The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About850 Baum St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 12/18/2014 (3)No Text 16D &�� _3�r, C OO IlC_M JC_la "S_M OO I I I n S I I nJ Je �N III (ENGINEERED �RUSES I�— BY OTHERS yYy '� •f�Y�IIII l p I I I 1 m I I I I I "y I I ppAry I Awe A I I 11� I I I Q I Ily 14" TJIl110 I I I I It" OF TRUSSE5 FLOOR JOISTS i I I i t II� I I I I I I I I I I� II 11 I qy p I4"�VI. `' STAIR 9 I 1 9 I 1 I e I OPENING 14" TJI/110 0 FLOOR JOISTS 0 � 16" O.C. 1W- I � q3) P4 "X14" LVL SIX �` STAIR - Xi FLOOR 14" TJI/110 JOISTS 19 1 OSTAIRI' 14" TJI/210 ix 7g61 FLOOR I JOISTS oBPT¢N I LP I i 9I 14" TJI/710 ' FLOOR JOISTS I I P 9 ° `STAIR � I OPENMG I � I I J J a° 14, LVL � 91 X� ?xc ; �I 1 3 g.o 14" TJI/110 FLOOR JOISTS a 16" O.O. ° I 1 old ENGINEERED TRUSSES ° IW BY OTHERS W-10 Hr•10 UPPER FLOOR FRAMING SCHEMATIC SCALE W • 1'-0" FSv &A WIL ✓', G IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllljllll I I_I 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIII11111 ENGINEERED TRUbbEry BY OTHER6 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII HIM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II EEEI D ITRUb�Eb I I I I I I I I I BY OTNERb EN INEERED TRU Eb BY OTHERb i E INEERED T.r. Eb ' BY OTHE- I ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ROOF FRAMING 5CNEMAT I C KALE 'V • f•0' %I No Text 9D011-L 3` 3' 311.13 ' Footine Oualitv Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually observed the fooling forms under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time ofour visit. -,_ , WR MINEROMM Client: PLso Ve 41 Site Address: 9JV 4n1'4.w If.' /An: �s 1-1 Aso- colt:,s, co Job#• WYoloss.aoz Lot:A%0-16Block: q Filing: Foundation Plan Information Plan By: GT[, T40ana.son Date: 2 Ol //I Jobll: WYOI93s I Fig sizes: Pad sizes Concrete on -site? ❑ yes, eno, (+/- % ftg poured —� Are the footing forms free of loose material, frost, water and or ice, roots, eti ❑ no Are the Footing / Pad form sizes in general conformance to the above foundation plan? E7yes, ❑ no Is the footing/pad reinforcing steel in -place or on site per the above foundation plan? Xgyes, ❑ no Weather: orw.n ~SSIF �Notes: 1 42,9 09 44/ M •r or` • u•re I _I _L lj 1 I I L_I__! ! I I I l r� l I I' I I----_� �-. • :. - I I 1_ I_I .. r I r1 : _I I_I I_I 1_, _t _'_L._•__;__�i : : I :_I_I. i rl I t i'I�i �r I I_� I_� : :-•-T•-LL��'��LI rrl I_ I_I rr`I j __rI I i I I I I I' I I I I I I '_I��+t__i_:_��il,_ 1 1_�";_;-�_� I_•_I � i I illlll III IIII I:I I_I-I„ I •!1'_i I'Ii'1 �I r rI I - 1 1 : =11Tr; ILL _I_I__i_IT_•-i :�i_I ��I, I I I: I• 1_II-,_� I '�' 7 1 _._ -Lill I I I I I L.Li_: ,1_•-i_i I_._1_'T.,I-`'- 1--1-'= I_Iyl '-I'j-. I j �f I. I T-1 I I I Li�.l�I�7 LI 1 �T. �_I_ i IT' _! [•_j!�'_y.y _ I i I-�- I I I -I � i I -'-I �1 i � :T� i I •_• : ,-�� I I I I I I I I I .:-rrrr_'r I: ��r�i ...r• ..rr, , r�Ll_I=: �_I_' LL �_I 17�r1 I I I' 1 rl rl I I I I �1-� ( I I I I I I I I ' i -: I 1 I '-f! � -_L Summary of O inions ff\It is our opinion that the general conformance with referenced above. footing formwork is in the foundation design ❑ It is our opinion that the footing formwork differs significantly from the foundation design referenced above (tad observation required). Corrective action: Pu, III.. t. Field Representative I -A) U Q•� 8/�I Date Date CTL I Thompson, Inca 1 1103 Old Town Lane, Suite 201B, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 �,2�b 60,LMS-)-,C ------------------- 1 � a.• /Z" I. I 16' I I 1111 I. � I:I I„I I �6 L------J I I I^I r_j L_________- I��I I ___-_____JI 1 --I.r---------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------------------,j IF-1 -- I i JG" I��• I I �a„ 1,,1 I � 1 III I I a I Z� I' I 111 I I !Z I.:.. I IL .Ir II I 20 I III , I LJ Iul I I 'I ____________________ I__________ I r----------- -------------!-�v- lI,;rI - - - - - - - - -------------------- �� y t 1I "III ICI Ilil I II I I I , I;II Z• II I V. 1 V I I: I I zo I ,• ?p.. I I I ------------- =------------------J•L------- --------- --- - I ----JI --�-, ---------------�. - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------ -------�-- ------J---- I„I I I I I r,- I LmJ I I I I I 1 • I �� I'�I ILI I.I I I�I I'I I I I I I IL I Irl I.I +I 11�1 i••I I I ,z�. l�.. ____ ________� ;I r_______ Reinforcing Steel Ouality Assurance Observation C T L I T H O M P S® N Fer the client s request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: X se V, 1.4 G Site Address: f,So l asu ll 0. 4 ,%.469 1—`l Fia_4- C 1Ve-s , co Job #: Wv0103S - 002 Lot:M13-J6Block: 9 Filing: Date: zz/Al Contact: Clete Sc4z.-yak Subdivision: 91d *® % a3®.-* Reinforcing Plan Information Plan By: cif 7iw�ls.s®;, Date: A4041 Job#: wY®teas �2 Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing ❑ grade beam ❑ structural slab ❑ column Arfoundation wall ❑ pier cap ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel Grade Horizontal Vert./Ties 2 3 4 Pier Cap / Slab Reinforcing Steel Grade Longitudinal Lateral A B C D UFER Ground AA -Installed —Location ❑ Not Observed • Max/Min wall height observed: 3 / .:? If void forms are required, are they installed as recommended? ❑yes ❑no Required thickness: in. Concrete on -site? ❑ yes ,Yno (% poured Weather: S VVF Notes 11!I I' 11! I IIII Ills 11111 " � :1 I _I 1 IT`, I rI 1-1 I_I—___-- I i_L!_� [' I r� 1 L.. i_[� I __I—:_L�__!�—_I -L-i Ili r[[,_i i_ -=---, '--[�� i' 1= i -,- = ---- _! I_: I I I I: —I i; ! I I I l i, , I I I I I I_I_I_I_• 1 1 1 :Tf—i � I —i i -I i —1_TI ._I I I_i Il `;-�.-i--_-- IT!III-IIIIIIIIIII�-II 1 I�i Ili ICI! riI Iii� 11!I 1. -ri l!li ,iI IIIi jI__lIii ��i -tip l.— iI!11I LL:1_ :j,!�;i� i _�Iii 1 p_i _I ,;,Il !'111 1 1,iilli I li!ii { I:i I'rllr I!�II II I!—li_-11III!I — _I it I_[IT_rt I r! ! 1 l- I I I Imo— !I i I i _i �rIT_r iT_I_I i_I I :_:_�—r_;_r I i I i i -� l j i ";_l_L•_� ITI _Q I i i f I I It'll I I I_11' I 1 : I —I !!! I I �,I�I�:I�IIIiII IIII Ii I;I I!I!!I Ili 1111_I' Summary of Opinions Mk -It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (tad observation required). Deficiencies noted: Field Representative _ �o.0O Ur4(�Z,,. 812,211,9 Date Date CTL I Thompson, Inc. I 1103 Old Town Lane, Suite 201B, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 , i t i i r , t i `I i , i t a r � I i , fm