Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2827 Sunset View Dr - Special Inspections/Engineering - 04/05/2016Foundation Wall Drain/ Void/Waterproofing Observation CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc. A AJ tee- -_ --ry rnvc t , CTL i TH®MPsON ADDRESS: r &Z y-i`er`2 i--4ZM S Z&? :77 Syic; w 2�2• - LOT BLOCK ZI FILING NO. PROJECT NO.4F-0 �OT q 7- 91b:U Foundation Plan Foundation Wall Layout BY �J� -171aM10SdAj PLAN NO. 1)t'144=5010. ©`7$ Foundation Type SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK inFOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER OEADLOAD _U o3-t 10 CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO. y�' U DATED NuV' t (1 i�l� Foundation Void •] REQUIRED THICKNESS INCHES MEASURED THICKNESS INCHES Foundation Wall Condition ❑ EXPOSED STEEL ❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.) (IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH) Recommended Drain Type ® EXTERIOR ❑ INTERIOR FIG. Cl INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER `I INCHES WALL HEIGHT 1 2-o INCHES DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH t 3 Z - ��� INCHES ❑ SLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR PIPE INSTALLED ❑ GRAVEL INSTALLED, GRAVEL SIZE Type of Outlet ❑ GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER [;5 SUMP PIT 5g UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB) fo Foundation Void: IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS REJECTED [ Foundation Wall Drain: IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED Foundation Waterproofing: '® IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED ❑ Exterior Insulation MANUFACTURER m HEIGHT FEET DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET N~ I I 1 l-_'-L. I I l I I- —LL ❑1_ II I l i__ f IIPP .� I• I I I I I _� i Irr-I` I II i � I i 1 ICI i t I l i t T ern y I. l i l U i RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE Nc ly D 'LU N sm a-tt— -c_ FIELD REPRESEVTIVp 00 i ^O APR 19 20. REVIEWED IfY �'•.O.00Oe,.��° G4< !,+ DATE OF OBSERVATION �9 it kk. Reinforcement onspecti®n CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc. 10 Inverness 'rive -East, Ste. -125 r-.11�-r ��'t."'^ ADDRESS: 15ZC.1470F, 1"AV&4 2 "Z-1. 5c, tj Sr t< \/i&,3 LOT 5_ BLOCK Z I FILING NO. JOB NO. 'Ff_QG _Y_7% 0100 Foundation Plan Foundation Wall Layout BY G ► L_L_+0A�p50 tJ : [2"A C EQP,6t _R`I6T 1QCK: PLAN NO. I��I���Q. ��Z DATE L Foundation Plan ❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK ❑ OTHER CTUTHOMPSON JOB NO. DATED WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET �. — INCHES Foundation Void XREQUIRED THICKNESS INCHES ❑ NOT REQUIRED Reinforcing Steel GRADE (to BAR SIZE ';jk+� NO.OF B S TOP 2) BOTTOM S, __FFJ VERTICAL S G Z4I[ OC HORIZONTAL' �Z� 3 Pow Instructions to Contractor )9�I1\1 GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN ❑ REJECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE EAr-0 `FI I_i F I FIF _:JAI f I C I I ��---'- ! -.I. ' •' 2 �-- I_�I--- UFER Grou)� n��d + Location of UFER Groundj1 LOCATION Z, C094-AQ(L 0 r C Cm ACa a4 Fc / F.1 a ///���❑ NOT INSTALLED ❑ NOT REQUIRED COMMENT: FIELD REPRESE ATIV 33103 �. REVIEWED"BY / �°�°1PR 1 '� [�J1b �,'-- DATE CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc. ADDRESS: 90-Invzrness-Drive-East,-Ste.125 Inc c►� r -.<- Fu.2s, Englewood, NCO-8Q'112 2 £s 2--7 S_wq z, r= r ,; , -- oa . LOT S BLOCK- ------- Z ------........---..._._.._....__.....-- -- ._........ _ att�1: Qt taF1 �Ell`� - ----- - - — FILING NO. - PROJECT NO: Hii GAS ! %• c> U Recommended Foundation System CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO. f r r (O -1 110030-) ZV DATED nl rau �llPj+�`CL . ZCUI LA V, SPREAD FOOTINGS G MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF 1600 PSF. MINIMUM WIDTH G CPA bS ZQX-Z _ INCHES FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF — PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE -BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF. MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH Foundation Plan BY C1 L TVaomp5o,- INCHES PLAN NO. �_b3��% • d, DATE f �( WALL FOOTING WIDTH I (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) COLUMN PADSeg 124-K^P'"5(INCHES) DEPTH 5�Ntk (INCHES) COLUMN PAD S,E�Q.C�lL1fL��S(INCHES)DEPTH 51501%wS(INCHES) REINFORCEMENTAS PER PLAN: 'YES ❑ NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED ❑ AT SITE g INSTALLED Soil Conditions At Footing Level UPPER LEVEL a.ft t 5Auj.�,yj of AQ-.._)- LOWER LEVEL OX" , 5Aur3!j , &AD 15T lbipwwj . 11w- Ground Water Conditions [ NONE IN EXCAVATION ❑ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING K ENCOUNTERED AT NO. TO FEET FEET IN BORING NO. 2 Remarks: &_L�Az Aox As V:-:nl u2w S -. A " V'x 13, Ie" 4 - S2" X t 2" g " Z-11 yze xk" ,5&_1,x z 2A" k U`'�cS� n- Ica"x3U"��" u2,1 X �AVI t= L 4" K IA4 `' X$' Cn • qJ7 Xi V' Foundation Layout l 1, syas�r ulcw © INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION Instructions to Contractor R FOOTING IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN ❑ FOOTING REJECTED ❑ CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION AS ANTICIPATED ❑ CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION NOT AS ANTICIPATED, CONTACT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE IV t FIELD REPRESENT IV �-Ii 04 �--A 38108 �. REVIEWED 1 ' �U 0.1 V 201 C- DATE OF OBSERVATION . eNAL co 0 0) a'> CLIENT: Toll Brothers, Inc. 10 Inverness Drive East, Ste. 125 Enalewood. CO 80112 : Brian Kel Soils Exposed in Excavation CTLITHOWSON ADDRESS: LOT r BLOCK Z f FILING NO. PROJECT NO. 6— Excavation Layout !i rli ! i —1 li�^I �r 1 I 1 I I i I Ground Water Conditions kNONE IN EXCAVATION ❑ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. TO FEET ENCOUNTERED AT_I�K FEET IN BORING NO. L5��� �( DRILLED DURING CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO%" &./ ✓7 DATED_//� REMARKS: Soils at Foundation Level UPPER LEVEL e4 , LOWER LEVEL 11 Recommended Foundation System SPREAD FOOTINGS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF. ❑ FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUMDEAD-LOAD MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF. MINIMUM DEAD -LOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS DESIGNED FOR: MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF. MINIMUM DEAD -LOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS MAXIMUM END PRESSURE OF PSF. SKIN FRICTION OF PSF. MINIMUM DEAD -LOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK MAXIMUM END PRESSURE OF PSF SKIN FRICTION OF PSF. MINIMUM DEAD -LOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS Instructions to Contractor CONDITIONS AS ANTICIPATED ❑ CONTACT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER jE57 Sal WLje -1-0 a J erly-F�l�/P� �, so -, / fo' Q ryj �lQ✓IGj�/ h� (.(� 7-/ IP ta^r �G G FIELD REPRESENT TIVE ✓ O° 38100 �. REVIEWED XX:APR 19 _ , 1t✓ ,. DATE OF OBSERVATION ......°.