HomeMy WebLinkAbout5233 Old Mill Rd - Special Inspections/Engineering - 04/25/2005Apr-25-05 11:39am From-CTL/Thompson Inc.
Foundation Wall Grain/
Void/Waterproofing inspection
9702069441 T-044 P.002/009 F-956
UTL I TMUMPUIUM
CLIENT: Standard Pacific Homes ADDRESS:
willow
__ :CA 313 oto O►rtz ,
-0 80141
LOT >% BLOCK_J_'1L
FILING NO. JOB NO. -OL"Ic. a 06E/ ,L"
Foundation Plan
BY N rf A U A 6 PLAN NO.
Foundation Type
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
Q D ILLED FRICTION PIE" ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
plroo-nNG W/MINIMUM Q OTHER
DEADLOAD -� 'C
CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. ��0(3� DATED , I Z --i-"a
Foundation Void
T'lREOUIRED THICKNESS INCHES
E+I�tEASUREO THICKNESS A INCHES
Foundation Wall Condition
71 EXPOSED STEEL
SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, VC.)
(IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH)
Recommended Drain Type
91&TERIOA Q INTERIOR i] BELOW FILL ❑ BELOW SLAS
FIG. �.
INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER _ INCHES
WALL HEIGHT _ INCHES
OEPTH-TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH �I! -�/?- INCHES
3*A8 ON GRADE STRUCTURAL FLOOR
PIPE INSTALLED it
GRAVEL INSTALLED, NOMINAL SIZE
Type of Outlet
[9RAVrM BELOW SEWER ❑ SUMP PIT
❑ UNDERORAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB)
p"foundation Void:
g-K GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
I) REJECTED
6-j-Foundation Wall Drain:
B411GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
REJECTED
(foundation Waterproofing:
GENERALCONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
Q REJECTED
[, Exterlor Insulation
MANUFACTURER
HEIGHT FEET
DISTANCE BELOW FOUNDATION WALL FEET
Foundation Wall Layout
I�
' � I
A
3Z
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
PIS- I" _
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE
REVIEWED BY
DATE OF INSPECTION
Apr-25-05 11:38am From-CTL/Thompson Inc. 9702009441 T-044 P•003/006 F-956
Foundation Walt CTLITHOMPSON
Reinforcement inspection
CLIENT; Standard Pacific Homes
6061 S. Willow Drive. Suite 232
Greenwood Village. Ca 8011
AtM: deif Gr_ainda -
Foundation
Foundation Plan
BYE.:_ �-a. ? _
PLAN NO. G ty AL _DATE
Foundation Plan
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
FOOTINGS WfTH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
Q DRILLED FRICTION PIERS
❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
❑ OTmER --
CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. ±4' ~ kat 15 1r DATED 12 - IT- 23
WALL ALIGNMENT OFFSET - 6F INCHES
Foundation Void
A REQUIRED THICKNESS _ INCHES
❑ NOT REQUIRED
Reinforcing Steel #
GRADE &0 BAR SIZE
NO. OF BARS
TOP _ 11 4BOTTOM 7-
VERTICAL
HORIZONTAL �—
CONTEItFONT5 '^'' ✓_.i '.y.•'�3� o. ` .
instructions to Contractor
IN GENERAL. CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
[] REJECTED
RECOMMENuF0 CORRECnVE PROCEDURE
ADDRESS; , I
LOT BLOCK 1 4
77-
FILING NO. JOB NO. I —
! !
Foundation Wall Layout
4.....'.
J ,
.1 A4: t I
LIFER Ground # Location of UFER Ground
❑ LOCAnON —
NOT INSTALLED
NOT REQUIRED .y /
COMMENT:
Apr-25-05 11:36am From-CTL/Thompson Inc.
Excavation/Footing
Inspection
CLIENT -
Standard Pacific Homes
---Go o D"rive—Suits 232- _
Greenw�ilage;
" Awn:. e�G�airida -- -• ----
Recommended Foundation System
CTLITHOMPSON JO8 NO.- f! 1--
DATED I Z
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF.
�,,/ MINIMUM WIDTH _ _ .. INCHES
z FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF PSF
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF __9,47,4� PSF•
PROVIDEA �.. _- INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS.
MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES
❑ GRACE BEAMS AND PADS
MAXIMUM SOIL Pf1E$SURE OF ._ _ ._ PSF.
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF _ -- PSF.
PROVIDE A _. __ INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS.
MINIMUM FOOTINGS WIDTH _._ INCHES
Foundation Plan
BY C_0 0 A.SSA•..
PLAN NO. - —co �i _.__ _.- DATE --
WALL FCOTiLji
IDTH . i[It (INCHES) DEPTH _ (INCHES)
COLUMN PA3 _� _ (INCHES) DEPTH _I +� _ (INCHES)
COLUMN PA6 kZG (INCHES) DEPTH _� _ _ . (INCHES)
REINFORCE LAN Q
[?'YES []NO ❑ NONE REQUIRED
J?'AT SITE ❑ INSTALLED
Soil Conditions At Footing Level
UPPER LEVEL
LOWER LEVEL. _.. G�
Ground Water Conditions
(WNONE IN EXCAVATION
❑ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. .. TO FEET
ENCOUNTERED AT . -A ..._ . FEET IN BORING NC. f,, y A /y
Remarks:_.
svs 1A1 .ry�v►Yis� /c�/1.�rE
1
9702069441 T-044 P•004/009 F-056
ADDRESS:
LOT - - /- - - ..�_ BLOCK / y -
FILING NO.
Foundation Layo i
' _I .x t
�.. 71
116
OLD ll1/GI...
Ak INDICATES APPAOXIMATE DEPTRUIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION
Ingrucuons to Contractor
[51IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ RCJECTED
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE