HomeMy WebLinkAbout3609 Rocky Stream Dr - Special Inspections/Engineering - 08/03/2005Footing Oualitv Assurance Observation
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually
observed the footing forms under construction at the site referenced
below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the
time of our visit.
S CURE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Client: Site Address: 3609 Rocky S+ream Dr_
l=or^F Coll ins,
Secure Job #: �,;F0S-887 Lot: 49 Block: — Filing: —
Date: 0R/O2i�S Contact:.Iaonpe.n_ Subdivision: SwSt Ack&tion
Foundation Plan Information
Plan By: Secure
D. O. 1 ••' is
Ftg sizes: $ "X 12 ;, 14" 16", W ZP•,, 22", 24 j Z61 ; 28" 34) �8
36 " �—�
Pad sizes : 8 k24''Ia 8"X2rn"� . R"'x28" C�.S.,x30„ v
I0„x36" O,10„x�(, 0„ I D x42 jd, (0„ x 4 6
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes , 19 no, (+/= % ftg poured 4
Are the footing fob free of loose material, frost, water and
or ice, roots, etc? ® yes , ❑ no
Are the Footing / Pad form s es in general conformance to
the above foundation plan? Dyes , ❑ no
Is the footing/pad remforc^' steel in -place or on site per the
above foundation plan? 0 yes, ❑ no
Weather: j-M" 8 5 T
Notes
!n.
28 16
2020,
40
Z4 14
qt _
I12
SuAimary of Opinions
Ed It is our opinion that the footing formwork is in
general conformance with the foundation design
referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the footing formwork differs
significantly from the foundation design referenced
above (2nd observation required).
Corrective action:
5
G
7
Reinforcing Steel Ouality Assurance Observation
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually
observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at
the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations.
and opinions at the time of our visit.
SECUIZE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Client: RGnnen Desl'an + Cb nsj ruchon Site Address: 3(DO9 S(ea" TY
Secure Job #: S Fo S -A87 Lot: 4q Block: — Filing, —
Date: og/os/OS Contact: Jay Rrannen Subdivision: SwI ft Acidlfio)n
Reinforcine Plan Information
1I-Orly
Date: nG /1-7/OS -Job#: SIE05-1987
Reinforcing Type(s): /
❑ footing 6/ foundation wall
❑ grade beam ❑ pier cap
❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade
❑ column ❑ other
Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Horz.
Vert./Ties
l
2)A 4 bars top,
(1 04 ar
60
--ox_
24"o c-
2
(2)#4bars top,
(I) t4 bar
t po,nk
24"o-C•
3
GO
(2.. 4 barS P�
(t #4 barns
24"o.c-
4
O
(z� 04 bars +oP
()B 4 bar @
�-
24"o, c-
Grade
b0fti4tAiR4
7-
,4-
60
CZ kt4 ars
6 d �� G r
-$-
0
(l� t# bar
(1 9 ar
"a.c.
E
Go
<2 tt4 bars toP
(1 tt4 bar
c_
Max / Min wall height observed: 10 Ft / 3 R
If void forms are required, are they installed as
recommended?
❑ yes , ❑ no Required thickness: in.
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes 0/no (% poured
Weather: Clealr,vwarM., 800E
Notes:
Swmary of Opinions
FY It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was in general conformance with the plan.
❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was not in general conformance with the plan.
(2"a observation required).
Deficiencies noted:
`lam
Perimeter Drain / Dampproofin2 Ouality
- RE
9Assurance Observation
1 ECU
Per the clients request, a representative of SECURE has visually 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS
observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced
above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the 11
time of our visit.
Secure Job #: SEMAR7 Lot: 4q Block: — Filing: —=
Date: Qg1Ls/nS Contact: oPn Subdivision: Swift /�ddlftOn
Project Specifications
Foundation Plan By: Secure
Geotechnical Report By: EEC
Recommended Drain type?
W Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior
❑ other
Observations
'meter drain observed around:
Basement ❑ Crawlspace
❑ Other:
Where does the p meter drain discharge?
❑ Daylight ®" Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain
Drpproofing observed around:
Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas
Comments
t
1 -ir
t
I t8"
Basernerrl�
yq
_ 5Y; - 1
_ — — - - — — Indicates approximate drain location
Summary of Opinions
It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or'
dampproofing observed generally conform with the
project referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofin IT observed differs significantly form the
project specif ications (2nd observation required).
Corrective Action: