HomeMy WebLinkAbout412 E Pitkin St - Special Inspections/Engineering - 08/28/2007Reinforcing Steel Quality Assurance Observation C T L I T H O M P S O N
Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC
observed the reinforcement within the formwork under construction at
the site referenced below. The following summarizes our observations
and opinions at the time of our visit.
Client:
1
L b-
Job #• jai _d /
Date: 4 z Contact:
Reinforcing Plan Information
Plan By: e017.1 / 7 ; / r. !;OLe
o
Date: rN1 ,10 11 7
Job#: ' e
Reinforcing Type(s):
❑ footing
UYfoundation wall
❑ grade beam
❑ pier cap
❑ structural slab
❑ slab -on -grade
❑ column
❑ other
Wall / Grade Beam Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Horizontal
Vert./Ties
F4
3�r
Pier Can / Slab Reinforcing Steel
Grade
Longitudinal
Lateral
A
B
C
D
LIFER Ground
Installed - Location d0
❑ Not Observed
Max/Min wall height observed: 5 `,o ,. /
If void forms are re uired, are they installed as
recommended? /
❑yes ❑no Required thickness:
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes ,t 'no (% poured = +/-
Weather: G . �•�,, -;.
Site Address
Lot: Block: Filing:
Subdivision: —
�M]
Summary of Opinions
It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was in general conformance with the plan.
❑ It is our opinion that the reinforcing steel observed
was not in general conformance with the plan.
(2°a observation required).
Deficiencies
.0
Field Representative
ate
p0 L/C
••
�: Tti.
Cj AST
✓° 38108 z
Rev' wed By
•.•
11.
�
CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524
Excavation Quality Assurance Observation
(Open -Hole)
Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually
observed the soils exposed within the excavation at the site referenced
below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the
time of our visit.
Client:
Job #•
Date:Contact:
Backeround Information:
Soils Report by: p�� < L, /7-0,1/ 2
Date:
Job#:
Anticipated Soil Profile: !<4J, y
Foundation Plan by: -7L 0 l :=GsE ✓
Date: �6�,� Job#: noisy/
Anticipated foundation type?
spread footing ❑ wall on grade
❑ footing with voids ❑ pad and grade beam
❑ drilled piers ❑ other (describe)
Observed Soil Profile: o
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Results:
Notes:
CTLITHOMPSON
Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC
3
Site Address: </1.2
Lot: Block: Filing: --
Subdivision: —
Summary of Opinions
4 It is our opinion that the exposed soils are generally
consistent with those anticipated.
❑ It is our opinion that the exposed soils differ
significantly from those anticipated.
(2°d observation required)
Recommendations:
Field Representative Date
By
Z
k3>t
`59 38108
CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street,
CO 80524
?elor
Footing Ouality Assurance Observation
Per the client's request, a representative of CTL Thompson has visually
observed the footing forms under construction at the site referenced
below. The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the
time of our visit.
111flow"""7TRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC
Client: �r ,�G,� <�o Site Address: ` .2
-ter- _ � � . -�.' � �'�• � � _ .7
Job #• �- .;
• o- %'' Lot: - Block: - Filing:
Date: v$ . 3 � Contact: ' , Subdivision:
a,4
Foundation Plan Information
Plan By: z:::_-!! 'o5a
Date: G n Job#:
Ftg sizes. `
Pad sizes
Concrete on -site? ❑ yes , Ano, (+/- % ftg poured )
Are the footing forms free of loose material, frost, water and
or ice, roots, etc? A yes , ❑ no
Are the Footing / Pad form sizes in general conformance to
the above foundation plan? .4 yes , ❑ no
Is the footing/pad reinforcing steel in -place or on site per the
above foundation plan? I4 yes, ❑ no
Weather: cwrr Yj<.`
Notes:
i
i; `
-
f
� � -i-
...
i
l
-
L C`
i
41
iJ .E. 7
r
i
i- -t- tl
-I- -�--�-JL
-
44-4
L
}
;
1+7?
Summary of Opinions
A It is our opinion that the footing formwork is in
general conformance with the foundation design
referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the footing formwork differs
significantly from the foundation design referenced
above (2Rd observation required).
Corrective action:
Field Representative Date
108
By
CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC I 351 Linden Street, Suite
CO 80524
Perimeter Drain / Dampuroorim Oualitv
Assurance Observation
Per the client's request, a representative of CTL has visually observed
the perimeter drain and/or dampproofing at the site referenced above.
The following summarizes our observations and opinions at the time of
our visit.
CTLITHOMPSON
Formerly Secure Foundations, LLC
r ,1
Client: �`r.>, :: l` Site Address:
d�
Job #: r:.r / Lot: — Block: Filing:
Date: o p7 Contact: sa/4 S�� . -� Subdivision:
Proiect Specifications
Foundation Plan By:
Date Job# -5
Geotechnical Report By: "(M
Date - Job#
Recommended Drain type?
,,,Exterior perimeter ❑ Interior
❑ other
Observations
Perimeter drain observed around:
,$Basement ❑ Crawlspace
❑ Other:
Where does the perimeter drain discharge?
❑ Daylight ASump pit ❑ Subdivision drain
Dampproofing observed around:
,Basement ❑ Crawlspace ❑ All backfill areas
Comments
,dd
.9 <<
_6
air
— — — — Indicates approximate drain location `
Summary of Opinions
,'It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed generally conform with the
project referenced above.
❑ It is our opinion that the foundation drain and/or
dampproofing observed differs significantly from the
project specifications (2nd observation required).
Corrective Action:
Field Representative , Date
CTL I Thompson Structural Engineers Ft. Collins, LLC 1 351 Linden Street, Suite 140, Ft. Collins, CO 80524