Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout304 Toronto St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 05/06/2011�k(��eZs Excavation/Footing Observation CLIENT: Encore Homes, LLC. Zia West Suulti A _......._............_ Windsor, Co bubbu CTL ! THOM PSON f ADDRESN _, C � f �+ t LOT .......... - BLOCK FILING NO PROJECT NO Aftn: Ms. Debra Rogers __............................. Recommended Foundation System CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NO. 7 f��. j • ly I -L C) ..................................................... DATED ....... ............................... _ .._.._.. - ...'..�..._�......._.+. . ❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF................................................................................. PSF. MINIMUM WIDTH . _�_.._..__.............__._....................................... ....... INCHES FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OFt PSF. PROVIDE A LI_ INCH VOID 13ENEAT�E BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH g- $,I (o INCHES ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS r MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF._.„_.................... _.... _........... ........ ....... .., PSF. PROVIDE A __ INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH ........ ... _....... ... .................... INCHES Foundation Plan �'^ BY (� 1 L :a cv^� S�Y_141 1_k Jna.+l2df5 _ PLAN NO. C-0 S tQ Q i 2. DATE _y:..l._©....:._ Z-0 )I WALL FOOTING WIDTH j�O "! (INCHES) DEPTH �._ _ (INCHES) COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) COLUMN PAD .............................. .........._,,.. (INCHES) DEPTH ................................. (INCHES) REINFORCEMENT AS PER PLAN. ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED [j AT SITE L_,� INSTALLED Soil Conditions At Footing Level I UPPER LEVEL ISC6_^CA 4 I . _..._.............................................................. .. LOWER LEVEL _.._...____ ..._._.. _.._.._ _ Ground Water Conditions B"NONE IN EXCAVATION 11 NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. .._.. _ TO,,.__........_...................FEET GJ'ENCOUNTERED AT ................... S t ............. FEET IN BORING NO TM ` i 3 Remarks: TPA err $jqt� jr)'$o Foundation Layout 2 I 7 2 PSF I�... i I PSF d-f f 4 i ♦ DICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTHIWIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION l structions to Contractor FOOTING IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN ❑yyII FOOTING REJECTED I� CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION AS ANTICIPATED ❑ CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION NOT AS ANTICIPATED, CONTACT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE P3 \ � ak ohs" Foundation Wall Reinforcement Observation pb 01M dw. CLIENT Encore Homes, LLC. ADDRESS: AA ' �Wir�sor, 805510 _ ........_..._ ... . '.. > .N 0 ....5'► __... _ .............__. .._-...._........ LOT ........._-........_....__ crZ.-... BLOCK FILING NO_, PROJECT NO.. 3.C3 s. Debra Rogers Foundation Plan BY PLAN NO. ,_0L2_ DATE � �4 j i Foundation Plan f...., SPREAD FOOTINGS KKOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD F1 GRADE BEAMS AND PADS DRILLED FRICTION PIERS [] DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK OTHER__........_ ................ CTLJTHOMPSON PROJECT NO. �A DATED WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET _.......... __...� _i...................._. _ INCHES Foundation Void L� 2REQUIREDTHICKNESS............. [ . INCHES C:i NOT REQUIRED Reinforcing Steel GRADE _ ? �._�. BAR SIZE NO. OF BARS TOP—: BOTTOM] �dLAir T— __... _.... _ VERTICAL HORIZONTAL _. COUNTERFORT Instructions to Contractor GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN ❑ REJECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE r • • Sooe_ �NS� Sib - E�+bMeea,•!y Foundation Wall Layout LIFER Ground.* Location of UFER Ground ter, [LOCATION L : F 1V C C' 1"IV66P NOT INSTALLED �- COMMENT: ...._.................................................................._...___.__.__. FIELD ncvicvrcu ,• s� 7 j/ O DATE OF OBSERVATION b \ � O� 6ZS Foundation Wall Drain/ Void/Waterproofing Observation CLIENT- Encore Homes, LLC. --...----.............._.._................._........ _.... _......... _........ _..... 1218 West Ash, Suite A Windsor, CO 80660 Attn: Ms. Debra Rogers Foundation Plan BY ____..-.._ .. _,._. ._. .._.._..._._ ........ PLAN NO. Foundation Type ❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS ❑ DRILLED FRICT€ON PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK JS FOOTING WIMINIMUM ❑ OTHER DEADLOAD CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NCO...... r, DATED Foundation Void ❑ REQUIRED THICKNESS__- v_- .._. .._... ❑ MEASURED THICKNESS Foundation Wall Condition ❑ EXPOSED STEEL ❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.) (IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH) INCHES INCHES Recommended Drain Type ❑ EXTERIOR ❑ INTERIOR FIG......... -_-_...... ..... INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER _. :. INCHES WALLHEIGHT.....................................................---........................_._......_...._...._.._................................_.._... , INCHES DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH,__ _ _. INCHES ❑ SLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR ❑ PIPE INSTALLED ❑ GRAVEL INSTALLED, GRAVEL SIZE Type of Outlet ❑ GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER F1 SUMP PIT ❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB) ❑ Foundation Void: ❑ IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED ❑ Foundation Wall Drain: ❑ IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED XFoundation Waterproofing: , GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED ❑ Exterior Insulation MANUFACTURER - HEIGHT FEET DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET S ✓� • �ir-b�nrt,E,ae�ivq ADDRESS: LOT ; Z_..._.................._......... BLOCK _....._.L%— -- FILING NO. PROJECT NO-5�C—Q Foundation Wall Layout _...... .... _... a RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE 5 � l 0� C)85 • • f s a • 9 S - ,. : • CLIENT' Encore Horneaj LC ADDRESS: C,r, ,.— k 121West Ash, Suite A i,,r,,,,,4no _5� r e e 4% Windsor. CO 80550 LOT l z BLOCK, _..._...... ......... �._.._ FILING NO. PROJECT NO. �3 _j 320 Attn- Ms- f1pbta Rnear¢ Foundation Plan BY ............. .__ _ _ .. ...... PLAN NO. __ Foundation Type ❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK P0 FOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER _....- DEADLOAD , MO CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NOi S3 w _a.l DATED Foundation Void REQUIRED THICKNESS u ......„.,.INCHES [] MEASURED THICKNESS .......... --........... ..... ........._._ INCHES Foundation Wall Condition �] EXPOSED STEEL ❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC 3 (IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH) Recommended Drain Type EXTERIOR [ pp 'INTERIOR FIG. .3 ._..._ .. _..__ __ LL.ry�......_._._.._...._...._.-.........._..._. ___.._..._...._..............._...__...,. INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER TINCHES WALL HEIGHT ................._................. INCHES ... .................................._..........................._...._........ _.._.................. DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH �_._ _ INCHES ❑ SLAB ON GRADE C@ STRUCTURAL. FLOOR PIPE INSTALLED ❑ GRAVEL INSTALLED, GRAVEL SIZE Type of Outlet ❑ GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER J5 SUMP PIT ❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB) ❑ Foundation Void: NIP [] IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS REJECTED Foundation Wall Drain: r.SIN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED Foundation Waterproofing: IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED p ❑ Exterior Insulation MANUFACTURER _ a� HEIGHT ........................................ FEET DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL _ _ _ FEET Foundation Wall Layout RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE