Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2432 Copper Crest Ln - Special Inspections/Engineering - 08/15/2013ZU 3 2. euipp( C`f est l^ A.G. Wassenaar Z, penv�r, [ 22 —5 10 -7-7 8900o Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants www.agwassenaar.com August 15, 2013 Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc. I 6892 South Yosemite Court, Suite 1-201L_Centennial, Colorado 80112 � 111 '- , �J Attention: Mr. Michael Bird Subject: Soil and Foundation Study Proposed Residential Structure Lot 8, Block 12 Kechter Crossing Fort Collins, Colorado Project Number 130422 Purpose As requested, we have performed a soil and foundation study at the subject site. The purpose of our study was to observe subsurface conditions encountered and to recommend geotechnical design criteria for the design and construction of the foundation for the proposed residence. This letter presents a summary of our findings and recommendations. Subsurface Conditions The field exploration included drilling a 4-inch diameter auger boring near the center of the lot to a depth of approximately 20 feet. The subsurface materials encountered consisted of: 0' to 7' Fill, clay, stiff, silty, sandy, slightly moist to moist, brown 7' to 20' Clay, stiff, silty, very sandy, slightly moist to wet, brown to reddish brown Date of drilling: June 27, 2013 Depth to water: 17 feet at the time of drilling Destroyed 5 days after drilling Laboratory Testing Samples obtained during drilling were returned to the laboratory. They were visually classified and testing was assigned to selected samples in an effort to evaluate the engineering properties of the subsurface materials encountered. Site specific laboratory swell/consolidation tests exhibited no to low measured swell (0.0% at a depth of 4 feet and 0.2% at a depth of 9 feet) upon an increase in moisture content under a load of 1,000 pounds per square foot (psf). Based upon visual observation of the subsurface conditions encountered and laboratory testing for this and/or adjacent lots, it is our opinion that the subsurface materials generally exhibit low potential for expansion. Refer to the Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication 43 for a description of expansive soils and their impact on structure performance. Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc. Pro�ect Number 130422 1 August 15, 2013 Page 2 Foundafion Recommendafions Based on our evaluation of the subsurface conditions,the proposed residence may be founded upon spread or pad-type footings bearing below any existing fill on the natural undisturbed soils or on properiy placed and compacted fill. The footings shouid be designed for a maximum bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Footing dimensions and foundation structural elements should be determined by a structural engineer. Concrete in contact with the subsurface materials should be designed for moderate (S1) sulfate exposure as defined by ACI 318.4.3. Bearing materials loosened by machine excavation should be removed prior to placing footing concrete. Occasionally, pockets of loose soils are encountered in foundation excavations. If this condition occurs, the footings should extend to firm soils. Exterior footings should bear at least 3 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. The bearing materials beneath footings should be protected from freezing during construction. All footing excavations should be observed prior to placement of concrete to confirm the footings are bearing on suitable materials as anticipated for design purposes. The foundation walls backfilled with on-site materials should be designed for a lateral earth pressure based upon an equivalent fluid density of 60 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for the "at rest" condition or ' 45 pcf for the "active" condition. The "active"condition should only be used where wall movements of at least 0.5% of the wall height are allowed. These values have been provided without considerations for sloping backfill, surcharge loading or hydrostatic pressures. Construction of a drain system and proper surface drainage as discussed later in this report may lower the potential of developing hydrostatic pressure in the backfill materials. Minor cracking of concrete foundation walls should be expected. Basement Floor Consfrucfion A basement slab performance risk evaluation was conducted in general conformance with industry guidelines for the local area. The risk assessment of a site for potential movement is not absolute; rather, it represents a judgment based upon the data available and our experience in the area. Movement of foundations and concrete flat work will occur with time in low to very high risk areas as ' the soil moisture content increases. On low and moderate rated sites, slab movements of up to 3 inches or more across the slab with slab cracking of up to %4-inch or more in width and/or differential are considered normal. The damage generally increases as the risk assessment increases and as the depth of wetting increases. It must be understood, however, that assessing risk is an opinion. There is currently no type of testing or correlation of factors that will definitively predict the amount of heave that a floor slab will exhibit. Therefore, it may be possible that heaves less than or in excess of what is considered "normal" may be experienced. For sites with a risk assessment of high or very high, we recommend an interior floor system engineered for expansive soils be constructed. An alternative to the use of an engineered floor system, such as soil modification to reduce the risk assessment, may also be considered. In addition, an engineered interiorfloor system is recommended for all finished areas or any other areas where floor movements cannot be tolerated. Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc. Project Number 130422 August 15, 2013 Page 3 Based upon our evaluation of the subsurface conditions at this site; it is our opinion that the slab performance risk for this site is low. If this risk of movement is not acceptable, engineered interior floors should be constructed or an alternative such as soil modification should be considered. If the Builder and/or Owner desires to construct a concrete slab-on-grade and accepts the risk of slab movement, slabs supported by the expansive subsurface materials should be constructed using the following criteria: 1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with a joint which allows free vertical movement of the slab. 2. Slab bearing partitions should be constructed with a minimum 2-inch void space. Stairways bearing upon the slab should be constructed in such a way as to allow at least 2 inches of slab heave. In the event of slab heave, the movement should not be transmitted directly through the partitions to the remainder of the residence. 3. Plumbing and utilities should be isolated from the slab. 4. Where a forced-air heating system is used and the furnace is located on the slab, we recommend provision for a collapsible connection between the furnace and the duct work to allow for at least 3 inches of slab heave. Utility connections should also be provided with flexible connections capable of accommodating the same magnitude of movement as specified above. 5. Provide frequent control joints in the slab. Following these recommendations will reduce immediate damage caused by movement of the floor slab; however, the void spaces recommended are not intended to predict total slab movement. Care should be taken to monitor and reestablish partition voids and flexible connections when necessary. We are available to provide further consultation regarding basement slab performance risk assessments. Crawl Space Consfruction The crawl space ground surFace should be sloped to the perimeter drain system. Trenching or dishing out of the crawl space is not recommended unless a drain system is placed in these areas in such a manner to facilitate drainage. The recommended clearance from the cra�vl space ground surface to the engineered floor system should meet applicable codes. In addition, all plumbing lines should be isolated from the ground surface or foundation walls by at least 2 inches. During construction, the crawl space area should be checked for standing water or very moist conditions, construction debris, and other deleterious materials. If these conditions exist, the area should be evaluated and mitigated, as necessary. Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc. Project Number 130422 August 15, 2013 Page 4 Crawl space areas should be constructed with consideration given to proper ventilation and moisture management. Provisions such as the installation of a vapor retarder should be utilized to reduce the amount of moisture (humidity) in the crawl space air. The Client and any future Owner should be aware that crawl space areas are subject to various air quality issues. A consultant specializing in ventilation and air quality control should be contacted to provide any additional recommendations. Such recommendations are beyond the geotechnical scope of this study. The environmental division of A. G. Wassenaar, Inc. is capable of providing such services. Refer to "Homeowner's Guide To Moisture Management" by Tri-County Health Department (Brochure Number S-323) for additional information. Subsurface Drainage As a minimum, we recommend providing a subsurface drainage system around the lowest below grade area. The purpose of the drain is to collect water which may become trapped on the surface of the excavation and enter the basement or crawl space areas. A drain should be constructed similar to the attached drain detail (Figure 1) and should be uniformly sloped to a positive gravity discharge or sump. If a sump pit is installed, it should be monitored for water accumulation and proper operation. The � �vater level in the sump pit should not be allowed to rise above the foundation drain inlet pipe(s). If water rises above the inlet pipe(s), a pump should be installed (if not originally equipped) or maintenance should be performed on the existing pump. Surface Drainage The wetting of foundation soils and/or bedrock materials which causes heave may be reduced by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. The following recommendations should be implemented during construction and maintained by the Homeowner after the residence is completed: 1. Excessive wetting or drying of the open foundation excavation should be avoided as much as practical during construction. 2. The ground surFace surrounding the exterior of the foundation should be maintained in such a manner as to provide for positive surface drainage away from the foundation. At completion of construction,we recommend a minimum fall away from the foundation of 6 inches in the first 5 feet. This slope should be continuous across the backfill zone. 3. Backfill around the foundation should be moistened and compacted in such a � manner as to reduce future settlement. Areas which settle should be filled as soon as possible in order to maintain positive drainage away from the foundation. Meritage Homes of Colorado, Inc. Project Number 130422 August 15, 2013 Page 6 If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this letter or in analysis of the proposed structure from the soil and foundation viewpoint, please call our office. Sincerely, ��� A. G. WASSENAAR, IN��'� P�O, R��� .P�� . �o sA4:. _r ��::. : � ti2 ��;;.. , �: m:m . " .p t-t Michael R. Conner, Pr�:. �/ . �.; Senior Engineer �.s'p'. . c�,�.� ,o•. . t�. ; FSS;'••.....••G��r;;. Reviewed by: ��MAI.�x. � Don Id L. Taylor, r; ' . Pr ident MRC/DLT/lia Attachment: Figure 1 Statement of Services A.G. Wassenaar Geotechnical and Environmental Consuftants ?'�_'.._Q..°. � NOTES: 1. DRAIN MUST SLOPE TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET AND/OR TO SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING 2. SLOPE BOTTOM OF TRENCH AND PIPE AT A MINIMUM OF 1/8"PER FOOT(i.e.140) OR AS APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 3. 4-INCH DIAPJiETER RIGID PERFORATED PVC SIUBSTITUTE APPROVED BY G OTECHNICAL ENGINEER //��\\/����\����j\�\�j/�\� 4. GRAVEL SPECIFICATION:2"A91NUS WASHED ROCK/GRAVEL,POORLY GRADED WITH NO NIORE THAN 3046 PASSING THE 3/S"SIEVE AND NO MORE THAN 1095 PASSING THE�4 SIEVE,OR AS FOUNDATION MINIMUP�1 10 MIL POLYETHYLENE BARRIER OR APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGI�VEER vdn�� EQUIVALENT APPROVED E3Y GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ATTACH TO WALL AFfER ` DAMPPROOFING AND EXTEND AT LEAST 1 I � FOOT UP ON\NALL AND BENEATH FLOW LINE BACKFILL OF PIPE. NON-1NOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC(MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER)PLACED ACROSS ENTIRE WIDTH OF DRAIN GRAVEL. � ///���DRAIN GRAVEL(SEE NOTE�64)GRAVEL SLIP / SHOULD FILL ENTIRE TRENCH AND EXTEND JOINT � LATERALLY TO TOP OF FOOTING. GRAVEL COVER A60VE PIPE SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4" r CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE ��������������/��� ���� �'�_ BACKFILL :�d��°::;o..:G';:::0:.:; . �� /����//�/��/����//�\ d°:Q C�:o:;p n�oQ�. �a . o:��: . d .o.: ��� �' � '� EXTEND POLYETHYLENE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF BOTTOM OF TRENCH. \ \ � DR,41N PIPE-(SEE NOTES;f2&3) 8" AT LOCATION OF HIGH POINT, � ESTA6LISH BOTTOM OF DRAIN DO NOT EXCAVATE tiNITHIN A 1:1 LINE P�IINIMUM pIPE AT LEAST 4"BELOW EXTENDING DOWN AND AWAY FROM BOTTONI OF FOOTING OR PAD EDGE OF FOOTING. MAINTAIN THIS ANGLE OF EXCAVATION TO A DEPTH OF TWICE THE FOOTING WIDTH. FOOTING FOUNDATION FfG 3 EXT-SOG TYFICAL EXTERIOR DRAIN DETAIL SEPTcNBEf720J7 FIGURE 1