
oxbow site.(old river bed). Performing Arts Center at oxbow site with parking sculpture garde[[,
bandstand,and picnic area. Upgrade Lincoln Street to cement roadway standards. Encourage
commercial redevelopment along Lincoln Street from Riverside in aitpark. L vec between river and
Miller Bros.Terminal. (noise abatement and flood control). Increase current setback on northeast
bank by 50 feet to accommodate levee and widened trail. Parking/transit center at miller Bms./Team
Petroleum sites. Bike/pedestrian bridge southeast of Lincoln Street bridge to Dorothy Udall area.
Walking path along bank of river,bike path along RR tracks in Dorothy Udall aria. Udall area
designed as retention during 500 year event.(will this alleviate threat in"triangle"and Buckingham
neighborhood?) Encourage cement use of Link'n Greens site. Bike trail access along Mulberry
directly to Pickle Plant sire. Upgrade Riverside Avenue in torrent roadway standards. Redevelop
Pickle Plant site as"River Heritage Park". Pedestrian/bike access only from trail,Riverside Avenue,
and Mulberry Street City authorized vehicle access through water treatment plant Two-deep tree line
between RR and park along Riverside. Park opens to Mulberry Street Information booth and
- interpretive stations amund oval"square'with sculpture fountain at the center. Picnic area between
"square"and Udall area. Named in honor of Howard Alden. Possible funding through"Poudw Rivet
Corridor Commission." Non sire-specific ideas: "Gas lamp"lights along bike path through
downtown corridor. Walking path should consist of natural material and follow existing social read$
where possible. Asphalt path replaced with concrete and widened to 6 foot standard. Where bikes
and pedestrian converge,increase path width to 10 feet Frequent trash receptacles(oil barrels
provided by Team Petroleum);painted by school kids depicting over aspects and maintained weekly by
the City through sponsorship program(businesses/organizations/individuals"buy"a trash can to
cover maintenance costs). Funding sources include"River Redevelopment Authority"(DDA II),with
expanded boundaries in include all adjacent commercial zones.
3/10/99 letter sent to Future railroad (1)Safety: This is not a dangerous crossing. Vehicle traffic is not fast due to the character of the
Mark Seals crossing guard on intersection. Very few trains cross Linden. Therefore we cannot see the mend of installing a crossing
Linden Street device for safety reasons.
(2)Engines with strings of rail cars often park on both sides of Linden,just clear of the street If the
trains did not move far enough along the tracks m clear the sensors that activate the signal,then the
signal might be activated for lengthy and unreasonable periods of time.
(3)We are trying in improve the appearances of this area and think that the addition of ugly signals with
cross arms would be adverse in this effort.
(4)Crossing guards would create an additional barrier to travel down Linden Street from Old Town. We
already have the barriers of Jefferson Street with its traffic speed,volume and charscer:the sluggish
tnffrc light for Linden Street cross-traffic;the railroad tracks;the psychological barrier of the open
space of the park;and the park threatening population of transients and drug dealers. We believe we
should be decreasing barriers,not increasing them.
(5)Them is very limited room on Linden for traffic in stop on the Jefferson side of the track..,. Even now
whim traffic must stop for a train,it can create a bottleneck at the Jefferson/Linden intersection. A
crossing guard could substantially increase the time and amount of traffic that wen:backed up,
especially if the train moved slowly,which it always does. This could increase the accident potential of
this intersection.
(6)The future character of this area is just barely beginning to develop. Until that character develops and
the usage of Linden Street is established it seems premature to suppose what this crossing needs in the
way of traffic control(if any). We believe that commonsense dicrates that crossing guards are not
needed on Linden.
12/5/98 Comments from First phase response 12/4/98 a meeting of the impacted property owners rook place. The recognition that growth will come
impacted to conceptual to this area was accepted The willingness to be involved in a pro-active way to help influence this
property owners drawings growth was coupled with dear statements that there is some"lack of trust"and a fear that this group's
_concerns and needs will not be honored by the planning process(City). Individual property owner
meeting rights must be protected and defended if necessary. Why wasn't the consultant that did the drawings
perceptive enough to talk to some of the Iniks that would be impacted the most--the property owners.
Planning for the area that doesn't take into account some need for semi traffic to support several of
the large businesses was again seen that"industry was planned out of existence." Mixed use in this
area was not seen as bad by our gathering and hopes were expressed that it should be continued.
Although some industry may find doing business at other locations worth making the move because of
the increased value of this land,other businesses are more historic and can't be moved(Ranch Way)
and their operation should be respected. The undeveloped comer of Willow and Linden may have
some"opportunities"for enhancements but should be controlled by the owners. This realignment of
Alalow is very important to future development of this arm. An obvious observation that seems at
issue is the City creating plans that take historic pmperties out of the picture(Life Training Center,El
Burrito). Mixed uses will likely be played out in the fumm. Another concern expressed was the issue
of rising real-estate taxes that might not keep up with expected increases in business income. Another
concern-tax issues and how some of the improvements will be paid for. Priorities: need m realign
Willow Street(and Linden)allowing for semi traffic. The expectation that waste water(utilities issues)
would need completion before Willow Stint realignment could be accomplished. Requesting that
each owner be sent a map of the area in question and a copy of zoning information.
11/10/98 Working group Implementation Don't have DDA lead this effort;Don't consider CDBG;GOCO grants=can acquire land;Need public
meeting Discussion coalition of support-to include different interests;Can have an executive director for fundraising;
projects;public relations;Modify DDA to accommodate other points of viav;-Ibis am needs
something broader than the DDA;Any agreement with Wal-Mart on Tax Increment Financing?
(needs to have Council approval);Different strategies for different areas:Green areas=natural areas
+stonnwater,Community center/recreation=parks;Private development fund other types of
improvements;Like concept of Urban Renewal Authority-a new organization. Can this overlap with
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 67
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
existing organizations?
I1/10/98 Working group Reactions to Like pedestrian use. Will have conflicts between peds&bikes on path;Shift in rail along Riverside would
meeting Conceptual"Bubble allow alternative modes to use Jefferson condor;Does Bill Neal have any interest in redevelopment
Diagram" area?;How often are rids used;Site of Triangle-difficult to deal with because of floodplain;Keeping
development out of floodplain is encouraging;Have separate paths between Linden and Lincoln
Sneed&in high use areas;Like softening of banks;Make Jefferson more inviting,Big issue:
availability of parking. Discuss shuttle.;Investigate City and County land near Oxbow site for parking
&shuttle system;Investigate triangle redevelopment area.for parking.;Pursue porosity across
Riverside from adjacent neighborhoods for pedestrians
11/10/98 Working group Public process Consider broader community input-i.e.more open houses;Important in get high level of property
meeting owner supper%
8/5/98 Poudre River As a group,the board felt that the discussion of flood plain management needed balance whereby
Trust Board of property owners accepted responsibility for the risks associated with Flood plain development;
Trustees Meeting Property owners am concerned that policy restrictions will greatly compromise the value of their land
8/5/98 Poudre River Bike lane needed,if only on one side,since people do want to ride to the River from downtown
Trust Board of
Trustees Meeting
8/5/98 Poudre River Expressed support for public/private development projects on,or near his property that would enhance
Trust Board of the area,but was very concerned about owning property that would be devalued by City policy
Trustees Meeting decisions. In particular,he did not want the City to decide that his property could not be redeveloped
since,according to aerial surveys,it was in the flood plain. His particular business would be better
suited for a dif&rent am,but not all his neighbors feel the same way.; Questioned how many acres
were included in the condor being discussed and how much of that is owned by the City.
Additionally,what was the definition of Flood Plain,versus Flood Way.
8/5/98 Poudre River Questioned whether there is sufficient room for sidewalks,trees and bike lanes on both sides of Linden
Tract Board of Street Bike lane needed,if only on one side.
Trustees Meeting
8/5/98 Poudre River Support for public/private development projects on,or near his property that would enhance the area,
Trust Board of but very concerned about owning property that would be devalued by City policy decision. Not want
Trustees Meeting City to decide that his property could not be redeveloped
8/5/98 Poudre River If traffic speeds could be controlled,the need for separate bike lanes could be eliminated.
Trost Board of
Trustees Meeting
5/7/98 Downtown Concern over the"Oxbow Site"indicated as a natural area on map;Ensure that the boundaries of natural
Development area inventory are firmly grounded in science;See this am as an extension of downtown;don't
Authority preclude river related developmenr,
5/6/98 Natural Don't do anything to encourage more use of the river,Provide a separate comment list for the
Resources Downtown River Corridor Working Group-don't trust this group. Don't think thev are officially
Advisory Board recognized.;No development in floodplain;Retain current businesses that am in the redevelopment
area;City should not give incentives to encourage growth in the river area;Do not extend the DDA;
Respect the value of the river,Don't put an outdoor amphitheater along river
5/1/98 Plarmarig and Ensure that City plays a proper role-encourage private investment in the aura
Zoning Board
4/15/98 Transportation Improve pedestrian connections throughout area;Include Buckingham&Alta Vista Neighborhoods in
Board planning
4/3/98 Environmental Scale of Bill Neal's project too large for area; Environmental community says don't put permanent
Brown Bag structures in floodplam;Ensure purpose of protecting floodplain is retained;Ensure that the river is.
Lunch Group enhanced as a wildlife condor,Kayak course is OK as long as people are not encouraged to use the
river more
3/17/98 Working group #4 River ADDITIONS: Boutique environment(Breckenridge example);Theme-don't forger(fort);District-
Comments Redevelopment Area theme important river,railroad;Deal with Riverside/Jefferson street,now a barter. 'rum into an
opportunity connections to old town,ped-friendly,etc.; If better for hotel/convention site,might
-pursue Auntie store's mill race(runnel)
3/17/98 Working group General to the project ADDITIONS: People-Friendly Transportation Patterns;Consider Pedestrian RADII(Walking Units)
comments area w/Developmen%Budd on Overall Theme of Education,Heritage General River Theme(Location);
Can We Locate Lee Martinez Foot/Cycle Bridge leg Link'n'Greens in Udall];Performing Arts Center,
DISAGREEMENTS: Urban Fishery,2 Trails walking and Other Along River;Aquarium Preservation
of Natural Riparian Zone;Extend Western Boundary 1/4 Mile to Integrate Lee Martinez;Overall
River-Floodplain management and Stream Stability
3/17/98 Working group #8 Pickle Plant Site ADDITIONS: Idea Benning along Riverside/Jefferson where tracks will be abandoned,would help
comments w/offsite floodplain mitigation;Potential of trade for floodplam areas(if access solved);Come to
Agreement on Gateway Concept.;CONSTRAINT: Access to Sire-Landlocked.-Access across
tracks-Illegal; DISAGREEMENTS: Expansion of Wastewater Treatment(Augment Capacity)
Disagree Odor,Residential,Too Close
3/17/98 Working group #7 Link N Greens CONSTRAINT: 'G Site in Flood Plain;Stability/Erosion Problems Near Mulberry Bridget,(Bikepath,
comments etc.);
3/17/98 Working group #1 Poudre River at ADDITIONS: Moving Gas Pumping Station(Gas Regulator),Improve Pedestrian Access at N.College
Comments College Avenue Area Bridge,(More Gateway),Amphitheater at Legacy Park
3/17/98 Working group #5 River Oxbow Site ADDITIONS: Linden Street"Escape Hatch"For Downtown-Modest Development Potential;
comments Transition But Sill Urban;Development Closer in Linden Street to Provide per.Connection;Match
Characteristics of Gustav Swanson-Mirrors;Integrate Both Side of River#4 And#5 Viewsheds,
Visual Connection;DISAGREEMENTS: Natural Vs.Developed Character,I low Par to Stretch Out
"Downtown"vs Keeping Compact
3/17/98 Working group #3 Northside Azdan ADDITIONS: Pin Park(Unused)out of Floodplain]Redevelopment of Site,Amphitheater Sire(Out
comments Community Center of Flood Plain),Comment Make No Decision until Azdan New Site Decision Reached
Site
3/17/98 Working group #2 Old Power Plant ADDITIONS: Back Side Potential Amphitheater Site,Redevelopment Opportunities South of Bridge,
comments Sire Privatizing W/covenants,Continuing Existing Use at Site(Periodic Loud Noise); Budd on Water and
Downtown River Condor Implementation Program 68
Appendix D -Public Comments
Date Event or Source Topic Comment
Historic Heritage(Water Heritage Museum);Relate Building to River Theme
3/17/98 Working group #6 Lincoln Street- ADDITIONS: Constrains Dealing with Petroleum contamination Site;Amphitheater(Washable
comments Poudre River Triangle Architecture);Showcase Mitigation Efforts. No Development. Open Space Important Linkage from
Link'N'Greens Site to Downtown;Parking Might Relieve Parking on Oxbow Site.) Mini-transit -
Center. Transfer m Downtown;DISAGREEMENTS: Special Redevelopment Project-Office
Education,Retail,Entcminment.Dining,Etc.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 69
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 70
Appendix E: Resolution to Acquire Certain Floodplain
Properties
RESOLUTION 2000-81
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO PURSUE THE ACQUISITION
OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE POUDRE RIVER FLOODWAY,
PRODUCT CORRIDOR AND FLOODPLAIN
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved on First Reading Ordinance No. 71, 2000,
making certain amendments to the City Code which will impose additional regulations (the
"Regulations") on real properties in the City that are situated within the Poudre River floodway,
product corridor and floodplain,as those terms are defined in the Regulations;and
WHEREAS,the purpose of the Regulations is to protect such properties from damage during
flooding and to protect the safety of persons occupying such properties;and
WHEREAS,the Regulations will generally prohibit all new structures within the floodway
and the product corridor;and
WHEREAS, the Regulations will permit commercial and industrial development in that
portion of the floodplain that is outside of the floodway and the product corridor,but will prohibit
the construction of new residential structures in such area unless property is removed from the
floodplain;and
WHEREAS,there are currently a number of structures within the floodway,product corridor
and floodplain that would be prohibited under the new Regulations referenced above (the
"Nonconforming Structures");and
WHEREAS,in order to more fully protect the property and lives of the residents of the City,
the Council believes that it would be desirable and in the best interests of the City if the City were
able to: (1)acquire such Nonconforming Structures and remove them and(2)acquire real property
in the floodplain so as to minimize the number of new structures constructed in the floodplain.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS as follows:
Section 1. That the City Manager is hereby directed to pursue the acquisition of the
Nonconforming Structures referenced above on a"willing seller,willing buyer"basis,subject to the
appropriation of the necessary funds for such acquisition,giving priority to those Nonconforming
Structures in the floodway and product corridor.
Section 2. That,if appropriate funding is available,the City Manager is further directed
to pursue the acquisition of any real property that is situated in the floodplain and outside the
floodway and product corridor.
Section 3. That nothing herein shall be construed to preclude the City from exercising
its power of eminent domain at such time, if at all, that the City Council determines that the
acquisition of any of the Nonconforming Structures is necessary in the public interest.
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 71
Appendix D -Floodplain Acquisition Resolution
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 6th day of June,A.D.
2000.
Mayor r
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Downtown River Corridor Implementation Program 72