Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2202 Fossil Creek Pkwy - Special Inspections/Engineering - 03/24/2005Excavation/Footing Inspection CLIENT: ADDRESS: _ __Ryland Homes--- --- -- -- - �✓CS f 8100 E. Maplewood Ave_., Ste. 100 oo Greenwd Villaael CO 80111 --__ LOT --- ---- - _ BLOCK -- _ - ----- - -- - --- -- .- - --- - - FILING NO. - - - ---- - JOB NO. Attn: Mr. Bob Shearer Recommended Foundation System CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. DATED�- XSPREAD FOOTINGS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF. MINIMUM WIDTH - _ " _ INCHES ❑ FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF _ PSF. MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A ----INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS. MINIMUM ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF _ _ _ PSF. MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF _ _ PSF. PROVIDE A ---,--------INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS. MINIMUM FOOTING WIDTH _ — - INCHES Foundation/ Plan [ ,/ BY --- PLAN NO. WALL FOOTING WIDTH 0 'J;t(INCHES) DEPTH 'S- ____ (INCHES) COLUMN PAD 1�`_�lf�A�L1 k (INCHES) DEPTH --(INCHES) COLUMN PAD/W&slQ (INCHES)) DEPTH - (INCHES) REINFORCEMENT AS PER PLAN: /tt' J-VxjVx /(j ja YES ❑ NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED kAT SITE ❑ INSTALLED Soil Conditions At Footing Lgvel UPPER LEVEL _C/q Sn�E/ �{ Ve L-L_ _Lw1 S1Q e LOWER LEVEL Ground Water Conditions PC NONE IN EXCAVATION ❑ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. TO FEET R ENCOUNTERED AT IC? - FEET IN BORING NO. Remarks: Foundation Layout r s T., x 0 416 .100 6 X INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION Instructions to Contractor IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN REJECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE _ o�Pp0 REG�ST� AIM_ FIELD REPRESENTATIVFt _ _ REVIEWED BY DATE OF INSPECTION O �I N A Foundation Wall Reinforcement Inspection CLIENT: Ryland Homes Foundation Plan 1 BY SS )j Lor_s PLAN NO. -7 Z S DATE 1-1- Foundation Plan I SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK ❑ OTHER CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. L ' Z1 S< DATED WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET G INCHES Foundation Void ❑ REQUIRED THICKNESS t NOT REQUIRED INCHES Reinforcing Steel, GRADE Co BAR SIZE -I NO. OF BARS TOP Z 41 it BOTTOM -L # a-1 VERTICAL e HORIZONTAL CONTERFONTS_-i+q �--p ;.1. 4a{ 1,� � � tl4A1 Instructions to Contractor IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN REJECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE OFCTLITHOMPSON k M iR- R: Irr lik R A. T. 111 1 ADDRESS. - LOT BLOCK G FILING NO. JOB NO. - LZ % Foundation Wall Layout M { t L� G� LF _ 67 G� eZ>'91' • i G ,-re_ it UFER Ground +- Location of UFER Ground ❑ LOCATION ❑ NOT INSTALLED [x NOT REQUIRED COMMENT: 6" —.I,, —.g Z _si 4 't A h:>4+,,,, -- ._.ram • L� 4 Z i � 4- FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWED BY 4-II- DATE OF INSPECTION i RED ' �S�ONAL EN ) Foundation Wall Dr.in/ Void/Waterproofing Inspection CLIENT: Ryland Homes ADDRESS: 5 t - LOT BLOCK____. JJ FILING NO. � JOB NO. Foundation Ian Foundation Wall Layout BY tV d F Yq' o b l e PLAN NO. i Foundation Type } SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS n ❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK li ❑ FOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER DEADLOAD a € CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. ryj LV `i� DATED NOV 1 Foundation Void j ❑ REQUIRED THICKNESS INCHES 1 ❑ MEASURED THICKNESS INCHES Foundation Wall Condition ❑ EXPOSED STEEL ❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.) (IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH) 4� Recommended Drain Type ❑ EXTERIOR_ INTERIOR BELOW FILL ❑ BELOW SLAB FIG. INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER INCHES WALL HEIGHT \OZ INCHES DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH ► INCHES C5S /1 ParVW SLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR T v(� Y�� PIPE INSTALLED �1 GRAVEL INSTALLED, NOMINAL SIZE RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE Type of Outlet ❑ GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER ;, SUMP PIT ❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB) ❑ Foundation Void: A ❑ IN GENERAL CONFORMA CE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS REJECTED Foundation Wall Drain: IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS REJECTED Foundation Waterproofing: IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ REJECTED ❑ Exterior Insulation MANUFACTURER HEIGHT -FEET DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET