HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-118-09/04/2001-APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE POLICY COMMITTEERESOLUTION 2001-118
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE POLICY COMMITTEE
WHEREAS,the Colorado Municipal League is an influential voice for municipal interests
on state and federal policies affecting municipalities;and
WHEREAS,the Colorado Municipal League is also an important source of information for
municipal officials in serving their communities;and
WHEREAS,the citizens of Fort Collins are best served by an informed and effective local
government;and
WHEREAS,the Colorado Municipal League Policy Committee is responsible forreviewing
legislative proposals and making recommendations to the League Executive Board;and
WHEREAS,the Policy Committee proposes to the Colorado Municipal League membership
revisions to the League’s policies which guide League positions on public policy issues affecting
municipalities;and
WHEREAS,it is in the best interest of the City of Fort Collins to have maximum
representation on the Policy Committee.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS that Mayor Ray Martinez and City Manager John F.Fischbach are hereby appointed to
represent the City of Fort Collins on the Colorado Municipal League Policy Committee.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 4th day of September,
A.D.2001.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
does not depend upon the process under which the Seneca Center was
reviewed and approved,but rather,upon the physical characteristics
of the Seneca Center,which characteristics fit the definition of a
“neighborhood center”as contained in the Land Use Code;and
(b)Steven Olt did not present evidence to the Board which was
substantially false or grossly misleading when he stated to the Board
that the reason for the separation requirements as established in the
Land Use Code is to prevent the proliferation of neighborhood
centers on arterial streets.
3.That the Board did not fail to properly interpret and apply relevant provisions
of the Code and Charter because:
(a)Seneca Center was reviewed and approved under the Land Development
Guidance System as a “neighborhood convenience shopping center”which
is the predecessor to the “neighborhood center”as contemplated in the
Land Use Code,and therefore,the separation requirement contained in
Sections 4.4(B)(3)(c)(l)and 4.4(D)(3)(b)should be applied to the
Appellant’s application,and
(b)The granting of the modifications requested by the Appellant would have
been detrimental to the public good,and the Appellant failed to persuade
the Council that the granting of the modifications would satisf~’the criteria
contained in Sections 2.8.2(H)(l),(2)or (3).
4.That the Council hereby upholds the decision of the Board denying the Appellant’s
request for modification of Land Use Code standards.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held this 4th day of September,
A.D.200l.7”
Mayor
ATTEST:
~~LA
City Clerk