HomeMy WebLinkAbout5621 Big Canyon Dr - Special Inspections/Engineering - 07/30/2013. ® i � • �I
Observafion
CLIENT ri Ryland,
8200E Maolgwood
1 Il 11=1' 1�•/1
Recommended Foundation System
�
CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT N;'Oy3-:d1�3 - / Z� —
DATED
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF ......... .... _.,,,,,,PSF.
�� MINIMUM WIDTH,r. INCHES
U FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOADvmu�Yrrta�t-V�m
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OFF-'CJ V
---`---.._.............._____ PSF.
MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRE
/$SURE OF pSF.
PROVIDE A _ 7-_._, INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS
MINIMUM WIDTH _—_� G..,,�,-� �'X (8) ry_................ INCHES
GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE. OF...-__,_-___._.._____..__._._..............__..� PSF.
MINIMUM DEAOLOAD PRESSURE OF
..................PSF.
PROVIDE A - ....... INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS
MINIMUM WIDTH _ INCHES
Foundation Plan
/�7L ......................r.. �/
PLAN NO, _S •J 1'2"............._._._............................... DATE ' 13
...._... ..._._..._....._.......--
WALL FOOTING WIDTH (INCHES) DEPTH _� _ (INCHES)
X COLUMN PAD > —.(INCHES) DEPTH �,;,�1_ —_-(INCHES)
COLUMN PAD _... _... _._._._ (INCHES) DEPTH ............... .......... (INCHES)
...........................
7REI FORCEMENTAS PER PLAN:
Y n NO NONE REOUIRED
Fj"AT SITE ij INSTALLED
Soil Conditions At Footinq Level
UPPER LEVEL s`:L MA l a I 1 *
LOWER LEVEL !iAY%A (�CGt,.u�T
.. .... . ........
._
Ground Water Conditions
Ulf IONE IN EXCAVATION
?NE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. _..- .... ...._...,,„-_ TO FEET
ENCOUNTERED AT _..... FEET IN BORING NO.
Remarks:
M.
M �. • a Mon
AODRE :- l
LOT
FILING NO:.:........_ NO.._.--.,
Foundation Layout
Si
A INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION
In%pm ions to Contractor
OFOOTING IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ FOIITING REJECTED
CI CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION AS ANTICIPATED
❑ CONDITIONS IN EXCAVATION NOT AS ANTICIPATED, CONTACT
GF..OTECHNICAL ENGINEER
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE
Foundation Wall
Reinforcement Observation
CTL I THOMPSON
CLIENT: Ryland Homes ADDR a
8200 E Maplewood Ave., Ste'. 150 _C le-
Greenwood:Vi _z CO 86111 4 Z t
LOT '/ BLOCK' L t _
Attn: Ms. Annette Wendorff FILING NO. PROJECT NO,
Foun'dati n,Plan (
By SGtt�v 11:5
PLAN NO. I Z t
DATE
Foundation Plan
n SJPREAD FOOTINGS
[J"FFOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD
❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS
❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
❑ OTHER.
CTLITHOMPSON'
PROJECTNO_ `�S3 r �1U 7" Z(; DATEl3 % Z "! / - 17
WALLALIGNMENTOFFSET __ I' INCHES
7dation Void Ll
UIRED THICKNESS _ - .� INCHES
❑ NOT REQUIRED
Reinforcing Steel, �- _
GRADE ____ (.00
BAR SIZE �>
NO. OF BARS _ '•
Top-2 4 5 �,(!11,� ��'�•�Cc�.n
BOTTOM 7— � ( ,G, l,1�'.,�h_
VERTICAL ! '�
HORIZONTAL
COUNTERFORT
Ins ctions to Contractor
IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN
❑ REJECTED
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE ..
Foundation Wall Layout
t
i
�_, .5�...
OF S Grou�«nd t-. Loc tion, o_f UFER Ground
21 'LOCATION,
❑ NOT INSTALLED i
COMMEND. .
Foundation Wall Drain/ CTL I THOMPSON
-Vei&Waterproof in9 Observation
CLIENT: Ryland Homes ADDRESS:
$ nnn F .Mapl wo d Avp_,Ste 15i) CCLELLAQDS C-�€EK
Greenvuood�/illage, GD 80111 l a � oY klV
..... ... LOT :-:. l _. BLOCK.::...:—/�
ndotff FILING NO, 3' PROJECT NO, FGO S543. 001__,
Foundation Plan
BY �S[S. CO1 \C to L'��RN TS PLAN NO. (_ I Z I
Foundation Type
❑ SPREAD FOOTINGS ❑ GRADE BEAMS AND PADS
❑ DRILLED FRICTION PIERS ❑ DRILLED PIERS INTO BEDROCK
Rf FOOTING W/MINIMUM ❑ OTHER
DEADLOAD _` 12A:
CTLITHOMPSON PROJECT NOGiJ'DATECi,y _� 'I 12
VREQUIREDTHICKNESS__. _q INCHES
❑ MEASURED THICKNESS- ---- ...--_,,.. a, INCHES
Foundation Wall Condition
❑ EXPOSED STEEL
❑ SURFACE PROBLEMS (HONEYCOMBING, ETC.)
(IF CHECKED, SHOW LOCATION ON SKETCH)
Recommended Drain Type
EXTERIOR ❑ INTERIOR
FIG, ., i :('LE7T& DAT&j:':,' ..1 22-i3
INSTALLED PIPE DIAMETER INCHES
WALL HEIGHT •=1'l.:'7 W INCHES
DEPTH -TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM OF TRENCH I23— 13_2> INCHES
SLAB ON GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL FLOOR
PIPE INSTALLED
GRAVEL INSTALLED, GRAVEL SIZE
Type of Outlet
❑ GRAVITY, BELOW SEWER 1KSUMP PIT
❑ UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION VISIBLE (AT STUB)
❑ IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
❑ REJECTED
Foundation Wall Drain:
9I1`1 GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
n REJECTED
Foundation Waterproofing:
XIN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
❑ REJECTED
c�
o_
MANUFACTURER
a
m
Foundation Wall Layout
z
�'
4 12:7_
r
BIC1 C_Oyoo DRIVE t
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE .... -