The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2044 Raven View Rd - Special Inspections/Engineering - 04/12/2007/ DamPyroofing Quality M— C T L I T H O M P S O N Assurance Observation Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Anchor Development CO. Site Address: `f-f�i 1338 Catalpa Drive, Fort Col Ens, Co. Job #: 3F0137r 80521 Lot: I*Z Block: — Filing: -- Date: 04/12/07 Contact: Russ Wei fo Subdivision: Ravenview Mo lf1 tot Proiect Specifications Foundation Plan By: CTL'Thompson Date I l /27ZOG Job# SF01376 Geotechnical Report By: EEC Date 04-01-247 Job# 09./30/04 Recommended Drain type? preVKJt1S(Y observect ❑ Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Perimeter drain observed around: preVIOVSty ❑ Basement ❑ Crawlspace observed ❑ Other: Where does the perimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight ❑ Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain prevtovS►y obWved D�mpproofing observed around: id Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas Comments Summary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain mt&e dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2nd observation required). Corrective Action: (.�i&'w, ki�uvc. 04/►2/07 Field Repr nta ve I— Date By CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 ReinforcinLy Steel Quality Assurance Observation C T L I T H O M P S O N Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. Client: Anchar Development- Co Site Address: AL4LI 2 yCW Ut pW ,21� 133 C'atalpA DrivP j Fnr (IIl63S*C0. 80521 Secure Job #: SEOi376 Lot: -t2 Block: — Filing: — Date: 04/04/07 Contact: Russ /eI)Subdivision: Raven VjejAi MuIffint Reinforcing Plan Information Plan By: GTI_f1hornpson Structura1Engin r Date: II/27/OG Job#: SF0137r, Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing ❑ grade beam ❑ structural slab ❑ column W(foundation wall ❑ pier cap ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel Grade Horizontal Vert./Ties 1 00 (2 Lf are tr per. 2 GO (2)a4bis tupt # o-c 3 C 4 Pier Cau / Slab Reinforcing Steel Grade Longitudinal Lateral A B C D DER Ground FR(histalled — Location ❑ Not Observed Max/Min wall height observed: _9/ 3 ft If void forms are required, are they installed as rrm omended? yes ❑no Required thickness: G in. Concrete on -site? ❑ yes limo (% poured = +/- ) J Notes:•• rovv oPorrh • •i • r fA bs&ri.. • r • l hnriZontaiii Er r � t E. �I_ r + r h i_ k +; FA Summary of Opinions Or It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (2" d observation required). Deficiencies �ddlLXLf/f/ �.(•'LA 04 /04 /07 Fielt RepreAntai've Date $' Q s R ewed By % ,✓� roF/At CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Perimeter Drain / Dampproofing Ouality Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. CTLITHOMPSON Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC Client: &ndhor DP\Je(nPMPnt f n. Site Address: 1339 Cat-alpa j�)rj\/P Fort GntImg, CC, Job #: S Ft51376 Lot: N 2 Block: --- Filing: -- Date: n3 /Lq /07 Contact: Pogs Welts Subdivision: Raven V i Pw MWti Lot Project Specifications Foundation Plan By: CST Lli ham ��r Dated/27/0(G Job#_SF-01S76 Geotechnical Report By: EEC Date Oq/3b/o4 Job# 04-01.2-47 Recommended Drain type? R(Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Pe imeter drain observed around: Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the p rimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight LT Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Dampproofing observed around: ❑ Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas watts not %n place Co-, ftme of observatian Comments Summary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2nd observation required). Corrective Action: —(�IfA'14, i2 l3/1q!0'7 Field Repredntarive Date 38108 CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 No Text Drilled Pier Ouality Assurance Observation C T L I T xm O M P S O N Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the drilling of the piers at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. aot-iH 9AAAE l/ vtew i Client: Anchor Development Co- Foundation Plan:CIL Thranrpaun Strtictura1 1338 Catalpa Drive Date: IIj27Joa Job: , F0�37G, Fort Colllm C() 80521 Job #: SF01376 Soil Report: Earfb Encitnecringi Cowl an Inc_ Date: 03/a2/o7 Contact: Russ Wens Job #: 04-01-24T ate: ngZkjj24 Site Address: Lot: I<t2 Block: Filing: Subdivision: Raven View Multi LDt Installation Contractor: A.,B,1I ais paDri_1it�, Weather: !�- G50F Drilled Pier Specifications Reinforcing Steel: (3) 1e G G Y Pier Diameter In in Min. Pier Length: ja ft Min. Penetration 12 � Planned Support Stratum: 0jay3fone Other: Description, E=Elevation of top pier, D=Pier Diameter, L=Total Pier Length, P=Penetration, H20=Depth to Water RMA ® oManlfl� I �Mrom� M4 Subsurface Conditions observed during drilling: 3 ft M materia i underlati✓ 6., nn1 p/rvs+ ,e Installation Methods Used o !6 1S iq.. ❑ umping ❑ Casing i° r 9 Drill & Pour ❑ Tremy � b . ° Summary of opinions: 9 Ld It is our opinion that the drilled piers observed were in "—+ to 1 general conformance with plans and specifications. '" o ❑ It is our opinion that the drilled piers were not in general conformance with plans and specifications. 10 Corrective Actions: 7 4 'T . 41,50"ri Field Representative: l.�,4hAg Ca 42rrtAi 03/24107Reviewed By: 108 CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft.