Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout220 Pascal St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 07/02/2007Footine Oualitv Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually observed the footing, forms under construction at the site referenced below. The following summanzes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. 8..CTLITHOMPSO s'r s u oar"o It n,t x t x`,itRs' Foundations,Formerly Secure Client: Pa (I ad i aY1 .Nam, I NC.. Site Address: z20 Po15 Ca d S+ree% t•Cci n5 Cp. ()5Z7 Ff041F65i CO Job #i S FOOD .010 Lot: 21 Block: y Filin Dater 2 07" Contact: Cahn Z2.0 5752 Subdivision: _ Old O A or Foundation. Plan Information Plan By: Cl'1:IT►cm Psai Sf rUC440 Ehg i MY5 Date: 6/7/017 Job#: 5FOO93y Ftgsizes: CF-i2<1Z���CF 1�=lraw$i�2d'ZovY`di'dCf-Z4=2t1 Pad sizes: Concrete -an -site? O yes, Who, (+/- % ftg.poured._) Are the footing forms free of loose material, frost, water and or ice, roots, etc?yes , ❑ no Are the Footing /Pad form sizes in general: conformance to the above foundation plan? -t9 yes , ❑ no Is the footing/pad: reinforcing steel in -place or on site per the above foundation plan? V yes, r❑ no Weather: SU��w EQQr Notes:' Summary of Opinions X It is our opinion that the footing formwork is in general conformance with the foundation design referenced above. Ll It isi our opinion that the footing formwork differs significantly from the foundation design . referenced above (2qd observation required). Corrective action: cvvdjr v^ 1 7/Z/L c*7 Field Represent ve POO t iC Date o, '3 8108 Z Rwiewed By' NAL CTL 1,Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 .p Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation CTLITHOMPSON Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Site Address: ry Ld 2 A & ^ fk Job #: SFDO `.Sq. 61a Lot: Block: � Filing: Date:Contact: d Subdivision: ReinforcinE Plan Information Plan By: �fdt�„rj j Date:-—Q`7 Jo #: SF�g3U Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing b foundation wall ❑ grade beam ❑ pier cap ❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ column ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel Grade Horizontal Vert./Ties 1 2 9-q I (3 2 40 �r m�bcl 4 & 19 w C. OW(P 1p"p C. Pier Cap / Slab Reinforcing Steel Grade Longitudinal Lateral A B C D UFER Ground 14Installed — Location J604 wo ❑ Not Observed V If Max/Min wall height observed: I / If void forms are required, are they installed as recommended? /lot t0 d vrrau ❑yes *o Required thickness: in. Concrete on -site? ❑ yes 3(no (% poured Weather: Notes: Summary of Opinions )4 It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (2ad observation required). Deficiencies noted: CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Perimeter Drain / DampproofinE Quality =� C T L I T ®NI P S O N Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Job #: S ©o93h.0/i7 Date: o, h 3 o> Contact: j J('L'1^FtCP G Project Specifications Foundation Plan By: ��° jam;,• v Date ��ury Job# �,�cnoezx Al Geotechnical Report By: t ft"n.�,,a Date gp X,.,44P Job# Recommended Drain type? ❑ Exterior perimeter Li Interior ❑ other Observations Perimeter drain observed around: A Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the perimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight 4Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Dampproofing observed around: ,4 Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas Comments Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC Site Address: �� ,ram s�F7 Fa�,f/r�;.ts � fa fa r'a Lot: t Block: il Filing: Subdivision: Summary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2❑d observation required). Corrective Action: CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524