Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2038 Raven View Rd - Special Inspections/Engineering - 04/12/2007/ Dampproofine OualitY C T L I T H O M P S O N Assurance Observation Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of �n� ((?���� ,o� f our visit. ea+��$ N C�"N vtaij Client: Anchor Development Co. Site Address: 1338 ('atalpa Drive, Fort Col1ins 71 Job #: 3F01376 90521 Lot: 1*2 Block: -- Filing: ---- Date: 04/12/07 Contact: RUSS we((s Subdivision: RavenvieW Multi tot Proiect Specifications Foundation Plan By: CTLIThompSon Date II/27/06 Job# SF01376 Geotechnical Report By: EEC Date Qq-pl-ZQ7 Job# 09.430104 Recommended Drain type? prew*oUSIY Observed ❑ Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Perimeter drain observed around: preVIOUS ly ❑ Basement ❑ Crawlspace observed ❑ Other: Where does the perimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight ❑ Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain prevtoUSly obServeci D�mpproofing observed around: Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas Summary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed differs significantly from the project specifications (2nd observation required). Comments Corrective Action: 04/ 12 /07 Field Reprc&ntaYve Date 38108 ��� a By CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Reinforcing Steel Ouality Assurance Observation C T L I T H O M P S O N Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations pt, and opinions at the time of our visit. ;; 036 � W r[�{t% � CIO FX Client: Anchor Development- Co. Site Address: 133$ Catalpa Drive j FnrtChi ►i 3s.CC3. 80521 Secure Job #: 5M 1376 Date: 04/04/07 Contact: Russ Welts Reinforcine Plan Information Plan By: GILt1hampson StrUctuaLEnj"ers D. • ••• • 1376 Reinforcing Type(s): ❑ footing afoundation wall ❑ grade beam ❑ pier cap ❑ structural slab ❑ slab -on -grade ❑ column ❑ other Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcine Steel Grade Horizontal Vert./Ties 1 G Q (z)id4 bars top, "o . 2 ro" c22tt4 Ntltvpd # .,o - 3 C< tt ' -c. " -c. 4 Pier Cap / Slab Reinforcina Steel Grade Longitudinal Lateral A B C D +ER Ground Installed — Location in ❑ Not Observed Max/Min wall height observed: 64 / 34 If void forms are required, are they installed as re ommended? es Ono Required thickness: 6 in. Concrete on -site? ❑ yes dno (% poured Weather: 45OF 1111 • •� • • %i •. r • •r! IL WIT7UN Lot: 42 Block: — Filing: — Subdivision: Raven View Mulfi Iot ni Summary of Opinions kf It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was in general conformance with the plan. ❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed was not in general conformance with the plan. (2nd observation required). Deficiencies r t n . 04 /04 /07 'ye Fiel$ Repre nta rve Date •N 4 �r .• f Gr`� . L38108.: Z.O , .N _ Rewlewed By ••........•n•••• CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Perimeter Drain / Dampnroofing Ouality Assurance Observation CTLITHOMPSON Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. ?036 MVEN Vie9P Client: Anchor DPVP1(oDMent rO. Site Address: Peyq . 2v3B Job #: S Fn l g76 Lot: Id4 2 Block: -- Filing: Date: 03e29®o7 Contact: Russ Welts Subdivision: Raven View M Proiect Specifications Foundation Plan By: GT L IT h cm p Wun Date 11 /27 /n(a Job# .S FQ 137C Geotechnical Report By: EEC Date 09/30/04 Job# 04.01147 Recommended Drain type? G(Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior ❑ other Observations Pe imeter drain observed around: Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ Other: Where does the p rimeter drain discharge? ❑ Daylight L9 Sump pit ❑ Subdivision drain Suirunary of Opinions It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or dampproofing observed generally conform with the project referenced above. Dampproofing observed around: ❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or ❑ Basement ❑Crawlspace ❑All backfill areas dampproofing observed differs significantly from the Wal is (lot %n place took 4tme o f observatitm Project specifications (2"d observation required). Corrective Action: 4, 41(ir� d37Z-9f07 FielO Repre4ntairive Date By, CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140 o11Iins, CO 80524 No Text CTLITHOMPSON Drilled Pier Quality Assurance Observation Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed the drilling of the piers at the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of our visit. ;tz3w p; O vl W Client: Anchor Deyelopmer t Co- Foundation Plan: CTLffhtZng�au_v1 frilelural 1338 Cmwpa D6yp Date: 11/27l06 Job: , EQIi IG Fart Colims CQ 80521 Job #• SG01.376 Soil Report: Earth En irleerin Cori) an Inc - Date: Q3/22/o7 Contact: qi)s,c Wetic Job#: 04-OI-24i ate: (j9jo/j24 Site Address: Lot: Id-2 Block: Filing: Subdivision: Raven y(eyj Multi Lot Installation Contractor: Qrp-N ais3opkDrjl(ti-n�c� Weather: Z G50 F Drilled Pier Specifications Reinforcing Steel: (3) O6 G'lade Q, ittl I I ength Pier Diameters in Min. Pier Length: I a ft Min. Penetration 17 ft Planned Support Stratum: elayStorlt Other: Description, E=Elevation of top pier, D=Pier Diameter, L=Total Pier Length, P=Penetration, H2O=Depth to Water ©�i11#i�ii����►`IL'� Subsurface Conditions observed during drilling: Mill rnateaw unclerlal» 6). 0I1vo/rl)e+ caystme Installation Methods Used ❑ wnping ❑ Casing Drill & Pour ❑ Tremy Summary of opinions: ld It is our opinion that the drilled piers observed were in general conformance with plans and specifications. ❑ It is our opinion that the drilled piers were not in general conformance with plans and specifications. Corrective Actions: i 1 . . ®� ® ll • �fffm,�� M sv s �Sffml J. ® I O WIMFUPI= �A I f. WOMEN M ® l� � WMUMI�Lvv NUM® &; 4 o --n to , Field Representative: aiP,t _j?Q Q3/22/07 Reviewed By: 38108 CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft.