HomeMy WebLinkAbout5315 Old Mill Rd - Special Inspections/Engineering - 03/28/2005Excavation/Footing CTL I THOMPSON
Inspection
CLIENT: ADDRESS:
-
Standard Pacific Homes �q�t%7 �i9,2K
606 f S-:_ WiIlow 6-64e; wife 232_ `D-
- -_Greenwoodi age,_CCVS011'r— - LOT _— BLOCKi'� _
- - ---- — --- ----- FILING NO. — -------- - JOB NO.
Attn: Jef#Grainda --
Recommended Foundation System
CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO.
DATED
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF.
MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES
2100TINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF Z!rU rJ PSF.
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF 800 PSF.
PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS.
MINIMUM WIDTH _� INCHES
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF _ PSF.
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF.
PROVIDE A INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS.
MINIMUM FOOTING WIDTH - INCHES
Foundation Plan
BY -- l�3 iSSO�
PLAN NO. --- �� t --- -- DATE
WALL FOOTING WIDTH J(P _ AINCHES) DEPTH (INCHES)
COLUMN PAD __- (INCHES) DEPTH _ __ (INCHES)
COLUMN PAD.-----,,- -----(INCHES) DEPTH --__-_-----_(INCHES)
REINFORCEMENT AS PER PLAN:
[?'YES ❑ NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED
[RAT SITE ❑ INSTALLED
Soil Conditions At Footing Level
UPPER LEVEL
r_ ✓/i r_ .�r t lii�c�✓} fll _�_.i'�/jam%
LOWER LEVEL / Sf% '►t" /j/� f�
Grgond Water Conditions
ONE IN EXCAVATION
U NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. TO FEET
ENCOUNTERED AT FEET IN BORING NO. L 7 d %
Remarks:
-✓ .1 ,-- �^�I aI >a �'�= E'as✓�'r D u�l
So IL I•✓ cX(A✓�t>iu�/ lc..,ili�7Erv1 r✓/
Foundation Layout
INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION
Instructions to Contractor
RN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ REJECTED
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
F 1ELD REPRESENTATI
DO REG;
.�$� 11'
U:
REVIEWED BY 1 •
p �'o'•,
DATE OF INSPE TION �_ •..,,.. G.
1
Foundation Wall
Reinforcement Inspection
CLIENT
Standard Pacific Homes
0. nr
:#••• • :1
Foundation Plan
BY a-; & -7
PLAN NO. TV r H DATE `4 - 1 '1
Foundation Plan
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS
❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
❑ OTHER 2
CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. �L ' Zg 7 S DATED IZ -11'.5" d i
WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET ® INCHES
Foundation Void j
7 REQUIRED THICKNESS ~ INCHES
❑ NOT REQUIRED
Reinforcing Steel I
GRADE G �� BAR SIZE '7
NO. OF BARS t
TOP S 44- •7 r ,...� .
BOTTOM 2- c.+�
VERTICAL jrw� Q /s
HORIZONTAL -tii ,pQL4 � Zt�
CONTERFONTS Y?jj y
Instructions to Contractor
IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ REJECTED
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
•
�,��too•�a�arso
ADDRESS:' (/
NJ1.r✓e�i i- 1P
S3iY vi1 wL.��� 1Z1
LOT i BLOCK I A/
FILING NO. JOB NO. Fe -0 I 'Sl Z
❑ NOT INSTALLED
NOT REQUIRED
COMMENT:
..R••
.O0 REFG
FIELD REPRESENTATIVtn
Ov; sj
REVIEWED BY
DATE OF INSPECTION �,_ cz-!
Foundation Wall Drain/
Void/Waterproofing Inspection
CLIENT: Standard Pacific Homes
-6964-S:-Willow Do ive-; Suite-232-- —
&eenwoodVi11ave,eoewi---- ---
Foundation Plan t ii
BY N�'�� [y PLAN NO
Foundation Type
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
FOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER
DEADLOAD
CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. f�G DATED IZ- 1 S -03
Foundation Void
Dq REQUIRED THICKNESS y INCHES
® MEASURED THICKNESS INCHES
Foundation Wall Condition
❑ EXPOSED STEEL
❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.)
(IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH)
Recommended Drain Type
N EXTERIOR ❑ INTERIOR ❑ BELOW FILL ❑ BELOW SLAB
FIG. 1'
INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER q� INCHES
WALL HEIGHT / G �{ (LS INCHES
DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH S' k�,iz,�- INCHES
NSLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR
PIPE INSTALLED O q
® GRAVEL INSTALLED, NOMINAL SIZE .
Type of Outlet
GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER ❑ SUMP PIT
❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB)
Foundation Void:
LN IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
f REJECTED
Foundation Wall Drain:
IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
REJECTED
Foundation Waterproofing:
�IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
7_1 REJECTED
Exterior Insulation
MANUFACTURER
HEIGHT _ FEET
DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET
F t! C O •: r Q E A T! 4-
ADDRESS: .pp
511 S Z>/1 /k.-I ( F =no
LOT 77 BLOCK 14
FILING NO. JOB NO. A4 -W5-1 Z
Foundation Wall Layout
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDUR
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE
REVIEWED BY
DATE OF INSPECTION